Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 200-205.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0136
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shouhua PENG1(), Mingming XU1, Jiqiang WEI1, Lijun LIANG1, Quan YE1, Xiaoyuan CHI2, Shaofeng ZHANG3, Xiangli DONG4(
)
Received:
2023-02-28
Accepted:
2023-05-08
Online:
2024-06-15
Published:
2024-06-12
Contact:
Xiangli DONG
彭守华1(), 许铭铭1, 尉继强1, 梁丽君1, 叶全1, 迟晓元2, 张少峰3, 董向丽4(
)
通讯作者:
董向丽
作者简介:
彭守华 E-mail: whnkypsh@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shouhua PENG, Mingming XU, Jiqiang WEI, Lijun LIANG, Quan YE, Xiaoyuan CHI, Shaofeng ZHANG, Xiangli DONG. Effects of Increase Applying of Biofertilizer Strain FBR1 on Growth Development and Yield of Peanut[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 200-205.
彭守华, 许铭铭, 尉继强, 梁丽君, 叶全, 迟晓元, 张少峰, 董向丽. 生物菌肥FBR1不同施用方式对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 200-205.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0136
处理 Treatment | 出苗期 Seedling stage(m/d) | 出苗率 Seedling rate/% | 花期 Flowering period/d | 成熟期 Mature period(m/d) | 实收穴数 Number of actual received |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 5/30 | 98.91 aAB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 166.00 aA |
CK2 | 5/30 | 99.40 aA | 36.67 aA | 9/28 | 165.00 abAB |
T1 | 5/30 | 99.30 aAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 165.33 abA |
T2 | 5/30 | 98.71 abAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 164.00 abcAB |
T3 | 5/30 | 98.51 bB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 163.33 bA |
T4 | 5/30 | 99.21 aA | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 159.33 cB |
Table 1 Fertility, seedling emergence and plant establishment of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 出苗期 Seedling stage(m/d) | 出苗率 Seedling rate/% | 花期 Flowering period/d | 成熟期 Mature period(m/d) | 实收穴数 Number of actual received |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 5/30 | 98.91 aAB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 166.00 aA |
CK2 | 5/30 | 99.40 aA | 36.67 aA | 9/28 | 165.00 abAB |
T1 | 5/30 | 99.30 aAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 165.33 abA |
T2 | 5/30 | 98.71 abAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 164.00 abcAB |
T3 | 5/30 | 98.51 bB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 163.33 bA |
T4 | 5/30 | 99.21 aA | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 159.33 cB |
处理 Treatment | 主茎高 Main stem height /cm | 侧枝长Lateral branch length/cm | 总分枝数 No. of total branches | 结果枝数 No. of podding branches | 有效分枝比例Effective branching ratio/% | 总果针数 No. of total pod needle | 无效果针数 No. of no effect needle | 有效果针比例 Ratio of effect needle/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 69.40 abAB | 74.57 aA | 8.03 aA | 6.23 aA | 77.40 aA | 33.10 aA | 14.57 aA | 56.05 aA |
CK2 | 68.83 aA | 71.50 aA | 8.60 aA | 6.53 aA | 75.99 aA | 30.40 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.30 aA |
T1 | 69.03 aAB | 73.37 aA | 8.37 aA | 6.33 aA | 75.64 aA | 33.50 aA | 13.20 aA | 60.71 aA |
T2 | 70.47 aA | 74.53 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.40 aA | 77.15 aA | 34.57 aA | 14.90 aA | 57.01 aA |
T3 | 67.53 abAB | 73.33 aA | 8.57 aA | 6.40 aA | 74.77 aA | 30.93 aA | 11.70 aA | 62.27 aA |
T4 | 65.43 bB | 71.07 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.30 aA | 76.17 aA | 30.93 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.56 aA |
Table 2 Plant development of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 主茎高 Main stem height /cm | 侧枝长Lateral branch length/cm | 总分枝数 No. of total branches | 结果枝数 No. of podding branches | 有效分枝比例Effective branching ratio/% | 总果针数 No. of total pod needle | 无效果针数 No. of no effect needle | 有效果针比例 Ratio of effect needle/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 69.40 abAB | 74.57 aA | 8.03 aA | 6.23 aA | 77.40 aA | 33.10 aA | 14.57 aA | 56.05 aA |
CK2 | 68.83 aA | 71.50 aA | 8.60 aA | 6.53 aA | 75.99 aA | 30.40 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.30 aA |
T1 | 69.03 aAB | 73.37 aA | 8.37 aA | 6.33 aA | 75.64 aA | 33.50 aA | 13.20 aA | 60.71 aA |
T2 | 70.47 aA | 74.53 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.40 aA | 77.15 aA | 34.57 aA | 14.90 aA | 57.01 aA |
T3 | 67.53 abAB | 73.33 aA | 8.57 aA | 6.40 aA | 74.77 aA | 30.93 aA | 11.70 aA | 62.27 aA |
T4 | 65.43 bB | 71.07 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.30 aA | 76.17 aA | 30.93 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.56 aA |
处理 Treatment | 饱果数 No. of full pods | 双饱果数 No. of double full pods | 秕果数 No. of blighted pod | 总果数 No. of total pod | 百果重 100-pod weight/g | 百仁重 100-seed weight/g | 千克果数No. of kilogram pods | 千克仁数No. of kilogram seeds | 出仁率 Kernel rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 14.67 abA | 6.93 aA | 3.83 aA | 18.53 abA | 228.90 aA | 83.83 aA | 590 aA | 1 226 aA | 66.40 aA |
CK2 | 13.73 bA | 6.03 aA | 4.23 aA | 18.00 bA | 223.05 aA | 86.39 aA | 599 aA | 1 269 aA | 65.42 aA |
T1 | 16.00 aA | 7.83 aA | 4.30 aA | 20.30 aA | 231.31 aA | 81.59 aA | 603 aA | 1 229 aA | 66.05 aA |
T2 | 14.73 abA | 6.87 aA | 4.67 aA | 19.67 abA | 234.08 aA | 84.82 aA | 597 aA | 1 235 aA | 65.89 aA |
T3 | 14.83 abA | 7.33 aA | 4.40 aA | 19.23 abA | 229.33 aA | 82.66 aA | 597 aA | 1 248 aA | 66.18 aA |
T4 | 14.63 abA | 6.83 aA | 3.77 aA | 18.43 abA | 229.00 aA | 82.60 aA | 594 aA | 1 365 aA | 65.88 aA |
Table 3 Pod development of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 饱果数 No. of full pods | 双饱果数 No. of double full pods | 秕果数 No. of blighted pod | 总果数 No. of total pod | 百果重 100-pod weight/g | 百仁重 100-seed weight/g | 千克果数No. of kilogram pods | 千克仁数No. of kilogram seeds | 出仁率 Kernel rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 14.67 abA | 6.93 aA | 3.83 aA | 18.53 abA | 228.90 aA | 83.83 aA | 590 aA | 1 226 aA | 66.40 aA |
CK2 | 13.73 bA | 6.03 aA | 4.23 aA | 18.00 bA | 223.05 aA | 86.39 aA | 599 aA | 1 269 aA | 65.42 aA |
T1 | 16.00 aA | 7.83 aA | 4.30 aA | 20.30 aA | 231.31 aA | 81.59 aA | 603 aA | 1 229 aA | 66.05 aA |
T2 | 14.73 abA | 6.87 aA | 4.67 aA | 19.67 abA | 234.08 aA | 84.82 aA | 597 aA | 1 235 aA | 65.89 aA |
T3 | 14.83 abA | 7.33 aA | 4.40 aA | 19.23 abA | 229.33 aA | 82.66 aA | 597 aA | 1 248 aA | 66.18 aA |
T4 | 14.63 abA | 6.83 aA | 3.77 aA | 18.43 abA | 229.00 aA | 82.60 aA | 594 aA | 1 365 aA | 65.88 aA |
处理 Treatment | 果针重 Pod needle weight/g | 秸秆重 Straw weight /g | 荚果重 Pod weight/g | 总干重 Total dry weight/g | 收获指数Harvest index/% | 小区荚果 产量 Small plot pod yield/kg | 荚果产量 Pod yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 小区籽仁 产量 Small plot seed yield/kg | 籽仁产量 Seed yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 1.67 aA | 20.36 aA | 24.65 bA | 46.69 bB | 52.67 aA | 7.97 aA | 5 975.22 aA | 5.30 aA | 3 971.82 aA |
CK2 | 1.65 aA | 20.49 aA | 23.33 bA | 45.47 bB | 51.27 aA | 7.67 aA | 5 750.40 aA | 5.02 aA | 3 761.99 aA |
T1 | 2.20 aA | 21.74 aA | 28.67 aA | 52.60 aA | 54.51 aA | 8.09 aA | 6 060.15 aA | 5.34 aA | 4 004.30 aA |
T2 | 2.08 aA | 21.18 aA | 25.65 bA | 48.91 bB | 52.41 aA | 7.86 aA | 5 890.29 aA | 5.19 aA | 3 889.39 aA |
T3 | 1.81 aA | 19.90 aA | 25.32 bA | 47.03 bB | 53.76 aA | 8.02 aA | 6 010.19 aA | 5.31 aA | 3 976.82 aA |
T4 | 1.80 aA | 19.56 aA | 25.99 abA | 47.35 bB | 54.80 aA | 7.55 aA | 5 657.98 aA | 4.98 aA | 3 729.52 aA |
Table 4 Dry matter distribution and yield of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 果针重 Pod needle weight/g | 秸秆重 Straw weight /g | 荚果重 Pod weight/g | 总干重 Total dry weight/g | 收获指数Harvest index/% | 小区荚果 产量 Small plot pod yield/kg | 荚果产量 Pod yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 小区籽仁 产量 Small plot seed yield/kg | 籽仁产量 Seed yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 1.67 aA | 20.36 aA | 24.65 bA | 46.69 bB | 52.67 aA | 7.97 aA | 5 975.22 aA | 5.30 aA | 3 971.82 aA |
CK2 | 1.65 aA | 20.49 aA | 23.33 bA | 45.47 bB | 51.27 aA | 7.67 aA | 5 750.40 aA | 5.02 aA | 3 761.99 aA |
T1 | 2.20 aA | 21.74 aA | 28.67 aA | 52.60 aA | 54.51 aA | 8.09 aA | 6 060.15 aA | 5.34 aA | 4 004.30 aA |
T2 | 2.08 aA | 21.18 aA | 25.65 bA | 48.91 bB | 52.41 aA | 7.86 aA | 5 890.29 aA | 5.19 aA | 3 889.39 aA |
T3 | 1.81 aA | 19.90 aA | 25.32 bA | 47.03 bB | 53.76 aA | 8.02 aA | 6 010.19 aA | 5.31 aA | 3 976.82 aA |
T4 | 1.80 aA | 19.56 aA | 25.99 abA | 47.35 bB | 54.80 aA | 7.55 aA | 5 657.98 aA | 4.98 aA | 3 729.52 aA |
1 | 孙海艳,侯乾,董文召,等.我国花生品种发展现状[J].中国种业,2022(7):15-17. |
2 | 迟晓元,许静,潘丽娟,等.不同花生种质荚果力学特性研究[J].花生学报,2022,51(4):18-28. |
CHI X Y, XU J, PAN L J, et al.. Study on pod mechanical properties of different peanut germplasms [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2022,51(4):18-28. | |
3 | 林倩,陈康,王永丽,等.烟台地区花生新品种试验示范[J].中国种业,2023(1):68-72. |
4 | 威海市地方史志办公室.威海年鉴2015[M].北京:方志出版社,2015:125. |
5 | 威海市地方史志办公室.威海年鉴2017[M].北京:方志出版社,2017,135. |
6 | 叶全,陈洪江.威海耕地[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2019:189-191. |
7 | 孟瑶,徐凤花,孟庆有,等.中国微生物肥料研究及应用进展[J].中国农学通报, 2008,24(6):276-283. |
MENG Y, XU F H, MENG Q Y, et al.. Current application status and prospect of microbiological fertilizer in China [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2008,24(6):276-283. | |
8 | 陈建生,李文金,康涛,等.花生上生物菌肥替代化肥减施增效技术研究[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(7):73-76. |
CHEN J S, LI W J, KANG T, et al.. Technique study on reducing application and increasing efficiency of peanut biological bacterial fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2021,53(7):73-76. | |
9 | 胡亚杰,韦建玉,卢健,等.枯草芽孢杆菌在农作物生产上的应用研究进展[J].作物研究,2019,33(2):167-172. |
HU Y J, WEI J Y, LU J, et al.. Research progress of Bacillus subtilis application in crops production [J]. Crop Res., 2019,33(2):167-172. | |
10 | 孙海艳,李荣德,史梦雅,等. 农作物品种试验规范 油料作物: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021. |
11 | 吴丽青,曲杰,程亮,等.不同种植密度对高油酸花生机收特性及产量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(5):47-50. |
WU L Q, QU J, CHENG L, et al.. Effects of different planting densities on high-oleic acid peanut yield and machanized harvest characteristics [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2020,52(5):47-50. | |
12 | 李峰,张甜,王铭伦,等.化肥减量配施生物肥对花生衰老特性、干物质积累及肥料利用效率的影响[J].花生学报,2022,51(1):9-16. |
LI F, ZHANG T, WANG M L, et al.. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on peanut senescence characteristics, dry matter accumulation and fertilizer utilization efficiency [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2022,51(1):9-16. | |
13 | 侯睿,张小红,张小军,等.生物菌肥在花生上施用效果的研究[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(8):78-83. |
HOU R, ZHANG X H, ZHANG X J, et al.. The application effect of biological bacterial fertilizer on peanut [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2017,33(8):78-83. | |
14 | 彭守华,尉继强,董向丽,等.花生施用不同菌肥的效应研究[J].农业科技通讯,2018(5):130-132. |
15 | 汤丰收,张新友,张俊,等.高油、高产花生新品种豫花9326抗旱生理特性及生产适应性研究[J].花生学报,2014,43(3):7-12. |
TANG F S, ZHANG X Y, ZHANG J, et al.. Research on physiological characteristics of drought resistance and productive adaptability of new peanut variety Yuhua 9326 with high oil and high yield [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2014,43(3):7-12. | |
16 | 甄志高,王晓林,段莹,等.不同种植密度对花生产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(2):90-91. |
ZHEN Z G, WANG X L, DUAN Y, et al.. Effect of different planting density on yield in peanut [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2004,20(2):90-91. | |
17 | 杨清夏,李欢,龙光强,等.基于有机肥和菌肥的玉米减肥增效研究[J].生态科学,2022,41(4):196-203. |
YANG Q X, LI H, LONG G Q, et al.. Study on reducing fertilizer and increasing use efficiency of maize based on organic fertilizer and bacterial fertilizer [J]. Ecol. Sci.,2022,41(4):196-203. | |
18 | 于占东,刘云峰,温丹,等.有机肥配施生物菌肥对设施蔬菜土壤改良及面条菜生长、品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2022,54(8):99-103. |
YU Z D, LIU Y F, WEN D, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizer combined with biological bacterial fertilizer on facility soil improvement and growth and quality of Silene conoidea L. [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2022,54(8):99-103. | |
19 | 肖孔操,刘杏梅,吴建军,等. 植物残体与土壤pH对农田土壤呼吸的影响研究[C]//面向未来的土壤科学(下册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集. 中国土壤学会,2012:499-500. |
20 | 阎世江,李照全,张治家.生物菌肥的研究现状与应用[J].北方园艺,2017(5):189-192. |
YAN S J, LI Z Q, ZHANG Z J. Research status and application of bacterial manure [J]. Northern Hortic., 2017(5):189-192. | |
21 | 刘亚东,刘景辉,卿香玉,等.生物菌肥对燕麦叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J].北方农业学报,2019,47(3):58-63. |
LIU Y D, LIU J H, QING X Y, et al.. Effect of the compound microbial fertilizer on the physiological characteristics and yield of oats [J]. J. Northern Agric., 2019,47(3):58-63. | |
22 | (日)比嘉照夫.农用与环保微生物[M].广州:广东世界图书出版公司,1999:8-11, 17. |
[1] | Zhenfei ZHANG, An YAN, Jing GUO, Yuhang ZHAO, Yilin YUAN, Peng LIU, Zuohao QU, Chuan YUAN. Research on Apple Yield Estimation Model Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 110-119. |
[2] | Jianfeng ZHANG, Wenfeng HOU, Yongqing WU, Kaixu LI, Xiaokun LI. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Interactions on Occurrence of Diseases and Insect Pests and Grain Yield of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 145-154. |
[3] | Caixia LYU, Yongfu LI, Huinan XIN, Na LI, Ning LAI, Qinglong GENG, Shuhuang CHEN. Effects of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate/Ammonium Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
[4] | Xueqing LIU, Jing WANG, Yi YANG, Huiqin WU, Yanhong WANG, Luyao WANG, Jiawei LU, Kaixuan ZHANG, Yuan ZHAI, Yan CHENG. Effect of Exogenous Ethephon on Defoliation and Yield of Pigmented Pepper [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 36-46. |
[5] | Qi ZHOU, Qiang LIU, Jing ZHANG, Chaochao DENG, Zhenlong WANG, Yang LIU, Fang WU, Hao CHANG, Yanfang ZHOU, Cuicui SU, Zhiguo SHI, Zhengrui GAO, Fengjie MA. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Soil Biological Characteristics of Pumpkin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[6] | Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth, Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217. |
[7] | Shichao CHEN, Ju WANG, Fuqiang GUO, Rui HAO, Jianping SHI. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Physiological Indexes and Yield of Protein Mulberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
[8] | Lijun DUAN, Xianhua DING, Weiqin LI, Shuangdui YAN. Investigation of Co-pyrolysis Behavior and Pyrolysis Product Analysis of Oak Bark and Corn Stalks [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 164-172. |
[9] | Guiqian ZHANG, Li ZHANG, Qian WANG, Caiyun LIU. Effect of Astragalus Polysaccharides on Colony Development and Honey Production in Honeybees [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 72-80. |
[10] | Yan WU, Leping ZOU, Huijie SONG, Dandan HU, Kailou LIU, Wanli LIANG. Effect of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined Urea on Ammonium Nitrogen of Surface Water and Early Rice Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 192-200. |
[11] | Darong LI, Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Meide ZHANG, Xiaogang JIANG, Jinwen YOU, Hua WANG. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Properties of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[12] | Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238. |
[13] | Qiang WU, Conglian WU, Xiaoyun WU, Jian WU, Xuanmei XU, Junsheng LAI, Weiyun HU, Bangchu GONG, Xibing JIANG. Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Yield and Fruit Quality of Castanea henryi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 228-237. |
[14] | Tingting LIU, Xiyu HAO, Hui WANG, Jingwen LENG, Shihang GONG, Wei LIU. Correlation Analysis Between Yield and Agronomical Traits of Different Foxtail Millet Varieties in Semi-arid Area of Western Jilin Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 50-60. |
[15] | Wenxuan SHI, Jinfang TAN, Qian ZHANG, Lantao LI, Yilun WANG. Effect of One-off Fertilization on Yield and Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency of Summer Maize in Different Ecological Regions [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 193-202. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||