Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 133-139.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0530
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles Next Articles
Taijun FANG1(), Lu HOU1,2, Luchao BAI1(
)
Received:
2022-06-27
Accepted:
2022-10-24
Online:
2024-01-15
Published:
2024-01-08
Contact:
Luchao BAI
通讯作者:
白露超
作者简介:
方泰军 E-mail:1169546019@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Taijun FANG, Lu HOU, Luchao BAI. Soil Microbial Diversity in the Rhizosphere of Lycium barbarum Infected with Root Rot Disease in the Qaidam Region[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 133-139.
方泰军, 侯璐, 白露超. 柴达木地区患根腐病枸杞根际土壤微生物多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 133-139.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0530
样品编号 Sample ID | 双端reads PE reads | 原始序列 Raw tag | 优化序列 Clean tag | 有效序列 Effective tag | 平均长度 Avglen/bp | GC/% | Q30/% | 有效性 Effective/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 138 258 | 125 656 | 119 310 | 119 145 | 261 | 45.60 | 97.24 | 86.18 |
S2 | 230 942 | 184 074 | 174 566 | 174 494 | 249 | 48.44 | 97.26 | 75.56 |
S3 | 170 588 | 151 295 | 142 645 | 142 567 | 287 | 59.33 | 96.13 | 83.57 |
S4 | 161 081 | 142 320 | 135 436 | 135 320 | 249 | 50.22 | 97.25 | 84.01 |
S6 | 169 066 | 149 480 | 142 190 | 142 016 | 247 | 53.14 | 97.28 | 84.00 |
R1 | 168 773 | 144 072 | 136 387 | 136 218 | 268 | 53.10 | 96.67 | 80.71 |
R2 | 130 623 | 117 505 | 104 076 | 104 001 | 252 | 51.96 | 97.20 | 79.62 |
R3 | 91 298 | 80 917 | 76 857 | 76 738 | 248 | 47.16 | 97.38 | 84.05 |
R4 | 116 581 | 104 969 | 100 082 | 99 942 | 235 | 49.92 | 97.77 | 85.73 |
R5 | 117 686 | 107 380 | 102 557 | 102 520 | 232 | 48.68 | 98.12 | 87.11 |
R6 | 90 044 | 80 035 | 76 309 | 76 237 | 242 | 45.97 | 97.41 | 84.67 |
Table 1 Sequencing data processing results of bacteria in sample
样品编号 Sample ID | 双端reads PE reads | 原始序列 Raw tag | 优化序列 Clean tag | 有效序列 Effective tag | 平均长度 Avglen/bp | GC/% | Q30/% | 有效性 Effective/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 138 258 | 125 656 | 119 310 | 119 145 | 261 | 45.60 | 97.24 | 86.18 |
S2 | 230 942 | 184 074 | 174 566 | 174 494 | 249 | 48.44 | 97.26 | 75.56 |
S3 | 170 588 | 151 295 | 142 645 | 142 567 | 287 | 59.33 | 96.13 | 83.57 |
S4 | 161 081 | 142 320 | 135 436 | 135 320 | 249 | 50.22 | 97.25 | 84.01 |
S6 | 169 066 | 149 480 | 142 190 | 142 016 | 247 | 53.14 | 97.28 | 84.00 |
R1 | 168 773 | 144 072 | 136 387 | 136 218 | 268 | 53.10 | 96.67 | 80.71 |
R2 | 130 623 | 117 505 | 104 076 | 104 001 | 252 | 51.96 | 97.20 | 79.62 |
R3 | 91 298 | 80 917 | 76 857 | 76 738 | 248 | 47.16 | 97.38 | 84.05 |
R4 | 116 581 | 104 969 | 100 082 | 99 942 | 235 | 49.92 | 97.77 | 85.73 |
R5 | 117 686 | 107 380 | 102 557 | 102 520 | 232 | 48.68 | 98.12 | 87.11 |
R6 | 90 044 | 80 035 | 76 309 | 76 237 | 242 | 45.97 | 97.41 | 84.67 |
样品名称 Sample ID | 双端reads PE reads | 原始序列 Raw tag | 优化序列 Clean tag | 有效序列 Effective tag | 平均长度 Avglen/bp | GC/% | Q30/% | 有效性 Effective/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 80 094 | 75 613 | 67 304 | 65 710 | 420 | 56.36 | 93.52 | 82.04 |
S2 | 79 987 | 75 747 | 67 761 | 66 482 | 421 | 55.71 | 93.68 | 83.12 |
S3 | 80 299 | 75 525 | 67 674 | 66 047 | 410 | 55.60 | 93.60 | 82.25 |
S4 | 60 696 | 56 920 | 50 780 | 50 403 | 421 | 55.45 | 93.59 | 83.04 |
S6 | 80 110 | 74 968 | 67 346 | 64 208 | 414 | 54.79 | 93.59 | 80.15 |
R1 | 80 088 | 75 167 | 67 274 | 62 304 | 417 | 53.72 | 93.30 | 77.79 |
R2 | 80 074 | 75 096 | 67 657 | 64 078 | 414 | 54.75 | 93.50 | 80.02 |
R3 | 75 853 | 70 702 | 62 696 | 61 758 | 419 | 56.64 | 93.47 | 81.42 |
R4 | 80 141 | 75 989 | 68 176 | 61 433 | 423 | 53.18 | 93.72 | 76.66 |
R5 | 79 748 | 76 114 | 68 622 | 62 850 | 425 | 51.42 | 93.57 | 78.81 |
R6 | 79 574 | 75 541 | 67 609 | 65 096 | 420 | 55.69 | 93.78 | 81.81 |
Table 2 Sequencing data processing results of fungus in sample
样品名称 Sample ID | 双端reads PE reads | 原始序列 Raw tag | 优化序列 Clean tag | 有效序列 Effective tag | 平均长度 Avglen/bp | GC/% | Q30/% | 有效性 Effective/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 80 094 | 75 613 | 67 304 | 65 710 | 420 | 56.36 | 93.52 | 82.04 |
S2 | 79 987 | 75 747 | 67 761 | 66 482 | 421 | 55.71 | 93.68 | 83.12 |
S3 | 80 299 | 75 525 | 67 674 | 66 047 | 410 | 55.60 | 93.60 | 82.25 |
S4 | 60 696 | 56 920 | 50 780 | 50 403 | 421 | 55.45 | 93.59 | 83.04 |
S6 | 80 110 | 74 968 | 67 346 | 64 208 | 414 | 54.79 | 93.59 | 80.15 |
R1 | 80 088 | 75 167 | 67 274 | 62 304 | 417 | 53.72 | 93.30 | 77.79 |
R2 | 80 074 | 75 096 | 67 657 | 64 078 | 414 | 54.75 | 93.50 | 80.02 |
R3 | 75 853 | 70 702 | 62 696 | 61 758 | 419 | 56.64 | 93.47 | 81.42 |
R4 | 80 141 | 75 989 | 68 176 | 61 433 | 423 | 53.18 | 93.72 | 76.66 |
R5 | 79 748 | 76 114 | 68 622 | 62 850 | 425 | 51.42 | 93.57 | 78.81 |
R6 | 79 574 | 75 541 | 67 609 | 65 096 | 420 | 55.69 | 93.78 | 81.81 |
样品编号 Sample ID | OTUs 数量 Number of OTUs | Ace 指数 Ace index | Chao 1 指数 Chao 1 index | Simpson 指数 Simpson index | Shannon 指数 Shannon index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 1 199 | 1 245.397 0 | 1 264.578 0 | 0.006 0 | 6.121 7 | 0.997 6 |
S2 | 1 258 | 1 309.514 0 | 1 332.938 0 | 0.009 2 | 5.945 3 | 0.997 5 |
S3 | 987 | 1 208.833 0 | 1 211.467 0 | 0.530 6 | 2.094 9 | 0.994 8 |
S4 | 1 223 | 1 296.1970 | 1 321.057 0 | 0.009 1 | 5.844 7 | 0.995 7 |
S6 | 772 | 909.499 3 | 906.166 8 | 0.136 0 | 3.936 7 | 0.996 5 |
R1 | 889 | 1 109.902 0 | 1 113.591 0 | 0.148 8 | 3.587 3 | 0.994 5 |
R2 | 933 | 1 154.560 0 | 1 139.816 0 | 0.273 4 | 3.153 9 | 0.994 8 |
R3 | 1 146 | 1 229.390 0 | 1247.261 0 | 0.006 8 | 5.911 5 | 0.996 7 |
R4 | 784 | 942.978 4 | 959.035 3 | 0.130 4 | 3.940 7 | 0.995 8 |
R5 | 564 | 901.055 0 | 807.142 9 | 0.144 7 | 3.286 0 | 0.996 0 |
R6 | 1 041 | 1 127.204 0 | 1 160.436 0 | 0.009 9 | 5.721 2 | 0.996 5 |
Table 3 Alpha diversity index statistics of bacteria
样品编号 Sample ID | OTUs 数量 Number of OTUs | Ace 指数 Ace index | Chao 1 指数 Chao 1 index | Simpson 指数 Simpson index | Shannon 指数 Shannon index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 1 199 | 1 245.397 0 | 1 264.578 0 | 0.006 0 | 6.121 7 | 0.997 6 |
S2 | 1 258 | 1 309.514 0 | 1 332.938 0 | 0.009 2 | 5.945 3 | 0.997 5 |
S3 | 987 | 1 208.833 0 | 1 211.467 0 | 0.530 6 | 2.094 9 | 0.994 8 |
S4 | 1 223 | 1 296.1970 | 1 321.057 0 | 0.009 1 | 5.844 7 | 0.995 7 |
S6 | 772 | 909.499 3 | 906.166 8 | 0.136 0 | 3.936 7 | 0.996 5 |
R1 | 889 | 1 109.902 0 | 1 113.591 0 | 0.148 8 | 3.587 3 | 0.994 5 |
R2 | 933 | 1 154.560 0 | 1 139.816 0 | 0.273 4 | 3.153 9 | 0.994 8 |
R3 | 1 146 | 1 229.390 0 | 1247.261 0 | 0.006 8 | 5.911 5 | 0.996 7 |
R4 | 784 | 942.978 4 | 959.035 3 | 0.130 4 | 3.940 7 | 0.995 8 |
R5 | 564 | 901.055 0 | 807.142 9 | 0.144 7 | 3.286 0 | 0.996 0 |
R6 | 1 041 | 1 127.204 0 | 1 160.436 0 | 0.009 9 | 5.721 2 | 0.996 5 |
样品编号 Sample ID | OTUs数量 Number of OTUs | Ace指数 Ace index | Chao 1指数 Chao 1 index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Shannon指数 Shannon index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 173 | 174.716 9 | 174.428 6 | 0.228 5 | 2.558 8 | 1.000 0 |
S2 | 209 | 213.203 4 | 212.000 0 | 0.049 0 | 3.721 1 | 1.000 0 |
S3 | 187 | 192.441 4 | 190.666 7 | 0.340 5 | 2.130 1 | 0.999 9 |
S4 | 238 | 240.086 8 | 238.600 0 | 0.041 6 | 4.020 9 | 1.000 0 |
S6 | 148 | 152.873 5 | 176.000 0 | 0.097 4 | 3.021 0 | 0.999 9 |
R1 | 198 | 207.646 1 | 215.000 0 | 0.118 5 | 3.014 1 | 0.999 9 |
R2 | 146 | 156.777 3 | 153.058 8 | 0.179 3 | 2.274 4 | 0.999 8 |
R3 | 212 | 214.678 8 | 216.666 7 | 0.061 8 | 3.354 8 | 0.999 9 |
R4 | 205 | 224.415 9 | 224.894 7 | 0.160 3 | 2.659 5 | 0.999 7 |
R5 | 140 | 151.143 5 | 151.333 3 | 0.167 9 | 2.337 3 | 0.999 8 |
R6 | 162 | 162.386 9 | 162.000 0 | 0.068 8 | 3.759 3 | 1.000 0 |
Table 4 Alpha diversity index of fungus
样品编号 Sample ID | OTUs数量 Number of OTUs | Ace指数 Ace index | Chao 1指数 Chao 1 index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Shannon指数 Shannon index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 173 | 174.716 9 | 174.428 6 | 0.228 5 | 2.558 8 | 1.000 0 |
S2 | 209 | 213.203 4 | 212.000 0 | 0.049 0 | 3.721 1 | 1.000 0 |
S3 | 187 | 192.441 4 | 190.666 7 | 0.340 5 | 2.130 1 | 0.999 9 |
S4 | 238 | 240.086 8 | 238.600 0 | 0.041 6 | 4.020 9 | 1.000 0 |
S6 | 148 | 152.873 5 | 176.000 0 | 0.097 4 | 3.021 0 | 0.999 9 |
R1 | 198 | 207.646 1 | 215.000 0 | 0.118 5 | 3.014 1 | 0.999 9 |
R2 | 146 | 156.777 3 | 153.058 8 | 0.179 3 | 2.274 4 | 0.999 8 |
R3 | 212 | 214.678 8 | 216.666 7 | 0.061 8 | 3.354 8 | 0.999 9 |
R4 | 205 | 224.415 9 | 224.894 7 | 0.160 3 | 2.659 5 | 0.999 7 |
R5 | 140 | 151.143 5 | 151.333 3 | 0.167 9 | 2.337 3 | 0.999 8 |
R6 | 162 | 162.386 9 | 162.000 0 | 0.068 8 | 3.759 3 | 1.000 0 |
1 | YAO R, HEINRICH M, ZOU Y, et al.. Quality variation of gouji (fruits of Lycium spp.) in China: a comparative morphological and metabolomic analysis [J/OL]. Front Pharmacol., 2018, 9:151 [2022-05-10]. . |
2 | CHEN C, SHAO Y, LI Y, et al.. Trace elements in Lycium barbarum L. leaves by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after microwave assisted digestion and multivariate analysis [J]. Spectrosc. Lett., 2015, 48:775-780. |
3 | 王凤宝,付金锋,董立峰,等.多倍体菜用枸杞新品种天精 3 号选育[J].核农学报,2013,27(6):723-730. |
WANG F B, FU J F, DONG L F, et al.. Selection and breeding of the new mixoploid lycium chinense miller variety Tianjing 3 [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2013, 27(6):723-730. | |
4 | CORRADO C, MINCUZZI A, SCHENA L, et al.. First report of collar and root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae on Lycium barbarum [J/OL]. J. Plant Pathol., 2018, 100:361 [2022-05-10]. . |
5 | 任如红,胡毅敏,李红叶,等.杨梅根腐病的早期诊断[J].浙江林学院学报,2000(1):117-121. |
REN R H, HU Y M, LI H Y, et al.. Early diagnosis of root rot in Chinese strawberry [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Coll., 2000(1):117-121. | |
6 | WANG L, LI X. Steering soil microbiome to enhance soil system resilience [J]. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 2019, 45:5-6,743-753. |
7 | MUNIR N, CHENG C Z, XIA C S, et al.. RNA-Seq analysis reveals an essential role of tyrosine metabolism pathway in response to root-rot infection in Gerbera hybrida [J/OL]. PloS One, 2019, 14(10):223519 [2022-05-10]. . |
8 | MOREIRA E C, PINHEIRO D G, GORDO S, et al.. Transcriptional profiling by RNA sequencing of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) roots infected by Fusarium solani f. sp. piperis [J/OL]. Acta Physiol. Plant, 2017, 39(10):239 [2022-05-10]. . |
9 | MANTIRI F R, SAMUELS G J, RAHE J E, et al.. Phylogenetic relationships in Neonectria species having Cylindrocarpon anamorphs inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences [J]. Can. J. Bot., 2001, 79:334-340. |
10 | MAVRODI O V, WALTER N, ELATEEK S, et al.. Suppression of rhizoctonia and pythium root rot of wheat by new strains of Pseudomonas [J]. Biol. Control, 2012, 62(2):13-25. |
11 | TEWOLDEMEDHIN Y T, MAZZOLA M, BOTHA W J, et al.. Characterization of fungi (Fusarium and Rhizoctonia) and oomycetes (Phytophthora and Pythium) associated with apple orchards in South Africa [J]. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 2011, 130(2):215-229. |
12 | WU Z, HAO Z, SUN Y, et al.. Comparison on the structure and function of the rhizosphere microbial community between healthy and root-rot Panax notoginseng [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2016, 107:99-107. |
13 | NATACHA B, HORTON M W, BERGELSON J, et al.. Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana [J/OL]. PloS One, 2013, 8:e56329 [2022-05-10]. . |
14 | CAO Y T, LIU J L. Review on the diseases and insects of Lycium barbarum L. [J]. Plant Dis. Pests, 2014, 5(6):8-12. |
15 | ROCHON D. Fungal transmission of plant viruses [J]. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2009, 34(1):87-108. |
16 | LIU Y, SUN Q, LI J, et al.. Bacterial diversity among the fruit bodies of ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic fungi and their corresponding hyphosphere soils [J]. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1):1-10. |
17 | DINLER H, BENLIOGLU S, BENLIOGLU K. Rhizoctonia fragariae causes black root rot on strawberry seedlings in Turkey [J]. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes, 2018, 13(1):1-3. |
18 | 吕靖雯,刘蕊,李国华,等.柚果面枝孢菌斑点病病原鉴定[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2018,44(6):687-694. |
LYU J W, LIU R, LI G H, et al.. Identification of pathogens causing fruit spot disease on Citrus grandis [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2018, 44(6):687-694. | |
19 | 雷桂林,刘云龙,刘雪峰,等.雪松针叶枯斑病病原鉴定及其生物学特性研究[J].林业科学研究, 2003(4):453-458. |
LEI G L, LIU Y L, LIU X F, et al.. Determination of necrotic spot pathogen on needle of Cedrus deodara and the biological characteristics of the pathogen [J]. For. Res., 2003(4):453-458. | |
20 | 任海英,王程安,俞浙萍,等.杨梅衰弱病根际土壤真菌的定量检测与分析[J].植物病理学报,2022,52(4):529-536. |
REN H Y, WANG C A, YU Z P, et al.. Quantitative detection and analysis of rhizospheric soil fungi in decline disease of Myrica rubra [J]. Acta Phytopathol. Sin., 2022, 52(4):529-536. |
[1] | Can WANG, Qiang CUI, Qianru SHI, Hao TANG, Xinjie NING, Jingjing ZHANG, Suqin YANG, Biao ZHANG. Deactivation of 3 Amendments and Their Effects on Microbial Coummunity in Different Contaminated Soils [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 215-226. |
[2] | Yishuai YANG, Lin TAN, Li NIU, Ping SHU, Zihan SHI, Jie FANG, Qiulong HU. Biological Characteristics and Fungicides Screening in Laboratory of Fusarium cugenangense Causing Camellia sinensis Root Rot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 133-141. |
[3] | Xiaoyu QI, Yanjie GUO, Lu LIU, Zitao ZHANG, Lijuan ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Planting Years on Soil Salinization and Microbial Community in Facility Vineyards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 218-228. |
[4] | Bing YANG. Research Progress on Pathogenic Mechanism, Host Molecule Response, and Prevention and Control Methods of Soybean Phytophthora sojae [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 133-142. |
[5] | Feifei LIU, Wanrong HE, Qiang SUN, Linqiao XI, Jiean LIAO, Lu HAN. Effect of Alfalfa Green Manure on Diversity and Function of Soil Bacteria in Apple Orchards in Tarim Basin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 223-233. |
[6] | Yalin YANG, Fengjinglin WU, Jianxin CHEN, Ziqiang WU, Li LIU, Donghua ZHANG, Huancheng MA, Jianrong WU. Analysis on Structure and Diversity of Fungi Community in Rhizosphere Soil and Root System of Camellia oleifera Root Rot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 121-135. |
[7] | Erhao ZHANG, Panpan LIU, Ping HE, Yue JIAN, Yuting XU, Chengxin CHEN, Yazhou LU, Xiaozhong LAN, Sangmu SUOLANG. Physiochemical Properties and Microbial Community Structure in Rhizosphere Soil of Dracocephalum tanguticum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 201-213. |
[8] | Rui XIAO, Lu TAN, Liang WU, Hao ZHANG, Jiayuan GUO, Haijun YANG. Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soil of Kochia scoparia Under Cd Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 203-215. |
[9] | Jingying JIA, Yahui LI, Bingzhe FU, Yun MA, Xiaoyan CAI. Analysis on miRs Expression Profiles of Alfalfa and Screening of Trans-border Potential miRs [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 43-53. |
[10] | Xinci WANG, Junqiao LI, Chenqin LI, Tian TIAN, Junru QU. Identification and Biological Characteristics of a Thelonectria Pathogenic Fungi of Potentilla anserina L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 87-95. |
[11] | Baixia ZHAO, Jianfang YAN. Diversity Analysis of Endophytic Bacterial Community in Different Tissues of ‘Summit’ Sweet Cherry Using High-throughput Sequencing [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 66-77. |
[12] | Keze YANG, Fang WU, Yujie WEI, Liangfang WANG, Hao CHANG, Zhitao WU, Xianzhong YANG. Pathogen Identification and Laboratory Drug Screening of Peony Root Rot in Cold and Cool Region of Hexi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 144-151. |
[13] | Ning YAN, Yu ZHAN, Xinyue MIAO, Ergang WANG, Changbao CHEN, Qiong LI. Effects of Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Soil Enzyme Activity in Continuous Cropping of Ginseng [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 133-144. |
[14] | Hongyan ZHAO, Junwei TAN, Jie ZHANG, Haonan CHEN, Chunxu WANG, Di ZHAO, Haipeng LI, Lixia ZHU, Yiqiang HAN. Community Structure of Stem-based Fungi Infected with Adzuki Bean and Mung Bean [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 129-136. |
[15] | Jiahuan HUO, Xiaolei WEN, Shuangmin LI, Lina FENG, Shuhui LAN, Lixin DONG, Sirou GUO, Jianing LI, Jianhua WANG, Huixia QI. Identification and Biological Characteristics of the Pathogen Causing Root Rot of Atractylodes chinensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 137-144. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||