Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 195-205.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0914
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiuli HAN1(), Jiawei LI1, Jie ZHANG1, Yanjie GUO1,2, Lijuan ZHANG1, Yanzhi JI1(
)
Received:
2022-10-26
Accepted:
2022-12-15
Online:
2024-04-15
Published:
2024-04-23
Contact:
Yanzhi JI
韩秀丽1(), 李嘉伟1, 张杰1, 郭艳杰1,2, 张丽娟1, 吉艳芝1(
)
通讯作者:
吉艳芝
作者简介:
韩秀丽 E-mail:Hanxl202210@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xiuli HAN, Jiawei LI, Jie ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Replacing Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Grape Growth and Soil Fertility[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 195-205.
韩秀丽, 李嘉伟, 张杰, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 吉艳芝. 生物有机肥替代化肥对葡萄生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 195-205.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0914
处理 Treatment | 养分投入 Nutrient | 生物有机肥 Bio-organic fertilizer/(kg·hm-2) | 灌水量 Amount of irrigation/m³ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 176 | 118 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 080 |
Opt | 147 | 98 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 840 |
B1 | 118 | 69 | 164 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 840 |
B2 | 89 | 40 | 143 | 58 | 58 | 42 | 840 |
Table 1 Nutrient input and irrigation amount of different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 养分投入 Nutrient | 生物有机肥 Bio-organic fertilizer/(kg·hm-2) | 灌水量 Amount of irrigation/m³ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 176 | 118 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 080 |
Opt | 147 | 98 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 840 |
B1 | 118 | 69 | 164 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 840 |
B2 | 89 | 40 | 143 | 58 | 58 | 42 | 840 |
处理 Treatment | 总酚 Total phenol/(mg·g-1) | 单宁 Tannin/(mg·g-1) | 花色苷 Anthocyanin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable aci/% | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | 籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | |||||
CK | 28.37±8.19 ab | 7.40±1.76 a | 6.27±3.95 b | 1.17±0.29 b | 1.02±0.74 a | 16.87±1.25 a | 1.19±0.01 a | 14.22±0.99 b |
Opt | 31.09±7.55 ab | 6.91±1.37 a | 12.07±4.31 ab | 1.67±0.82 ab | 1.02±0.27 a | 16.97±0.67 a | 1.23±0.18 a | 13.99±2.17 b |
B1 | 23.12±1.89 b | 7.25±2.49 a | 7.25±3.84 b | 0.98±0.54 b | 0.82±0.06 b | 17.80±0.36 a | 1.02±0.21 ab | 18.04±3.88 ab |
B2 | 21.05±5.31 b | 6.80±1.40 a | 15.35±4.45 a | 2.21±0.86 a | 1.10±0.25 a | 17.17±1.85 a | 0.87±0.07 b | 19.70±0.53 a |
Table 3 Grape quality of different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 总酚 Total phenol/(mg·g-1) | 单宁 Tannin/(mg·g-1) | 花色苷 Anthocyanin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable aci/% | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | 籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | |||||
CK | 28.37±8.19 ab | 7.40±1.76 a | 6.27±3.95 b | 1.17±0.29 b | 1.02±0.74 a | 16.87±1.25 a | 1.19±0.01 a | 14.22±0.99 b |
Opt | 31.09±7.55 ab | 6.91±1.37 a | 12.07±4.31 ab | 1.67±0.82 ab | 1.02±0.27 a | 16.97±0.67 a | 1.23±0.18 a | 13.99±2.17 b |
B1 | 23.12±1.89 b | 7.25±2.49 a | 7.25±3.84 b | 0.98±0.54 b | 0.82±0.06 b | 17.80±0.36 a | 1.02±0.21 ab | 18.04±3.88 ab |
B2 | 21.05±5.31 b | 6.80±1.40 a | 15.35±4.45 a | 2.21±0.86 a | 1.10±0.25 a | 17.17±1.85 a | 0.87±0.07 b | 19.70±0.53 a |
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 8.13±0.02αb | 8.29±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.02 αa | 8.33±0.01 αb | 8.39±0.03 αa |
Opt | 8.09±0.06 αb | 8.24±0.01 αa | 8.27±0.02 αa | 8.32±0.01 αa | 8.34±0.01 αa | |
B1 | 8.14±0.09 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.11 αa | |
B2 | 8.11±0.07 αa | 8.24±0.05 αa | 8.27±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.11 αa | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 8.11±0.09 αb | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.30±0.01 αa | 8.28±0.05 αb | 8.36±0.01 αa |
Opt | 8.11±0.04 αb | 8.28±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.36±0.03 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.06 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.28±0.04 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.02 αa | 8.19±0.06 αab | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.30±0.04 αa | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 8.23±0.06 αb | 8.33±0.07 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αb | 8.38±0.05 αa |
Opt | 8.21±0.09 αab | 8.39±0.16 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.35±0.10 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | 8.28±0.09 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.07 αa | 8.19±0.07 αab | 8.25±0.11 αa | 8.29±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.08 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 8.35±0.06 αa | 8.41±0.14 αa | 8.33±0.14 αa | 8.41±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa |
Opt | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.38±0.05 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.34±0.03 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | |
B1 | 8.11±0.01 βa | 8.16±0.06 βb | 8.20±0.09 αa | 8.27±0.15 αa | 8.27±0.08 αa | |
B2 | 7.97±0.04 γb | 8.14±0.01 βb | 8.21±0.05 αa | 8.24±0.02 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa |
Table 4 Soil pH of different fertilization treatments
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 8.13±0.02αb | 8.29±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.02 αa | 8.33±0.01 αb | 8.39±0.03 αa |
Opt | 8.09±0.06 αb | 8.24±0.01 αa | 8.27±0.02 αa | 8.32±0.01 αa | 8.34±0.01 αa | |
B1 | 8.14±0.09 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.11 αa | |
B2 | 8.11±0.07 αa | 8.24±0.05 αa | 8.27±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.11 αa | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 8.11±0.09 αb | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.30±0.01 αa | 8.28±0.05 αb | 8.36±0.01 αa |
Opt | 8.11±0.04 αb | 8.28±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.36±0.03 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.06 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.28±0.04 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.02 αa | 8.19±0.06 αab | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.30±0.04 αa | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 8.23±0.06 αb | 8.33±0.07 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αb | 8.38±0.05 αa |
Opt | 8.21±0.09 αab | 8.39±0.16 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.35±0.10 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | 8.28±0.09 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.07 αa | 8.19±0.07 αab | 8.25±0.11 αa | 8.29±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.08 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 8.35±0.06 αa | 8.41±0.14 αa | 8.33±0.14 αa | 8.41±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa |
Opt | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.38±0.05 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.34±0.03 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | |
B1 | 8.11±0.01 βa | 8.16±0.06 βb | 8.20±0.09 αa | 8.27±0.15 αa | 8.27±0.08 αa | |
B2 | 7.97±0.04 γb | 8.14±0.01 βb | 8.21±0.05 αa | 8.24±0.02 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa |
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 10.44±2.95 αa | 6.30±1.12 βc | 8.48±0.78 αa | 7.47±0.36 αa | 3.41±0.90 βbc |
Opt | 11.83±1.56 αa | 10.68±0.13 αa | 6.06±1.50 βa | 6.63±0.38 αa | 5.54±0.12 αa | |
B1 | 12.71±1.74 αa | 9.95±2.15 αa | 6.26±0.57 βa | 6.46±1.20 αa | 5.37±0.84 αa | |
B2 | 12.89±1.55 αa | 9.07±0.85 αa | 8.30±0.71 αa | 7.14±1.16 αa | 6.06±0.41 αab | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 12.17±0.30 αa | 10.24±0.50 αa | 3.70±2.10 βb | 3.80±1.83 αb | 3.00±0.66 βc |
Opt | 12.80±0.82 αa | 9.29±0.36 αb | 5.60±0.10 αβa | 5.14±0.09 αb | 4.02±0.22 αβbc | |
B1 | 12.30±0.54 αa | 11.72±0.44 αa | 8.04±1.47 αa | 6.50±2.39 αa | 4.87±0.78 αa | |
B2 | 13.00±1.87 αa | 11.23±2.50 αa | 8.20±1.51 αa | 5.43±1.54 αa | 4.83±0.99 αb | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 9.85±1.99 αa | 8.06±0.74 αβb | 5.85±0.91 βb | 5.05±0.60 αb | 4.93±0.88 αβa |
Opt | 9.47±1.06 αa | 7.04±0.95 βc | 4.72±0.59 βa | 4.62±0.71 αb | 4.28±0.83 βb | |
B1 | 11.91±2.91 αa | 8.64±2.81 αβa | 6.42±1.35 αβa | 7.35±2.41 αa | 6.03±0.42 αβa | |
B2 | 12.60±2.13 αa | 10.20±0.76 αa | 8.67±1.97 αa | 7.55±1.44 αa | 6.54±1.11 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 9.75±1.06 γa | 5.39±0.18 βc | 5.47±0.43 βγb | 4.44±0.08 αβb | 4.52±0.58 βγab |
Opt | 10.23±2.79 βγa | 6.56±0.88 βc | 4.10±1.95 γa | 2.14±0.29 βc | 3.05±0.59 γc | |
B1 | 13.38±1.74 αβa | 10.06±1.60 αa | 7.08±0.46 αβa | 5.87±1.92 αa | 5.79±1.72 αβa | |
B2 | 13.96±0.51 αa | 11.43±0.71 αa | 8.95±0.14 αa | 6.08±2.11 αa | 6.48±0.29 αab |
Table 5 Soil organic matter content of different fertilization treatments
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 10.44±2.95 αa | 6.30±1.12 βc | 8.48±0.78 αa | 7.47±0.36 αa | 3.41±0.90 βbc |
Opt | 11.83±1.56 αa | 10.68±0.13 αa | 6.06±1.50 βa | 6.63±0.38 αa | 5.54±0.12 αa | |
B1 | 12.71±1.74 αa | 9.95±2.15 αa | 6.26±0.57 βa | 6.46±1.20 αa | 5.37±0.84 αa | |
B2 | 12.89±1.55 αa | 9.07±0.85 αa | 8.30±0.71 αa | 7.14±1.16 αa | 6.06±0.41 αab | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 12.17±0.30 αa | 10.24±0.50 αa | 3.70±2.10 βb | 3.80±1.83 αb | 3.00±0.66 βc |
Opt | 12.80±0.82 αa | 9.29±0.36 αb | 5.60±0.10 αβa | 5.14±0.09 αb | 4.02±0.22 αβbc | |
B1 | 12.30±0.54 αa | 11.72±0.44 αa | 8.04±1.47 αa | 6.50±2.39 αa | 4.87±0.78 αa | |
B2 | 13.00±1.87 αa | 11.23±2.50 αa | 8.20±1.51 αa | 5.43±1.54 αa | 4.83±0.99 αb | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 9.85±1.99 αa | 8.06±0.74 αβb | 5.85±0.91 βb | 5.05±0.60 αb | 4.93±0.88 αβa |
Opt | 9.47±1.06 αa | 7.04±0.95 βc | 4.72±0.59 βa | 4.62±0.71 αb | 4.28±0.83 βb | |
B1 | 11.91±2.91 αa | 8.64±2.81 αβa | 6.42±1.35 αβa | 7.35±2.41 αa | 6.03±0.42 αβa | |
B2 | 12.60±2.13 αa | 10.20±0.76 αa | 8.67±1.97 αa | 7.55±1.44 αa | 6.54±1.11 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 9.75±1.06 γa | 5.39±0.18 βc | 5.47±0.43 βγb | 4.44±0.08 αβb | 4.52±0.58 βγab |
Opt | 10.23±2.79 βγa | 6.56±0.88 βc | 4.10±1.95 γa | 2.14±0.29 βc | 3.05±0.59 γc | |
B1 | 13.38±1.74 αβa | 10.06±1.60 αa | 7.08±0.46 αβa | 5.87±1.92 αa | 5.79±1.72 αβa | |
B2 | 13.96±0.51 αa | 11.43±0.71 αa | 8.95±0.14 αa | 6.08±2.11 αa | 6.48±0.29 αab |
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 有效钾 Available potassium | 总酚 Total phenol | 单宁Tannin | 花色苷Anthocyanin | 可溶性固形物 Solubility solids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic matter | -0.910** | ||||||||
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 0.869** | -0.822** | |||||||
速效磷 Available phosphorus | -0.341 | 0.477 | -0.445 | ||||||
有效钾 Available potassium | -0.533 | 0.502 | -0.676* | 0.261 | |||||
总酚 Total phenol | 0.478 | -0.684* | 0.446 | -0.503 | -0.464 | ||||
单宁 Tannin | -0.425 | 0.250 | -0.147 | -0.185 | 0.006 | 0.093 | |||
花色苷 Anthocyanin | 0.196 | -0.223 | 0.159 | -0.071 | -0.061 | -0.102 | 0.253 | ||
可溶性固形物 Solubility solids | -0.239 | 0.266 | -0.524 | 0.085 | 0.285 | 0.189 | -0.261 | -0.575 | |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.748** | -0.712** | 0.700* | -0.475 | -0.439 | 0.653* | -0.141 | -0.038 | -0.091 |
Table 6 Correlation between soil indexes and grape quality
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 有效钾 Available potassium | 总酚 Total phenol | 单宁Tannin | 花色苷Anthocyanin | 可溶性固形物 Solubility solids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic matter | -0.910** | ||||||||
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 0.869** | -0.822** | |||||||
速效磷 Available phosphorus | -0.341 | 0.477 | -0.445 | ||||||
有效钾 Available potassium | -0.533 | 0.502 | -0.676* | 0.261 | |||||
总酚 Total phenol | 0.478 | -0.684* | 0.446 | -0.503 | -0.464 | ||||
单宁 Tannin | -0.425 | 0.250 | -0.147 | -0.185 | 0.006 | 0.093 | |||
花色苷 Anthocyanin | 0.196 | -0.223 | 0.159 | -0.071 | -0.061 | -0.102 | 0.253 | ||
可溶性固形物 Solubility solids | -0.239 | 0.266 | -0.524 | 0.085 | 0.285 | 0.189 | -0.261 | -0.575 | |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.748** | -0.712** | 0.700* | -0.475 | -0.439 | 0.653* | -0.141 | -0.038 | -0.091 |
处理 Treatment | 投入/(元·hm-2) Input/ (yuan·hm-2) | 2019 | 2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | |||
CK | 24 373.98 | 40 943.22± 7 622.09 b | 16 569.24± 7 622.09 b | 1.68±0.31 b | 42 079.95± 2 432.63 c | 17 705.97± 2 432.63 b | 1.73± 0.10 c | |
Opt | 22 828.32 | 54 224.24± 12 134.94 ab | 31 395.92± 12 134.94 a | 2.38±0.53 a | 44 259.79± 2 682.49 c | 21 431.47± 2 682.49 b | 1.94± 0.12 b | |
B1 | 24 881.04 | 55 870.11± 2 453.50 ab | 30 989.07± 2 453.50 a | 2.25±0.10 ab | 55 043.16± 724.21 a | 30 162.12± 724.21 a | 2.21± 0.03 a | |
B2 | 26 933.76 | 48 200.19± 2 043.73 ab | 21 266.44± 2 043.73 b | 1.79±0.08 ab | 48 572.93± 2 637.13 b | 21 639.17± 2 637.13 b | 1.80± 0.01 bc |
Table 7 Economic benefits of grape under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 投入/(元·hm-2) Input/ (yuan·hm-2) | 2019 | 2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | |||
CK | 24 373.98 | 40 943.22± 7 622.09 b | 16 569.24± 7 622.09 b | 1.68±0.31 b | 42 079.95± 2 432.63 c | 17 705.97± 2 432.63 b | 1.73± 0.10 c | |
Opt | 22 828.32 | 54 224.24± 12 134.94 ab | 31 395.92± 12 134.94 a | 2.38±0.53 a | 44 259.79± 2 682.49 c | 21 431.47± 2 682.49 b | 1.94± 0.12 b | |
B1 | 24 881.04 | 55 870.11± 2 453.50 ab | 30 989.07± 2 453.50 a | 2.25±0.10 ab | 55 043.16± 724.21 a | 30 162.12± 724.21 a | 2.21± 0.03 a | |
B2 | 26 933.76 | 48 200.19± 2 043.73 ab | 21 266.44± 2 043.73 b | 1.79±0.08 ab | 48 572.93± 2 637.13 b | 21 639.17± 2 637.13 b | 1.80± 0.01 bc |
1 | 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021:1-945. |
2 | 郭巨秋.河北省苹果园土壤养分状况与变化研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2020. |
GUO J Q. Study on soil nutrient status and change of apple orchard in Hebei province [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agriculture University, 2020. | |
3 | FONTES J, YEBOAH E, OFORI P, et al.. Fertilizer and residue quality effects on organic matter stabilization in soil aggregates [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2009, 73(3):961-966. |
4 | 寇长林,骆晓声,巨晓棠.优化施氮对设施番茄土壤硝态氮残留及土壤氮平衡的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(5):837-848. |
KOU C L, LUO X S, JU X T. Effects of optimal nitrogen fertilization on N balance and nitrate-N accumulation in greenhouse tomato fields [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2021, 27(5):837-848. | |
5 | 仝倩倩,祝英,崔得领,等.我国微生物肥料发展现状及在蔬菜生产中的应用[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(4):259-266. |
TONG Q Q, ZHU Y, CUI D L, et al.. The development status of microbial fertilizer in China and its application in vegetable planting [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2022(4):259-266. | |
6 | 倪幸,窦春英,丁立忠,等.有机物料对山核桃林地土壤的培肥改良效果[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5):1266-1275. |
NI X, DOU C Y, DING L Z, et al.. Organic materials improved the soil fertility in Carya cathayensis forest lands [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2018, 24(5):1266-1275. | |
7 | 周超.有机肥部分替代化学肥料对苹果园土壤养分和生物活性的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2018. |
ZHOU C. Effect of partial substitution of organic fertilizers on soil nutrients and biological activity in apple orchard [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018. | |
8 | 申小冉,徐明岗,张文菊,等.长期不同施肥对土壤各粒级组分中氮含量及分配比例的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(5):1127-1134. |
SHEN X R, XU M G, ZHANG W J, et al.. Effect of various long-term fertilizations on soil nitrogen concentration and distribution percentage in particle-size fractions [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2012, 18(5):1127-1134. | |
9 | 任静,刘小勇,韩富军,等.施氮水平对旱塬覆沙苹果园土壤酶活性及果实品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(8):206-213. |
REN J, LIU X Y, HAN F J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels on soil enzyme activity and fruit quality of sand-covered apple orchard in Loess Plateau of Eastern Gansu [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(8):206-213. | |
10 | IQBAL A, HE L, ALI I, et al.. Manure combined with chemical fertilizer increases rice productivity by improving soil health, post-anthesis biomass yield, and nitrogen metabolism [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(10):e0238934 [2022-09-15]. . |
11 | 王慧,卜容燕,韩上,等.有机肥配施化肥对直播油菜产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(6):156-165. |
WANG H, BU R Y, HAN S, et al.. The effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on the yields,nutrient uptake and utilization of direct-seeding rapeseed [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. Chin., 2021(6):156-165. | |
12 | 周喜荣,张丽萍,孙权,等.有机肥与化肥配施对果园土壤肥力及鲜食葡萄产量与品质的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2019,53(6):861-868. |
ZHOU X R, ZHANG L P, SUN Q, et al.. Effects of combined organic fertilizer with chemical fertilizer on soil fertility in orchard and yield and quality of table grape [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2019, 53(6):861-868. | |
13 | 李水祥.有机肥替代部分化肥对蜜柚树体营养及果实品质的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2019. |
LI S X. Effects of chemical fertilizer partialy substituted by organicfertilizer on the nutrition and fruit quality of pomelo trees [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. | |
14 | SANJARIMIJANI M, SIROUSMEHR A R, FAKHERI B. The effects of drought stress and humic acid on morphological traits, yield and anthocyanin of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) [J]. Agroecology, 2016, 8(3):346-358. |
15 | 刘璐.两种微生物菌剂对土壤特性及赤霞珠葡萄果实品质的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学, 2016. |
LIU L. Effects of two microbial agents on soil properties and Cabernet sauvignon grape quality [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2016. | |
16 | TOMIĆ J, PEŠAKOVIĆ M, MILIVOJEVIĆ J, et al.. How to improve strawberry productivity, nutrients composition, and beneficial rhizosphere microflora by biofertilization and mineral fertilization [J]. J. Plant Nutr., 2018, 41(13/16):2009-2021. |
17 | YUAN G, JIA C, LI Z, et al.. Effect of brassinosteroids on drought resistance and abscisic acid concentration in tomato under water stress [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2010, 126(2):103-108. |
18 | 谢凯,宋晓晖,董彩霞,等.不同有机肥处理对黄冠梨生长及果园土壤性状的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(1):214-222. |
XIE K, SONG X H, DONG C X, et al.. Effects of different organic fertilizers on tree growth and soil property in Huangguan pear orchard [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(1): 214-222. | |
19 | 王志慧,马振朝,张丽娟,等.河北葡萄园施肥与土壤养分演变及其对产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(7):106-115. |
WANG Z H, MA Z C, ZHANG L J, et al.. Fertilization and soil nutrient evolution of vineyards in Hebei and its impact on yield [J]. Northern Hortic., 2020(7):106-115. | |
20 | 佟鑫,马振朝,张子涛,等.河北省赤霞珠葡萄土壤养分情况与叶片营养诊断分析[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(13):146-151. |
TONG X, MA Z C, ZHANG Z T, et al.. Analysis of soil nutrients and leaf nutrition diagnosis of chaxia bead grapes in Hebei province [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2021, 49(13):146-151. | |
21 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
22 | 牛雪,张军翔,徐国前.葡萄与葡萄酒中总酚测定方法的研究进展[J].食品与机械,2016(3):239-242. |
NIU X, ZHANG J X, XU G Q. Research progress on determination of total polyphenols in grape and wine [J]. Food Mach., 2016(3):239-242. | |
23 | 杨夫臣,吴江,程建徽,等.葡萄果皮花色素的提取及其理化性质[J].果树学报,2007,24(3):287-292. |
YANG F C, WU J, CHENG J H, et al.. Studies on extr action and physical-chemical properties of anthocyanin from Red Globe grape peel [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2007, 24(3):287-292. | |
24 | 王华.葡萄与葡萄酒实验技术操作规范[M].西安:西安地图出版社,1999:1-327. |
25 | 段鑫垚.不同行内覆盖处理对葡萄园土壤性质和葡萄果实品质的影响研究 [D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. |
DUAN X Y. Research on the influence of different in-row mulching treatments on soil properties and berry quality in vineyard [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021. | |
26 | BOŻENA D, JACEK D, ANNA P, et al.. The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration-results from a field-scale study [J]. J. Soil Sediment., 2016, 16(10):2335-2343. |
27 | YUAN G F, JIA C G, LI Z, et al.. Effect of brassinosteroids on drought resistance and abscisic acid concentration in tomato under water stress [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2010, 126(2):103-108. |
28 | 杨雪,王添,谢永丽,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌DGL1促燕麦生长分子机制及代谢通路探究[J].草地学报,2022,30(11):2899-2909. |
YANG X, WANG T, XIE Y L, et al.. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DGL1 promotes Avena sativa growth and the underlying molecular mechanism of metabolic pathways [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2022, 30(11):2899-2909. | |
29 | 吴莉.贺兰山东麓不同品种酿酒葡萄与葡萄酒中酚类和香气物质积累的比较研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2020. |
WU L. Comparative study on the accumulation of phenols and aroma substances in different grape varieties and wines at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2020. | |
30 | 胡禧熙,王迪,鲁会玲,等.限根栽培模式对‘夏黑’葡萄园土壤pH及养分含量的影响[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2020(4):25-28. |
HU X X, WANG D, LU H L, et al.. Effect of root restriction cultivation pattern on soil pH and nutrient content of ‘Summer Black’ vineyard [J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 2020(4):25-28. | |
31 | ZERIHUN A, MCCLYMONT L, LANYON D, et al.. Deconvoluting effects of vine and soil properties on grape berry composition [J]. J. Sci. Food. Agric., 2015, 95(1):193-203. |
32 | 周娟,袁珍贵,郭莉莉,等.土壤酸化对作物生长发育的影响及改良措施[J].作物研究,2013,27(1):96-102. |
33 | LI J L, LIANG Y Y, LIU W J, et al.. Effects of manure substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizer on rubber seedling growth and soil environment [J]. J. Appl. Ecol., 2022, 33(2):431-438. |
34 | 谢丽华,李玲玲,谢军红,等.有机肥替代化肥对陇中旱区玉米生长及农田碳排放的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(6):1029-1038. |
XIE L H, LI L L, XIE J H, et al.. Effects of substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer on maize growth and field carbon emission in dry farming area of Longzhong, Gansu province [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2022, 28(6):1029-1038. | |
35 | 赵健宇,王凤新,孟潮彪,等.生物有机肥对马铃薯产量与土壤氮循环作用机制研究[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(4):343-351. |
ZHAO J Y, WANG F X, MENG C B, et al.. Mechanism of bio-organic fertilizer on potato yield and soil nitrogen-cycling [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2022, 53(4):343-351. | |
36 | 岳文俊,张富仓,李志军,等.水氮耦合对甜瓜氮素吸收与土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):88-96, 119. |
YUE W J, ZHANG F C, LI Z J, et al.. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on nitrogen uptake of muskmelon and nitrate accumulation in soil [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2015, 46(2):88-96, 119. | |
37 | 宋建强,屈慧鸽,梁海忠,等.‘蛇龙珠’葡萄园土壤指标与葡萄酒理化指标相关性分析[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(6):863-870. |
SONG J Q, QU H G, LIANG H Z, et al.. Correlation analysis between soil indicators and physiochemical indexes of wine composition in ‘Cabernet Gernischt’vineyard [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2018, 27(6):863-870. | |
38 | 张筠筠.化肥减施对酿酒葡萄园土壤质量及酿酒葡萄产量品质的影响研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2019. |
ZHANG J J. Effect of fertilizer reduction on soil quality and wine grape quality and yield at the vineyard [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2019. |
[1] | Wen DONG, Zehui JU, Zhenzhong WANG, Kangtai SUN. Project Establishment Analysis and Prospects of China’s “Forestry Germplasm Resources Cultivation and Quality Improvement” in the “14th Five-Year” National Key R&D Program [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 1-10. |
[2] | Hang CAO, Xinbing YANG, Yanlin LIU, Na HUO, Xiaokuan LIU, Xinyue LI. Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities of Reconstituted Soils from Limestone Mines [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 168-178. |
[3] | Xiang SUN, Liyang ZHANG, Jiying YIN, Kaiyi WANG, Meirong GUO, Heju HUAI. Problems and Countermeasures of Digital Transformation of Maize Seed Production Base [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 8-17. |
[4] | Tao LIU, Yuhui KONG. Research Advance on Coordinated Adaptation of New Quality Agricultural Productivity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 1-9. |
[5] | Guotao YANG, Shijie ZHANG, Chao CHEN, Yun LIU, Chen HE, Yinghao NING, Qing ZHANG. Identification of 5 Common Pesticides Used in Flue-tobacco Field Production Based on Hyperspectral Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 122-132. |
[6] | Xiaowei CHEN, Yuzhu SHA, Xiu LIU, Pengyang SHAO, Fanxiong WANG, Zhuanhui XIE, Wenxin YANG, Qianling CHEN, Min GAO, Wei HUANG. Analysis of Gene Expression Characteristics Associated with Quality, Nutrient Composition, and Meat Quality of Tibetan Sheep Meat During Different Phenological Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 161-171. |
[7] | Guangyong SONG, Yawen GUO, Jing XUE, Keqing YANG, Xuede SU, Long ZHOU. Effects of Different Fertilizer and Water Treatments on Fruit Quality of 7 Table Grapes in Greenhouses [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 229-240. |
[8] | Yanfang ZHU, Qiang CHANG, Yan HAO, Hailong CHEN. Effects of Reflective Film on Fruit Quality and Volatile Components of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 72-82. |
[9] | Shijian BAI, Jinge HU. Effects of Gibberellic Acid on Berry and Raisin of Perlette Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 158-169. |
[10] | Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth, Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217. |
[11] | Jialiang YUAN, Runnan LIAN, Wuping ZHANG. Accurate Identification and Grading Method for Daylily Flower Buds [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 103-112. |
[12] | Wenting ZHANG, Yang LI, Shi QIU, Guangming LU, Dongshu GUO, Baolong ZHANG, Jinyan WANG. Effects of Badh2 Gene on Rice Quality Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 39-48. |
[13] | Darong LI, Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Meide ZHANG, Xiaogang JIANG, Jinwen YOU, Hua WANG. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Properties of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[14] | Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238. |
[15] | Dexuan ZHO, Peng GAO, Xiaolei WEN, Shifeng MU, Suhong GAO, Lina FENG, Weiming SUN, Huixia QI. Effect of Chinese Chestnut Yellow Crinkle Disease on Quality of Chestnut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 136-140. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||