Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 26-39.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0732
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jiangbo LI(), Wenju GAO, Xiaodong YUN, Jieyin ZHAO, Shiwei GENG, Chunbin HAN, Quanjia CHEN, Qin CHEN(
)
Received:
2022-09-01
Accepted:
2023-02-13
Online:
2024-03-15
Published:
2024-03-07
Contact:
Qin CHEN
李江博(), 高文举, 运晓东, 赵杰银, 耿世伟, 韩春斌, 陈全家, 陈琴(
)
通讯作者:
陈琴
作者简介:
李江博 E-mail:760631995@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jiangbo LI, Wenju GAO, Xiaodong YUN, Jieyin ZHAO, Shiwei GENG, Chunbin HAN, Quanjia CHEN, Qin CHEN. Effects of Different Water Stress Treatments on Core Germplasm Resources of Upland Cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 26-39.
李江博, 高文举, 运晓东, 赵杰银, 耿世伟, 韩春斌, 陈全家, 陈琴. 不同水分胁迫处理对陆地棉核心种质资源的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 26-39.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0732
编号Code | 品种Variety | 来源Source | 编号Code | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新陆早7号 Xinluzao 7 | 西北内陆 Inland Northwest | 16 | 鲁棉2号 Lumian 2 | 黄河流域 Yellow River basin |
2 | 新陆早31号 Xinluzao 31 | 17 | 鲁原343 Luyuan 343 | ||
3 | 新陆中8号 Xinluzhong 8 | 18 | 鲁1138 Lu 1138 | ||
4 | 酒棉8号 Jiumian 8 | 19 | 运1812 Yun 1812 | ||
5 | 荆55173 Jing 55173 | 长江流域 Yangtze River basin | 20 | 冀丰908 Jifeng 908 | |
6 | 泗168 Si 168 | 21 | 阿肯色971 Akense 971 | 美国 United States | |
7 | 徐州6号 Xuzhou 6 | 22 | GP135 | ||
8 | 中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 黄河流域 Yellow River basin | 23 | 岱字棉16号 Daizimian 16 | |
9 | 中棉所41 Zhongmiansuo 41 | 24 | King | ||
10 | 中棉所50 Zhongmiansuo 50 | 25 | MAR-7A-3 | ||
11 | 中棉所60 Zhongmiansuo 60 | 26 | Miscot 7803-52 | ||
12 | 中植86-1 Zhongzhi 86-1 | 27 | 澳SIV2 Ao SIV2 | 澳大利亚 Australia | |
13 | 中远0114 Zhongyuan 0114 | 28 | 非洲棉E-40 Feizhoumian E-40 | 非洲 Africa | |
14 | 晋棉49 Jinmian 49 | 29 | F281 | 法国 France | |
15 | 晋棉46 Jinmian 46 | 30 | 保2367 Bao 2367 | 保加利亚 Bulgaria |
Table 1 30 cotton materials
编号Code | 品种Variety | 来源Source | 编号Code | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新陆早7号 Xinluzao 7 | 西北内陆 Inland Northwest | 16 | 鲁棉2号 Lumian 2 | 黄河流域 Yellow River basin |
2 | 新陆早31号 Xinluzao 31 | 17 | 鲁原343 Luyuan 343 | ||
3 | 新陆中8号 Xinluzhong 8 | 18 | 鲁1138 Lu 1138 | ||
4 | 酒棉8号 Jiumian 8 | 19 | 运1812 Yun 1812 | ||
5 | 荆55173 Jing 55173 | 长江流域 Yangtze River basin | 20 | 冀丰908 Jifeng 908 | |
6 | 泗168 Si 168 | 21 | 阿肯色971 Akense 971 | 美国 United States | |
7 | 徐州6号 Xuzhou 6 | 22 | GP135 | ||
8 | 中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 黄河流域 Yellow River basin | 23 | 岱字棉16号 Daizimian 16 | |
9 | 中棉所41 Zhongmiansuo 41 | 24 | King | ||
10 | 中棉所50 Zhongmiansuo 50 | 25 | MAR-7A-3 | ||
11 | 中棉所60 Zhongmiansuo 60 | 26 | Miscot 7803-52 | ||
12 | 中植86-1 Zhongzhi 86-1 | 27 | 澳SIV2 Ao SIV2 | 澳大利亚 Australia | |
13 | 中远0114 Zhongyuan 0114 | 28 | 非洲棉E-40 Feizhoumian E-40 | 非洲 Africa | |
14 | 晋棉49 Jinmian 49 | 29 | F281 | 法国 France | |
15 | 晋棉46 Jinmian 46 | 30 | 保2367 Bao 2367 | 保加利亚 Bulgaria |
性状 Trait | 处理方式 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果枝始节数 FNFB | CK | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 9.72 |
W1 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 10.32 | |
W2 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 8.85 | |
果枝始节高 HFNFB/cm | CK | 6.76 | 1.79 | 4.77 | 11.18 | 26.48 |
W1 | 8.33 | 1.22 | 5.52 | 11.12 | 14.65 | |
W2 | 6.29 | 1.15 | 4.47 | 8.60 | 18.28 | |
果枝数 FB | CK | 8.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 8.96 |
W1 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 | 10.56 | |
W2 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 6.42 | |
株高 PH/cm | CK | 54.53 | 4.62 | 46.07 | 68.10 | 8.47 |
W1 | 38.72 | 4.38 | 31.35 | 46.05 | 11.31 | |
W2 | 48.39 | 3.68 | 42.10 | 56.50 | 7.60 | |
开花数 FN | CK | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 23.04 |
W1 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 16.32 | |
W2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 20.20 | |
棉铃数 BN | CK | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 18.49 |
W1 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 24.14 | |
W2 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 24.38 | |
上五果枝叶片数 LTFFBN | CK | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 11.00 | 9.59 |
W1 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.24 | |
W2 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 | 12.17 | |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | CK | 10.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 12.00 | 16.93 |
W1 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 12.54 | |
W2 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 11.00 | 9.51 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of agronomic traits of 30 cotton materials
性状 Trait | 处理方式 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果枝始节数 FNFB | CK | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 9.72 |
W1 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 10.32 | |
W2 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 8.85 | |
果枝始节高 HFNFB/cm | CK | 6.76 | 1.79 | 4.77 | 11.18 | 26.48 |
W1 | 8.33 | 1.22 | 5.52 | 11.12 | 14.65 | |
W2 | 6.29 | 1.15 | 4.47 | 8.60 | 18.28 | |
果枝数 FB | CK | 8.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 8.96 |
W1 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 | 10.56 | |
W2 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 6.42 | |
株高 PH/cm | CK | 54.53 | 4.62 | 46.07 | 68.10 | 8.47 |
W1 | 38.72 | 4.38 | 31.35 | 46.05 | 11.31 | |
W2 | 48.39 | 3.68 | 42.10 | 56.50 | 7.60 | |
开花数 FN | CK | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 23.04 |
W1 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 16.32 | |
W2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 20.20 | |
棉铃数 BN | CK | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 18.49 |
W1 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 24.14 | |
W2 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9.00 | 24.38 | |
上五果枝叶片数 LTFFBN | CK | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 11.00 | 9.59 |
W1 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.24 | |
W2 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 | 12.17 | |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | CK | 10.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 12.00 | 16.93 |
W1 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 12.54 | |
W2 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 11.00 | 9.51 |
性状 Trait | 处理方式 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽棉产量 CSY/g | CK | 106.35 | 9.92 | 88.33 | 129.82 | 9.33 |
W1 | 80.80 | 8.34 | 66.33 | 97.61 | 10.32 | |
W2 | 89.34 | 12.34 | 57.04 | 116.30 | 13.81 | |
皮棉产量 CLY/g | CK | 45.54 | 5.18 | 32.88 | 56.36 | 11.37 |
W1 | 30.20 | 4.96 | 18.45 | 38.90 | 16.42 | |
W2 | 35.76 | 4.38 | 27.40 | 44.20 | 12.25 | |
衣分 LP/% | CK | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.30 |
W1 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.54 | 16.22 | |
W2 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 12.50 | |
单株产量 YPP/g | CK | 33.26 | 10.19 | 17.51 | 55.72 | 30.64 |
W1 | 19.33 | 5.81 | 10.50 | 38.53 | 30.06 | |
W2 | 25.54 | 9.05 | 10.97 | 45.92 | 35.43 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of agronomic traits of 30 cotton materials
性状 Trait | 处理方式 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽棉产量 CSY/g | CK | 106.35 | 9.92 | 88.33 | 129.82 | 9.33 |
W1 | 80.80 | 8.34 | 66.33 | 97.61 | 10.32 | |
W2 | 89.34 | 12.34 | 57.04 | 116.30 | 13.81 | |
皮棉产量 CLY/g | CK | 45.54 | 5.18 | 32.88 | 56.36 | 11.37 |
W1 | 30.20 | 4.96 | 18.45 | 38.90 | 16.42 | |
W2 | 35.76 | 4.38 | 27.40 | 44.20 | 12.25 | |
衣分 LP/% | CK | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.30 |
W1 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.54 | 16.22 | |
W2 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 12.50 | |
单株产量 YPP/g | CK | 33.26 | 10.19 | 17.51 | 55.72 | 30.64 |
W1 | 19.33 | 5.81 | 10.50 | 38.53 | 30.06 | |
W2 | 25.54 | 9.05 | 10.97 | 45.92 | 35.43 |
性状 Trait | 胁迫处理Stress treatment | |
---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 5.96 | 9.37 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 57.55 | 36.62 |
果枝数 FB | 16.40 | 33.04 |
株高 PH | 28.71 | 10.79 |
开花数 FN | 34.19 | 13.17 |
棉铃数 BN | 26.49 | 27.46 |
上五果枝叶片数 LTFFBN | 3.79 | 23.72 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 29.75 | 56.13 |
籽棉产量 CSY | 10.12 | 38.76 |
皮棉产量 CLY | 36.33 | 7.40 |
衣分 LP | 54.19 | 29.33 |
单株产量 YPP | 1.91 | 14.52 |
Table 3 Drought variability index under different treatment (%)
性状 Trait | 胁迫处理Stress treatment | |
---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 5.96 | 9.37 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 57.55 | 36.62 |
果枝数 FB | 16.40 | 33.04 |
株高 PH | 28.71 | 10.79 |
开花数 FN | 34.19 | 13.17 |
棉铃数 BN | 26.49 | 27.46 |
上五果枝叶片数 LTFFBN | 3.79 | 23.72 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 29.75 | 56.13 |
籽棉产量 CSY | 10.12 | 38.76 |
皮棉产量 CLY | 36.33 | 7.40 |
衣分 LP | 54.19 | 29.33 |
单株产量 YPP | 1.91 | 14.52 |
Fig. 1 Differences of 12 indicators under different treatmentsNote: *, ** and *** indicate significant differences between treatments at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
性状 Trait | 主成分Principal component | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 0.666 | 0.317 | -0.130 | 0.063 | 0.072 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 0.750 | 0.212 | 0.397 | 0.036 | 0.122 |
果枝数 FB | 0.549 | -0.042 | -0.561 | 0.312 | -0.149 |
株高 PH | 0.244 | 0.484 | -0.337 | -0.104 | 0.662 |
开花数 FN | -0.386 | 0.579 | 0.144 | -0.420 | -0.121 |
棉铃数 BN | 0.546 | -0.152 | 0.392 | 0.412 | -0.414 |
上五果枝叶片 LTFFBN | -0.303 | 0.380 | -0.272 | 0.618 | 0.034 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 0.783 | -0.198 | 0.252 | 0.045 | 0.324 |
籽棉产量 CSY | -0.465 | 0.366 | 0.052 | 0.562 | 0.090 |
皮棉产量 CLY | 0.088 | 0.925 | 0.019 | 0.072 | -0.228 |
衣分 LP | 0.406 | 0.746 | -0.028 | -0.301 | -0.308 |
单株产量 YPP | -0.329 | 0.310 | 0.680 | 0.221 | 0.293 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 3.015 | 2.564 | 1.381 | 1.303 | 1.014 |
贡献率 Contribute rate/% | 25.128 | 21.365 | 11.506 | 10.862 | 8.447 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribute rate/% | 25.128 | 46.493 | 57.998 | 68.86 | 77.307 |
Table 4 PCA factor loading matrix and contribution rate under W1 treatment
性状 Trait | 主成分Principal component | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 0.666 | 0.317 | -0.130 | 0.063 | 0.072 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 0.750 | 0.212 | 0.397 | 0.036 | 0.122 |
果枝数 FB | 0.549 | -0.042 | -0.561 | 0.312 | -0.149 |
株高 PH | 0.244 | 0.484 | -0.337 | -0.104 | 0.662 |
开花数 FN | -0.386 | 0.579 | 0.144 | -0.420 | -0.121 |
棉铃数 BN | 0.546 | -0.152 | 0.392 | 0.412 | -0.414 |
上五果枝叶片 LTFFBN | -0.303 | 0.380 | -0.272 | 0.618 | 0.034 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 0.783 | -0.198 | 0.252 | 0.045 | 0.324 |
籽棉产量 CSY | -0.465 | 0.366 | 0.052 | 0.562 | 0.090 |
皮棉产量 CLY | 0.088 | 0.925 | 0.019 | 0.072 | -0.228 |
衣分 LP | 0.406 | 0.746 | -0.028 | -0.301 | -0.308 |
单株产量 YPP | -0.329 | 0.310 | 0.680 | 0.221 | 0.293 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 3.015 | 2.564 | 1.381 | 1.303 | 1.014 |
贡献率 Contribute rate/% | 25.128 | 21.365 | 11.506 | 10.862 | 8.447 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribute rate/% | 25.128 | 46.493 | 57.998 | 68.86 | 77.307 |
性状 Trait | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 0.430 | -0.107 | 0.495 | 0.392 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 0.652 | -0.393 | 0.396 | 0.080 |
果枝数 FB | 0.492 | 0.079 | 0.420 | 0.285 |
株高 PH | 0.382 | 0.528 | 0.204 | -0.195 |
开花数 FN | -0.568 | 0.029 | 0.094 | 0.518 |
棉铃数 BN | 0.246 | 0.400 | -0.484 | 0.520 |
上五果枝叶片 LTFFBN | 0.459 | 0.065 | -0.250 | 0.545 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 0.644 | -0.512 | 0.203 | -0.205 |
籽棉产量 CSY | -0.688 | -0.354 | 0.415 | 0.202 |
皮棉产量 CLY | -0.291 | 0.550 | 0.616 | -0.042 |
衣分 LP | 0.432 | 0.792 | 0.072 | -0.180 |
单株产量 YPP | 0.432 | -0.338 | -0.385 | -0.079 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 2.938 | 2.048 | 1.670 | 1.238 |
贡献率 Contribute rate/% | 24.480 | 17.064 | 13.916 | 10.319 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribute rate/% | 24.480 | 41.543 | 55.459 | 65.778 |
Table 5 PCA factor loading matrix and contribution rate under W2 treatment
性状 Trait | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | |
果枝始节数 FNFB | 0.430 | -0.107 | 0.495 | 0.392 |
果枝始节高 HFNFB | 0.652 | -0.393 | 0.396 | 0.080 |
果枝数 FB | 0.492 | 0.079 | 0.420 | 0.285 |
株高 PH | 0.382 | 0.528 | 0.204 | -0.195 |
开花数 FN | -0.568 | 0.029 | 0.094 | 0.518 |
棉铃数 BN | 0.246 | 0.400 | -0.484 | 0.520 |
上五果枝叶片 LTFFBN | 0.459 | 0.065 | -0.250 | 0.545 |
主茎叶片数 MSLN | 0.644 | -0.512 | 0.203 | -0.205 |
籽棉产量 CSY | -0.688 | -0.354 | 0.415 | 0.202 |
皮棉产量 CLY | -0.291 | 0.550 | 0.616 | -0.042 |
衣分 LP | 0.432 | 0.792 | 0.072 | -0.180 |
单株产量 YPP | 0.432 | -0.338 | -0.385 | -0.079 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 2.938 | 2.048 | 1.670 | 1.238 |
贡献率 Contribute rate/% | 24.480 | 17.064 | 13.916 | 10.319 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribute rate/% | 24.480 | 41.543 | 55.459 | 65.778 |
品种名Variety | 胁迫ⅠW1 | 胁迫Ⅱ W2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | |
中棉所41 Zhongmiansuo 41 | 0.774 | 1 | 0.595 | 6 |
晋棉46 Jinmian 46 | 0.717 | 2 | 0.515 | 11 |
新陆早7号Xinluzao 7 | 0.683 | 3 | 0.697 | 1 |
中棉所60 Zhongmiansuo 60 | 0.674 | 4 | 0.497 | 14 |
Miscot7803-52 | 0.658 | 5 | 0.441 | 20 |
荆55173 Jing 55173 | 0.655 | 6 | 0.511 | 12 |
岱字棉16号Daizimian 16 | 0.649 | 7 | 0.423 | 21 |
GP135 | 0.642 | 8 | 0.556 | 8 |
MAR-7A-3 | 0.639 | 9 | 0.631 | 4 |
King | 0.614 | 10 | 0.442 | 18 |
冀丰908 Jifeng 908 | 0.610 | 11 | 0.611 | 5 |
晋棉49 Jinmian 49 | 0.605 | 12 | 0.476 | 16 |
非洲棉E-40 Feizhoumian E-40 | 0.599 | 13 | 0.519 | 10 |
新陆早31号Xinluzao 31 | 0.597 | 14 | 0.574 | 7 |
泗168 Si 168 | 0.549 | 15 | 0.636 | 3 |
酒棉8号Jiumian 8 | 0.542 | 16 | 0.231 | 30 |
中植86-1 Zhongzhi 86-1 | 0.533 | 17 | 0.529 | 9 |
阿肯色971 Akense 971 | 0.525 | 18 | 0.321 | 25 |
F281 | 0.516 | 19 | 0.350 | 23 |
徐州6号Xuzhou 6 | 0.515 | 20 | 0.687 | 2 |
澳SIV2 Ao SIV2 | 0.500 | 21 | 0.300 | 26 |
保2367 Bao 2367 | 0.481 | 22 | 0.283 | 28 |
鲁1138 Lu 1138 | 0.468 | 23 | 0.453 | 17 |
中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 0.447 | 24 | 0.396 | 22 |
鲁原343 Luyuan 343 | 0.424 | 25 | 0.296 | 27 |
运1812 Yun 1812 | 0.423 | 26 | 0.322 | 24 |
中远0114 Zhongyuan 0114 | 0.400 | 27 | 0.490 | 15 |
鲁棉2号Lumian 2 | 0.354 | 28 | 0.504 | 13 |
新陆中8号Xinluzhong 8 | 0.302 | 29 | 0.246 | 29 |
中棉所50 Zhongmainsuo 50 | 0.285 | 30 | 0.442 | 19 |
Table 6 D value of varieties under different stress treatments
品种名Variety | 胁迫ⅠW1 | 胁迫Ⅱ W2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | |
中棉所41 Zhongmiansuo 41 | 0.774 | 1 | 0.595 | 6 |
晋棉46 Jinmian 46 | 0.717 | 2 | 0.515 | 11 |
新陆早7号Xinluzao 7 | 0.683 | 3 | 0.697 | 1 |
中棉所60 Zhongmiansuo 60 | 0.674 | 4 | 0.497 | 14 |
Miscot7803-52 | 0.658 | 5 | 0.441 | 20 |
荆55173 Jing 55173 | 0.655 | 6 | 0.511 | 12 |
岱字棉16号Daizimian 16 | 0.649 | 7 | 0.423 | 21 |
GP135 | 0.642 | 8 | 0.556 | 8 |
MAR-7A-3 | 0.639 | 9 | 0.631 | 4 |
King | 0.614 | 10 | 0.442 | 18 |
冀丰908 Jifeng 908 | 0.610 | 11 | 0.611 | 5 |
晋棉49 Jinmian 49 | 0.605 | 12 | 0.476 | 16 |
非洲棉E-40 Feizhoumian E-40 | 0.599 | 13 | 0.519 | 10 |
新陆早31号Xinluzao 31 | 0.597 | 14 | 0.574 | 7 |
泗168 Si 168 | 0.549 | 15 | 0.636 | 3 |
酒棉8号Jiumian 8 | 0.542 | 16 | 0.231 | 30 |
中植86-1 Zhongzhi 86-1 | 0.533 | 17 | 0.529 | 9 |
阿肯色971 Akense 971 | 0.525 | 18 | 0.321 | 25 |
F281 | 0.516 | 19 | 0.350 | 23 |
徐州6号Xuzhou 6 | 0.515 | 20 | 0.687 | 2 |
澳SIV2 Ao SIV2 | 0.500 | 21 | 0.300 | 26 |
保2367 Bao 2367 | 0.481 | 22 | 0.283 | 28 |
鲁1138 Lu 1138 | 0.468 | 23 | 0.453 | 17 |
中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 0.447 | 24 | 0.396 | 22 |
鲁原343 Luyuan 343 | 0.424 | 25 | 0.296 | 27 |
运1812 Yun 1812 | 0.423 | 26 | 0.322 | 24 |
中远0114 Zhongyuan 0114 | 0.400 | 27 | 0.490 | 15 |
鲁棉2号Lumian 2 | 0.354 | 28 | 0.504 | 13 |
新陆中8号Xinluzhong 8 | 0.302 | 29 | 0.246 | 29 |
中棉所50 Zhongmainsuo 50 | 0.285 | 30 | 0.442 | 19 |
Fig. 4 Clustering of D values under two stressesNote:D1—Drought resistance comprehensive evaluation values in stress treatment Ⅰ; D2—Drought resistance comprehensive evaluation values in stress treatment Ⅱ.
1 | WANG C, ISODA A, WANG P. Growth and yield performance of some cotton cultivars in Xinjiang China an arid area with short growing period [J]. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 2004,190(3):177-183. |
2 | KANG Y H, WANG R S, WAN S Q, et al.. Effects of different water levels on cotton growth and water use through drip irrigation in an arid region with saline ground water of Northwest China [J]. Agric. Water Manage., 2012,109(6):117-126. |
3 | ULLAH A, SUN H, YANG X Y, et al.. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop [J]. Plant Biotech. J., 2017,15(3):271-284. |
4 | CATTIVELLI L, RIZZA F, BADECK F W, et al.. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics [J]. Field Crops Res., 2008,105(1):1-14. |
5 | FRANKEL O H, BROWN A H D. Current plant genetic resources a critical appraisal [J]. Genetics: New Front., 1984, 4: 3-13. |
6 | ALIREZA N G, GADIR N G, DAVOUD H, et al.. Effects of drought stress condition on the yield and yield components of advanced wheat genotypes in Ardabil Iran [J]. J. Food Agric. Environ., 2009,7(3):228-234. |
7 | LIU C Y, YANG Z Y, HU Y G. Drought resistance of wheat alien chromosome addition lines evaluated by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought resistance index of grain yield [J]. Field Crops Res., 2015,179(8):103-112. |
8 | 王士强,胡银岗,佘奎军,等.小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(11):2452-2459. |
WANG S Q, HU Y G, SHE K J, et al.. Gray relational grade analysis of agronomical and physi-biochemical traits related to drought tolerance in wheat [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin.,2007,40(11):2452-2459. | |
9 | 李贵全,张海燕,季兰,等.不同大豆品种抗旱性综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2408-2412. |
LI G Q, ZHANG H Y, JI L, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of different soybean varieties [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2006,17(12):2408-2412. | |
10 | 谢小玉,张霞,张兵.油菜苗期抗旱性评价及抗旱相关指标变化分析[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(3):476-485. |
XIE X Y, ZHANG X, ZHANG B. Evaluation of drought resistance and analysis of variation of relevant parameters at seedling stage of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Sci.Agric.Sin., 2013,46(3):476-485. | |
11 | 柯贞进,尹美强,温银元,等.干旱胁迫下聚丙烯酰胺浸种对谷子种子萌发及幼苗期抗旱性的影响[J].核农学报,2015,29(3):563-570. |
KE Z J, YIN M Q, WEN Y Y, et al.. Effects of polyacrylamide seed soaking on seed germination and drought resistance of millet (Setaria italica) seedlings under drought stress [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2015,29(3):563-570. | |
12 | 徐蕊,王启柏,张春庆,等.玉米自交系抗旱性评价指标体系的建立[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(1):72-84. |
XU R, WANG Q B, ZHANG C Q, et al.. Drought-resistance evaluation system of maize inbred [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2009, 42(1): 72-84. | |
13 | 祁旭升,王兴荣,张彦军,等.胡麻成株期抗旱指标筛选与种质抗性鉴定[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(15):3076-3087. |
QI X S, WANG X R, ZAHNG Y J, et al.. Drought resistance indexes selection for oil flax at the adult stage and drought resistance identification of oil flax germplasm [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2010,43(15):3076-3087. | |
14 | 姚玉波.不同品种亚麻种子萌发期抗旱性鉴定[J].核农学报,2015,29(10):2033-2039. |
YAO Y B. Drought resistance identification of different flax varieties in seed germination stage [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2015,29(10):2033-2039. | |
15 | 石运庆,苗华荣,胡晓辉,等.花生耐盐碱性鉴定指标的研究及应用[J].核农学报,2015,29(3):442-447. |
SHI Y Q, MIAO H R, HU X H, et al.. Research and application of saline-alkaline tolerance indexes of peanut [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2015,29(3): 442-447. | |
16 | KRAMER D M, EVANS J R. The importance of energy balance in improving photosynthetic productivity [J]. Plant Physiol., 2011,155(1):70-78. |
17 | SOOMROO M H, MARKHAND G S. Screening Pakistani cotton for drought tolerance [J]. Pak. J. Bot., 2011,44(1):383-388. |
18 | WIGGINS M S, LEIB B G, MUELLER T C, et al.. Investigation of physiological growth, fiber quality, yield, and yield stability of upland cotton varieties in differing environments [J]. J. Cott. Sci., 2013,17(3):140-148. |
19 | 闫成川,曾庆涛,陈琴,等.陆地棉花铃期抗旱指标筛选及评价[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(7):46-57. |
YAN C C, ZENG Q T, CHEN Q, et al.. Screening and evaluation of drought resistance indicators at flowering and boll stage of upland cotton [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022, 24(7):46-57. | |
20 | 孙丰磊,张玻,曲延英,等.花铃期干旱胁迫对不同棉花品种光合特性影响及抗旱性评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(5):7-13. |
SUN F L, ZHANG B, QU Y Y, et al.. Effects of drought stress during the blooming period on photosynthetic characteristics and assessment drought resistance of different cotton varieties [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2018,36(5):7-13. | |
21 | 孙丰磊,曲延英,陈全家,等. 棉花抗旱相关指标综合评价及灰色关联分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(1):233-239. |
SUN F L, QU Y Y, CHEN Q J, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton drought tolerance indexes and gray relational analysis [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2019,37(1):233-239. | |
22 | 杜雄明,周忠丽.棉花种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005:1-89. |
23 | 俞希根,孙景生,肖俊夫,等.棉花适宜土壤水分下限和干旱指标研究[J].棉花学报,1999,27(1):36-39. |
YU X G, SUN J S, XIAO J F, et al.. A study on drought indices and lower limit of suitable soil moisture of cotton [J]. Cott. Sci., 1999,27(1):36-39. | |
24 | 李少昆,肖璐,黄文华.不同时期干旱胁迫对棉花生长和产量的影响Ⅱ棉花生长发育及生理特性的变化[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),1999,3(4):259-264. |
LI S K, XIAO L, HUANG W H. Effect of drought stress on cotton growth and lint yield at different growing stage [J]. J. Shihezi. Univ. (Nat. Sci), 1999,3(4):259-264. | |
25 | 兰巨生,胡福顺,张景瑞,等.作物抗旱指数的概念和统计方法[J].华北农学报,1990,5(2):20-25. |
LAN J S, HU F S, ZHANG J R, et al..The concept and statistical method of drought resistance index in crops [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 1990,5(2):20-25. | |
26 | ABRAHAM B, WAYNE R J. Breeding crop varieties for stress environments [J]. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 1985,2(3):199-238. |
27 | 黎裕,王天宇,刘成,等.玉米抗旱品种的筛选指标研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2004,5(3):210-215. |
LI Y, WANG T Y, LIU C, et al.. Analysis on criteria for screening drought tolerant maize hybrids [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2004,5(3):210-215. | |
28 | 徐银萍,潘永东,刘强德,等.大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J].作物学报,2020,46(3):448-461. |
XU Y P, PAN Y D, LIU Q D, et al.. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of barley resources at mature period [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2020,46(3):448-461. | |
29 | 刘光辉,陈全家,吴鹏昊,等.棉花花铃期抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报,2016,17(1): 53-62. |
LIU G H, CHEN Q J, WU P H, et al.. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance indices of cotton at blossing and boll-forming stages [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2016,17(1):53-62, | |
30 | SUN F L, CHEN Q, CHEN Q J, et al.. Screening of key drought tolerance indices for cotton at the flowering and boll setting stage using the dimension reduction method [J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2021,12:619926 [2022-08-01]. . |
31 | BO W, FU B C, QIN G J, et al.. Evaluation of drought resistance in Iris germanica L. based on subordination function and principal component analysis [J]. Emirates J. Food Agric., 2017,29(10):770-778. |
32 | NEGRAO S, SCHMOCKEL S M, TESTER M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress [J]. Ann. Bot., 2017,119(1): 1-11. |
33 | KAKAR N, JUMAA S H, REDONA E D, et al.. Evaluating rice for salinity using potculture provides a systematic tolerance assessment at the seedling stage [J]. Rice, 2019,57(12):1-14. |
34 | 刘鹏鹏,陈全家,曲延英,等.棉花种质资源抗旱性评价[J].新疆农业科学,2014,51(11):1961-1969. |
LIU P P, CHEN Q J, QU Y Y, et al.. The drought resistance evaluation of cotton germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci. Technol., 2014,51(11):1961-1969. | |
35 | 郑巨云,桑志伟,王俊铎,等.棉花品种抗旱性相关指标分析与综合评价[J].中国农业科技导报, 2022,24(10):23-34. |
ZHENG J Y, SANG Z W, WANG J D, et al.. Indexes analysis and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of cotton varieties [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022,24(10):23-34. | |
36 | 宋凤斌,徐世昌.玉米抗旱性鉴定指标的研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(1):127-129. |
SONG F B, XU S C. Study on the drought-resistant identification indexes in maize [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2004,12(1):127-129. |
[1] | Hao JIA, Hongzhe WANG, Zhengwen SUN, Qishen GU, Dongmei ZHANG, Xingyi WANG, Yan ZHANG, Huaiyu LU, Zhiying MA, Xingfen WANG. Genome-wide Identification of VOZ Genes Family in Cotton and Study on Salt Tolerance Function of GhVOZ1 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 58-68. |
[2] | Guiyuan ZHAO, Yongqiang WANG, Jianguang LIU, Zhao GENG, Hanshuang ZHANG, Liqiang WU, Xingfen WANG, Guiyin ZHANG. Effect of Exogenous Gene Insertion Site on Bt Protein Content in Insect-resistant Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 44-53. |
[3] | Yixin CHEN, Xiubo YANG, Shijun TIAN, Cong WANG, Zhiying BAI, Cundong LI, Ke ZHANG. Response of GhCOMT28 to Drought Stress in Gossypium hirsutum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 45-56. |
[4] | Zhiduo DONG, Qiuping FU, Jian HUANG, Tong QI, Yanbo FU, Kuerban Kaisaier. Analysis of Salt Tolerance Capacity of Xinjiang Cotton Guring Germination [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 57-67. |
[5] | Zicheng PENG, Hongli DU, Ming WANG, Fenghua ZHANG, Haichang YANG. Research on AMF Regulation of Cotton Growth and Ion Balance Under Salt Alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 33-41. |
[6] | Yumang ZHANG, Guijuan CHEN, Hongyan CHANG, Yongheng WANG, Shuxia LIU, Yunxiu YING. Effect of New Degradable Soil Water-retaining Agent on Growth and Development of Maize Seedlings Under Water Stress at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 201-210. |
[7] | Songjiang DUAN, Haoran HU, Chengjie ZHANG, Wei SUN, Yifan WU, Rensong GUO, Jusong ZHANG. Differences in Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Genotypes of Island Cotton and Their Effects on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 61-71. |
[8] | Huiting WENG, Haiyang LIU, Huiming GUO, Hongmei CHENG, Jun LI, Chao ZHANG, Xiaofeng SU. Preliminary Function Analysis of GhERF020 Gene in Response to Verticillium Wilt in Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 112-121. |
[9] | Ziqin LI, Jiaqiang WANG, Zhen LI, Deqiu ZOU, Xiaogong ZHANG, Xiaoyu LUO, Weiyang LIU. Estimation of Chlorophyll Density of Cotton Leaves Based on Spectral Index [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 103-111. |
[10] | Yiyun GUI, Haibi LI, Qiang LIANG, Rongzhong YANG, Jinju WEI, Debin WEI, Wenjiao LI, Xihui LIU, Hui ZHOU. Changes of Sugarcane Stem Node Growth Under Artificial Water Control and Natural Water Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 25-36. |
[11] | Yukun QIN, Junying CHEN, Lijuan ZHANG. Response of Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristics and Yield of Cotton in North Jiangxi Cotton Region to Nitrogen Reduction Measures [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 191-199. |
[12] | Ling LIN, Yujie ZHU, Lei FENG, Guangmu TANG, Yunshu ZHANG, Wanli XU. Effects of Aged Cotton Straw Biochars on Soil Properties and Nitrogen Utilization of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 184-191. |
[13] | Lihua LI, Zhengwen SUN, Huifeng KE, Qishen GU, Liqiang WU, Yan ZHANG, Guiyin ZHANG, Xingfen WANG. Development and Effect Evaluation of KASP Markers for Fiber Strength in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 46-55. |
[14] | Panpan MENG, Haiyan HE, Yuxin CAO, Lixin ZHANG, Qinghao LYU, Ruilin QI, Hongrui ZHANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of 5 Cultivation Types of Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. at Branching Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 90-99. |
[15] | Menghua ZHAI, Minghui SUN, Xuerui LI, Xinlong XU, Haizhou GAO, Jusong ZHANG. Effects of DPC on Plant Type Shaping of Cotton Under Different Plant Spacing Configurations [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 145-156. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||