








Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 38-47.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0550
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shengwei GUO1(
), Siwen BIAN1, Jianwen DING2, Xiaochen ZHANG2, Xing YANG2, Jin DU1(
), Chunyang XIANG1(
)
Received:2022-07-04
Accepted:2022-09-06
Online:2023-02-15
Published:2023-05-17
Contact:
Jin DU,Chunyang XIANG
郭胜微1(
), 边思文1, 丁建文2, 张晓辰2, 杨兴2, 杜锦1(
), 向春阳1(
)
通讯作者:
杜锦,向春阳
作者简介:郭胜微 E-mail: guo8871@sina.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47.
郭胜微, 边思文, 丁建文, 张晓辰, 杨兴, 杜锦, 向春阳. 糯玉米萌发期耐低温品种资源的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 38-47.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0550
| 编号Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | 13 | 万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 25 | 润糯175 Runnuo175 | 37 | 天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 |
| 2 | 景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 14 | 景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | 26 | 润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 38 | 润糯73 Runnuo 73 |
| 3 | 农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 15 | 润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 27 | 润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | 39 | 润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 |
| 4 | 津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | 16 | 彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | 28 | 景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 40 | 大黄粘 Dahuangnian |
| 5 | 润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 17 | 景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 29 | 景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | 41 | 润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 |
| 6 | 润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 18 | 润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 30 | 润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 42 | 华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 |
| 7 | 润糯163 Runnuo 163 | 19 | 润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 31 | 景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 43 | 栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo |
| 8 | 润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 20 | 津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | 32 | 景颇556 Jingpo 556 | 44 | 津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 |
| 9 | 津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | 21 | 景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 33 | 润糯597 Runnuo 597 | 45 | 润糯863 Runnuo 863 |
| 10 | 润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | 22 | 润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | 34 | 润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 46 | 黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 |
| 11 | 润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 23 | 润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 35 | 景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 47 | 润糯197 Runnuo 197 |
| 12 | 润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | 24 | 景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | 36 | 津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | 48 | 润糯650 Runnuo 650 |
Table 1 48 tested waxy maize varieties
| 编号Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | 13 | 万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 25 | 润糯175 Runnuo175 | 37 | 天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 |
| 2 | 景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 14 | 景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | 26 | 润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 38 | 润糯73 Runnuo 73 |
| 3 | 农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 15 | 润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 27 | 润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | 39 | 润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 |
| 4 | 津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | 16 | 彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | 28 | 景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 40 | 大黄粘 Dahuangnian |
| 5 | 润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 17 | 景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 29 | 景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | 41 | 润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 |
| 6 | 润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 18 | 润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 30 | 润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 42 | 华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 |
| 7 | 润糯163 Runnuo 163 | 19 | 润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 31 | 景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 43 | 栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo |
| 8 | 润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 20 | 津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | 32 | 景颇556 Jingpo 556 | 44 | 津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 |
| 9 | 津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | 21 | 景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 33 | 润糯597 Runnuo 597 | 45 | 润糯863 Runnuo 863 |
| 10 | 润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | 22 | 润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | 34 | 润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 46 | 黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 |
| 11 | 润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 23 | 润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 35 | 景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 47 | 润糯197 Runnuo 197 |
| 12 | 润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | 24 | 景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | 36 | 津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | 48 | 润糯650 Runnuo 650 |
Fig. 1 Correlation of indexes of 48 waxy maize varieties under chilling stressNote: RGE—Relative germination energy; RGR—Relative germination rate; RVI—Relative vigour index; RSL—Relative seedling length; RRL—Relative root length; RRSA—Relative root surface area; RRV—Relative root volume; RSDW—Relative shoot dry weight; RRDW—Relative root dry weight; RRN—Relative roots number; ** indicates significant correlation at P<0.01 level.
| KMO检验KMO test | 0.726 | |
|---|---|---|
球体检验 Bartlett test | 近似卡方Approx. Chi-Square | 792.326 |
| 自由度df | 45 | |
| 显著性Significance | 0.000 | |
Table 2 KMO and Bartlett compatibility test
| KMO检验KMO test | 0.726 | |
|---|---|---|
球体检验 Bartlett test | 近似卡方Approx. Chi-Square | 792.326 |
| 自由度df | 45 | |
| 显著性Significance | 0.000 | |
| 指标Index | 第1主成分PC 1 | 第2主成分PC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGE | 0.227 | 0.309 |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 0.268 | 0.374 |
| 相对活力指数RVI | 0.328 | 0.372 |
| 相对苗长RSL | 0.340 | -0.025 |
| 相对根长RRL | 0.350 | -0.314 |
| 相对根表面积RRSA | 0.358 | -0.309 |
| 相对根体积RRV | 0.351 | -0.284 |
| 相对苗干重RSDW | 0.253 | 0.463 |
| 相对根干重RRDW | 0.363 | 0.067 |
| 相对根系数RRN | 0.290 | -0.363 |
| 特征值Eigenvalue | 6.477 | 1.442 |
| 贡献率Contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 14.417 |
| 累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 79.183 |
Table 3 Eigenvectors and percentage of accumulated contribution of two principal components
| 指标Index | 第1主成分PC 1 | 第2主成分PC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGE | 0.227 | 0.309 |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 0.268 | 0.374 |
| 相对活力指数RVI | 0.328 | 0.372 |
| 相对苗长RSL | 0.340 | -0.025 |
| 相对根长RRL | 0.350 | -0.314 |
| 相对根表面积RRSA | 0.358 | -0.309 |
| 相对根体积RRV | 0.351 | -0.284 |
| 相对苗干重RSDW | 0.253 | 0.463 |
| 相对根干重RRDW | 0.363 | 0.067 |
| 相对根系数RRN | 0.290 | -0.363 |
| 特征值Eigenvalue | 6.477 | 1.442 |
| 贡献率Contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 14.417 |
| 累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 79.183 |
品种 Variety | Y1 | Y2 | U1 | U2 | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | -1.578 | -0.396 | 0.336 | 0.623 | 0.388 | 36 |
景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 0.842 | 0.007 | 0.544 | 0.682 | 0.569 | 19 |
农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 2.077 | -0.046 | 0.650 | 0.674 | 0.654 | 10 |
津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | -1.192 | -1.566 | 0.369 | 0.450 | 0.384 | 38 |
润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 2.625 | -0.620 | 0.697 | 0.589 | 0.677 | 8 |
润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 0.903 | -0.757 | 0.549 | 0.569 | 0.553 | 20 |
润糯163 Runnuo 163 | -2.603 | -1.186 | 0.249 | 0.506 | 0.295 | 43 |
润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 6.167 | -0.159 | 1.000 | 0.658 | 0.938 | 1 |
津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | -3.697 | -0.831 | 0.155 | 0.558 | 0.228 | 46 |
润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | -2.757 | 0.238 | 0.235 | 0.716 | 0.323 | 40 |
润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 2.830 | -4.612 | 0.714 | 0.000 | 0.584 | 15 |
润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | -0.107 | 0.138 | 0.462 | 0.701 | 0.506 | 26 |
万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 1.538 | 1.191 | 0.603 | 0.857 | 0.650 | 11 |
景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | -0.363 | 1.383 | 0.440 | 0.885 | 0.521 | 24 |
润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 2.066 | 1.090 | 0.649 | 0.842 | 0.684 | 7 |
彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | -0.887 | 0.816 | 0.396 | 0.801 | 0.469 | 31 |
景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 4.599 | 2.160 | 0.866 | 1.000 | 0.890 | 2 |
润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 0.951 | -0.173 | 0.553 | 0.655 | 0.572 | 17 |
润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 1.147 | 0.560 | 0.570 | 0.764 | 0.605 | 13 |
津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | -5.295 | 0.450 | 0.018 | 0.747 | 0.151 | 47 |
景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 0.005 | 1.013 | 0.472 | 0.831 | 0.537 | 22 |
润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | -2.674 | -0.246 | 0.242 | 0.645 | 0.316 | 41 |
润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 1.673 | -1.838 | 0.615 | 0.410 | 0.578 | 16 |
景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | -2.268 | 0.180 | 0.277 | 0.708 | 0.356 | 39 |
润糯175 Runnuo 175 | 4.582 | -0.397 | 0.864 | 0.622 | 0.820 | 3 |
润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 1.870 | -0.080 | 0.632 | 0.669 | 0.639 | 12 |
润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | -1.436 | -0.317 | 0.349 | 0.634 | 0.401 | 34 |
景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 2.089 | 1.986 | 0.651 | 0.974 | 0.709 | 6 |
景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | -1.162 | 0.666 | 0.372 | 0.779 | 0.446 | 32 |
润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 3.580 | 0.957 | 0.778 | 0.822 | 0.786 | 4 |
景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 1.396 | 1.926 | 0.591 | 0.965 | 0.659 | 9 |
景颇556 Jingpo 556 | -1.047 | 1.279 | 0.382 | 0.870 | 0.471 | 30 |
润糯597 Runnuo 597 | -5.504 | 0.139 | 0.000 | 0.702 | 0.128 | 48 |
润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 2.039 | -2.376 | 0.646 | 0.330 | 0.589 | 14 |
景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 0.671 | 0.524 | 0.529 | 0.758 | 0.571 | 18 |
津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | -3.148 | -1.248 | 0.202 | 0.497 | 0.256 | 44 |
天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 | 3.642 | -0.307 | 0.784 | 0.636 | 0.757 | 5 |
润糯73 Runnuo 73 | -0.328 | 0.155 | 0.443 | 0.704 | 0.491 | 28 |
润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 | 0.121 | -0.478 | 0.482 | 0.611 | 0.505 | 27 |
大黄粘 Dahuangnian | 0.082 | 0.924 | 0.479 | 0.818 | 0.540 | 21 |
润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 | -1.368 | -1.076 | 0.354 | 0.522 | 0.385 | 37 |
华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 | -4.567 | 1.809 | 0.080 | 0.948 | 0.238 | 45 |
栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.486 | 0.699 | 0.525 | 23 |
津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 | 0.080 | 0.216 | 0.478 | 0.713 | 0.521 | 25 |
润糯863 Runnuo 863 | -1.301 | -0.928 | 0.360 | 0.544 | 0.394 | 35 |
黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 | -1.316 | 0.111 | 0.359 | 0.697 | 0.420 | 33 |
润糯197 Runnuo 197 | -0.535 | 0.419 | 0.426 | 0.743 | 0.483 | 29 |
润糯650 Runnuo 650 | -2.609 | -0.822 | 0.248 | 0.560 | 0.305 | 42 |
| 权重Weight | 0.818 | 0.182 |
Table 4 Principal component score, weight, membership function value and D value of low temperature tolerance of 48 waxy maize varieties
品种 Variety | Y1 | Y2 | U1 | U2 | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | -1.578 | -0.396 | 0.336 | 0.623 | 0.388 | 36 |
景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 0.842 | 0.007 | 0.544 | 0.682 | 0.569 | 19 |
农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 2.077 | -0.046 | 0.650 | 0.674 | 0.654 | 10 |
津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | -1.192 | -1.566 | 0.369 | 0.450 | 0.384 | 38 |
润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 2.625 | -0.620 | 0.697 | 0.589 | 0.677 | 8 |
润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 0.903 | -0.757 | 0.549 | 0.569 | 0.553 | 20 |
润糯163 Runnuo 163 | -2.603 | -1.186 | 0.249 | 0.506 | 0.295 | 43 |
润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 6.167 | -0.159 | 1.000 | 0.658 | 0.938 | 1 |
津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | -3.697 | -0.831 | 0.155 | 0.558 | 0.228 | 46 |
润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | -2.757 | 0.238 | 0.235 | 0.716 | 0.323 | 40 |
润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 2.830 | -4.612 | 0.714 | 0.000 | 0.584 | 15 |
润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | -0.107 | 0.138 | 0.462 | 0.701 | 0.506 | 26 |
万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 1.538 | 1.191 | 0.603 | 0.857 | 0.650 | 11 |
景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | -0.363 | 1.383 | 0.440 | 0.885 | 0.521 | 24 |
润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 2.066 | 1.090 | 0.649 | 0.842 | 0.684 | 7 |
彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | -0.887 | 0.816 | 0.396 | 0.801 | 0.469 | 31 |
景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 4.599 | 2.160 | 0.866 | 1.000 | 0.890 | 2 |
润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 0.951 | -0.173 | 0.553 | 0.655 | 0.572 | 17 |
润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 1.147 | 0.560 | 0.570 | 0.764 | 0.605 | 13 |
津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | -5.295 | 0.450 | 0.018 | 0.747 | 0.151 | 47 |
景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 0.005 | 1.013 | 0.472 | 0.831 | 0.537 | 22 |
润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | -2.674 | -0.246 | 0.242 | 0.645 | 0.316 | 41 |
润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 1.673 | -1.838 | 0.615 | 0.410 | 0.578 | 16 |
景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | -2.268 | 0.180 | 0.277 | 0.708 | 0.356 | 39 |
润糯175 Runnuo 175 | 4.582 | -0.397 | 0.864 | 0.622 | 0.820 | 3 |
润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 1.870 | -0.080 | 0.632 | 0.669 | 0.639 | 12 |
润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | -1.436 | -0.317 | 0.349 | 0.634 | 0.401 | 34 |
景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 2.089 | 1.986 | 0.651 | 0.974 | 0.709 | 6 |
景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | -1.162 | 0.666 | 0.372 | 0.779 | 0.446 | 32 |
润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 3.580 | 0.957 | 0.778 | 0.822 | 0.786 | 4 |
景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 1.396 | 1.926 | 0.591 | 0.965 | 0.659 | 9 |
景颇556 Jingpo 556 | -1.047 | 1.279 | 0.382 | 0.870 | 0.471 | 30 |
润糯597 Runnuo 597 | -5.504 | 0.139 | 0.000 | 0.702 | 0.128 | 48 |
润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 2.039 | -2.376 | 0.646 | 0.330 | 0.589 | 14 |
景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 0.671 | 0.524 | 0.529 | 0.758 | 0.571 | 18 |
津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | -3.148 | -1.248 | 0.202 | 0.497 | 0.256 | 44 |
天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 | 3.642 | -0.307 | 0.784 | 0.636 | 0.757 | 5 |
润糯73 Runnuo 73 | -0.328 | 0.155 | 0.443 | 0.704 | 0.491 | 28 |
润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 | 0.121 | -0.478 | 0.482 | 0.611 | 0.505 | 27 |
大黄粘 Dahuangnian | 0.082 | 0.924 | 0.479 | 0.818 | 0.540 | 21 |
润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 | -1.368 | -1.076 | 0.354 | 0.522 | 0.385 | 37 |
华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 | -4.567 | 1.809 | 0.080 | 0.948 | 0.238 | 45 |
栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.486 | 0.699 | 0.525 | 23 |
津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 | 0.080 | 0.216 | 0.478 | 0.713 | 0.521 | 25 |
润糯863 Runnuo 863 | -1.301 | -0.928 | 0.360 | 0.544 | 0.394 | 35 |
黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 | -1.316 | 0.111 | 0.359 | 0.697 | 0.420 | 33 |
润糯197 Runnuo 197 | -0.535 | 0.419 | 0.426 | 0.743 | 0.483 | 29 |
润糯650 Runnuo 650 | -2.609 | -0.822 | 0.248 | 0.560 | 0.305 | 42 |
| 权重Weight | 0.818 | 0.182 |
| 1 | FEDOROFF N, WESSLER S, SHURE M. Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac Ds [J]. Cell, 1983, 35(1):235-242. |
| 2 | DONG L, QI X, ZHU J, et al.. Supersweet and waxy:meeting the diverse demands for specialty maize by genome editing [J]. Plant Biotechnol. J., 2019, 17(10):1853-1855. |
| 3 | 史亚兴,徐丽,赵久然,等.中国糯玉米产业优势及在“一带一路”发展中的机遇[J].作物杂志,2019(2):15-19. |
| SHI Y X, XU L, ZHAO J R, et al.. Waxy maize industry advantages in China and opportunities in the development of the belt and road [J]. Crops, 2019(2):15-19. | |
| 4 | SOBKOWIAK A, JOŃCZYK M, ADAMCZYK J, et al.. Molecular foundations of chilling-tolerance of modern maize [J/OL]. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17(1):125 [2022-06-05]. . |
| 5 | MARTA B, SZAFRANSKA K, POSMYK M. Exogenous melatonin improves antioxidant defense in cucumber seeds (Cucumis sativus L.) germinated under chilling stress [J/OL]. Front. Recent Dev. Plant Sci., 2016, (7):575 [2022-06-05]. . |
| 6 | 赵小强,方鹏,彭云玲,等.低温胁迫下不同玉米自交系对外源甜菜碱的生理响应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020, 38(3):81-88. |
| ZHAO X Q, FANG P, PENG Y L, et al.. Physiological responses of different maize inbred lines to exogenous GB under low temperature stress [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Area, 2020, 38(3):81-88. | |
| 7 | VRANOVA E, INZE D, BREUSEGEM F V. Signals transduction during oxidative stress [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2002, 53(3):1227-1236. |
| 8 | 孙玉珺,吴玥,马德志,等.外源油菜素内酯对低温胁迫下玉米发芽及幼苗生理特性的影响[J].华北农学报,2019, 34(3):119-128. |
| SUN Y J, WU Y, MA D Z, et al.. Effects of brassinolide on seed germination and seedling physiology of maize under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2019, 34(3):119-128. | |
| 9 | MIEDEMA P. The effects of low temperature on Zea mays L. [J]. Adv. Agron.,1982, 35(1):93-129. |
| 10 | 景宇鹏,连海飞,李焕春,等.玉米耐盐碱能力及评价指标筛选研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(11):94-104. |
| JING Y P, LIAN H F, LI H C, et al.. Study on saline-alkaline tolerance ability and evaluation index selection for corn [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2018, 20(11):94-104. | |
| 11 | 丁圆圆,王曦奥,刘策,等.黄瓜耐湿冷性苗期综合评价预测方程的建立[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(11):87-96. |
| DING Y Y, WANG X A, LIU C, et al.. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation and prediction equation for cucumber wet-cold tolerance in seedling stage [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022, 24(11):87-96. | |
| 12 | 杨锦越,任洪,赵晓燕,等.灰色关联分析和聚类分析在玉米品种综合评判中的应用[J].种子,2021,40(12):107-115. |
| YANG J Y, REN H, ZHAO X Y, et al.. Application of grey correlational analysis and cluster analysis in comprehensive evaluation of maize varieties [J]. Seeds, 2021, 40(12):107-115. | |
| 13 | MIDEKSA A, TESFAYE K, RAHIMI M. Agronomic performance, variance components, and clustering in vernonia galamensis germplasm from ethiopia [J/OL]. Int. J. Agron., 2022:5245183 [2022-06-05]. . |
| 14 | 刘杰,张春宵,李淑芳,等.81份玉米杂交种萌发期耐冷性的鉴定和评价[J].玉米科学,2020,28(5):20-26, 31. |
| LIU J, ZHANG C X, LI S F, et al.. Identification and evaluation of cold tolerance of 81 corn hybrids at germination stage [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2020, 28(5):20-26, 31. | |
| 15 | 褚力嘉,曹士亮,靳羽晗,等.玉米萌发期耐冷性鉴定研究[J].种子,2020,39(1):36-41. |
| CHU L J, CAO S L, JIN Y H, et al.. Identification of cold tolerance of maize during germination [J]. Seeds, 2020, 39(1):36-41. | |
| 16 | 张红生,王州飞.种子学[M].(第三版).北京:科学出版社,2021:1-255. |
| ZHANG H S, WANG Z F. Seed Science [M]. (3rd Ed.). Beijing: Science Press, 2021:1-255. | |
| 17 | REVILLA P, RODRÍGUEZ V M, ORDÁS A, et al.. Association mapping for cold tolerance in two large maize inbred panels [J]. BMC Plant Biol., 2016, 16(1):127-137. |
| 18 | 赵永锋,韩静静,贾晓艳,等.低温胁迫对不同玉米种子萌发的影响[J].种子,2019,38(5):86-89. |
| ZHAO Y F, HAN J J, JIA X Y, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on seed germination of different maize [J]. Seeds, 2019, 38(5):86-89. | |
| 19 | GUAN Y J, HU J, WANG X J, et al.. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress [J] . J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci., 2009, 10(6):427-433. |
| 20 | 吕天放,徐田军,刘月娥,等.低温胁迫对不同基因型玉米种子萌发特性的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(6):45-49. |
| LYU T F, XU T J, LIU Y E, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on seed germination of different maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(6):45-49. | |
| 21 | MOHAMED M, SHIMAA I, ROBERT D, et al.. Cold stress in maize (Zea mays) is alleviated by the over-expression of Phytoglobin 1 (ZmPgb1.1) [J]. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2021,167:901-910. |
| 22 | 刘禹辰.低温对不同品种玉米种子萌发的影响及化控效果研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018. |
| LIU Y C. Effects of low temperature on seed germination of different types of maize and chemical regulation effects [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018. | |
| 23 | 黄贺,闫蕾,吕艳,等.甘蓝型油菜发芽期低温耐性的评价与材料筛选[J].中国油料作物学报,2019,41(5):723-734. |
| HUANG H, YAN L, LYU Y, et al.. Screening and evaluation of low temperature tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) at germination stage [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2019, 41(5):723-734. | |
| 24 | 薛云云,白冬梅,田跃霞,等.24份山西花生资源芽期和苗期耐寒性鉴定[J].核农学报,2018,32(3):582-590. |
| XUE Y Y, BAI D M, TIAN Y X, et al.. Cold tolerance identification for 24 peanut resources from Shanxi province at the stage of germination and seedling [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2018, 32(3):582-590. | |
| 25 | ZHAO X C, WEI Y L, ZHANG J J, et al.. Membrane lipids’ metabolism and transcriptional regulation in maize roots under cold stress [J/OL]. Front. Recent Dev. Plant Sci., 2021, 12:639132 [2022-06-05]. . |
| 26 | HUND A, FRACHEBOUD Y, SOLDATI A, et al.. QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress [J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2004, 65(3):618-629. |
| 27 | 张陇艳,程功敏,魏恒玲,等.陆地棉种子萌发期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷性鉴定[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(1):19-33. |
| ZHANG L Y, CHENG G M, WEI H L, et al.. Chilling tolerance identification and response to cold stress of Gossypium hirsutum varieties (lines) during germination stage [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2021, 54(1):19-33. | |
| 28 | 王丽艳,唐金敏,郑桂萍,等.水稻萌发期和幼苗期耐低温指标体系构建及综合评价[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(10):58-65. |
| WANG L Y, TANG J M, ZHENG G P, et al.. Characterization and evaluation of low temperature resistance of rice at germination and seedling stages [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019, 21(10):58-65. | |
| 29 | 王英成,芦光新,邓晖,等.基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种农艺性状评价及筛选研究[J].草地学报,2019,27(6):1725-1732. |
| WANG Y C, LU G X, DENG H, et al.. Evaluation and screening of agricultural characters of silage maize varieties based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2019, 27(6):1725-1732. | |
| 30 | 蔺豆豆,赵桂琴,琚泽亮,等.15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J].草业学报,2021,30(11):108-121. |
| LIN D D, ZHAO G Q, JU Z L, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 15 oat varieties at the seedling stage [J]. J. Grass Ind., 2021, 30(11):108-121. | |
| 31 | 彭云玲,王亚昕,赵小强,等.不同玉米自交系耐寒性评价及差异分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(3):267-280. |
| PENG Y L, WANG Y X, ZHAO X Q, et al.. Evaluation and difference analysis of cold tolerance of different maize inbred lines [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Area, 2016, 34(3):267-280. | |
| 32 | 卢柏山,董会,史亚兴,等.不同品种鲜食玉米体外抗氧化能力综合评价[J].华北农学报,2021,36():101-110. |
| LU B S, DONG H, SHI Y X, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of antioxidant capacity in vitro of different varieties of fresh corn [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2021, 36(S1):101-110. | |
| 33 | 吴奇,周宇飞,高悦,等.不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J].作物学报,2016,42(8):1233-1246. |
| WU Q, ZHOU Y F, GAO Y, et al.. Screening and identification for drought resistance during germination in sorghum cultivars [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2016, 42(8):1233-1246. | |
| 34 | 李红宇,李逸,司洋,等.北方粳稻耐盐碱相关性状主成分分析及综合评价[J].核农学报,2020,34(8):1862-1871. |
| LI H Y, LI Y, SI Y, et al.. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of saline-alkaline tolerance related traits of northern japonica rice [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2020, 34(8):1862-1871. |
| [1] | Lintao CHEN, Zhaoxiang LIU, Ying LAN, Xiangwei MOU, Xu MA, Rijun WANG. Research on Rice Variety Identification Based on Hyperspectral Technology and Principal Component Analysis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 104-111. |
| [2] | Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169. |
| [3] | Baozhen ZENG, Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO. Determination of the Best Harvesting Period for ‘Muhe White’ Grape in Minqin District, Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 70-79. |
| [4] | Ting WANG, Jinghan DU, Guangdi ZHANG, Jianglong WANG, Yinan JIA, Yu WANG, Wenyi BAO. Study on Quality and Volatile Substances of New Excellent Cabbage Varieties in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 165-180. |
| [5] | Xueqing WANG, Bo ZHANG, Liting HAN, Zhuanzhuan LYU, Jianjun CHEN, Zhulin ZHANG, Junqiang ZHANG, Jianmei DU. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Volatile Compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 146-158. |
| [6] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
| [7] | Yutao SHI, Huizhen XIE, Shulin ZHENG, Guanhua YU, Feiquan WANG, Li LI, Bo ZHANG, Yuanhua LI, Shengcai LUO. Analysis of Biochemical Characteristics and Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity of Tea Polysaccharides of Local Tea Germplasms in Wuyishan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 65-76. |
| [8] | Yue PAN, Baoqing WANG, Jijiao WANG, Yong MA, Yalan LI. CO2 Response Model Fitting and Evaluation of Vitis amurensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 58-66. |
| [9] | Tingting CAO, Chun LIU, Youwei FAN, Li MA, Zhiyu REN, Suxia YUAN, Junyun ZHANG, Zunyao QIAN, Guangzhao YANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Supply Level on Plant Growth and Development in Miniature Potted Rose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 67-79. |
| [10] | Panpan MENG, Haiyan HE, Yuxin CAO, Lixin ZHANG, Qinghao LYU, Ruilin QI, Hongrui ZHANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of 5 Cultivation Types of Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. at Branching Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 90-99. |
| [11] | Shengmei LI, Bo PANG, Shiwei GENG, Wu SONG, Hongmei LI, Maosen MA, Ru ZHANG, Xinyan WANG, Wenwei GAO. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L. Backross Populations in Full Boll Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 40-51. |
| [12] | Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76. |
| [13] | Shuang WANG, Yixing HOU, Linjiao FENG, Qianqian LU, Long ZHOU. Effect of Drought Stress on Anatomical Structure of Leaves in Table Grape Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 40-49. |
| [14] | Shulin ZHENG, Yutao SHI, Feiquan WANG, Bangqiang WU, Yuanhua LI, Bo ZHANG, Naixing YE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Content of Mineral Elements in Flowers of Different Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 178-188. |
| [15] | Yuexin ZHANG, Yunxia MA, Xiuzhi MA, Jinwang ZHANG, Yuelin WANG, Haisheng YU. Soil Nutrient Characteristics of Ulmus pumila L. Forest at Different Ages in Daqingshan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 168-176. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010802021197号