Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 182-191.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0553
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Juxian GUO1(), Bishan OUYANG2, Guihua LI1(
), Mei FU1, Wenlong LUO1, Shanwei LUO1, Meilian LU2
Received:
2022-07-04
Accepted:
2022-10-31
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-05-17
Contact:
Guihua LI
郭巨先1(), 欧阳碧珊2, 李桂花1(
), 符梅1, 罗文龙1, 骆善伟1, 陆美莲2
通讯作者:
李桂花
作者简介:
郭巨先 E-mail:guojuxian2021@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Juxian GUO, Bishan OUYANG, Guihua LI, Mei FU, Wenlong LUO, Shanwei LUO, Meilian LU. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Quality and Soil of Continuous Crop Chinese Flowering Cabbage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 182-191.
郭巨先, 欧阳碧珊, 李桂花, 符梅, 罗文龙, 骆善伟, 陆美莲. 微生物有机肥对连作菜薹生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 182-191.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0553
处理 Treatment | 基肥 Basal fertilizer | 第2次施肥 The second fertilizer | 第3次施肥 The third fertilizer | 第4次施肥 The fourth fertilizer |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T1 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T2 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T3 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T4 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 |
Table 1 Treats of fertilizer
处理 Treatment | 基肥 Basal fertilizer | 第2次施肥 The second fertilizer | 第3次施肥 The third fertilizer | 第4次施肥 The fourth fertilizer |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T1 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T2 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T3 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 复合肥75 Compound fertilizer 75 |
T4 | 有机肥3 000 Bio-organic fertilizer 3 000 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 | 有机肥1 500 Bio-organic fertilizer 1 500 |
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 薹长 Flower stalk length/cm | 单株质量 Plant weight/g | 主薹质量 Flower stalk weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 39.75±2.63 b | 33.50±2.64 c | 142.25±19.50 c | 116.00±15.42 d |
T1 | 49.25±2.50 a | 43.50±3.41 a | 194.25±17.59 b | 142.00±17.26 cd |
T2 | 43.71±1.50 b | 38.43±2.06 b | 174.68±18.31 b | 138.36±16.85 bc |
T3 | 49.25±0.95 a | 44.50±2.38 a | 239.00±30.82 a | 196.25±18.71 b |
T4 | 49.00±1.15 a | 44.25±1.71 a | 275.50±35.06 a | 237.75±30.83 a |
Table 2 Growth of Chinese flowering cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 薹长 Flower stalk length/cm | 单株质量 Plant weight/g | 主薹质量 Flower stalk weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 39.75±2.63 b | 33.50±2.64 c | 142.25±19.50 c | 116.00±15.42 d |
T1 | 49.25±2.50 a | 43.50±3.41 a | 194.25±17.59 b | 142.00±17.26 cd |
T2 | 43.71±1.50 b | 38.43±2.06 b | 174.68±18.31 b | 138.36±16.85 bc |
T3 | 49.25±0.95 a | 44.50±2.38 a | 239.00±30.82 a | 196.25±18.71 b |
T4 | 49.00±1.15 a | 44.25±1.71 a | 275.50±35.06 a | 237.75±30.83 a |
处理 Treatment | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·100 g-1) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar/(mg·100 g-1) | 蛋白质 Protein/(mg·100 g-1) | 粗纤维 Crude fibre/% | 可溶性固体物 Soluble solids/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 42.20±0.02 c | 1.185±0.009 b | 1.655±0.003 c | 0.660±0.006 c | 3.090±0.003 b |
T1 | 43.25±0.09 c | 1.185±0.009 b | 1.675±0.003 c | 0.660±0.006 c | 3.295±0.002 b |
T2 | 44.15±0.03 b | 1.095±0.003 c | 1.775±0.014 b | 0.635±0.003 d | 3.995±0.005 b |
T3 | 41.95±0.14 d | 1.315±0.003 a | 1.655±0.014 c | 0.760±0.006 a | 3.995±0.001 b |
T4 | 44.85±0.03 a | 1.195±0.003 b | 1.860±0.023 a | 0.695±0.003 b | 4.245±0.003 a |
Table 3 Quality of Chinese flowering cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 维生素C Vitamin C/(mg·100 g-1) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar/(mg·100 g-1) | 蛋白质 Protein/(mg·100 g-1) | 粗纤维 Crude fibre/% | 可溶性固体物 Soluble solids/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 42.20±0.02 c | 1.185±0.009 b | 1.655±0.003 c | 0.660±0.006 c | 3.090±0.003 b |
T1 | 43.25±0.09 c | 1.185±0.009 b | 1.675±0.003 c | 0.660±0.006 c | 3.295±0.002 b |
T2 | 44.15±0.03 b | 1.095±0.003 c | 1.775±0.014 b | 0.635±0.003 d | 3.995±0.005 b |
T3 | 41.95±0.14 d | 1.315±0.003 a | 1.655±0.014 c | 0.760±0.006 a | 3.995±0.001 b |
T4 | 44.85±0.03 a | 1.195±0.003 b | 1.860±0.023 a | 0.695±0.003 b | 4.245±0.003 a |
处理 Treatment | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali-hydrolyzable N/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg-1) | 电导率 Electrical conductivity/(ms·cm-1) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 24.42±0.07 d | 99.26±2.97 e | 114.22±2.54 c | 405.01±3.46 b | 0.165±0.003 d | 6.35±0.01 a |
T1 | 24.93±0.19 d | 140.81±4.46 d | 206.72±3.81 a | 441.02±1.15 a | 0.365±0.023 c | 6.14±0.02 a |
T2 | 28.47±0.05 c | 155.14±2.12 c | 195.71±0.00 a | 400.50±2.59 b | 0.417±0.006 b | 6.36±0.03 a |
T3 | 32.19±1.82 b | 166.57±1.21 b | 189.10±4.58 a | 339.23±3.22 d | 0.420±0.003 b | 6.54±0.02 a |
T4 | 38.99±0.31 a | 196.17±6.39 a | 144.54±4.49 b | 384.67±6.64 c | 0.455±0.003 a | 6.53±0.02 a |
Table 4 Soil chemical properties under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali-hydrolyzable N/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg-1) | 电导率 Electrical conductivity/(ms·cm-1) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 24.42±0.07 d | 99.26±2.97 e | 114.22±2.54 c | 405.01±3.46 b | 0.165±0.003 d | 6.35±0.01 a |
T1 | 24.93±0.19 d | 140.81±4.46 d | 206.72±3.81 a | 441.02±1.15 a | 0.365±0.023 c | 6.14±0.02 a |
T2 | 28.47±0.05 c | 155.14±2.12 c | 195.71±0.00 a | 400.50±2.59 b | 0.417±0.006 b | 6.36±0.03 a |
T3 | 32.19±1.82 b | 166.57±1.21 b | 189.10±4.58 a | 339.23±3.22 d | 0.420±0.003 b | 6.54±0.02 a |
T4 | 38.99±0.31 a | 196.17±6.39 a | 144.54±4.49 b | 384.67±6.64 c | 0.455±0.003 a | 6.53±0.02 a |
处理 Treatment | 脲酶 Urease/(μg·d-1·g-1 DW) | 酸性磷酸酶 Acid phosphatase/(μmol·d-1·g-1 DW) | 过氧化氢酶 Catalase/(μmol·d-1·g-1 DW) | 蔗糖酶 Sucrase/(m·d-1·g-1 DW) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 953.43±9.91 a | 22.64±1.04 c | 54.71±0.72 a | 39.31±0.22 d |
T1 | 789.43±13.67 c | 22.85±0.66 c | 54.35±0.52 a | 65.25±2.63 c |
T2 | 903.96±7.82 b | 29.94±0.36 a | 54.35±0.63 a | 70.16±3.24 bc |
T3 | 902.54±9.10 b | 26.79±0.42 b | 57.53±2.11 a | 75.31±0.90 b |
T4 | 873.47±13.09 b | 27.87±0.95 ab | 58.76±2.95 a | 85.27±4.95 a |
Table 5 Soil enzyme activity under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 脲酶 Urease/(μg·d-1·g-1 DW) | 酸性磷酸酶 Acid phosphatase/(μmol·d-1·g-1 DW) | 过氧化氢酶 Catalase/(μmol·d-1·g-1 DW) | 蔗糖酶 Sucrase/(m·d-1·g-1 DW) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 953.43±9.91 a | 22.64±1.04 c | 54.71±0.72 a | 39.31±0.22 d |
T1 | 789.43±13.67 c | 22.85±0.66 c | 54.35±0.52 a | 65.25±2.63 c |
T2 | 903.96±7.82 b | 29.94±0.36 a | 54.35±0.63 a | 70.16±3.24 bc |
T3 | 902.54±9.10 b | 26.79±0.42 b | 57.53±2.11 a | 75.31±0.90 b |
T4 | 873.47±13.09 b | 27.87±0.95 ab | 58.76±2.95 a | 85.27±4.95 a |
处理 Treatment | 细菌 Bacteria/(107 cfu·g-1 FW) | 真菌 Fungi/(104 cfu·g-1 FW) | 放线菌 Actinomycetes/(106 cfu·g-1 FW) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.14±0.22 c | 4.63±0.21 c | 10.02±0.28 b |
T1 | 6.27±0.21 c | 4.11±0.14 c | 8.35±0.37 c |
T2 | 8.43±0.22 b | 8.30±0.29 a | 14.13±0.52 a |
T3 | 6.02±0.22 c | 7.11±0.40 b | 14.79±0.79 a |
T4 | 11.09±0.46 a | 8.30±0.44 a | 14.63±0.55 a |
Table 6 Microbial populations in soil under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 细菌 Bacteria/(107 cfu·g-1 FW) | 真菌 Fungi/(104 cfu·g-1 FW) | 放线菌 Actinomycetes/(106 cfu·g-1 FW) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.14±0.22 c | 4.63±0.21 c | 10.02±0.28 b |
T1 | 6.27±0.21 c | 4.11±0.14 c | 8.35±0.37 c |
T2 | 8.43±0.22 b | 8.30±0.29 a | 14.13±0.52 a |
T3 | 6.02±0.22 c | 7.11±0.40 b | 14.79±0.79 a |
T4 | 11.09±0.46 a | 8.30±0.44 a | 14.63±0.55 a |
处理 Ttreatment | ACE指数 ACE index | Chao 1 指数 Chao 1 index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 香农指数 Shannon index | 覆盖率Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T4 | 1 777.02±15.39 Aa | 1 791.31±13.47 Aa | 0.994 0±0.000 2 Aa | 9.20±.014 Aa | 1.00±0.00 Aa |
CK | 1 770.87±20.91 Aa | 1 778.64±26.20 Aa | 0.992 2±0.000 2 Bb | 9.02±.013 Bb | 1.00±0.00 Aa |
Table 7 Alpha diversity index of soil bacteria community
处理 Ttreatment | ACE指数 ACE index | Chao 1 指数 Chao 1 index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 香农指数 Shannon index | 覆盖率Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T4 | 1 777.02±15.39 Aa | 1 791.31±13.47 Aa | 0.994 0±0.000 2 Aa | 9.20±.014 Aa | 1.00±0.00 Aa |
CK | 1 770.87±20.91 Aa | 1 778.64±26.20 Aa | 0.992 2±0.000 2 Bb | 9.02±.013 Bb | 1.00±0.00 Aa |
处理 Ttreatment | ACE 指数 ACE index | Chao1 指数 Chao 1 index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 香农指数 Shannon index | 覆盖率Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T4 | 640.38±116.81a | 646.47±116.92 a | 0.94±0.39 a | 6.20±0.96 a | 1.00±0.00 a |
CK | 559.12±79.43 a | 564.86±79.24 a | 0.89±0.33 a | 4.50±0.39 b | 1.00±0.00 a |
Table 8 Alpha diversity index of soil fungal community
处理 Ttreatment | ACE 指数 ACE index | Chao1 指数 Chao 1 index | 辛普森指数 Simpson index | 香农指数 Shannon index | 覆盖率Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T4 | 640.38±116.81a | 646.47±116.92 a | 0.94±0.39 a | 6.20±0.96 a | 1.00±0.00 a |
CK | 559.12±79.43 a | 564.86±79.24 a | 0.89±0.33 a | 4.50±0.39 b | 1.00±0.00 a |
1 | 张华,刘自珠. 菜薹(菜心)的市场需求与育种现状[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2010 (3): 10-12. |
ZHANG H, LIU Z Z. The market demand and the breeding of Chinese flowering cabbage [J]. China Veget., 2010(3):10-12. | |
2 | 陈汉才,吴增祥,林悦欣,等. 广东菜心、芥蓝研究现状与展望[J]. 广东农业科学, 2021,48 (9): 62-71. |
CHEN H C, WU Z X, LIN Y X, et al.. Research status and prospect of flowering Chinese cabbage and Chinese kale in Guangdong [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2021,48 (9): 62-71. | |
3 | LIU Z X, LIU J J, YU Z H, et al.. Long-term continuous cropping of soybean is comparable to crop rotation in mediating microbial abundance, diversity and community composition [J/OL]. Soil Tillage Res., 2020, 197:104503 [2022-06-04]. . |
4 | 郑立伟,赵阳阳,王一冰,等.不同连作年限甜瓜种植土壤性质和微生物多样性[J].微生物学通报,2022,49(1):101-114. |
ZHENG L W, ZHAO Y Y, WANG Y B, et al.. Soil properties and microbial diversity in the muskmelon fields after continuous cropping for different years [J]. Microbiol. China, 2022,49(1):101-114. | |
5 | SUN J B, ZOU L P, LI W B, et al.. Soil microbial and chemical properties influenced by continuous cropping of banana [J]. Sci. Agric., 2018: 75 (5): 420-425. |
6 | 蒋玉根,邵赛男,蒋沈悦,等. 施肥对连作大棚蔬菜产量、土壤养分和微生物种群的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2020,61(5) : 927-931. |
JIANG Y G, SHAO S N, JIANG S Y, et al.. Effects of fertilization on yield of vegetable, soil nutrient and microbial population in continuous croping greenhouse [J]. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2020,61(5): 927-931. | |
7 | 宋秀丽, 吴舒婷, 李锦辉,等. 土壤微生物群落对连作种植制度的响应[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(1): 172-181. |
SONG X L, WU S T, LI J H, et al.. Response of soil microbial community to continuous cropping system [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2022, 30(1): 172-181. | |
8 | 邹锦丰, 周传志. 微生物肥料研究进展及发展前景[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021 (22): 142-144. |
ZHOU J F, ZHOU C Z. Research progress and development prospect of microbial fertilizer [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021 (22): 142-144. | |
9 | 安祥瑞,江尚焘,谢昶琰,等.减施化肥配施有机肥对荔枝园土壤微生物区系的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2022,33( 4) : 1099-1108. |
AN X R, JIANG S T, XIE C Y, et al.. Effects of reducing chemical fertilizers combined with organic fertilizers on soil microbial commu-nity in litchi orchards [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2022, 33(4): 1099-1108. | |
10 | 于会丽,徐国益,路绪强,等.微生物菌剂对连作西瓜土壤微生物环境及果实品质的影响[J].果树学报,2020,37(7):1025-1035. |
YU H L, XU G Y, LU X Q, et al.. Effects of microbial agents on soil micro environment and fruit quality of watermelon under continuous cropping [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2020,37(7):1025-1035. | |
11 | MAHESH N. Microbial fertilizer effect in soil enhancement [J/OL]. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol., 2021,13(4):465 [2022-06-04]. . |
12 | 黄锐,王进闯,陈淼,等. 基于宏基因组学方法分析化肥减施对热带地区菜地土壤微生物群落的影响[J].热带作物学报, 2022,43(8):1716-1727. |
HUANG R, WANG J C, CHEN M, et al.. Soil microbial community characteristics in a tropical vegetable soil under different chemical fertilizer reduction based on metagenomic analysis [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2022,43(8):1716-1727. | |
13 | 刘沙沙, 李兵, 张古彬,等. 有机肥替代化肥对豫东地区上海青生长及氮磷利用的影响 [J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(8): 14-18, 47. |
LIU S S, LI B, ZHANG G B, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on growth and N/P utilization ratio in brassica campestris in East Henan [J]. J. Agric., 2019, 9(8): 14-18, 47. | |
14 | GAO J X, NING X, YIN C, et al.. Synergistic effects of organic fertilizer and corn straw on microorganisms of pepper continuous cropping soil in China [J]. Bioengi. Bugs, 2020,11(1):1258-1268. |
15 | 柳玲玲, 芶久兰, 何佳芳,等. 生物有机肥对连作马铃薯及土壤生化性状的影响[J]. 土壤, 2017, 49(4): 706-711. |
LIU L L, GOU J L, HE J F, et al.. Effects of different bio-organic fertilizers on potato production and soil biochemical characteristics in a continuous cropping system [J]. Soils, 2017, 49(4): 706-711. | |
16 | 雷菲, 张冬明, 吴宇佳,等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对樱桃番茄产量、品质和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(6): 1269-1277. |
LEI F, ZHANG D M, WU Y J, et al.. Influences of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer application on yield and quality of cherry tomato and structure of soil microbial community [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2021, 43(6): 1269-1277. | |
17 | 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2003:1-191. |
18 | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000:125-233. |
19 | 林先贵.土壤微生物研究原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010: 431. |
LIN X G. Principles and Methods of Soil Microbiology Research [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2010: 431. | |
20 | 童辉, 袁祖华, 彭莹, 等. 木霉菌有机肥配施化肥对菜薹产量和品质的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2021 (20): 66-68. |
TONG H, YUAN Z H, PENG Y, et al.. Effects of trichoderma bio-organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of stalk Chinese cabbage [J]. J. Changjiang Veget., 2021 (20): 66-68. | |
21 | 王冰清, 尹能文, 郑棉海, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(1): 242-247. |
WANG B Q, YIN N W, ZHENG M H, et al.. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and organic manure supplement on vegetables yield and quality [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2012, 28(1): 242-247. | |
22 | ZHANG N, HE X, ZHANG J, et al.. Suppression of fusarium wilt of banana with application of bio-organic fertilizers [J]. Pedosphere, 2014, 24(5):613-624. |
23 | YANG W N, YU L, LUO D H, et al.. Effect of combined application of biochar with chemical fertilizer and organic fertilizer on soil phosphatase activity and microbial community [J]. Environ. Sci.,2022, 43(1):540-549. |
24 | 王一昭, 陈花. 菌糠复合物对小白菜幼苗期土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2021, 67(10): 56-61. |
WANG Y Z, CHEN H. Effects of fungus chaff complex on soil enzyme activity [J]. Shaanxi J. Agric. Sci., 2021, 67(10): 56-61. | |
25 | 王磊, 高方胜, 曹逼力, 等. 有机肥和化肥配施对不同熟期大白菜土壤生物特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 66-72. |
WANG L, GAO F S, CAO B L, et al.. Effects of combined organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer application on soil biological characteristics,yield,and quality of Chinese cabbage with different maturity periods [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2022, 41(1): 66-72. | |
26 | 姜蓉, 徐智, 汤利. 化肥减量配施不同有机肥对设施菊花土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2017, 32(5): 895-902. |
JIANG R, XU Z, TANG L. Effects of different organic fertilizers on soil microbial functional diversity of greenhouse chrysanthemum under chemical fertilizers reduction [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ., 2017, 32(5): 895-902. | |
27 | LI R Y, PANG Z Q, ZHOU Y M, et al.. Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in sugarcane fields applied with organic fertilizer [J/OL]. Biomed. Res. Intern., 2020: 9381506 [2022-06-04]. . |
28 | ZHOU N, MU M J, YANG M, et al.. The effect of microbial fertilizer on the growth, rhizospheric environment and medicinal quality of Fritillaria taipaiensis [J/OL]. Horticulturae, 2021,7(11): 500 [2022-06-04]. . |
[1] | Haiyan LI, Ting ZHANG, Xinchang LI, Ling ZHANG, Pei WANG, Minhu BAO. Screening and Identification of a Strain of Bacillus velezensis Against Botrytis cinerea [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 110-118. |
[2] | Zhien LIU, Yong HE, Zhicheng WANG, Xiaokang ZHAN, Tingbao WANG, Yaowei LIU, Zhihong TIAN. Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis of Growth Regulating Factor GRF Gene Family in Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 18-27. |
[3] | Qi ZHOU, Qiang LIU, Jing ZHANG, Chaochao DENG, Zhenlong WANG, Yang LIU, Fang WU, Hao CHANG, Yanfang ZHOU, Cuicui SU, Zhiguo SHI, Zhengrui GAO, Fengjie MA. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Soil Biological Characteristics of Pumpkin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[4] | Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth, Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217. |
[5] | Xiaodan WU, Li GAO, Tiangeng GONG, Xiangfeng KONG, Yuzhou JIANG, Guixia JIA. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer and Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Lilium [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 221-229. |
[6] | Darong LI, Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Meide ZHANG, Xiaogang JIANG, Jinwen YOU, Hua WANG. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Properties of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[7] | Xueqing MA, Aoran JI, Jiaoli ZHENG, Chunxia CAO, Yan GONG, Daye HUANG, Beibei WANG. Research Progress on Growth-promoting Mechanism and Application of Plant Growth-promoting Rhizobacteria [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 13-23. |
[8] | Tingting MA, Yanrong ZHAO, Yuqing WEI, Yuejuan WANG, Xuefei WANG, Erdong ZHANG. Dynamic Characteristics of Stem Growth and Sugar Accumulation of Sweet Sorghum at Late Growth Stage Under Soil Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 42-50. |
[9] | Fei YANG, Zhongke FENG, Yangyang ZHOU, Wensheng CHENG, Zhichao WANG. Construction of A Standardized Height-diameter Equation for the Main Tree Species in China Suitable for the GlobalAllomeTree International Data Platform [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 62-71. |
[10] | Mei WU, Jinzhu ZHANG, Zhenhua WANG, Jian LIU, Yue WEN, Xuanzhi LI. Effects of Water and Air Interaction on Physiological Growth and Yield of Maize Under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 189-200. |
[11] | Li MA, Tingting CAO, Youwei FAN, Zhiyu REN, Chun LIU, Suxia YUAN. Effects of Different Rooting Reagents on Rooting of Miniature Potted Rose Cuttings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 50-60. |
[12] | Yanbo FU, Bingbing LENG, Qingyong BIAN, Zhiduo DONG, Guohong LIU, Haifeng LI, Yunmeng WEN, Wenbo GUO, Wanxu ZHANG. Passivation Effect of Biochar on Soil Cadmium Pollution and Rape Growth [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 183-190. |
[13] | Shouhua PENG, Mingming XU, Jiqiang WEI, Lijun LIANG, Quan YE, Xiaoyuan CHI, Shaofeng ZHANG, Xiangli DONG. Effects of Increase Applying of Biofertilizer Strain FBR1 on Growth Development and Yield of Peanut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 200-205. |
[14] | Zhimin YANG, Huihao ZHANG, Yuanyuan ZHANG, Hongyan DU, Xiaodong LIU, Yaguang HOU, Yi WANG, Daolong XU, Jingui HUANG, Xiaoning CHENG, Yang SUI, Ruili WANG, Chao YU, Lingling ZHAO, Chunmei CHEN, Ru YA, Li JIA, Mingyue ZHANG, Hongwei WANG, Songyao YAO, Ying ZHAO, Ke SHAO. Identification of Streptomyces rochei HM85 and Its Biocontrol and Growth-promoting Effects on Sugar Beet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 148-155. |
[15] | Yangyang DU, Yuanyuan BAO, Xiangyu LIU, Xinyong ZHANG. Effects of Tartary Buckwheat Rotation on Enzyme Activities and Microorganisms in Rhizosphere Soil of Cultivated Potato in Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 192-200. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||