Effects of Early Bolting on Growth and Quality of Angelica dahurica

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0334

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of early bolting on the growth and quality of Angelica dahurica， 8 different sampling times were set during the growth of early bolting and non-bolting （normal growth） of Angelica dahurica to analyze agronomic characters of plant and the coumarins content in the roots were determined. The results showed that the plant height， number of fresh leaves， aboveground fresh weight and aboveground dry weight of early bolting and non-bolting plants of Angelica dahurica increased at first and then decreased during the growth， while the root length， root diameter， root fresh weight， root dry weight and root shoot ratio increased gradually. There were significant differences in plant height， aboveground fresh weight， aboveground dry weight， root dry weight， and root drying rate between early bolting and non-bolting plants of Angelica dahurica. In the whole growth process， the plant height， aboveground fresh weight and aboveground dry weight of early bolting plants were significantly higher than those of non-bolting plants， and the root drying rate of early bolting plants was significantly lower than non-bolting plants. In the early growth stage （before April 6）， imperatorin and isoimperatorin content in the roots of non-bolting plants were significantly higher than those of early bolting plants. The content of imperatorin and isoimperatorin alternated between non-bolting and early bolting plants in the middle growth period. At harvest time （July 14）， the content of imperatorin and isoimperatorin in non-bolting plants were 0.283 8% and 0.157 9%， which were higher than 0.268 8% and 0.068 0% of early bolting plants， and the content of isoimperatorin was significantly different. Early bolting not only affected the aboveground growth of Angelica dahurica， but also affected the underground root weight and coumarins content.

Key words: Angelica dahurica, early bolting, growth and development, quality

摘要：

为探讨早期抽薹对白芷生长发育和品质的影响，以早期抽薹与非抽薹（同时期正常生长）白芷植株为对象，在生长过程中设置8个取样时间，对其植株农艺性状和根部香豆素类成分含量进行分析。结果表明，在白芷生长过程中，早期抽薹和非抽薹植株的株高、鲜叶片数、地上部鲜重及干重均呈先增加后减少的趋势，而根长、根直径、根鲜重及干重、根冠比均呈逐渐上升的趋势；早期抽薹植株的株高、地上部鲜重及干重、根干重、根折干率与非抽薹植株的均有显著差异，在整个生长过程中早期抽薹植株的株高、地上部鲜重及干重均显著高于非抽薹植株，根折干率显著低于非抽薹植株。正常抽薹植株根中的欧前胡素和异欧前胡素含量在生长前期（4月6日前）显著高于同时期早期抽薹植株，生长中期非抽薹与早期抽薹植株间的欧前胡素和异欧前胡素含量高低交替变化，至收获期（7月14日）非抽薹株的欧前胡素和异欧前胡素含量分别为0.283 8%、0.157 9%，高于早期抽薹植株的0.268 8%、0.068 0%，其中，异欧前胡素含量差异达显著水平。上述结果表明，早期抽薹不但影响白芷植株地上部的生长，还影响地下部根重量及香豆素类成分含量。

关键词: 白芷, 早期抽薹, 生长发育, 品质

CLC Number:

S567

Ping WU, Xiaoyu WANG, Junxia GUO, Songlin ZHANG, Qingmiao LI, Qingmao FANG. Effects of Early Bolting on Growth and Quality of Angelica dahurica[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 58-66.

吴萍, 王晓宇, 郭俊霞, 张松林, 李青苗, 方清茂. 早期抽薹对白芷生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(12): 58-66.

Figures/Tables 6

References 26

1	中华人民共和国卫生部药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020: 109-110.
	China Pharmacopoeia Committee. Chinese Pharmacopoeia [M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2020:109-110.
2	杨红梅,刘玲玲,何明城,等.白芷免洗面膜的制备及质量评价[J].广州化工,2021,49(23):71-75.
	YANG H M, LIU L L, HE M C, et al.. Preparation and quality evaluation of dahurica free mask [J]. Guangzhou Chem. Ind., 2021, 49(23):71-75.
3	赵东岳,郝庆秀,康利平,等.伞形科药用植物早期抽薹研究进展[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(1):20-23.
	ZHAO D Y, HAO Q X, KANG L P, et al.. Advance in studying early bolting of umbelliferae medicinal plant [J]. China J. Chin. Materia Med., 2016, 41(1):20-23.
4	黎黎,刘娟,阳梦瑶,等.低温春化与光周期调控对普通白菜抽薹性状的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(5):45-51.
	LI L, LIU J, YANG M Y, et al.. Effects of low temperature vernalization and photoperiod regulation on bolting characters of pakchoi [J]. China Cucurbits Veget., 2021, 34(5):45-51.
5	王昱卜,陈晨,杜巍,等.不同品种半结球叶用莴苣抽薹特性分析[J].北京农学院学报,2021,36(2):31-35.
	WANG Y B, CHEN C, DU W, et al.. Bolting characteristics analysis of different varieties of lettuce [J]. J. Beijing Univ. Agric., 2021, 36(2):31-35.
6	孙亚玲,岳林旭,臧传江,等.不同播期和定植前植株大小对洋葱抽薹率及产量的影响[J].现代农业科技, 2019(22):39-40.
	SUN Y L, YUE L X, ZANG C J, et al.. Effects of different sowing time and plant size before planting on bolting rate and yield of qnion [J]. Modern Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019(22):39-40.
7	甘彩霞,崔磊,庞文星,等.基于萝卜高密度遗传图谱的抽薹和开花性状的QTL定位[J].园艺学报,2021,48(7):1273-1281.
	GAN C X, CUI L, PANG W X, et al.. QTL mapping of bolting and flowering traits based on high density genetic map of radish [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2021, 48(7):1273-1281.
8	刘丽娜,张南平,金红宇,等.野生抽薹与未抽薹防风中色原酮类成分比较研究[J].中国药学杂志,2020,55(8):637-642.
	LIU L N, ZHANG N P, JIN H Y, et al.. Comparison of chromone components and their contents between bolting and non-bolting Saposhnikoviae radix [J]. Chin. Pharm. J., 2020, 55(8):637-642.
9	徐广,李品明,杨毅,等.播种期对前胡早期抽薹和产质量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2021(20):55-57.
	XU G, LI P M, YANG Y, et al.. Effects of different sowing periods on early bolting, yield and quality of peucedantun praeruptorum [J]. Modern Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021(20):55-57.
10	陈存武,韩邦兴.LC-MS分析早薹对白花前胡根化学成分的影响[J].食品与生物技术学报,2013, 32 (8): 887-890.
	CHEN C W, HAN B X. Influence of early bolting on the chemical compositions of Radix Peucedani root by LC-MS [J]. J. Food Sci. Biotech., 2013, 32 (8): 887-890 .
11	孙晖,孙小兰,孟祥才,等.防风抽薹对药材质量和产量的影响[J].世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2008(2):101-104, 108.
	SUN H, SUN X L, MENG X C, et al.. Bolt effect on quality and yield of saposhnikovia divaricata roots [J]. World Sci. Technol-Modern. Tradit. Chin. Med. Materia Medica, 2008(2):101-104, 108.
12	邱黛玉,蔺海明,刘学周.当归成药期生长动态及其早期抽薹规律研究[J].甘肃农业科技,2008( 6):15-18.
	QIU D Y, LI H M, LIU X Z. Study on the growth dynamics and its early bolting regularity of Angelica sinensis [J]. Gansu Agric. Sci. Tech., 2008(6):15-18.
13	晏宇杭,卢丽洁,周永峰,等.川白芷产地趁鲜切制与传统切制方法对其质量的影响[J].中草药,2021,52(14):4176-4184.
	YAN Y H, LU L J, ZHOU Y F, et al.. Effect of fresh cutting and traditional cutting methods on quality of Angelica dahurica [J]. Chin. Trad. Herbal Drugs, 2021, 52(14):4176-4184.
14	汪精磊,李锡香,邱杨,等.十字花科蔬菜抽薹开花性状的调控机理和分子育种研究进展[J].植物遗传资源学报,2015,16(6):1283-1289.
	WANG J L, LI X X, QIU Y, et al.. Research advances on molecular markers and regulation mechanism for the bolting and blooming characteristics of brassicaceae vegetables [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2015, 16(6):1283-1289.
15	陈微,李威亚,惠林冲,等.洋葱抽薹开花性状的研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(3):151-156.
	CHEN W, LI W Y, HUI L C, et al.. Research advances on bolting and flowering characteristics of onion [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2020, 52(3):151-156.
16	苑军,殷霈瑶,李红莉.白芷的生物学特性及规范化栽培技术[J].中国林副特产,2010(1):43-44.
	YUAN J, YIN P Y, LI H L. Biological characteristics and standardized cultivation techniques of Angelica dahurica [J]. Forest By-Product Speciality China, 2010(1):43-44.
17	马逾英,郭丁丁,蒋桂华,等.白芷种质资源的调查报告[J].华西药学杂志,2009,24(5):457-460.
	MA Y Y, GUO D D, JIANG G H, et al.. Investigation report on the germplasm resources of Angelica dahurica [J]. West Chin. J. Pharmaceutical Sci., 2009, 24(5):457-460.
18	郭爱珍,陈斌,王光,等.胡萝卜肉质根大小对种株抽薹开花的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2015(12):11-13.
	GUO A Z, CHEN B, WANG G, et al.. Effects of fleshy root size on bolting and blossoming in carrot seed plants [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2015(12):11-13.
19	刘娟,黎黎,陆柄辰,等.普通白菜种质资源耐抽薹性评价及耐抽薹种质的筛选[J].中国蔬菜,2019(9): 37-43.
	LIU J, LI L, LU B C, et al.. Evaluation on bolting tolerance of pakchoi germplasm resources and screening of bolting tolerance germplasm [J]. China Veget., 2019(9):37-43.
20	王建华,崔景荣,朱燕,等.防风及其地区习用品解热镇痛作用的比较研究[J].中国医药学报,1989(1): 20-22, 79.
21	尹红芳,晋小军.控制抽薹对宽叶羌活产量和品质的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(3):77-80, 87.
	YIN H F, JIN X J. Effect of controlling bolting on yield and quality from root of Notopterygium forbesii [J]. J. Gansu Agric. Univ., 2009, 44(3):77-80, 87.
22	王梦月,贾敏如,马逾英,等.不同入药部分及不同加工方法对白芷香豆素类成分含量的影响[J].中药材, 2004 (11):826-828.
	WANG M Y, JIA M R, MA Y Y, et al.. Determination of coumarins content in radix angelicae dahuricae by HPLC and UV [J]. J. Chin. Med. Mater., 2004(11):826-828.
23	李博园,韩敏,张明英,等.杭白芷根发育过程中香豆素类成分主要积累部位及含量变化研究[J].陕西农业科学,2020,66(7):48-52.
	LI B Y, HAN M, ZHANG M Y, et al.. Study on the main accumulation site and content changes of coumarins in root during development of Angelica dahurica [J]. Shaanxi J. Agric. Sci., 2020, 66(7): 48-52.
24	陈郡雯,吴卫,侯凯等.川白芷生长发育、养分及有效成分的动态研究[J].中国中药杂志,2010,35(21): 2812-2817.
	CHEN J W, WU W, HOU K, et al.. Dynamic research of growth,N,P,K and active ingredients in Angelica dahurica var.formosana from Sichuan province [J]. China J. Chin. Materia Med., 2010, 35(21): 2812-2817.
25	马逾英,钟世红,贾敏如,等.川白芷与公白芷的形态组织学对比鉴定[J].时珍国医国药,2005(9):833-834.
	MA Y Y, ZHONG S H, JIA M R, et al.. Comparasion of macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of Chuan Baizhi and Gong Baizhi [J]. Lishizhen Med. Materia Medica Res., 2005(9):833-834.
26	兰志琼,卢先明,陈继兰,等.白芷根中香豆素类成分的组织化学定位研究[J].中国医药导报,2011,8(36): 66-68.
	LAN Z Q, LU X M, CHEN J L, et al.. Study on histochemical allocation of coumarin in the root of Anglica Dahurica [J]. China Med. Herald, 2011, 8(36): 66-68.

采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	地上部鲜重 Aboveground fresh weight/g		地上部干重 Aboveground dry weight/g		地上部折干率 Aboveground drying rate/%
采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting
3/22	77.6±2.9	14.8±0.7^*	15.0±0.8	2.3±0.1^*	19.3±0.3	15.5±0.1^*
4/6	182.1±7.6	23.0±1.1^*	41.6±2.1	3.6±0.2^*	22.9±0.2	15.6±0.7^*
4/21	185.1±8.2	57.9± 2.6^*	30.3±1.5	8.6±0.4^*	16.4±0.3	14.9±0.3
5/7	151.5±7.0	63.6±3.0^*	32.8±1.6	15.0±1.1^*	21.6±0.4	23.6±0.6
5/25	118.1±7.1	41.2±2.1^*	28.1±1.4	9.9±0.9^*	23.8±0.4	24.0±2.4
6/10	74.2±4.0	56.1±2.5^*	16.5±1.3	13.8±0.7^*	22.2±0.6	24.6±0.4
6/25	90.9±4.8	43.6±2.4^*	20.4±1.5	10.6±0.5^*	22.4±1.2	24.3±0.5
7/14	72.3±3.6	28.5±1.2^*	16.0±0.9	6.9±0.3^*	22.1±0.3	24.2±0.4

采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	地上部鲜重 Aboveground fresh weight/g		地上部干重 Aboveground dry weight/g		地上部折干率 Aboveground drying rate/%
采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting
3/22	77.6±2.9	14.8±0.7^*	15.0±0.8	2.3±0.1^*	19.3±0.3	15.5±0.1^*
4/6	182.1±7.6	23.0±1.1^*	41.6±2.1	3.6±0.2^*	22.9±0.2	15.6±0.7^*
4/21	185.1±8.2	57.9± 2.6^*	30.3±1.5	8.6±0.4^*	16.4±0.3	14.9±0.3
5/7	151.5±7.0	63.6±3.0^*	32.8±1.6	15.0±1.1^*	21.6±0.4	23.6±0.6
5/25	118.1±7.1	41.2±2.1^*	28.1±1.4	9.9±0.9^*	23.8±0.4	24.0±2.4
6/10	74.2±4.0	56.1±2.5^*	16.5±1.3	13.8±0.7^*	22.2±0.6	24.6±0.4
6/25	90.9±4.8	43.6±2.4^*	20.4±1.5	10.6±0.5^*	22.4±1.2	24.3±0.5
7/14	72.3±3.6	28.5±1.2^*	16.0±0.9	6.9±0.3^*	22.1±0.3	24.2±0.4

采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	根鲜重 Root fresh weight/g		根干重 Root dry weight/g		根折干率 Root drying rate/%
采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting
3/22	12.8±0.7	2.4±0.1^*	2.5±0.1	0.6±0.0^*	19.6±0.4	25.4±0.9^*
4/6	25.0±1.9	4.7±0.2^*	6.3±0.7	1.6±0.1^*	25.1±1.1	34.0±1.2^*
4/21	33.1±1.5	20.3±1.3^*	8.5±0.7	6.2±0.4^*	25.6±1.0	30.7±0.3^*
5/7	49.6±3.2	37.2±1.6^*	11.1±0.8	14.6±0.6^*	22.4±0.2	39.3±0.4^*
5/25	48.9±2.7	44.4±2.4	12.9±0.6	18.0±0.8^*	26.4±0.4	40.6±0.7^*
6/10	43.2±2.8	61.5±5.1^*	10.4±0.9	23.0±1.3^*	24.1±0.6	37.5±1.4^*
6/25	54.1±0.4	125.7±8.1^*	15.4±0.8	44.3±2.7^*	28.4±1.4	35.3±1.2^*
7/14	62.9±3.1	150.4±7.4^*	17.4±0.9	47.4±2.4^*	27.7±0.1	31.5±0.1^*

采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	根鲜重 Root fresh weight/g		根干重 Root dry weight/g		根折干率 Root drying rate/%
采集时间Sampling date（m/d）	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting	早期抽薹 Early bolting	非抽薹 Non-bolting
3/22	12.8±0.7	2.4±0.1^*	2.5±0.1	0.6±0.0^*	19.6±0.4	25.4±0.9^*
4/6	25.0±1.9	4.7±0.2^*	6.3±0.7	1.6±0.1^*	25.1±1.1	34.0±1.2^*
4/21	33.1±1.5	20.3±1.3^*	8.5±0.7	6.2±0.4^*	25.6±1.0	30.7±0.3^*
5/7	49.6±3.2	37.2±1.6^*	11.1±0.8	14.6±0.6^*	22.4±0.2	39.3±0.4^*
5/25	48.9±2.7	44.4±2.4	12.9±0.6	18.0±0.8^*	26.4±0.4	40.6±0.7^*
6/10	43.2±2.8	61.5±5.1^*	10.4±0.9	23.0±1.3^*	24.1±0.6	37.5±1.4^*
6/25	54.1±0.4	125.7±8.1^*	15.4±0.8	44.3±2.7^*	28.4±1.4	35.3±1.2^*
7/14	62.9±3.1	150.4±7.4^*	17.4±0.9	47.4±2.4^*	27.7±0.1	31.5±0.1^*

[1]	Wen DONG, Zehui JU, Zhenzhong WANG, Kangtai SUN. Project Establishment Analysis and Prospects of China’s “Forestry Germplasm Resources Cultivation and Quality Improvement” in the “14^th Five-Year” National Key R&D Program [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 1-10.
[2]	Tao LIU, Yuhui KONG. Research Advance on Coordinated Adaptation of New Quality Agricultural Productivity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 1-9.
[3]	Xiaowei CHEN, Yuzhu SHA, Xiu LIU, Pengyang SHAO, Fanxiong WANG, Zhuanhui XIE, Wenxin YANG, Qianling CHEN, Min GAO, Wei HUANG. Analysis of Gene Expression Characteristics Associated with Quality， Nutrient Composition， and Meat Quality of Tibetan Sheep Meat During Different Phenological Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 161-171.
[4]	Guangyong SONG, Yawen GUO, Jing XUE, Keqing YANG, Xuede SU, Long ZHOU. Effects of Different Fertilizer and Water Treatments on Fruit Quality of 7 Table Grapes in Greenhouses [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 229-240.
[5]	Yanfang ZHU, Qiang CHANG, Yan HAO, Hailong CHEN. Effects of Reflective Film on Fruit Quality and Volatile Components of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 72-82.
[6]	Shijian BAI, Jinge HU. Effects of Gibberellic Acid on Berry and Raisin of Perlette Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 158-169.
[7]	Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth， Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
[8]	Jialiang YUAN, Runnan LIAN, Wuping ZHANG. Accurate Identification and Grading Method for Daylily Flower Buds [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 103-112.
[9]	Wenting ZHANG, Yang LI, Shi QIU, Guangming LU, Dongshu GUO, Baolong ZHANG, Jinyan WANG. Effects of Badh2 Gene on Rice Quality Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 39-48.
[10]	Darong LI, Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Meide ZHANG, Xiaogang JIANG, Jinwen YOU, Hua WANG. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Properties of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 216-226.
[11]	Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization， Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238.
[12]	Dexuan ZHO, Peng GAO, Xiaolei WEN, Shifeng MU, Suhong GAO, Lina FENG, Weiming SUN, Huixia QI. Effect of Chinese Chestnut Yellow Crinkle Disease on Quality of Chestnut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 136-140.
[13]	Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169.
[14]	Qiang WU, Conglian WU, Xiaoyun WU, Jian WU, Xuanmei XU, Junsheng LAI, Weiyun HU, Bangchu GONG, Xibing JIANG. Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Yield and Fruit Quality of Castanea henryi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 228-237.
[15]	Baozhen ZENG, Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO. Determination of the Best Harvesting Period for ‘Muhe White’ Grape in Minqin District， Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 70-79.