Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 51-62.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0301
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fuxia YANG(), Huan HE(
), Ling TANG, Kuanying LI, Fen LIU, Jianjun CHEN
Received:
2024-04-15
Accepted:
2024-06-11
Online:
2025-10-15
Published:
2025-10-15
Contact:
Huan HE
通讯作者:
贺欢
作者简介:
杨馥霞 E-mail:yangfu.xia@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Fuxia YANG, Huan HE, Ling TANG, Kuanying LI, Fen LIU, Jianjun CHEN. Effects of Suboptimal Low Temperatures on Leaf Structure and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Strawberry During Reproductive Period[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(10): 51-62.
杨馥霞, 贺欢, 汤玲, 李宽莹, 刘芬, 陈建军. 亚适低温对生殖期草莓叶片结构和光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(10): 51-62.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0301
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 叶面积 LS/cm2 | 叶厚度 LT/mm | 叶体积 LV/cm3 | 叶组织密度 LTD/(g·cm-3) | 比叶面积 SLA/(cm2·g-1) | 叶干物质含量 LDMC/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 32.23±3.25 a | 0.44±0.03 a | 1.43±0.20 a | 0.15±0.03 c | 157.36±29.04 abc | 0.28±0.04 b |
7 | 27.85±4.45 b | 0.35±0.04 b | 0.99±0.22 b | 0.17±0.02 b | 170.32±32.01 a | 0.24±0.03 c | ||
14 | 28.44±3.43 b | 0.29±0.02 c | 0.81±0.14 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 148.49±10.80 bc | 0.29±0.01 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 32.23±3.25 a | 0.44±0.03 a | 1.43±0.20 a | 0.15±0.03 c | 157.36±29.04 abc | 0.28±0.04 b | |
7 | 27.38±2.78 b | 0.37±0.04 b | 1.01±0.20 b | 0.16±0.02 bc | 168.85±16.61 ab | 0.25±0.02 c | ||
14 | 26.09±1.43 b | 0.29±0.03 c | 0.75±0.10 c | 0.25±0.02 a | 141.49±8.48 c | 0.30±0.03 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 18.45±6.28 b | 0.34±0.03 a | 0.63±0.23 b | 0.40±0.67 a | 143.34±49.85 b | 0.35±0.21 a |
7 | 20.75±2.47 b | 0.30±0.04 b | 0.64±0.14 b | 0.21±0.05 a | 160.86±32.59 ab | 0.26±0.05 ab | ||
14 | 25.04±3.85 a | 0.27±0.03 c | 0.68±0.16 ab | 0.25±0.04 a | 149.67±13.02 b | 0.31±0.01 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 18.45±6.28 b | 0.34±0.03 a | 0.63±0.23 b | 0.40±0.67 a | 143.34±49.85 b | 0.35±0.21 a | |
7 | 21.81±2.44 ab | 0.32±0.03 ab | 0.70±0.13 ab | 0.18±0.03 a | 180.97±25.16 a | 0.23±0.02 b | ||
14 | 25.28±4.18 a | 0.32±0.04 ab | 0.81±0.18 a | 0.24±0.04 a | 137.31±17.36 b | 0.32±0.03 ab |
Table 1 Leaf traits of strawberry under different treatments
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 叶面积 LS/cm2 | 叶厚度 LT/mm | 叶体积 LV/cm3 | 叶组织密度 LTD/(g·cm-3) | 比叶面积 SLA/(cm2·g-1) | 叶干物质含量 LDMC/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 32.23±3.25 a | 0.44±0.03 a | 1.43±0.20 a | 0.15±0.03 c | 157.36±29.04 abc | 0.28±0.04 b |
7 | 27.85±4.45 b | 0.35±0.04 b | 0.99±0.22 b | 0.17±0.02 b | 170.32±32.01 a | 0.24±0.03 c | ||
14 | 28.44±3.43 b | 0.29±0.02 c | 0.81±0.14 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 148.49±10.80 bc | 0.29±0.01 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 32.23±3.25 a | 0.44±0.03 a | 1.43±0.20 a | 0.15±0.03 c | 157.36±29.04 abc | 0.28±0.04 b | |
7 | 27.38±2.78 b | 0.37±0.04 b | 1.01±0.20 b | 0.16±0.02 bc | 168.85±16.61 ab | 0.25±0.02 c | ||
14 | 26.09±1.43 b | 0.29±0.03 c | 0.75±0.10 c | 0.25±0.02 a | 141.49±8.48 c | 0.30±0.03 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 18.45±6.28 b | 0.34±0.03 a | 0.63±0.23 b | 0.40±0.67 a | 143.34±49.85 b | 0.35±0.21 a |
7 | 20.75±2.47 b | 0.30±0.04 b | 0.64±0.14 b | 0.21±0.05 a | 160.86±32.59 ab | 0.26±0.05 ab | ||
14 | 25.04±3.85 a | 0.27±0.03 c | 0.68±0.16 ab | 0.25±0.04 a | 149.67±13.02 b | 0.31±0.01 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 18.45±6.28 b | 0.34±0.03 a | 0.63±0.23 b | 0.40±0.67 a | 143.34±49.85 b | 0.35±0.21 a | |
7 | 21.81±2.44 ab | 0.32±0.03 ab | 0.70±0.13 ab | 0.18±0.03 a | 180.97±25.16 a | 0.23±0.02 b | ||
14 | 25.28±4.18 a | 0.32±0.04 ab | 0.81±0.18 a | 0.24±0.04 a | 137.31±17.36 b | 0.32±0.03 ab |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 叶绿素a Chl a/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b Chl b/(mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 2.33±0.04 a | 1.32±0.02 a |
7 | 2.29±0.11 a | 1.29±0.14 a | ||
14 | 2.28±0.08 a | 1.24±0.07 a | ||
LT | 0 | 2.33±0.04 a | 1.32±0.02 a | |
7 | 2.24±0.03 a | 1.23±0.06 a | ||
14 | 2.28±0.06 a | 1.23±0.05 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 2.11±0.01 b | 1.13±0.04 ab |
7 | 2.14±0.02 ab | 1.09±0.02 b | ||
14 | 2.15±0.04 ab | 1.16±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 2.11±0.01 b | 1.13±0.04 ab | |
7 | 2.14±0.04 ab | 1.10±0.01 b | ||
14 | 2.18±0.03 a | 1.15±0.00 a |
Table 2 Leaf chlorophyll contents of strawberry under different treatments
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 叶绿素a Chl a/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b Chl b/(mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 2.33±0.04 a | 1.32±0.02 a |
7 | 2.29±0.11 a | 1.29±0.14 a | ||
14 | 2.28±0.08 a | 1.24±0.07 a | ||
LT | 0 | 2.33±0.04 a | 1.32±0.02 a | |
7 | 2.24±0.03 a | 1.23±0.06 a | ||
14 | 2.28±0.06 a | 1.23±0.05 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 2.11±0.01 b | 1.13±0.04 ab |
7 | 2.14±0.02 ab | 1.09±0.02 b | ||
14 | 2.15±0.04 ab | 1.16±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 2.11±0.01 b | 1.13±0.04 ab | |
7 | 2.14±0.04 ab | 1.10±0.01 b | ||
14 | 2.18±0.03 a | 1.15±0.00 a |
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 净光合速率Pn/ (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度Ci/ (μmol·mol-1) | 气孔导度Gs/ (mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率Tr/ (mmol·m-2·s-1) | 水分利用效率WUE/(mmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 10.13±1.17 b | 333.03±23.76 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 3.53±1.32 a | 3.18±1.32 c |
7 | 10.52±0.39 b | 367.27±3.66 b | 0.17±0.01 b | 3.03±0.20 ab | 3.47±0.11 bc | ||
14 | 9.40±0.22 b | 334.56±17.02 b | 0.12±0.01 b | 1.62±0.08 b | 5.83±0.42 a | ||
LT | 0 | 10.13±1.17 b | 333.03±23.76 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 3.53±1.32 a | 3.18±1.32 c | |
7 | 12.00±0.49 a | 452.21±26.03 a | 0.29±0.03 a | 4.41±0.51 a | 2.74±0.22 c | ||
14 | 9.30±0.05 b | 357.05±25.40 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 1.93±0.34 b | 4.93±0.92 ab | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 9.71±0.61 ab | 317.06±27.14 cd | 0.12±0.03 b | 2.99±0.64 a | 3.32±0.53 b |
7 | 9.26±0.35 ab | 361.21±19.05 b | 0.14±0.03 b | 1.92±0.26 b | 4.88±0.52 a | ||
14 | 9.85±0.12 a | 306.95±7.69 d | 0.12±0.00 b | 1.98±0.10 b | 4.98±0.24 a | ||
LT | 0 | 9.71±0.61 ab | 317.06±27.14 cd | 0.12±0.03 b | 2.99±0.64 a | 3.32±0.53 b | |
7 | 9.59±0.38 ab | 401.51±6.07 a | 0.22±0.05 a | 3.46±0.52 a | 2.80±0.29 b | ||
14 | 8.79±0.87 b | 348.13±28.11 bc | 0.09±0.03 b | 1.82±0.42 b | 4.94±0.89 a |
Table 3 Photosynthetic parameters of strawberry leaf under different treatments
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 净光合速率Pn/ (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度Ci/ (μmol·mol-1) | 气孔导度Gs/ (mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率Tr/ (mmol·m-2·s-1) | 水分利用效率WUE/(mmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 10.13±1.17 b | 333.03±23.76 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 3.53±1.32 a | 3.18±1.32 c |
7 | 10.52±0.39 b | 367.27±3.66 b | 0.17±0.01 b | 3.03±0.20 ab | 3.47±0.11 bc | ||
14 | 9.40±0.22 b | 334.56±17.02 b | 0.12±0.01 b | 1.62±0.08 b | 5.83±0.42 a | ||
LT | 0 | 10.13±1.17 b | 333.03±23.76 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 3.53±1.32 a | 3.18±1.32 c | |
7 | 12.00±0.49 a | 452.21±26.03 a | 0.29±0.03 a | 4.41±0.51 a | 2.74±0.22 c | ||
14 | 9.30±0.05 b | 357.05±25.40 b | 0.15±0.03 b | 1.93±0.34 b | 4.93±0.92 ab | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 9.71±0.61 ab | 317.06±27.14 cd | 0.12±0.03 b | 2.99±0.64 a | 3.32±0.53 b |
7 | 9.26±0.35 ab | 361.21±19.05 b | 0.14±0.03 b | 1.92±0.26 b | 4.88±0.52 a | ||
14 | 9.85±0.12 a | 306.95±7.69 d | 0.12±0.00 b | 1.98±0.10 b | 4.98±0.24 a | ||
LT | 0 | 9.71±0.61 ab | 317.06±27.14 cd | 0.12±0.03 b | 2.99±0.64 a | 3.32±0.53 b | |
7 | 9.59±0.38 ab | 401.51±6.07 a | 0.22±0.05 a | 3.46±0.52 a | 2.80±0.29 b | ||
14 | 8.79±0.87 b | 348.13±28.11 bc | 0.09±0.03 b | 1.82±0.42 b | 4.94±0.89 a |
Fig. 2 Chla fluorescence transientsof strawberry leaves under different treatmentsA: Original curve and normalized curve of fluorescence kinetics within 0.05 to 0.30 ms; B:Original curve and normalized curve of fluorescence kinetics within 0.0 to 2.0 ms
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 初始荧光Fo | 最大荧光Fm | 最大光化学效率Fv /Fm | 相对可变荧光Vj |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 396.50±9.27 bc | 2 666.50±39.54 a | 0.85±0.00 a | 0.39±0.02 b |
7 | 384.33±12.09 c | 2 391.67±69.57 e | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.38±0.01 b | ||
14 | 384.33±9.87 c | 2 473.67±74.52 d | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.44±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 415.17±18.84 a | 2 649.17±32.50 ab | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.38±0.04 b | |
7 | 400.33±9.37 b | 2 593.67±20.02 bc | 0.85±0.00 ab | 0.39±0.01 b | ||
14 | 404.33±6.80 ab | 2 578.33±74.59 c | 0.84±0.00 b | 0.43±0.01 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 404.67±25.95 ab | 2 614.33±119.29 a | 0.85±0.01 a | 0.44±0.02 ab |
7 | 400.33±11.55 ab | 2 427.67±65.56 c | 0.84±0.00 b | 0.40±0.01 c | ||
14 | 384.00±11.28 b | 2 450.83±32.20 bc | 0.84±0.00 ab | 0.47±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 417.50±19.23 a | 2 610.17±78.73 a | 0.84±0.01 ab | 0.45±0.03 ab | |
7 | 409.50±30.14 ab | 2 533.83±107.40 ab | 0.84±0.01 ab | 0.44±0.03 b | ||
14 | 421.50±40.40 a | 2 538.67±74.62 ab | 0.83±0.02 b | 0.46±0.02 ab |
Table 4 Photosynthetic parameters of strawberry leaf under different treatments
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间 Stress time/d | 初始荧光Fo | 最大荧光Fm | 最大光化学效率Fv /Fm | 相对可变荧光Vj |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 396.50±9.27 bc | 2 666.50±39.54 a | 0.85±0.00 a | 0.39±0.02 b |
7 | 384.33±12.09 c | 2 391.67±69.57 e | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.38±0.01 b | ||
14 | 384.33±9.87 c | 2 473.67±74.52 d | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.44±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 415.17±18.84 a | 2 649.17±32.50 ab | 0.84±0.01 b | 0.38±0.04 b | |
7 | 400.33±9.37 b | 2 593.67±20.02 bc | 0.85±0.00 ab | 0.39±0.01 b | ||
14 | 404.33±6.80 ab | 2 578.33±74.59 c | 0.84±0.00 b | 0.43±0.01 a | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 404.67±25.95 ab | 2 614.33±119.29 a | 0.85±0.01 a | 0.44±0.02 ab |
7 | 400.33±11.55 ab | 2 427.67±65.56 c | 0.84±0.00 b | 0.40±0.01 c | ||
14 | 384.00±11.28 b | 2 450.83±32.20 bc | 0.84±0.00 ab | 0.47±0.02 a | ||
LT | 0 | 417.50±19.23 a | 2 610.17±78.73 a | 0.84±0.01 ab | 0.45±0.03 ab | |
7 | 409.50±30.14 ab | 2 533.83±107.40 ab | 0.84±0.01 ab | 0.44±0.03 b | ||
14 | 421.50±40.40 a | 2 538.67±74.62 ab | 0.83±0.02 b | 0.46±0.02 ab |
品种Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间Stress time/d | ABS/RC | DIo /RC | TRo /RC | ETo /RC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 1.91±0.12 a | 0.28±0.02 bc | 1.63±0.10 a | 0.99±0.05 abc |
7 | 1.99±0.12 a | 0.32±0.03 a | 1.67±0.10 a | 1.03±0.04 a | ||
14 | 1.69±0.10 b | 0.26±0.03 c | 1.43±0.08 b | 0.80±0.02 d | ||
LT | 0 | 1.87±0.08 a | 0.29±0.02 b | 1.58±0.07 a | 0.97±0.05 bc | |
7 | 1.95±0.13 a | 0.30±0.03 ab | 1.65±0.11 a | 1.01±0.05 ab | ||
14 | 1.97±0.06 a | 0.31±0.01 ab | 1.66±0.05 a | 0.95±0.02 c | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 2.16±0.24 a | 0.33±0.04 a | 1.83±0.20 a | 1.01±0.08 ab |
7 | 2.03±0.06 a | 0.34±0.01 a | 1.70±0.05 a | 1.02±0.03 a | ||
14 | 1.76±0.13 b | 0.28±0.03 b | 1.48±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 c | ||
LT | 0 | 2.10±0.10 a | 0.34±0.03 a | 1.76±0.08 a | 0.98±0.04 ab | |
7 | 2.16±0.20 a | 0.35±0.04 a | 1.81±0.16 a | 1.01±0.04 ab | ||
14 | 2.16±0.14 a | 0.36±0.05 a | 1.80±0.09 a | 0.96±0.03 b |
Table 5 Activity of PSⅡ reaction center of strawberry leaf under different treatments
品种Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间Stress time/d | ABS/RC | DIo /RC | TRo /RC | ETo /RC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 1.91±0.12 a | 0.28±0.02 bc | 1.63±0.10 a | 0.99±0.05 abc |
7 | 1.99±0.12 a | 0.32±0.03 a | 1.67±0.10 a | 1.03±0.04 a | ||
14 | 1.69±0.10 b | 0.26±0.03 c | 1.43±0.08 b | 0.80±0.02 d | ||
LT | 0 | 1.87±0.08 a | 0.29±0.02 b | 1.58±0.07 a | 0.97±0.05 bc | |
7 | 1.95±0.13 a | 0.30±0.03 ab | 1.65±0.11 a | 1.01±0.05 ab | ||
14 | 1.97±0.06 a | 0.31±0.01 ab | 1.66±0.05 a | 0.95±0.02 c | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 2.16±0.24 a | 0.33±0.04 a | 1.83±0.20 a | 1.01±0.08 ab |
7 | 2.03±0.06 a | 0.34±0.01 a | 1.70±0.05 a | 1.02±0.03 a | ||
14 | 1.76±0.13 b | 0.28±0.03 b | 1.48±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 c | ||
LT | 0 | 2.10±0.10 a | 0.34±0.03 a | 1.76±0.08 a | 0.98±0.04 ab | |
7 | 2.16±0.20 a | 0.35±0.04 a | 1.81±0.16 a | 1.01±0.04 ab | ||
14 | 2.16±0.14 a | 0.36±0.05 a | 1.80±0.09 a | 0.96±0.03 b |
品种Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间Stress time/d | PIabs | ψo | ϕEo | ϕPo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 4.76±0.66 a | 0.61±0.02 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.85±0.00 a |
7 | 4.34±0.53 ab | 0.62±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.84±0.01 b | ||
14 | 4.17±0.81 ab | 0.56±0.02 b | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.84±0.01 b | ||
LT | 0 | 4.76±0.86 a | 0.62±0.04 a | 0.52±0.03 a | 0.84±0.01 b | |
7 | 4.48±0.71 a | 0.61±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.85±0.00 ab | ||
14 | 3.66±0.36 b | 0.57±0.01 b | 0.48±0.01 b | 0.84±0.00 b | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 3.24±0.68 ab | 0.56±0.02 bc | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.85±0.01 a |
7 | 3.79±0.29 a | 0.60±0.01 a | 0.50±0.01 a | 0.84±0.00 b | ||
14 | 3.51±0.64 a | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.84±0.00 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 3.17±0.61 ab | 0.55±0.03 bc | 0.47±0.03 b | 0.84±0.01 ab | |
7 | 3.16±0.78 ab | 0.56±0.03 b | 0.47±0.03 b | 0.84±0.01 ab | ||
14 | 2.76±0.66 b | 0.54±0.02 bc | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.83±0.02 b |
Table 6 Yields or flux ratios of strawberry leaf under different treatments
品种Variety | 处理Treatment | 胁迫时间Stress time/d | PIabs | ψo | ϕEo | ϕPo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宁玉Ningyu | CK | 0 | 4.76±0.66 a | 0.61±0.02 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.85±0.00 a |
7 | 4.34±0.53 ab | 0.62±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.84±0.01 b | ||
14 | 4.17±0.81 ab | 0.56±0.02 b | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.84±0.01 b | ||
LT | 0 | 4.76±0.86 a | 0.62±0.04 a | 0.52±0.03 a | 0.84±0.01 b | |
7 | 4.48±0.71 a | 0.61±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.85±0.00 ab | ||
14 | 3.66±0.36 b | 0.57±0.01 b | 0.48±0.01 b | 0.84±0.00 b | ||
京藏香 Jingzangxiang | CK | 0 | 3.24±0.68 ab | 0.56±0.02 bc | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.85±0.01 a |
7 | 3.79±0.29 a | 0.60±0.01 a | 0.50±0.01 a | 0.84±0.00 b | ||
14 | 3.51±0.64 a | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.84±0.00 ab | ||
LT | 0 | 3.17±0.61 ab | 0.55±0.03 bc | 0.47±0.03 b | 0.84±0.01 ab | |
7 | 3.16±0.78 ab | 0.56±0.03 b | 0.47±0.03 b | 0.84±0.01 ab | ||
14 | 2.76±0.66 b | 0.54±0.02 bc | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.83±0.02 b |
Fig. 3 Leaf ultrastructure of strawberry under different treatmentsA: Jingzangxiang 0 d before treatment; B: Jingzangxiang of CK for 7 d; C: Jingzangxiang of CK for 14 d; D: Jingzangxiang of LT for 7 d; E: Jingzangxiang of LT for 14 d; F: Ningyu 0 d before treatment; G: Ningyu of CK for 7 d; H: Ningyu of CK for 14 d; I: Ningyu of LT for 7 d; J: Ningyu of LT for 14 d. N—Cell nucleus; Mi—Mitochondria; RER—Rough endoplasmic reticulum; —Mild swelling of mitochondria; —Vacuoles; —Chloroplasts; —Lamellar structures; —Starch granules; —Osmiophilic granules; —Intercellular filaments
[1] | 高峰,俞立,卢尚琼,等.国外设施农业的现状及发展趋势[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(2):279-285. |
GAO F, YU L, LU S Q, et al.. Status quo and development trend of facility agriculture in foreign countries [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Coll., 2009, 26(2):279-285. | |
[2] | 吴长征,蒲文宣,盛崧,等.亚适低温影响植物生长及氮营养的分子生理机制研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报, 2023,25 (1):16-25. |
WU C Z, PU W X, SHENG S, et al.. Research advance on molecular physiological mechanisms of the effect of suboptimal low temperatures on plant growth and nitrogen nutrition [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023, 25(1):16-25. | |
[3] | 朱丽云,杨再强,李军,等.花期低温寡照对番茄开花坐果特性及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业气象,2017,38(7): 456-465. |
ZHU L Y, YANG Z Q, LI J, et al.. Effect of low temperature and weak light at flowering stage on flower-fruit characteristics of tomato [J]. Chin. J. Agrometeorol., 2017, 38(7):456-465. | |
[4] | 江莎,胡阳,郑书馨,等.不同光强与光质对“达赛莱克特”草莓叶片形态结构的影响[J].电子显微学报,2009,28(5):453-461. |
JIANG S, HU Y, ZHENG S X, et al.. Morphologic effects of different light intensities and light qualities on the leaf of ‘Darselect’ strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch) [J]. J. Chin. Electron.Microsc. Soc., 2009, 28(5): 453-461. | |
[5] | 王勋陵,王静.植物形态结构与环境[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,1989:105-138. |
[6] | 李芳兰,包维楷.植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J].植物学通报,2005():118-127. |
LI F L, BAO W K. Responses of the morphological and anatomical structure of the plant leaf to environmental change [J]. Chin. Bull. Bot., 2005(S1): 118-127. | |
[7] | 张元梅,樊卫国.草莓光合作用的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2016,44(9):24-29. |
ZHANG Y M, FAN W G. Advances in photosynthesis of strawberry [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2016, 44(9): 24-29. | |
[8] | LORENZO M, PINEDO M L, EQUIZA M A, et al.. Changes in apoplastic peroxidase activity and cell wall composition are associated with cold-induced morpho-anatomical plasticity of wheat leaves [J]. Plant Biol., 2019, 21(S1):84-94. |
[9] | DUMLAO M R, DAREHSHOURI A, COHU C M, et al.. Low temperature acclimation of photosynthetic capacity and leaf morphology in the context of phloem loading type [J]. Photosynth. Res., 2012, 113(1):181-189. |
[10] | 郭玲玲.野生草莓属植物对温度的耐受能力与倍性及气候因子的相关性[D].太原:山西师范大学,2017. |
GUO L L. Tolerance of wild Fragaria species to temperature and their correlation with ploidy level and climate [D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Normal University, 2017. | |
[11] | 杨馥霞,汤玲,贺欢,等.取样部位对6个草莓品种低温半致死温度的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2019(12):31-34. |
[12] | 张广华.弱光、低温胁迫对草莓(Fragariaananassa Duch.)光合作用的影响[D].保定:河北农业大学,2004. |
ZHANG G H. Eeffes of weak light and low temperature stress on photosynthesis in strawberry [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2004. | |
[13] | 周艳威,陈金慧,鲁路,等.杂交鹅掌楸体胚再生植株淹水胁迫下叶片超微结构及光合特性变化[J].林业科学,2018,54(3):19-28. |
ZHOU Y W, CHEN J H, LU L,et al.. Changes on leaf chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of Liriodendron sino-americanum somatic embryo regeneration seedlings under waterlogging stress [J]. Sci. Silvae Sin., 2018, 54(3):19-28. | |
[14] | 关思慧,柴亚倩,崔洪鑫,等.低温胁迫对2个石榴品种幼苗光合参数和生理特性的影响[J].果树学报,2023,40(5):946-958. |
GUAN S H, CHAI Y Q, CUI H X, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on photosynthetic parameters and phys-iological characteristics for seedlings of two pomegranate varieties [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2023, 40(5):946-958. | |
[15] | 刘慧英,朱祝军,史庆华.低温胁迫下嫁接对西瓜光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数影响的研究[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2007,25(2):163-167. |
LIU H Y, ZHU Z J, SHI Q H. Effects of low temperature stress on characteristics of photosynthesis in leaves of own-rooted and grafted watermelon seedling [J]. J. Shihezi Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2007, 25(2): 163-167. | |
[16] | 田海涛,高培军,温国胜.7种箬竹抗寒特性比较[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(6):641-646. |
TIAN H T, GAO P J, WEN G S. Comparative study of cold resistance characteristics in seven Indocalamus spp [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Coll., 2006, 23(6):641-646. | |
[17] | 邵怡若,许建新,薛立,等.低温胁迫时间对4种幼苗生理生化及光合特性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(14):4237-4247. |
SHAO Y R, XU J X, XUE L, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on physiological-biochemical indexes and photosynthetic characteristics of seedlings of four plant species [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2013, 33(14): 4237-4247. | |
[18] | 徐超,王明田,杨再强,等.高温对温室草莓光合生理特性的影响及胁迫等级构建[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):231-240. |
XU C, WANG M T, YANG Z Q, et al.. Effects of high temperature on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of strawberry seedlings in greenhouse and construction of stress level [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2021, 32(1):231-240. | |
[19] | 方平,杨鹤,牛晨,等.不同LED光质对人参种苗叶片生理特性和超微结构的影响[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2022,42(12):3864-3871. |
FANG P, YANG H, NIU C, et al.. Effects of different LED light quality on the physiological characteristics and ultrastructure of ginseng seedling leaves [J]. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal., 2022, 42(12): 3864-3871. | |
[20] | 蔺经,杨青松,王中华,等.梨杂种苗童区和成年区叶片光合荧光特征及超微结构研究[J].果树学报,2011,28(5):750-754. |
LIN J, YANG Q S, WANG Z H, et al.. Photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics and ultrastructure of juvenile zone and adult zone in pear hybrid seedlings [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2011, 28(5):750-754. | |
[21] | 何洁,刘鸿先,王以柔,等. 低温与植物的光合作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1986(2): 1-6. |
HE J, LIU H X, WANG Y R, et al.. Low temperature and photosythesis of plants [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 1986(2):1-6. | |
[22] | 杜丽君,牛先前,林晓红,等.低温对枇杷苗叶片与根尖的生理状况及超微结构的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2019,27(4):452-460. |
DU L J, NIU X Q, LIN X H, et al.. Influence of low temperature on physiological and cell ultrastructure of leaves and roots of Eriobotrya japonica seedlings [J]. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot., 2019, 27(4):452-460. | |
[23] | 周蕴薇.翠南报春叶片细胞超微结构对低温的适应性变化[J].园艺学报,2006,33(6):1365-1368. |
ZHOU Y W. Adapted responses of mesophyll cell ultrastructure in Primula sieboldii leaves cultured at different low temperatures [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2006, 33(6):1365-1368. | |
[24] | 刘芬,陈桂华,王悦,等.水稻淡黄叶突变体xws的光合特性与基因定位[J].核农学报,2022,36(6):1080-1088. |
LIU F, CHEN G H, WANG Y, et al.. Photosynthetic characteristics and gene mapping of pale yellow leaf rice mutant xws [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2022, 36(6):1080-1088. | |
[25] | 郑丽梅,司龙亭,韩贵超.低温处理对不同耐寒性黄瓜幼苗叶片超微结构的影响[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(4):276-279. |
ZHENG L M, SI L T, HAN G C. Effects of low temperature treatment on the ultrastructure of seedling leaf of different cold resistance cucumber [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2009, 18(4): 276-279. | |
[26] | 黄俊,郭世荣,吴震,等.弱光对不结球白菜光合特性与叶绿体超微结构的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2):352-358. |
HUANG J, GUO S R, WU Z, et al.. Effects of weak light on photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure of non-heading Chinese cabbage [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2007, 18(2): 352-358. | |
[27] | 冯梅.胡杨叶形变化与个体发育阶段的关系研究[D].阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2014. |
FENG M. Relationship populus euphratical leaf change and individual developmentol stages [D]. Alar: Tarim University, 2014. | |
[28] | 李超.中亚热带九种常绿阔叶树种幼苗叶结构型性状相关性与叶经济谱分析[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2016. |
LI C. Analysis of relationships among leaf structural traits and economics spectrum of the nine evergreen broad leaved treeseedlings in the Mid-subtropical Zone of China [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2016. |
[1] | Yanfang ZHU, Qiang CHANG, Yan HAO, Hailong CHEN. Effects of Reflective Film on Fruit Quality and Volatile Components of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 72-82. |
[2] | Xin ZHAO, Zilong WU, Chao HAN, Hao ZHANG, Wei SONG, Ziyi LI. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Cadmium Enrichment of Setaria viridis Under Cadmium Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 193-202. |
[3] | Shuang LI, Aiying WANG, Zhen JIAO, Qing CHI, Hao SUN, Tao JIAO. Physiological and Chemical Characteristics and Transcriptome Analysis of Different Type of Wheat Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 20-32. |
[4] | Yu MIAO, Jie WANG, Yaoyao ZHAO, Lijia ZHANG, Meijun LIU. Study on Recovery Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Leaves After Low Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 80-89. |
[5] | Jingjuan GAO, Chenyu ZHU, Yuqin KE, Chaoyuan ZHENG, Chunying LI, Wenqing LI. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application Period on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Flue-cured Tobacco Under Tobacco-Rice Rotation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 157-165. |
[6] | Xiaoting WANG, Pengpeng ZHANG. Phylogenic and Functional Profile of Ser/Thr Kinases in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 66-76. |
[7] | Lu MENG, Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG, Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI. Effects of Lime on Soil Improvement and Plant Growth in Apple Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 197-204. |
[8] | Changzheng WU, Wenxuan PU, Song SHENG, Yucheng XIANG, Weiqin YANG, Wenrui LI, Pingjun HUANG, Laihua LIU. Research Advance on Molecular Physiological Mechanisms of the Effect of Suboptimal Low Temperatures on Plant Growth and Nitrogen Nutrition [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 16-25. |
[9] | Ailin DAI, Yonggang ZHANG, Qiang AI, Xichao TENG, Limin YANG. Effects of Different Light Qualities on Growth, Physiological Characteristics and Flavonoids Accumulation of Epimedium koreanum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 85-92. |
[10] | MA Xingdong1, GUO Yehong1*, DU Tao2, LI Meiying3, XU Yingjie1, CHEN Xiaowei1, YAN Zongbang1, YANG Shaojie1, FENG Jinglu1. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Diurnal Variation of Photosynthesis and Yield of Two Lycium Species [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 173-182. |
[11] | HAO Zhenggang, ZHAO Huijun, WEI Yuqing*, ZENG Zhouqi, WANG Zhiheng. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Sweet Sorghum to Cadmium Stress and Its Cadmium Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 30-42. |
[12] | YIN Yonggang, YUAN Junwei, LIU Changjiang, HAN Bin, LI Minmin, SUN Yan, JIA Nan, GUO Zijuan, ZHAO Shengjian*. Effects of NaCl Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Vitis sp. Rootstocks [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 49-55. |
[13] |
WANG Hao1, MA Wenli1, CHEN Yongwei1, BO Jianhua1, LI Zongze1, JIN Wei1, WEI Feng1,2*.
Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Light Energy and Electric Energy Efficiency of Strawberry Under Different Light Supplement Positions
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 29-36.
|
[14] | WANG Mengyuan1, DU Yanquan2, CAI Weiwei1, WANG Zihao2*, ZHU Jianqiang1*. Effect of Complex Antagonistic Bacteria on Controlling Strawberry Root Rot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 100-110. |
[15] | LIU Shidou1, ZHU Xinping1,2*, ZHAO Yi1, WANG Boyan1, HAN Yaoguang1, YANG Beibei1, LU Zhi1, JIA Hongtao1,2. Cotton Stalk Biochar Retarding Stress of Cadmium on Growth of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(4): 139-146. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||