Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 178-188.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0228
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shulin ZHENG1,2(), Yutao SHI1(
), Feiquan WANG1, Bangqiang WU3, Yuanhua LI1, Bo ZHANG1, Naixing YE2(
)
Received:
2022-03-25
Accepted:
2022-05-07
Online:
2023-04-01
Published:
2023-06-26
Contact:
Yutao SHI,Naixing YE
郑淑琳1,2(), 石玉涛1(
), 王飞权1, 吴邦强3, 李远华1, 张渤1, 叶乃兴2(
)
通讯作者:
石玉涛,叶乃兴
作者简介:
郑淑琳 E-mail: zsl@wuyiu.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shulin ZHENG, Yutao SHI, Feiquan WANG, Bangqiang WU, Yuanhua LI, Bo ZHANG, Naixing YE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Content of Mineral Elements in Flowers of Different Tea Germplasm Resources[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 178-188.
郑淑琳, 石玉涛, 王飞权, 吴邦强, 李远华, 张渤, 叶乃兴. 不同茶树种质资源花器矿质元素含量分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 178-188.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0228
样品编号 Sample No. | 种质名称 Germplasm name | 来源地 Origin | 样品编号 Sample No. | 种质名称 Germplasm name | 来源地 Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TF01 | 巴渝特早 Bayutezao | 重庆Chongqing | TF13 | 名山白毫131 Mingshanbaihao 131 | 四川Sichuan |
TF02 | 白鸡冠 Baijiguan | 福建Fujian | TF14 | 名山早311 Mingshanzao 311 | 四川Sichuan |
TF03 | 半天妖 Bantianyao | 福建Fujian | TF15 | 平阳特早茶 Pingyangtezaocha | 浙江Zhejiang |
TF04 | 北斗 Beidou | 福建Fujian | TF16 | 奇曲 Qiqu | 福建Fujian |
TF05 | 春闺 Chungui | 福建Fujian | TF17 | 千年雪 Qiannianxue | 浙江Zhejiang |
TF06 | 大红袍 Dahongpao | 福建Fujian | TF18 | 青心乌龙 Qingxinwulong | 台湾Taiwan |
TF07 | 丹桂 Dangui | 福建Fujian | TF19 | 秋香 Qiuxiang | 福建Fujian |
TF08 | 黄金芽 Huangjinya | 浙江Zhejiang | TF20 | 肉桂 Rougui | 福建Fujian |
TF09 | 金凤凰 Jinfenghuang | 福建Fujian | TF21 | 玉麒麟 Yuqilin | 福建Fujian |
TF10 | 涟源奇曲 Lianyuanqiqu | 湖南Hunan | TF22 | 紫红袍 Zihongpao | 福建Fujian |
TF11 | 龙井43 Longjing 43 | 浙江Zhejiang | TF23 | 紫娟 Zijuan | 云南Yunnan |
TF12 | 蒙山11号 Mengshan 11 | 四川Sichuan |
Table 1 Basic information of tea germplasms for testing
样品编号 Sample No. | 种质名称 Germplasm name | 来源地 Origin | 样品编号 Sample No. | 种质名称 Germplasm name | 来源地 Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TF01 | 巴渝特早 Bayutezao | 重庆Chongqing | TF13 | 名山白毫131 Mingshanbaihao 131 | 四川Sichuan |
TF02 | 白鸡冠 Baijiguan | 福建Fujian | TF14 | 名山早311 Mingshanzao 311 | 四川Sichuan |
TF03 | 半天妖 Bantianyao | 福建Fujian | TF15 | 平阳特早茶 Pingyangtezaocha | 浙江Zhejiang |
TF04 | 北斗 Beidou | 福建Fujian | TF16 | 奇曲 Qiqu | 福建Fujian |
TF05 | 春闺 Chungui | 福建Fujian | TF17 | 千年雪 Qiannianxue | 浙江Zhejiang |
TF06 | 大红袍 Dahongpao | 福建Fujian | TF18 | 青心乌龙 Qingxinwulong | 台湾Taiwan |
TF07 | 丹桂 Dangui | 福建Fujian | TF19 | 秋香 Qiuxiang | 福建Fujian |
TF08 | 黄金芽 Huangjinya | 浙江Zhejiang | TF20 | 肉桂 Rougui | 福建Fujian |
TF09 | 金凤凰 Jinfenghuang | 福建Fujian | TF21 | 玉麒麟 Yuqilin | 福建Fujian |
TF10 | 涟源奇曲 Lianyuanqiqu | 湖南Hunan | TF22 | 紫红袍 Zihongpao | 福建Fujian |
TF11 | 龙井43 Longjing 43 | 浙江Zhejiang | TF23 | 紫娟 Zijuan | 云南Yunnan |
TF12 | 蒙山11号 Mengshan 11 | 四川Sichuan |
元素 Element | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% | 遗传多样性指数 H' |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | 8 139.44 | 10 169.54 | 5 614.87 | 1 055.13 | 12.96 | 1.93 |
Ca | 1 727.96 | 2 600.14 | 1 148.81 | 333.25 | 19.29 | 1.19 |
P | 1 011.08 | 1 300.50 | 686.00 | 137.70 | 13.62 | 2.02 |
Mg | 794.35 | 1 013.86 | 560.02 | 109.06 | 13.73 | 2.05 |
Mn | 701.42 | 1 032.77 | 456.10 | 122.89 | 17.52 | 1.91 |
S | 172.83 | 208.41 | 132.26 | 20.50 | 11.86 | 2.19 |
Al | 131.61 | 214.93 | 88.41 | 30.03 | 22.81 | 2.04 |
B | 43.99 | 80.01 | 18.72 | 18.38 | 41.78 | 2.13 |
Ba | 30.36 | 51.87 | 13.60 | 10.24 | 33.73 | 2.17 |
Fe | 22.71 | 42.60 | 13.11 | 5.92 | 26.08 | 1.78 |
Na | 21.47 | 33.36 | 15.20 | 4.62 | 21.53 | 1.90 |
Zn | 9.37 | 15.29 | 6.77 | 2.08 | 22.16 | 1.83 |
Cu | 3.53 | 5.39 | 2.19 | 0.77 | 21.76 | 1.92 |
Ti | 1.83 | 3.11 | 1.02 | 0.54 | 29.51 | 2.04 |
Ni | 0.70 | 1.73 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 48.96 | 1.65 |
Cr | 0.51 | 0.92 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 37.42 | 1.99 |
Se | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 15.88 | 1.73 |
Co | 0.37 | 0.81 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 38.71 | 1.79 |
Table 2 Characteristic statistic parameters of 18 mineral elements in 23 tea flower samples
元素 Element | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% | 遗传多样性指数 H' |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | 8 139.44 | 10 169.54 | 5 614.87 | 1 055.13 | 12.96 | 1.93 |
Ca | 1 727.96 | 2 600.14 | 1 148.81 | 333.25 | 19.29 | 1.19 |
P | 1 011.08 | 1 300.50 | 686.00 | 137.70 | 13.62 | 2.02 |
Mg | 794.35 | 1 013.86 | 560.02 | 109.06 | 13.73 | 2.05 |
Mn | 701.42 | 1 032.77 | 456.10 | 122.89 | 17.52 | 1.91 |
S | 172.83 | 208.41 | 132.26 | 20.50 | 11.86 | 2.19 |
Al | 131.61 | 214.93 | 88.41 | 30.03 | 22.81 | 2.04 |
B | 43.99 | 80.01 | 18.72 | 18.38 | 41.78 | 2.13 |
Ba | 30.36 | 51.87 | 13.60 | 10.24 | 33.73 | 2.17 |
Fe | 22.71 | 42.60 | 13.11 | 5.92 | 26.08 | 1.78 |
Na | 21.47 | 33.36 | 15.20 | 4.62 | 21.53 | 1.90 |
Zn | 9.37 | 15.29 | 6.77 | 2.08 | 22.16 | 1.83 |
Cu | 3.53 | 5.39 | 2.19 | 0.77 | 21.76 | 1.92 |
Ti | 1.83 | 3.11 | 1.02 | 0.54 | 29.51 | 2.04 |
Ni | 0.70 | 1.73 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 48.96 | 1.65 |
Cr | 0.51 | 0.92 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 37.42 | 1.99 |
Se | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 15.88 | 1.73 |
Co | 0.37 | 0.81 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 38.71 | 1.79 |
Fig. 1 Correlation among 18 mineral elements in tea flower samplesNote: * and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively.
矿质元素 Mineral element | 主成分Principal component | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
Al (X1) | 0.137 | 0.162 | -0.061 | 0.395 | -0.388 | -0.262 | -0.396 |
B (X2) | 0.095 | 0.474 | -0.141 | 0.078 | 0.145 | 0.088 | -0.040 |
Ba (X3) | 0.157 | 0.398 | 0.061 | 0.022 | -0.030 | 0.417 | 0.199 |
Ca (X4) | 0.264 | 0.082 | 0.401 | -0.070 | -0.279 | 0.183 | 0.055 |
Co (X5) | 0.213 | -0.224 | -0.213 | 0.113 | -0.094 | 0.569 | -0.174 |
Cr (X6) | -0.010 | 0.293 | 0.318 | -0.035 | 0.307 | 0.014 | -0.209 |
Cu (X7) | 0.294 | -0.169 | -0.015 | 0.104 | 0.321 | -0.107 | 0.346 |
Fe (X8) | 0.071 | -0.074 | 0.088 | 0.481 | 0.423 | -0.149 | -0.348 |
K (X9) | 0.422 | 0.035 | 0.053 | -0.226 | 0.095 | 0.148 | -0.211 |
Mg (X10) | 0.354 | -0.008 | 0.089 | 0.117 | 0.034 | -0.429 | 0.332 |
Mn (X11) | 0.287 | -0.101 | 0.222 | 0.263 | -0.407 | -0.026 | -0.114 |
Na (X12) | 0.000 | -0.224 | 0.393 | 0.138 | -0.037 | 0.092 | 0.109 |
Ni (X13) | -0.044 | -0.260 | -0.049 | 0.451 | 0.285 | 0.362 | 0.070 |
P (X14) | 0.411 | -0.062 | -0.256 | -0.157 | 0.117 | -0.053 | -0.019 |
S (X15) | 0.339 | -0.167 | -0.332 | -0.061 | -0.088 | -0.060 | 0.139 |
Se (X16) | -0.050 | 0.306 | 0.058 | 0.373 | -0.089 | 0.060 | 0.510 |
Ti (X17) | 0.154 | 0.397 | -0.251 | 0.073 | 0.128 | -0.037 | -0.100 |
Zn (X18) | 0.207 | -0.023 | 0.446 | -0.218 | 0.245 | -0.009 | -0.100 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.055 | 3.420 | 2.560 | 1.697 | 1.638 | 1.097 | 1.045 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 22.529 | 19.002 | 14.221 | 9.429 | 9.101 | 6.093 | 5.805 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 22.529 | 41.531 | 55.751 | 65.181 | 74.281 | 80.374 | 86.179 |
Table 3 Principal component analysis of the content of 18 mineral elements in 23 tea flower samples
矿质元素 Mineral element | 主成分Principal component | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
Al (X1) | 0.137 | 0.162 | -0.061 | 0.395 | -0.388 | -0.262 | -0.396 |
B (X2) | 0.095 | 0.474 | -0.141 | 0.078 | 0.145 | 0.088 | -0.040 |
Ba (X3) | 0.157 | 0.398 | 0.061 | 0.022 | -0.030 | 0.417 | 0.199 |
Ca (X4) | 0.264 | 0.082 | 0.401 | -0.070 | -0.279 | 0.183 | 0.055 |
Co (X5) | 0.213 | -0.224 | -0.213 | 0.113 | -0.094 | 0.569 | -0.174 |
Cr (X6) | -0.010 | 0.293 | 0.318 | -0.035 | 0.307 | 0.014 | -0.209 |
Cu (X7) | 0.294 | -0.169 | -0.015 | 0.104 | 0.321 | -0.107 | 0.346 |
Fe (X8) | 0.071 | -0.074 | 0.088 | 0.481 | 0.423 | -0.149 | -0.348 |
K (X9) | 0.422 | 0.035 | 0.053 | -0.226 | 0.095 | 0.148 | -0.211 |
Mg (X10) | 0.354 | -0.008 | 0.089 | 0.117 | 0.034 | -0.429 | 0.332 |
Mn (X11) | 0.287 | -0.101 | 0.222 | 0.263 | -0.407 | -0.026 | -0.114 |
Na (X12) | 0.000 | -0.224 | 0.393 | 0.138 | -0.037 | 0.092 | 0.109 |
Ni (X13) | -0.044 | -0.260 | -0.049 | 0.451 | 0.285 | 0.362 | 0.070 |
P (X14) | 0.411 | -0.062 | -0.256 | -0.157 | 0.117 | -0.053 | -0.019 |
S (X15) | 0.339 | -0.167 | -0.332 | -0.061 | -0.088 | -0.060 | 0.139 |
Se (X16) | -0.050 | 0.306 | 0.058 | 0.373 | -0.089 | 0.060 | 0.510 |
Ti (X17) | 0.154 | 0.397 | -0.251 | 0.073 | 0.128 | -0.037 | -0.100 |
Zn (X18) | 0.207 | -0.023 | 0.446 | -0.218 | 0.245 | -0.009 | -0.100 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.055 | 3.420 | 2.560 | 1.697 | 1.638 | 1.097 | 1.045 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 22.529 | 19.002 | 14.221 | 9.429 | 9.101 | 6.093 | 5.805 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 22.529 | 41.531 | 55.751 | 65.181 | 74.281 | 80.374 | 86.179 |
样品编号 Sample No. | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排序 Ranking | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | |||
TF01 | 2.140 | 0.044 | 4.785 | -0.100 | -0.011 | 0.977 | 1.539 | 1.518 | 2 |
TF02 | 0.550 | -1.288 | -0.600 | -1.740 | -1.342 | -0.981 | 2.091 | -0.500 | 16 |
TF03 | -0.698 | -2.012 | 0.034 | 0.991 | -0.035 | 1.329 | 0.870 | -0.623 | 18 |
TF04 | -0.030 | 1.379 | -0.520 | 0.212 | 1.001 | -0.752 | 0.281 | 0.305 | 9 |
TF05 | 0.189 | -3.938 | -0.605 | 3.244 | 2.660 | -0.351 | 0.558 | -0.269 | 15 |
TF06 | 1.427 | 2.395 | -2.881 | 0.737 | -0.807 | 0.296 | 1.773 | 0.559 | 5 |
TF07 | -4.851 | -0.656 | 1.150 | -0.149 | 0.139 | 0.067 | 0.322 | -1.196 | 22 |
TF08 | 2.395 | 1.165 | -0.261 | 0.184 | 0.101 | -2.013 | 0.211 | 0.740 | 3 |
TF09 | -2.474 | 1.824 | -0.271 | 0.359 | 0.621 | 1.377 | -0.902 | -0.147 | 13 |
TF10 | -2.729 | 0.793 | -0.728 | -0.686 | 0.749 | 0.139 | 0.171 | -0.632 | 19 |
TF11 | 2.030 | -2.443 | 0.432 | 0.432 | -2.627 | 0.111 | -0.374 | -0.185 | 14 |
TF12 | 0.380 | -0.750 | 0.999 | -1.748 | 0.009 | 0.553 | -0.274 | -0.070 | 11 |
TF13 | 0.590 | -1.981 | 0.102 | -2.947 | 1.202 | -0.588 | -1.559 | -0.605 | 17 |
TF14 | 0.840 | 2.683 | -0.801 | -0.528 | 1.139 | -0.032 | -0.724 | 0.690 | 4 |
TF15 | 1.718 | 3.074 | 1.384 | -0.157 | 1.876 | 0.965 | -0.034 | 1.601 | 1 |
TF16 | -2.980 | -0.300 | -1.120 | -0.329 | -2.105 | 0.840 | -0.536 | -1.264 | 23 |
TF17 | 2.143 | -0.213 | -0.832 | 0.366 | -0.163 | 0.679 | 0.235 | 0.462 | 6 |
TF18 | -0.748 | 0.383 | 2.997 | 0.658 | -0.236 | -0.224 | -0.834 | 0.359 | 8 |
TF19 | -0.387 | 2.779 | 0.426 | 0.921 | -2.194 | -0.133 | -0.228 | 0.424 | 7 |
TF20 | 0.191 | -1.838 | -0.191 | -1.079 | -0.308 | -1.642 | -0.312 | -0.674 | 21 |
TF21 | 3.413 | -1.344 | -1.917 | 0.228 | -0.129 | 1.890 | -1.856 | 0.300 | 10 |
TF22 | -1.336 | -0.225 | -1.870 | -1.163 | 1.272 | -0.339 | 1.031 | -0.654 | 20 |
TF23 | -0.773 | 0.468 | 0.288 | 2.290 | -0.814 | -2.168 | -1.448 | -0.139 | 12 |
Table 4 Score of principal components of 23 tea flower samples
样品编号 Sample No. | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排序 Ranking | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | |||
TF01 | 2.140 | 0.044 | 4.785 | -0.100 | -0.011 | 0.977 | 1.539 | 1.518 | 2 |
TF02 | 0.550 | -1.288 | -0.600 | -1.740 | -1.342 | -0.981 | 2.091 | -0.500 | 16 |
TF03 | -0.698 | -2.012 | 0.034 | 0.991 | -0.035 | 1.329 | 0.870 | -0.623 | 18 |
TF04 | -0.030 | 1.379 | -0.520 | 0.212 | 1.001 | -0.752 | 0.281 | 0.305 | 9 |
TF05 | 0.189 | -3.938 | -0.605 | 3.244 | 2.660 | -0.351 | 0.558 | -0.269 | 15 |
TF06 | 1.427 | 2.395 | -2.881 | 0.737 | -0.807 | 0.296 | 1.773 | 0.559 | 5 |
TF07 | -4.851 | -0.656 | 1.150 | -0.149 | 0.139 | 0.067 | 0.322 | -1.196 | 22 |
TF08 | 2.395 | 1.165 | -0.261 | 0.184 | 0.101 | -2.013 | 0.211 | 0.740 | 3 |
TF09 | -2.474 | 1.824 | -0.271 | 0.359 | 0.621 | 1.377 | -0.902 | -0.147 | 13 |
TF10 | -2.729 | 0.793 | -0.728 | -0.686 | 0.749 | 0.139 | 0.171 | -0.632 | 19 |
TF11 | 2.030 | -2.443 | 0.432 | 0.432 | -2.627 | 0.111 | -0.374 | -0.185 | 14 |
TF12 | 0.380 | -0.750 | 0.999 | -1.748 | 0.009 | 0.553 | -0.274 | -0.070 | 11 |
TF13 | 0.590 | -1.981 | 0.102 | -2.947 | 1.202 | -0.588 | -1.559 | -0.605 | 17 |
TF14 | 0.840 | 2.683 | -0.801 | -0.528 | 1.139 | -0.032 | -0.724 | 0.690 | 4 |
TF15 | 1.718 | 3.074 | 1.384 | -0.157 | 1.876 | 0.965 | -0.034 | 1.601 | 1 |
TF16 | -2.980 | -0.300 | -1.120 | -0.329 | -2.105 | 0.840 | -0.536 | -1.264 | 23 |
TF17 | 2.143 | -0.213 | -0.832 | 0.366 | -0.163 | 0.679 | 0.235 | 0.462 | 6 |
TF18 | -0.748 | 0.383 | 2.997 | 0.658 | -0.236 | -0.224 | -0.834 | 0.359 | 8 |
TF19 | -0.387 | 2.779 | 0.426 | 0.921 | -2.194 | -0.133 | -0.228 | 0.424 | 7 |
TF20 | 0.191 | -1.838 | -0.191 | -1.079 | -0.308 | -1.642 | -0.312 | -0.674 | 21 |
TF21 | 3.413 | -1.344 | -1.917 | 0.228 | -0.129 | 1.890 | -1.856 | 0.300 | 10 |
TF22 | -1.336 | -0.225 | -1.870 | -1.163 | 1.272 | -0.339 | 1.031 | -0.654 | 20 |
TF23 | -0.773 | 0.468 | 0.288 | 2.290 | -0.814 | -2.168 | -1.448 | -0.139 | 12 |
Fig. 2 Cluster heatmap of 23 tea flower samples based on the content 18 mineral elementsNote:The color of the heatmap represents the normalized value of the mineral element content, with the color going from blue to red, representing low to high content; sample No. is same to Table 1.
矿质元素 Mineral element | 类群ⅠGroupⅠ | 类群Ⅱ GroupⅡ | 类群Ⅲ Group Ⅲ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | |
Al | 124.93 ab | 26.22 | 112.24 b | 33.52 | 147.91 a | 30.85 |
B | 29.09 b | 18.83 | 41.23 ab | 6.77 | 56.08 a | 8.18 |
Ba | 23.82 b | 29.96 | 27.64 ab | 25.97 | 36.57 a | 29.05 |
Ca | 1 801.73 a | 33.90 | 1 413.42 b | 41.33 | 1 865.04 a | 28.71 |
Co | 0.46 b | 26.24 | 0.35 b | 20.46 | 0.32 b | 24.21 |
Cr | 0.37 b | 17.36 | 0.50 ab | 21.17 | 0.63 a | 19.65 |
Cu | 4.00 a | 7.44 | 2.93 b | 13.23 | 3.56 ab | 10.10 |
Fe | 23.53 b | 11.19 | 19.78 b | 11.72 | 23.90 b | 9.90 |
K | 8 624.30 a | 18.73 | 7 084.04 b | 8.79 | 8 433.29 a | 23.82 |
Mg | 818.93 a | 10.71 | 668.35 b | 26.09 | 852.74 a | 26.06 |
Mn | 742.43 a | 13.66 | 582.42 b | 10.38 | 744.12 a | 19.19 |
Na | 21.55 b | 18.46 | 21.75 b | 13.39 | 21.25 b | 12.20 |
Ni | 0.75 b | 39.27 | 0.80 b | 20.08 | 0.60 b | 14.67 |
P | 1 095.88 a | 67.07 | 887.31 b | 43.50 | 1 025.98 a | 28.19 |
S | 187.18 a | 20.27 | 156.33 b | 19.22 | 172.70 ab | 20.71 |
Se | 0.33 b | 39.44 | 0.41 a | 24.91 | 0.44 a | 36.94 |
Ti | 1.48 b | 10.01 | 1.62 b | 15.17 | 2.19 a | 10.77 |
Zn | 9.94 a | 6.07 | 7.75 b | 10.71 | 9.95 a | 12.19 |
平均值 Mean value | 23.05 | 20.35 | 20.30 |
Table 5 Comparison of mineral element content among three clusters
矿质元素 Mineral element | 类群ⅠGroupⅠ | 类群Ⅱ GroupⅡ | 类群Ⅲ Group Ⅲ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | 平均值 Mean value/(mg·kg-1) | 变异系数 CV/% | |
Al | 124.93 ab | 26.22 | 112.24 b | 33.52 | 147.91 a | 30.85 |
B | 29.09 b | 18.83 | 41.23 ab | 6.77 | 56.08 a | 8.18 |
Ba | 23.82 b | 29.96 | 27.64 ab | 25.97 | 36.57 a | 29.05 |
Ca | 1 801.73 a | 33.90 | 1 413.42 b | 41.33 | 1 865.04 a | 28.71 |
Co | 0.46 b | 26.24 | 0.35 b | 20.46 | 0.32 b | 24.21 |
Cr | 0.37 b | 17.36 | 0.50 ab | 21.17 | 0.63 a | 19.65 |
Cu | 4.00 a | 7.44 | 2.93 b | 13.23 | 3.56 ab | 10.10 |
Fe | 23.53 b | 11.19 | 19.78 b | 11.72 | 23.90 b | 9.90 |
K | 8 624.30 a | 18.73 | 7 084.04 b | 8.79 | 8 433.29 a | 23.82 |
Mg | 818.93 a | 10.71 | 668.35 b | 26.09 | 852.74 a | 26.06 |
Mn | 742.43 a | 13.66 | 582.42 b | 10.38 | 744.12 a | 19.19 |
Na | 21.55 b | 18.46 | 21.75 b | 13.39 | 21.25 b | 12.20 |
Ni | 0.75 b | 39.27 | 0.80 b | 20.08 | 0.60 b | 14.67 |
P | 1 095.88 a | 67.07 | 887.31 b | 43.50 | 1 025.98 a | 28.19 |
S | 187.18 a | 20.27 | 156.33 b | 19.22 | 172.70 ab | 20.71 |
Se | 0.33 b | 39.44 | 0.41 a | 24.91 | 0.44 a | 36.94 |
Ti | 1.48 b | 10.01 | 1.62 b | 15.17 | 2.19 a | 10.77 |
Zn | 9.94 a | 6.07 | 7.75 b | 10.71 | 9.95 a | 12.19 |
平均值 Mean value | 23.05 | 20.35 | 20.30 |
1 | XIA E H, TONG W, WU Q, et al.. Tea plant genomics: achievements, challenges, and perspectives [J/OL]. Hortic. Res., 2020, 7(7): 0225-4 [2022-03-24]. . |
2 | YANG Y, SUN M, LI S, et al.. Germplasm resources and genetic breeding of Paeonia: a systematic review [J/OL]. Hortic. Res., 2020, 7(1): 0332-2 [2022-03-24]. . |
3 | 金基强,张晨禹,马建强, 等.茶树种质资源研究“十三五”进展及“十四五”发展方向[J].中国茶叶,2021,43(9):42-49, 76. |
JIN J Q, ZHANG C Y, MA J Q, et al.. Research progress on tea germplasms during the 13th five-year plan period and development direction in the 14th five-year plan period [J]. China Tea J., 2021,43(9):42-49, 76. | |
4 | SOETAN K O, OLAIYA C O, OYEWOLE O E. The importance of mineral elements for humans, domestic animals, and plants-a review [J]. African J. Food sci., 2010, 4(5): 200-222. |
5 | 齐冰洁,王敏,张智勇,等.燕麦种质资源矿质元素的多样性分析[J].作物杂志,2020(4):72-78. |
QI B J, WANG M, ZHANG Z Y, et al.. Diversity analysis of mineral elements in oat germplasm resources [J]. Crops, 2020(4):72-78. | |
6 | MATSUDA H, NAKAMURA S, MORIKAWA T, et al.. New biofunctional effects of the flower buds of Camellia sinensis and its bioactive acylated oleanane-type triterpene oligoglycosides [J]. J. Nat. Med., 2016, 70(4):689-701. |
7 | CHEN D, CHEN G, DING Y, et al.. Polysaccharides from the flowers of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) modulate gut health and ameliorate cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression [J/OL]. J. Funct. Foods, 2019, 61: 103470 [2022-03-24]. . |
8 | CHEN Y, FU X, MEI X, et al.. Characterization of functional proteases from flowers of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants [J]. J. Funct. Foods, 2016, 25: 149-159. |
9 | CHEN D, CHEN G, SUN Y, et al.. Physiological genetics, chemical composition, health benefits and toxicology of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) flower: a review [J/OL]. Food Res. Int., 2020, 137: 109584 [2022-03-24]. . |
10 | LI B, JIN Y, XU Y, et al.. Safety evaluation of tea (Camellia sinensis) flower extract: assessment of mutagenicity, and acute and subchronic toxicity in rats [J]. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2011, 133(2): 583-590. |
11 | 朱建新,程福建,林全女,等.茶树花资源综合利用及保健功效研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2021,49(6):7-9. |
ZHU J X, CHENG F J, LIN Q N, et al.. Research progress on the comprehensive utilization and health efficacy of tea flower resources [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2021,49(6):7-9. | |
12 | 王泽涵,于文涛,王鹏杰,等.茶树花不同发育时期的转录组分析[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2022,51(1):46-52. |
WANG Z H, YU W T, WANG P J, et al.. Transcriptome analysis at different flowering developmental stages of tea plant [J]. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2022,51(1):46-52. | |
13 | 李金,陈莲芙,金恩惠,等.不同茶树品种的茶树花黄酮苷研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2019,45(6):707-714. |
LI J, CHEN L F, JIN E H, et al.. Research on flavonoid glycosides of tea flower in different tea plant cultivars [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2019,45(6):707-714. | |
14 | 黄艳,商虎,朱嘉威,等.加工工艺对茶树花品质及抗氧化活性的影响[J].食品科学,2020,41(11):165-170. |
HUANG Y, SHANG H, ZHU J W, et al.. Effects of processing treatments on quality and antioxidant activity of tea plant flower [J]. Food Sci., 2020,41(11):165-170. | |
15 | CHEN D, DING Y, CHEN G, et al.. Components identification and nutritional value exploration of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) flower extract: evidence for functional food [J/OL]. Food Res. Int., 2020, 132: 109100 [2022-03-24]. . |
16 | 许兰,张丹,仝团团,等.茶树花提取物的抑菌和美白功效评价[J].天然产物研究与开发,2018,30(8):1287-1293. |
XU L, ZHANG D, TONG T T, et al.. Assessment on antibacterial and whitening effect of tea (Camellia sinensis) flower extraction [J]. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev., 2018,30(8):1287-1293. | |
17 | 郑淑琳,石玉涛,王飞权,等.乌龙茶种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析与评价[J].福建农业学报,2020,35(2):150-160. |
ZHENG S L, SHI Y T, WANG F Q, et al.. Minerals in oolong tea germplasms [J]. Fujian J. Agric. Sci., 2020,35(2):150-160. | |
18 | 石玉涛,郑淑琳,王飞权,等.武夷名丛茶树种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(7):37-50. |
SHI Y T, ZHENG S L, WANG F Q, et al.. Characteristics analysis of mineral element contents in Wuyi Mingcong tea plant germplasm resources [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020,22(7):37-50. | |
19 | 徐桂妹,陈泉宾.武夷岩茶产区的气候条件分析[J].茶叶科学技术,2009(3): 36-38. |
20 | 叶江华,张奇,林生,等.大红袍茶树生长及鲜叶品质与土壤特性的相关性[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(5):488-496. |
YE J H, ZHANG Q, LIN S, et al.. Correlation of growth and fresh leaf quality of Dahongpao tea tree with soil characteristics [J]. J. For. Environ., 2019,39(5):488-496. | |
21 | 叶宏萌,郑茂钟,李国平,等.武夷岩茶主产区土壤及茶叶微量元素分布特征[J].森林与环境学报,2016,36(4):423-428. |
YE H M, ZHENG M Z, LI G P, et al.. Distribution characteristics of trace elements in the soils and tea leaves in Wuyi Yan tea provenance [J]. J. For. Environ., 2016,36(4):423-428. | |
22 | JIA S, WANG Y, HU J, et al.. Mineral and metabolic profiles in tea leaves and flowers during flower development [J]. Plant Physiol. Bioch., 2016, 106: 316-326. |
23 | 王洁,石元值,张群峰,等.基于矿物元素指纹的龙井茶产地溯源[J].核农学报,2017,31(3):547-558. |
WANG J, SHI Y Z, ZHANG Q F, et al.. Geographical origin discriminant of Longjing tea based on mineral element fingerprints [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2017, 31(3):547-558. | |
24 | 黄月琴,方荣,陈学军,等.茄子种质资源表型性状分析与遗传多样性评价[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(7):1896-1904. |
HUANG Y Q, FANG R, CHEN X J, et al.. Analysis of phenotypic traits and evaluation genetic diversity of eggplant germplasm resources [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2021,42(7):1896-1904. | |
25 | CHEN C, CHEN H, ZHANG Y, et al.. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data [J]. Mol. Plant, 2020, 13(8): 1194-1202. |
26 | 刘伟,张群,李志坚,等.不同品种黄花菜游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J].食品科学,2019,40(10):243-250. |
LIU W, ZHANG Q, LI Z J, et al.. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for evaluating free amino acids of different cultivars of daylily buds [J]. Food Sci., 2019,40(10):243-250. | |
27 | 马小卫, 马永利, 武红霞,等. 基于因子分析和聚类分析的杧果种质矿质元素含量评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(7):1371-1381. |
MA X W, MA Y L, WU H X, et al.. Assessment of mineral elements contents at the mango germplasm level based on factor analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2018, 45(7):1371-1381. | |
28 | 张正仁, 宋长铣.土壤环境和植物基因型与土壤中微量元素的关系[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),1992,28(3):472-478. |
ZHANG Z R, SONG C X. The relationship between micronutrients in soil, and soil environments and plant genotypes [J]. J. Nanjing Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 1992,28(3):472-478. | |
29 | 杨雪梅,张锦超,邓光华,等.不同石榴品种籽粒矿质营养元素含量综合评价[J].山东农业科学,2022,54(2):63-68. |
YANG X M, ZHANG J C, DENG G H, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of mineral elements contents in arils of different pomegranate varieties [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci.,2022,54(2):63-68. | |
30 | 陈昌婕,苗玉焕,方艳,等.不同艾种质资源矿质元素含量及其与品质的关系[J].中国中药杂志,2022,47(4):880-888. |
CHEN C J, MIAO Y H, FANG Y, et al.. Content of mineral elements in different Artemisia argyi germplasms and their relationship with quality properties [J]. China J. Chin. Mater. Med., 2022,47(4):880-888. | |
31 | 薛晓芳,赵爱玲,王永康,等.不同枣品种果实矿质元素含量分析[J].山西农业科学,2016,44(6):741-745. |
XUE X F, ZHAO A L, WANG Y K, et al.. Analysis on mineral element contents of fruits in different Chinese jujube varieties [J]. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2016,44(6):741-745. | |
32 | 项越,赵淑婷,吴昊,等.虎尾草不同器官矿质元素含量对碱化环境的响应[J].草业科学,2022,39(3):511-519. |
XIANG Y, ZHAO S T, WU H, et al.. Effects of alkali stress on the content of mineral elements in different organs of Chloris virgata [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2022,39(3):511-519. | |
33 | 杨波,车玉红,徐叶挺,等.不同扁桃品种花和叶片矿质营养元素含量分析[J].新疆农业科学,2013,50(3):466-470. |
YANG B, CHE Y H, XU Y T, et al.. Analysis of mineral nutrient content of flowers and leaves of different varieties of almond (Oblate Peach) [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2013,50(3):466-470. | |
34 | 王健胜,吴政卿,周正富,等.国内外小麦种质主要矿质元素含量的评价分析[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(22):7550-7557. |
WANG J S, WU Z Q, ZHOU Z F, et al.. Evaluation and analysis of major mineral elements content in domestic and foreign wheat germplasm [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2018, 16(22):7550-7557. | |
35 | 严学成, 马艳兰, 孙治旭, 等. 茶叶中铬、镉、汞、砷及氟化物限量: [S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003. |
36 | 刘新, 汪庆华, 张宪, 等. 绿色食品 茶叶: [S].北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018. |
37 | 张祺悦,张健,李赫,等.硒蛋白结构与营养功能研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(3):196-201. |
ZHANG Q Y, ZHANG J, LI H, et al.. Research progress of selenoprotein structure and nutritional function [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2021,42(3):196-201. | |
38 | 李传友, 吕宗浩, 黄辉, 等. 富硒茶: [S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002. |
[1] | Wen DONG, Zehui JU, Zhenzhong WANG, Kangtai SUN. Project Establishment Analysis and Prospects of China’s “Forestry Germplasm Resources Cultivation and Quality Improvement” in the “14th Five-Year” National Key R&D Program [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 1-10. |
[2] | Yifan LIU, Shaoshuai LIU, Rui ZANG, Yang LI, Wei LIU, Tingting LI, Danmei LIU, Dengcai LIU, Aili LI, Long MAO, Xiang WANG, Shuaifeng GENG. Analysis of Quality Traits of 168 Wheat Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 44-57. |
[3] | Huanbin ZHENG, Ming LI, Suxin YANG, Weilin WU. Alkaline Tolerance Screening and Evaluation Analysis of Soybean Germplasm Resources at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 54-71. |
[4] | Lintao CHEN, Zhaoxiang LIU, Ying LAN, Xiangwei MOU, Xu MA, Rijun WANG. Research on Rice Variety Identification Based on Hyperspectral Technology and Principal Component Analysis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 104-111. |
[5] | Jinxian LIU, Lijuan WANG, Jie LIU, Xianyu FU, Guangheng WU. Identification and Expression Analysis of Calmodulin-binding Transcription Activator (CAMTA) Family Genes in Tea Plants [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 71-82. |
[6] | Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169. |
[7] | Baozhen ZENG, Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO. Determination of the Best Harvesting Period for ‘Muhe White’ Grape in Minqin District, Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 70-79. |
[8] | Ting WANG, Jinghan DU, Guangdi ZHANG, Jianglong WANG, Yinan JIA, Yu WANG, Wenyi BAO. Study on Quality and Volatile Substances of New Excellent Cabbage Varieties in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 165-180. |
[9] | Xueqing WANG, Bo ZHANG, Liting HAN, Zhuanzhuan LYU, Jianjun CHEN, Zhulin ZHANG, Junqiang ZHANG, Jianmei DU. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Volatile Compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 146-158. |
[10] | Yunxing WAN, Ziyang YAN, Jun YAO, Liming GUO, Jinzhong ZHU, Jianning TANG, Caiyun QIAO, Haiou KUANG, Xueyang GONG, Dan YUE, Wenzheng ZHAO. Study on the Flowering Biology and Pollination Characteristics of Goji Berries [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 34-43. |
[11] | Shan GAO, Xiaocui YAN, Nan WANG, Mengjie ZHANG, Youpeng LI, Wenda DIAO, Huijun DUAN. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 255 Maize Germplasm Resources Based on 10K SNP Chip [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 20-33. |
[12] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
[13] | Yanhong ZHANG, Zhanbin GUO, Ruixiang LIU. Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Agronomic Characters of 50 Chenopodium Quinoa Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 45-54. |
[14] | Shuhua HE, Zhixia HOU, Yajing WANG, Cai QIN, Ying JIANG, Xiaohan ZHANG, Yang LI. Effects of Shoot Pruning in Autumn on Buds Differentiation and Endogenous Hormones of Vaccinium Spp. in Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 55-62. |
[15] | Yutao SHI, Huizhen XIE, Shulin ZHENG, Guanhua YU, Feiquan WANG, Li LI, Bo ZHANG, Yuanhua LI, Shengcai LUO. Analysis of Biochemical Characteristics and Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity of Tea Polysaccharides of Local Tea Germplasms in Wuyishan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 65-76. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||