Abstract: Since China joined CGIAR, it has established long-term friendly partnership and cooperation with CGIAR. China also gained a lot of benefits during the cooperation with CGIAR, but there was quantitative evaluations missing in measuring Chinas CGIARs cooperation, so it was necessary to build an effect index system, methods as well as the giving weight to each index. This paper took 13 CGIAR centers as examples, and formed the performance scale of research achievements of each center based on the evaluation index system and performance basic data of the cooperation effect between China and CGIAR. The research performance of each center was calculated based on the weight, and the research performance and potential of each center was comprehensively evaluated through the comparison of horizontal (between each center) and vertical (in different years), which had a reference for China to allocate its contribution to various CGIAR centers.

Key words: CGIAR；evaluation, measurement；Indicators, analysis

摘要： 中国自加入国际农业研究磋商组织（CGIAR）以来，与CGIAR建立了长期友好的合作伙伴关系，在合作过程中双方收获颇丰，但一直存在二者合作效果评估体系缺失的问题，无法量化地比较CGIAR与中国合作尤其是各所属中心与中国的合作差异。通过研究中国与CGIAR合作的情况与成效，结合CGIAR所属中心发布的报告等材料提取了与中国合作效果的量化指标，构建了中国与CGIAR合作效果测度的指标体系并确定了指标权重，再以13个参与评估的CGIAR中心为样本，基于权重，计算出各中心的科研绩效值，并通过横向（各中心之间）和纵向（不同年度）的对比，全面评估了CGIAR各中心的科研绩效表现和潜力的差异，为今后科学有效地分配中国政府对各中心的捐款提供了指导依据。

关键词: CGIAR, 合作效果, 指标体系, 评价