Quality Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Zingiber officinale Rosc. Varieties

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0249

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to compare the quality of different ginger varieties， 8 ginger varieties were selected as materials and planted in experimental field in Tangshan of Hebei province， the rhizomes were reserved during harvest. The study measured the quality indexes and yield， and analyzed the membership function of each index， then evaluated their nutritional qualities. The results showed that the different ginger varieties had different quality performance in Tangshan area. ‘Jijiang 1’ had the highest soluble protein content， and ‘Jijiang 18’ had the highest polyphenol content. ‘Shandong Changyi big ginger’ had the highest content of soluble sugar， polysaccharide， curcumin， curcumin， flavonoids and vitamin C. The comprehensive evaluation of membership function showed that the order of ginger qualities in Tangshan area from high to low was ‘Shandong Changyi big ginger’>‘Jijiang 18’>‘Jijiang 7’>‘Jijiang 1’>‘Anhui Tongling ginger’>‘Jijiang 5’>‘Jijiang 2’>‘Shandong wawa ginger’. The varieties with high yield were ‘Shandong Changyi big ginger’， ‘Jijiang 5’ and ‘Jijiang 2’. The results provided theoretical basis for the breeding， development and utilization of new varieties in Hebei.

Key words: ginger, variety, quality, yield, membership function

摘要：

为比较不同生姜品种品质差异，选取8个生姜优良品种作为试验材料，统一种植在河北省唐山师范学院试验田中，收获期留取根状茎，测定品质指标及产量，并对各指标进行隶属函数分析，对其营养品质进行综合评价。结果表明：生姜品种在唐山地区品质表现各不相同，其中，‘冀姜1号’可溶性蛋白含量最高，‘冀姜18号’多酚含量最高，而‘山东昌邑大姜’可溶性糖、多糖、姜辣素、姜黄素、黄酮、维生素C含量均最高。隶属函数综合评价表明，在唐山地区生姜品质由高到低排序依次为‘山东昌邑大姜’>‘冀姜18号’>‘冀姜7号’>‘冀姜1号’>‘安徽铜陵生姜’>‘冀姜5号’>‘冀姜2号’>‘山东娃娃姜’。产量高的品种为‘冀姜5号’‘山东昌邑大姜’和‘冀姜2号’。研究结果为冀姜新品种的选育及开发利用提供了理论依据。

关键词: 生姜, 品种, 品质, 产量, 隶属函数

CLC Number:

S632.5

Xiangdong WANG, Yue SONG, Yanzhi MA. Quality Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Zingiber officinale Rosc. Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 56-66.

王向东, 宋玥, 马艳芝. 不同生姜品种的品质比较与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 56-66.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1 Soluble protein content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 2 Soluble sugar content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 3 Polysaccharide content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 4 Gingerols content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 5 Curcumin content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 6 Flavone content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 7 Polyphenol content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Fig. 8 Vc content of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

Table 1 Membership function value of different ginger varieties

品种 Varieties	可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar	多糖 Polysaccharide	姜辣素Gingerlos	姜黄素 Curcumin	黄酮 Flavone	多酚 Polyphenol	维生素C Vc	隶属函数值 Value of membership function	排名 Rank
冀姜1号 Jijiang 1	1.000	0.041	0.631	0.000	0.286	0.323	0.586	0.424	0.411	4
冀姜2号 Jijiang 2	0.653	0.819	0.162	0.101	0.064	0.000	0.348	0.000	0.268	7
山东娃娃姜 Shandong wawa ginger	0.294	0.901	0.000	0.074	0.000	0.129	0.281	0.276	0.244	8
安徽铜陵生姜 Anhui Tongling ginger	0.980	0.313	0.299	0.208	0.156	0.060	0.303	0.551	0.359	5
冀姜5号 Jijiang 5	0.000	0.535	0.582	0.363	0.374	0.369	0.018	0.438	0.335	6
山东昌邑大姜 Shandong Changyi big ginger	0.421	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.662	1.000	0.885	1
冀姜7号 Jijiang 7	0.609	0.000	0.758	0.577	0.247	0.673	0.000	0.634	0.437	3
冀姜18号 Jijiang 18	0.736	0.597	0.978	0.356	0.504	0.570	1.000	0.828	0.696	2

Fig. 9 Yield of different ginger varietiesNote： Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties at P<0.05 level.

References 35

1	张凡.姜片的微波与热风联合干燥工艺及动力学研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.
	ZHANG F. Research on combination drying process and kinetics of ginger slices using microwave-hot air dehydration [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015.
2	田红梅,严从生,贾利,等.我国生姜地方资源品质比较研究[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(24):58-59.
	TIAN H M, YAN C S, JIA L, et al.. Comparative study on the quality of ginger local resources in China [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci. Bull., 2016, 22(24):58-59.
3	王一鸣,唐建,陈娟,等.生姜新品种引进与比较试验[J].长江蔬菜,2019(6):55-57.
	WANG Y M, TANG J, CHEN J, et al.. Introduction and comparative test of new ginger cultivars [J]. J. Changjiang Veget., 2019(6):55-57.
4	王向东,王永存,马艳芝,等.不同生姜品种抗氧化活性的比较[J].中国果菜,2018,38(5):14-18.
	WANG X D, WANG Y C, MA Y Z, et al.. Comparison of antioxidant activity of different varieties of Zingiber officinale Rosc. [J]. China Fruit Veget., 2018, 38(5):14-18.
5	王永存,李劲松,王淑荣,等.冀东地区生姜主要虫害种类及防治措施[J].长江蔬菜,2018(21):49-50.
	WANG Y C, LI J S, WANG S R, et al.. Main pest species and control measures of ginger in Eastern Hebei [J]. J. Changjiang Veget. , 2018(21):49-50.
6	刘丹,张程慧,安容慧,等.生姜主要生物活性成分提取及应用研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(20):391-395, 400.
	LIU D, ZHANG C H, AN R H, et al.. Advances on extraction and application of ginger bioactive ingredient [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2016, 37(20):391-395, 400.
7	孙亚玲,宋计平,许念芳,等.山东地区生姜贮藏保鲜技术要点[J].种子科技,2019,37(3):44-45.
	SUN Y L, SONG J P, XU N F, et al.. Key points of ginger storage and preservation technology in Shandong province [J]. Seed Sci. Tech., 2019, 37(3):44-45.
8	邵海南,刘雲祥,咸文荣.施肥水平对生姜产量和品质的影响[J].青海大学学报,2021,39(5):51-56.
	SHAO H N, LIU Y X, XIAN W R. Effects of fertilization level on the yield and quality of Zingier officinale Roscoe. [J]. J. Qinghai Univ., 2021, 39(5):51-56.
9	周洁,覃竹山,吴金平,等.生姜品质成分及姜辣素的比较[J].中国调味品,2021,46(12):151-154.
	ZHOU J, QIN Z S, WU J P, et al..Comparison of quality components and gingerols of ginger [J]. Chin. Condiment, 2021, 46(12):151-154.
10	韩春梅,李春龙,叶少平,等.不同栽培模式下生姜品质及经济效益的比较研究[J].北方园艺,2013(22):41-43.
	HAN C M, LI C L, YE S P, et al.. Comparative trial of open field new cultivars (Lines) of autumn radish [J]. Northern Hortic. , 2013(22):41-43.
11	谭金霞,李萌,韩太利,等.基于主成分和聚类分析评价山东地区生姜品质[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(14):14-20.
	TAN J X, LI M, HAN T L, et al.. Quality evaluation of ginger varieties produced in Shandong by principal component and cluster analysis [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2021, 42(14):14-20.
12	赵文竹,王欣珂,于志鹏,等.响应面优化生姜多糖提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J].食品研究与开发,2017,38(20):31-36.
	ZHAO W Z, WANG X K, YU Z P, et al.. Optimizition extraction of polysaccharides from ginger by response surface methodology and antioxidant activity [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2017, 38(20):31-36.
13	刘琳琪,刘玉环,赵晨曦,等.不同产地生姜主要活性成分的比较分析[J].天然产物研究与开发,2015,27(6):1016-1021.
	LIU L Q, LIU Y H, ZHAO C X, et al.. Comparative analysis of main active constituents in ginger samples collected from different origins [J]. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev., 2015, 27(6):1016-1021.
14	蔡婧婧,唐晓珍,位思清,等.生姜中姜黄素的匀浆结合有机溶剂法提取工艺优化[J].中国调味品,2018,43(7):26-32.
	CAI J J, TANG X Z, WEI S Q, et al.. Optimization of homogenization and organic solvent extraction of curcumin in ginger [J]. Chin. Condiment, 2018, 43(7):26-32.
15	李杰,赵雨,普玲玲,等.生姜黄酮提取工艺优化研究[J].食品研究与开发,2018,39(22):59-65.
	LI J, ZHAO Y, PU L L, et al.. Study on extraction process optimization of Zingiber officinale Roscoe flavonoids [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2018, 39(22):59-65.
16	刘军伟,李啸晨,侯婴惠,等.生姜多酚类物质的提取工艺研究[J].中国调味品,2017,42(5):153-156.
	LIU J W, LI X C, HOU Y H, et al.. Study on the extraction process of polyphenols from ginger [J]. Chin. Condiment, 2017, 42(5):153-156.
17	王向东,王永存,马艳芝,等.ISSR标记在生姜品种遗传多样性中的应用[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(7):42-47.
	WANG X D, WANG Y C, MA Y Z, et al.. Application of ISSR in genetic diversity analysis of Zingiber officinale Rosc [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2018, 20(7):42-47.
18	焦洁.考马斯亮蓝G-250染色法测定苜蓿中可溶性蛋白含量[J].农业工程术,2016,36(17):33-34.
	JIAO J. Determination of soluble protein content in alfalfa by Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining [J]. Agric. Eng. Tech., 2016, 36(17):33-34.
19	柳荫,吴凤智,陈龙,等.考马斯亮蓝法测定核桃水溶性蛋白含量的研究[J].中国酿造,2013,32(12):131-133.
	LIU Y, WU F Z, CHEN L, et al.. Determination of water-soluble protein in walnut by Bradford method [J]. China Brew., 2013, 32(12):131-133.
20	李晓旭,李家政.优化蒽酮比色法测定甜玉米中可溶性糖的含量[J].保鲜与加工,2013,13(4):24-27.
	LI X X, LI J Z. Determination of the content of soluble sugar in sweet sorn with optimized anthrone colorimetric method [J]. Stor. Proc., 2013, 13(4):24-27.
21	邓胜国,尹爱武,陈铁壁.生姜多糖的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J].湖南科技学院学报, 2013,34(4):66-70, 73.
	DENG S G, YIN A W, CHEN T B. Study on extraction technology and antioxidant activity of ginger polysaccharide [J]. J. Hunan Univ. Sci. Eng., 2013, 34(4):66-70, 73.
22	赖海涛,吕禹哲,苏国成.生姜中姜辣素提取方法研究[J].化学工程与装备,2017(3):11-12, 15.
	LAI H T, LYU Y Z, SU G C. Study on extraction method of gingerol from ginger [J]. Chem. Eng. Equip., 2017(3):11-12, 15.
23	杜秋叶,李赫,蔡成岗,等.超声波辅助提取生姜中姜辣素的工艺研究[J].广州化工,2014,42(15):73-75.
	DU Q Y, LI H, CAI C G, et al.. Optimization of ultrasonic assistant extraction process of gingerol from ginger [J]. Guangzhou Chem. Ind., 2014, 42(15):73-75.
24	孙鹏尧,李丹丹,牟德华.响应面法优化超声波辅助提取姜黄素类化合物工艺及动力学分析[J].中国食品添加剂,2016 (12):99-108.
	SUN P Y, LI D D, MOU D H. Technology and kinetic analysis of curcumin extraction from Curcuma longa L. using ultrasonic-assisted method [J]. China Food Addit., 2016 (12):99-108.
25	张旭辉,赵瑞华,李丹阳,等.超声法提取灵芝菌糠中总黄酮的工艺研究[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2017,36(4):63-66.
	ZHANG X H, ZHAO R H, LI D Y, et al.. Study on Ultrasonic extraction process of total flavonoids from ganoderma lucidum Fungus chaff [J]. J. Yanan Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2017, 36(4):63-66.
26	唐仕荣,李超,宋慧,等.生姜多酚的优化提取及其抗氧化性研究[J].食品工业科技, 2010, 31(4):256-259.
	TANG S R, LI C, SONG H, et al.. Study on extraction and antioxidation of ginger polyphenols [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2010, 31(4):256-259.
27	李书静,李可,姚新建,等.2,6-二氯靛酚钠法测定果汁饮料中的维生素C[J].光谱实验室,2011,28(5):2391-2394.
	LI S J, LI K, YAO X J, et al.. Determination of vitamin C in the fruit-juices by 2, 6-dichlorindophenol sodium method [J]. Chin. J. Spectrosc. Lab., 2011, 28(5):2391-2394.
28	张国新,王秀萍,姚玉涛,等.主成分分析及隶属函数法对菊芋苗期耐盐性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(30):77-79.
	ZHANG G X, WANG X P, YAO Y T, et al.. Salt tolerance of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings evaluated by principal component analysis and membership function method [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(30):77-79.
29	徐义康,高飞,施柳,等.利用隶属函数法综合评价8个大白菜品种性状[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(5):845-852.
	XU Y K, GAO F, SHI L, et al.. Evaluation of eight Chinese cabbage cultivars using the membership function method [J]. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ., 2018, 35(5):845-852.
30	朱丹,吴升炜,张婉萍,等.含维生素C的水包油包多元醇多重结构乳状液的制备[J].化学世界,2019,60(4):227-235.
	ZHU D, WU S W, ZHANG W P, et al.. Preparation of polyols in oil in water multiple emulsions containing vitamin C [J]. Chem. World, 2019, 60(4):227-235.
31	姚礼发,李清海,李录久,等.氮钾配施对生姜品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2007(31):9978,9990.
	YAO L F, LI Q H, LI L J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application combined with potassium on the quality of ginger [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2007(31):9978,9990.
32	李佳妮,白宝清,金晓第,等.酶解超声波协同提取藜麦多糖及体外活性评价[J].食品研究与开发,2019,40(8):57-64.
	LI J N, BAI B Q, JIN X D, et al.. Synergistic extraction of chenopodium quinoa polysaccharide by enzyme-ultrasound and activity evaluation in vitro [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2019, 40(8):57-64.
33	高晓东,王秋英,乔旭光,等.多种生姜有效成分联合提取工艺[J].食品与发酵工业,2013,39(1):203-207.
	GAO X D, WANG Q Y, QIAO X G, et al.. The optimum extraction process of ginger various effective components [J]. Food Ferment. Ind., 2013, 39(1):203-207.
34	罗海玲,龚明霞,周芸伊,等.利用隶属函数法对山药种质资源品质和产量进行综合评价[J].西南农业学报,2018,31 (5):911-916.
	LUO H L, GONG M X, ZHOU Y Y, et al.. Comprehensive analysis on quality and yield of yam germplasm resources by membership function method [J]. Southwest China J. Agric.Sci., 2018, 31 (5):911-916.
35	郭孝萱,张芸丹,邱静,等.生姜营养品质评价指标体系构建[J].中国调味品,2020,45(10):192-196.
	GUO X X, ZHANG Y D, QIU J, et al.. Construction of nutritional quality evaluation index system of ginger [J]. Chin. Condiment, 2020, 45(10):192-196.

[1]	Wen DONG, Zehui JU, Zhenzhong WANG, Kangtai SUN. Project Establishment Analysis and Prospects of China’s “Forestry Germplasm Resources Cultivation and Quality Improvement” in the “14^th Five-Year” National Key R&D Program [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 1-10.
[2]	Zhenfei ZHANG, An YAN, Jing GUO, Yuhang ZHAO, Yilin YUAN, Peng LIU, Zuohao QU, Chuan YUAN. Research on Apple Yield Estimation Model Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 110-119.
[3]	Jianfeng ZHANG, Wenfeng HOU, Yongqing WU, Kaixu LI, Xiaokun LI. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Interactions on Occurrence of Diseases and Insect Pests and Grain Yield of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 145-154.
[4]	Jie LIU, Bin WANG, Jingjing HOU, Bing WU, Li ZHAO. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Flax Local Varieties in Gansu [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 69-78.
[5]	Caixia LYU, Yongfu LI, Huinan XIN, Na LI, Ning LAI, Qinglong GENG, Shuhuang CHEN. Effects of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate/Ammonium Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 179-186.
[6]	Xueqing LIU, Jing WANG, Yi YANG, Huiqin WU, Yanhong WANG, Luyao WANG, Jiawei LU, Kaixuan ZHANG, Yuan ZHAI, Yan CHENG. Effect of Exogenous Ethephon on Defoliation and Yield of Pigmented Pepper [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 36-46.
[7]	Tao LIU, Yuhui KONG. Research Advance on Coordinated Adaptation of New Quality Agricultural Productivity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 1-9.
[8]	Xiaowei CHEN, Yuzhu SHA, Xiu LIU, Pengyang SHAO, Fanxiong WANG, Zhuanhui XIE, Wenxin YANG, Qianling CHEN, Min GAO, Wei HUANG. Analysis of Gene Expression Characteristics Associated with Quality， Nutrient Composition， and Meat Quality of Tibetan Sheep Meat During Different Phenological Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 161-171.
[9]	Qi ZHOU, Qiang LIU, Jing ZHANG, Chaochao DENG, Zhenlong WANG, Yang LIU, Fang WU, Hao CHANG, Yanfang ZHOU, Cuicui SU, Zhiguo SHI, Zhengrui GAO, Fengjie MA. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Soil Biological Characteristics of Pumpkin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 190-203.
[10]	Guangyong SONG, Yawen GUO, Jing XUE, Keqing YANG, Xuede SU, Long ZHOU. Effects of Different Fertilizer and Water Treatments on Fruit Quality of 7 Table Grapes in Greenhouses [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 229-240.
[11]	Yanfang ZHU, Qiang CHANG, Yan HAO, Hailong CHEN. Effects of Reflective Film on Fruit Quality and Volatile Components of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 72-82.
[12]	Shijian BAI, Jinge HU. Effects of Gibberellic Acid on Berry and Raisin of Perlette Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 158-169.
[13]	Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth， Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
[14]	Shichao CHEN, Ju WANG, Fuqiang GUO, Rui HAO, Jianping SHI. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Physiological Indexes and Yield of Protein Mulberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 240-249.
[15]	Manhong WANG, Meijuan XIAO, Ahmad IRSHAD, Eltyb Ahmed Nimir NIMIR, Ibrahim El Dessougi HANADI, Guisheng ZHOU, Guanglong ZHU. Identification and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Sorghum at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 52-63.