Agronomic Traits and Effective Components of Different Tea Chrysanthemum Varieties in Coastal Area

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0536

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to screen out the varieties of tea Chrysanthemum suitable for cultivation and application in coastal areas， 13 agronomic traits related to plant， leaf and flower morphology and 3 effective components of 10 tea Chrysanthemum varieties were measured and compared. The ecological adaptability and nutritional quality of different varieties of tea Chrysanthemum in coastal areas were comprehensively evaluated by correlation analysis， principal component analysis and membership function method. The results showed that there were differences in agronomic traits among different varieties of tea Chrysanthemum， and the coefficient of variation ranged from 20.02% to 65.87%. The content of chlorogenic acid ranged from 0.55% to 1.32%. The content of 3，5-o-dicaffeoyl quinic acid ranged from 0.67% to 2.24%. The content of luteoloside ranged from 0.13% to 1.38%. 4 principal components were extracted by principal component analysis， with a cumulative contribution rate of 90.77%. Leaf length， leaf width， leaf weight， flower diameter， petal number， petal layer number and luteolin glycoside content could be used as the main evaluation indexes. Combined with the membership function method， the comprehensive evaluation of 10 varieties of tea Chrysanthemum showed that ‘Gonghuangju’ ‘Jinsihuangju’ ‘Xiaoqihuangju’ and ‘Yutai 1’ had better comprehensive performance and strong adaptability in coastal areas. The results could provide reference for the application and promotion of tea Chrysanthemum resources in coastal areas.

Key words: tea Chrysanthemun, agronomic traits, effective components, principal component analysis, comprehensive evaluation

摘要：

为筛选适宜滨海地区栽培应用的茶菊品种，测定比较了10个茶菊品种的植株、叶片及头状花序相关的13个农艺性状和3种有效成分，并利用相关分析、主成分分析结合隶属函数法对其在滨海地区的生态适应性和营养品质进行综合评价。结果表明，不同茶菊品种农艺性状间存在差异且变异丰富，变异系数在20.02%~65.87%之间；各品种绿原酸含量在0.55%~1.32%之间，3，5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸含量在0.67%~2.24%之间，木犀草苷含量在0.13%~1.38%之间。主成分分析提取到4个主成分，累计贡献率达90.77%，叶长、叶宽、叶片重、花径、花瓣数、花瓣层数及木犀草苷含量等指标可作为主要评价指标。结合隶属函数法对10个茶菊品种进行综合评价，得出‘贡黄菊’‘金丝皇菊’‘晓起皇菊’和‘玉台1号’综合表现较好，在滨海地区具有较强的适应性。研究结果为茶菊资源在滨海地区的推广应用提供参考。

关键词: 茶菊, 农艺性状, 有效成分, 主成分分析, 综合评价

CLC Number:

S571.9

Ding DING, Lingjie ZHENG, Hongbao WANG, Lijin ZHENG, Yanchao GUO. Agronomic Traits and Effective Components of Different Tea Chrysanthemum Varieties in Coastal Area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 45-53.

丁丁, 郑伶杰, 王红宝, 郑丽锦, 郭艳超. 滨海地区不同茶菊品种农艺性状及有效成分综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(10): 45-53.

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

1	陈俊愉.中国花卉品种分类学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2001: 218.
2	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M].一部. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020: 323-324.
3	任磊,赵夏陆,许靖,等. 4种茶菊对干旱胁迫的形态和生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(15): 5131-5139.
	REN L, ZHAO X L, XU J, et al.. Varied morphological and physiological responses to drought stress among four tea Chrysanthemum cultivars [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2015, 35(15): 5131-5139.
4	夏伟,谭政委,余永亮,等. 药用菊花种质资源研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(21): 37-38, 49.
	XIA W, TAN Z W, YU Y L, et al.. Research progress of medicinal Chrysanthemum germplasm resources [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(21): 37-38, 49.
5	孙叶硕,张国新,丁守鹏,等. 盐胁迫对樱桃番茄风味品质的影响[J]. 核农学报,2022,36(4): 838-844.
	SUN Y S, ZHANG G X, DING S P, et al.. Effects of salt stress on flavor compounds of cherry tomato fruits [J]. Acta Agric.Nucl. Sin., 2022, 36(4): 838-844.
6	汪涛,郭巧生,毛鹏飞,等. 不同产地杭菊植物学特征比较[J]. 中国中药杂志,2012,37(23): 3536-3539.
	WANG T, GUO Q S, MAO P F, et al.. Comparison of botanical characteristics of cultivated Chrysanthemum morifolium cv.‘Hangju’of different origins [J]. Chin. J. Chin. Mater Med., 2012, 37(23): 3536-3539.
7	朱德宁,韩宇,房伟民,等. 多花型园林小菊品质评价与品种筛选[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2018,41(2): 266-274.
	ZHU D N, HAN Y, FANG W M, et al.. Studies on the quality evaluation and variety selection of multi-flower garden Chrysanthemum [J]. Nanjing Agric.Univ., 2018, 41(2): 266-274.
8	张冬菊,张晓,吴鹏夫,等. 基于层次分析法的切花菊引种适应性评价[J]. 北方园艺,2013(22): 82-85.
	ZHANG D J, ZHANG X, WU P F, et al.. Introduction adaptability evaluation of cut Chrysanthemum based on analytic hierarchy process [J]. Northern Hortic., 2013(22): 82-85.
9	蒋琴杰,王艺光,房伟民,等. 叶用型食用菊品种筛选[J]. 核农学报,2020,34(1): 10-16.
	JIANG Q J, WAGN Y G, FANG W M, et al.. Selection of edible leaf-use Chrysanthemum [J]. Acta Agric.Nucl. Sin., 2020, 34(1): 10-16.
10	王江民,张建华,义鸣放,等. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南菊花: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
	WANG J M, ZHANG J H, YI M F, et al.. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stabilityChrysanthemum: [S]. Bejing: Standards Press of China, 2018.
11	马佳,刘雅辉,孙建平,等. Streptomyces TOR3209介导盐碱地金花葵根际的生态效应[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2020,43(2): 53-61.
	MA J, LIU Y H, SUN J P, et al.. Ecological effects of streptomyces TOR3209 on Hibiseu manihot L. rhizosphere soil of saline-alkali land [J]. J. Agric. Univ. Hebei, 2020, 43(2): 53-61.
12	郭方其,黑银秀,刘君,等. 利用层次分析法评价与筛选夏季切花多头菊品种[J]. 江西农业学报,2020,32(11): 25-31.
	GUO F Q, HEI Y X, LIU J, et al.. Evaluation and selection of summer spray cut Chrysanthemum varieties by analytic hierarchy process [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(11): 25-31.
13	何晓群. 多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2015: 152-174.
14	田小霞,毛培春,李杉杉,等. 紫花苜蓿苗期耐盐指标筛选及耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3): 545-553.
	TIAN X X, MAO P C, LI S S, et al.. Dete rmination of salt tolerant indexes and vomprehensive eva luation of salt tolerance at the seedlings of alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2017, 25(3): 545-553.
15	耿雷跃,马小定,崔迪,等. 水稻全生育期耐盐性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20 (2): 267-275.
	GENG L Y, MA X D, CUI D, et al.. Identification and evaluation method for saline tolerance in rice during the whole growth stage [J]. J. Plant Genetic Resour., 2019, 20 (2): 267-275.
16	刘引. 不同菊花种质资源农艺性状、化学成分和药理作用比较研究[D]. 武汉:湖北中医药大学, 2020.
	LIU Y. Comparative study on agronomic characterization, chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of different Chrysanthemum germplasm resources [D]. Wuhan: Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, 2020.
17	吕晋慧,任磊,李艳锋,等. 不同基因型茶菊对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2013,37(7): 656-664.
	LYU J H, REN L, LI Y F, et al.. Responses to salt stress among different genotypes of tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Plant Ecol. J., 2013, 37(7): 656-664.
18	陈乐,刘引,陈昌婕,等. 药用及茶用菊花种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(15): 5172-5188.
	CHEN L, LIU Y, CHEN C J, et al.. Analysis on genetic diversity of agronomic traits in Chrysanthemum germplasm for medicinal and tea use [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2022, 20(15): 5172-5188.
19	王启璋,王海滨,田洁. 基于主成分分析评价园林小菊资源在西宁地区的适应性[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2021,23(11): 62-72.
	WANG Q Z, WANG H B, TIAN J. Adaptability evaluation of garden Chrysanthemum resources in xining based on PCA [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021, 23(11): 62-72.
20	林海明,杜子芳. 主成分分析综合评价应该注意的问题[J]. 统计研究,2013,30(8): 25-31.
	LIN H M, DU Z F. Some problems in comprehensive evaluation in the principal component analysis [J]. Statistical Res., 2013, 30(8): 25-31.
21	吴盼婷,王江民,沈佳逾,等. 不同菊花品种根系、地上部和叶片相关指标分析及抗逆性评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2017,26(2): 46-54.
	WU P T, WANG J M, SHEN J Y, et al.. Analyses on related indexes of root, above-ground part and leaf of different cultivars of Chrysanthemum morifolium and stress resistance evaluation [J]. J. Plant Resour. Environ., 2017, 26(2): 46-54.

品种 Variety	花色 Color	来源 Source
贡白菊 Gongbaiju	白色 White	河南 Henan
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui	粉色 Pink	河南 Henan
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
黄滁龙 Huangchulong	白色 White	北京 Beijing
乳荷 Ruhe	白色 White	北京 Beijing
玉台1号 Yutai 1	白色 White	北京 Beijing
黄金菊 Huangjinju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan

品种 Variety	花色 Color	来源 Source
贡白菊 Gongbaiju	白色 White	河南 Henan
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui	粉色 Pink	河南 Henan
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
黄滁龙 Huangchulong	白色 White	北京 Beijing
乳荷 Ruhe	白色 White	北京 Beijing
玉台1号 Yutai 1	白色 White	北京 Beijing
黄金菊 Huangjinju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju	黄色 Yellow	河南 Henan

品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	茎粗 Stem diameter/mm	冠幅 Crown width/cm	叶长 Leaf length/cm	叶宽 Leaf width/cm	叶重 Leaf weight/g
贡白菊 Gongbaiju	55.90±2.95 b	6.29±0.67 bc	44.43±4.08 cd	6.20±0.66 bc	3.70±0.40 b	0.30±0.08 ef
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui	56.07±2.87 b	5.95±1.31 bcd	40.83±6.19 de	7.47±1.66 ab	4.23±1.09 b	0.58±0.12 bc
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui	46.93±3.11 c	6.49±1.08 bc	47.20±1.82 c	7.43±1.48 ab	4.67±1.65 ab	0.69±0.03 b
黄滁龙 Huangchulong	31.67±3.33 d	4.32±0.96 d	35.20±3.27 e	3.83±1.33 c	2.43±0.67 b	0.20±0.03 f
乳荷 Ruhe	41.93±3.38 c	6.00±1.02 bcd	39.23±3.24 de	6.26±0.84 bc	3.43±0.91 b	0.32±0.05 ef
玉台1号 Yutai 1	45.33±1.76 c	7.77±0.62 ab	44.50±3.28 cd	6.44±1.87 bc	3.50±1.59 b	0.44±0.13 de
黄金菊 Huangjinju	33.13±3.07 d	5.54±0.63 cd	64.90±1.38 a	4.80±1.69 bc	2.64±1.00 b	0.19±0.04 f
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju	53.60±4.28 b	8.98±1.50 a	39.40±2.53 de	10.80±3.04 a	6.57±2.08 a	1.01±0.14 a
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju	65.50±1.32 a	7.67±0.70 ab	54.45±3.16 b	8.25±2.51 ab	4.20±1.89 b	0.50±0.08 cd
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju	66.67±2.66 a	6.33±0.77 bc	56.60±5.09 b	7.78±1.97 ab	4.28±1.23 b	0.41±0.24 de
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%	25.54	20.02	20.12	27.78	29.34	53.49

品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	茎粗 Stem diameter/mm	冠幅 Crown width/cm	叶长 Leaf length/cm	叶宽 Leaf width/cm	叶重 Leaf weight/g
贡白菊 Gongbaiju	55.90±2.95 b	6.29±0.67 bc	44.43±4.08 cd	6.20±0.66 bc	3.70±0.40 b	0.30±0.08 ef
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui	56.07±2.87 b	5.95±1.31 bcd	40.83±6.19 de	7.47±1.66 ab	4.23±1.09 b	0.58±0.12 bc
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui	46.93±3.11 c	6.49±1.08 bc	47.20±1.82 c	7.43±1.48 ab	4.67±1.65 ab	0.69±0.03 b
黄滁龙 Huangchulong	31.67±3.33 d	4.32±0.96 d	35.20±3.27 e	3.83±1.33 c	2.43±0.67 b	0.20±0.03 f
乳荷 Ruhe	41.93±3.38 c	6.00±1.02 bcd	39.23±3.24 de	6.26±0.84 bc	3.43±0.91 b	0.32±0.05 ef
玉台1号 Yutai 1	45.33±1.76 c	7.77±0.62 ab	44.50±3.28 cd	6.44±1.87 bc	3.50±1.59 b	0.44±0.13 de
黄金菊 Huangjinju	33.13±3.07 d	5.54±0.63 cd	64.90±1.38 a	4.80±1.69 bc	2.64±1.00 b	0.19±0.04 f
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju	53.60±4.28 b	8.98±1.50 a	39.40±2.53 de	10.80±3.04 a	6.57±2.08 a	1.01±0.14 a
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju	65.50±1.32 a	7.67±0.70 ab	54.45±3.16 b	8.25±2.51 ab	4.20±1.89 b	0.50±0.08 cd
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju	66.67±2.66 a	6.33±0.77 bc	56.60±5.09 b	7.78±1.97 ab	4.28±1.23 b	0.41±0.24 de
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%	25.54	20.02	20.12	27.78	29.34	53.49

品种 Variety	单花鲜重 Flower fresh weight/g	单花干重 Flower dry weight/g	花径 Flower diameter/cm	花瓣层数 Flower layers	花瓣数 Petals number	外轮瓣长 Petal length/cm	外轮瓣宽 Petal width/cm
贡白菊 Gongbaiju	1.75±0.22 e	0.24±0.03 b	4.02±0.08 d	9.33±0.58 c	210.33±39.76 ab	1.93±0.15 ef	0.77±0.06 a
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui	3.05±0.15 cd	0.27±0.01 b	5.28±0.30 b	7.00±1.00 d	101.83±9.85 d	3.75±0.12 b	0.33±0.05 e
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui	0.69±0.05 f	0.07±0.01 d	4.47±0.25 cd	1.33±0.58 e	34.67±4.58 e	2.75±0.06 c	0.35±0.05 e
黄滁龙 Huangchulong	1.84±0.09 bc	0.23±0.03 b	4.53±0.09 c	8.67±0.58 c	194.67±23.06 b	2.43±0.15 d	0.68±0.08 b
乳荷 Ruhe	1.13±0.10 e	0.16±0.03 c	4.48±0.17 cd	7.00±1.00 d	138.67±16.71 cd	2.23±0.15 de	0.67±0.05 b
玉台1号 Yutai 1	1.40±0.20 de	0.19±0.02 c	4.47±0.28 cd	8.67±0.58 c	158.33±9.07 c	2.03±0.06 ef	0.68±0.08 b
黄金菊 Huangjinju	0.34±0.04 f	0.04±0.01 d	2.15±0.23 e	11.00±0.00 b	196.67±12.22 b	1.77±0.25 f	0.17±0.05 f
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju	4.33±0.27 a	0.39±0.02 a	5.77±0.61 a	10.67±0.58 b	130.33±10.69 cd	4.05±0.32 a	0.42±0.04 d
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju	2.15±0.16 b	0.25±0.03 b	4.48±0.17 cd	14.67±0.58 a	245.33±27.59 a	2.17±0.12 de	0.62±0.04 bc
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju	2.01±0.17 bc	0.20±0.02 c	4.40±0.24 cd	14.33±0.58 a	237.00±10.54 a	1.93±0.06 ef	0.57±0.05 c
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%	65.87	49.84	21.27	41.62	39.50	31.55	37.05