中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 161-169.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0009
周文1(), 郭笑恒1(
), 徐锐2, 王晓丽2, 牛慧伟3, 韩丹1(
), 邵惠芳1(
)
收稿日期:
2022-01-05
接受日期:
2022-04-12
出版日期:
2023-07-15
发布日期:
2023-08-25
通讯作者:
韩丹,邵惠芳
作者简介:
周文 E-mail:2207568640@qq.com基金资助:
Wen ZHOU1(), Xiaoheng GUO1(
), Rui XU2, Xiaoli WANG2, Huiwei NIU3, Dan HAN1(
), Huifang SHAO1(
)
Received:
2022-01-05
Accepted:
2022-04-12
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-08-25
Contact:
Dan HAN,Huifang SHAO
摘要:
为探明烤烟间作半夏对烤烟产量、品质和经济效益的影响,设置烤烟单作(CK)及半夏与烤烟分别按照1∶2(C1)、1∶3 (C2)、1∶4(C3)的比例进行间作共4个处理,研究烤烟间作半夏对烤烟农艺性状、抗病性、产量、品质和经济性状的影响。结果表明,相对于单作,烤烟间作半夏显著提高了烤烟的株高和最大叶面积,改善了烤烟冠层形态;显著减少了赤星病病害的发生,相对防治效果为45%(C1)、30.7%(C2)和38.2%(C3)。并且,间作半夏提高了烤烟上、中、下部叶的中性致香物质总量,改善了烟叶品质;提高了上等烟比例和经济效益。其中,半夏与烤烟1∶2间作处理的综合收效较单作提高6.1%,整体表现最好,为缓解烟草连作障碍、实现助农增收提供了新途径。
中图分类号:
周文, 郭笑恒, 徐锐, 王晓丽, 牛慧伟, 韩丹, 邵惠芳. 烤烟间作半夏对烤烟生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 161-169.
Wen ZHOU, Xiaoheng GUO, Rui XU, Xiaoli WANG, Huiwei NIU, Dan HAN, Huifang SHAO. Effects of Intercropping Pinellia ternata on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 161-169.
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 节间距 Pitch step/cm | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 91.60±5.77 b | 9.70±0.51 a | 4.88±0.29 a | 1 304.45±72.79 b |
C1 | 101.90±3.77 a | 9.71±0.44 a | 4.79±0.17 a | 1 454.27±82.46 a |
C2 | 105.90±6.42 a | 9.66±0.82 a | 4.67±0.38 a | 1 486.49±79.63 a |
C3 | 98.70±4.58 ab | 9.55±0.65 a | 4.84±0.26 a | 1 352.37±86.38 ab |
表1 不同处理下烤烟成熟期田间农艺性状指标
Table 1 Field agronomic traits of flue?cured tobacco at maturity stage under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 节间距 Pitch step/cm | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 91.60±5.77 b | 9.70±0.51 a | 4.88±0.29 a | 1 304.45±72.79 b |
C1 | 101.90±3.77 a | 9.71±0.44 a | 4.79±0.17 a | 1 454.27±82.46 a |
C2 | 105.90±6.42 a | 9.66±0.82 a | 4.67±0.38 a | 1 486.49±79.63 a |
C3 | 98.70±4.58 ab | 9.55±0.65 a | 4.84±0.26 a | 1 352.37±86.38 ab |
处理 Treatment | 茎叶夹角 Cauline leaf angle/(°) | 叶向值 Leaf orientation value | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.50±3.53 c | 82.36±4.74 c | 4.58±0.36 a | 8.30±0.30 c |
C1 | 67.00±4.37 bc | 86.54±6.53 bc | 2.48±0.19 c | 8.93±0.36 bc |
C2 | 77.00±6.04 a | 95.13±5.49 a | 3.60±0.22 b | 10.31±0.41 a |
C3 | 72.00±4.35 b | 90.75±6.94 b | 4.26±0.25 a | 9.17±0.41 b |
表2 不同处理下成熟期烤烟的冠状形态指标
Table 2 Coronal morphology indexes of flue?cured tobacco at maturity under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 茎叶夹角 Cauline leaf angle/(°) | 叶向值 Leaf orientation value | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.50±3.53 c | 82.36±4.74 c | 4.58±0.36 a | 8.30±0.30 c |
C1 | 67.00±4.37 bc | 86.54±6.53 bc | 2.48±0.19 c | 8.93±0.36 bc |
C2 | 77.00±6.04 a | 95.13±5.49 a | 3.60±0.22 b | 10.31±0.41 a |
C3 | 72.00±4.35 b | 90.75±6.94 b | 4.26±0.25 a | 9.17±0.41 b |
指标Index | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率 Incidence rate/% | 43.02±0.51 a | 21.55±0.12 d | 27.27±0.21 b | 26.56±0.18 c |
病情指数 Disease index/% | 20.70±0.31 a | 11.38±0.08 d | 14.34±0.11 b | 12.81±0.10 c |
相对防治效果 Relative control effect/% | — | 45.02±0.33 a | 30.72±0.25 c | 38.12±0.34 b |
表3 不同处理下成熟期烤烟田间赤星病害情况
Table 3 Situation of red star disease in flue?cured tobacco at mature stage under different treatments
指标Index | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率 Incidence rate/% | 43.02±0.51 a | 21.55±0.12 d | 27.27±0.21 b | 26.56±0.18 c |
病情指数 Disease index/% | 20.70±0.31 a | 11.38±0.08 d | 14.34±0.11 b | 12.81±0.10 c |
相对防治效果 Relative control effect/% | — | 45.02±0.33 a | 30.72±0.25 c | 38.12±0.34 b |
叶位 Leaf position | 处理Treatment | 总糖含量 Total sugar content/% | 烟碱含量 Nicotine content/% | 氯含量Chlorine content/% | 还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content/% | 钾含量Kalium content/% | 两糖比 Ratio sugar/total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio sugar/nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | CK | 19.72±0.44 c | 3.06±0.14 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 16.49±0.97 c | 1.94±0.26 a | 0.84±0.04 b | 5.39±0.12 c |
C1 | 23.27±1.00 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 17.21±0.54 bc | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.74±0.02 c | 5.39±0.19 c | |
C2 | 21.37±0.49 b | 3.01±0.25 a | 0.47±0.03 b | 19.72±0.33 a | 2.10±0.18 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 6.55±0.13 a | |
C3 | 20.67±1.45 bc | 3.01±0.17 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 18.03±0.43 b | 1.98±0.23 a | 0.88±0.09 ab | 5.99±0.21 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | CK | 18.72±0.90 c | 3.12±0.11 a | 0.62±0.05 a | 14.72±1.09 b | 1.65±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.72±0.11 c |
C1 | 28.66±1.37 a | 2.34±0.13 c | 0.32±0.02 c | 22.07±0.94 a | 2.22±0.28 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 9.43±0.21 a | |
C2 | 22.10±1.87 b | 2.63±0.13 b | 0.45±0.05 b | 16.62±0.98 b | 2.16±0.27 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 6.32±0.12 b | |
C3 | 19.95±1.24 bc | 3.08±0.19 a | 0.57±0.07 ab | 15.43±0.96 b | 2.00±0.20 a | 0.77±0.06 a | 5.06±0.10 c | |
下部叶Lower leaves | CK | 21.02±1.16 a | 1.67±0.06 b | 1.10±0.06 a | 16.18±0.86 a | 2.79±0.25 b | 0.77±0.04 a | 9.69±0.36 a |
C1 | 16.52±1.40 b | 1.47±0.12 c | 0.68±0.05 c | 11.90±0.50 b | 3.47±0.54 b | 0.72±0.03 b | 8.10±0.23 b | |
C2 | 20.39±1.27 a | 1.69±0.09 b | 0.92±0.07 b | 15.36±0.90 a | 4.12±0.24 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 9.09±0.31 ab | |
C3 | 21.81±1.05 a | 2.65±0.18 a | 1.06±0.07 ab | 17.02±0.54 a | 3.10±0.12 b | 0.73±0.04 ab | 6.05±0.14 c |
表4 不同处理下烤烟各部位烟叶的化学成分
Table 4 Chemical composition indexes of flue-cured tobacco leaves under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 处理Treatment | 总糖含量 Total sugar content/% | 烟碱含量 Nicotine content/% | 氯含量Chlorine content/% | 还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content/% | 钾含量Kalium content/% | 两糖比 Ratio sugar/total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio sugar/nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | CK | 19.72±0.44 c | 3.06±0.14 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 16.49±0.97 c | 1.94±0.26 a | 0.84±0.04 b | 5.39±0.12 c |
C1 | 23.27±1.00 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 17.21±0.54 bc | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.74±0.02 c | 5.39±0.19 c | |
C2 | 21.37±0.49 b | 3.01±0.25 a | 0.47±0.03 b | 19.72±0.33 a | 2.10±0.18 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 6.55±0.13 a | |
C3 | 20.67±1.45 bc | 3.01±0.17 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 18.03±0.43 b | 1.98±0.23 a | 0.88±0.09 ab | 5.99±0.21 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | CK | 18.72±0.90 c | 3.12±0.11 a | 0.62±0.05 a | 14.72±1.09 b | 1.65±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.72±0.11 c |
C1 | 28.66±1.37 a | 2.34±0.13 c | 0.32±0.02 c | 22.07±0.94 a | 2.22±0.28 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 9.43±0.21 a | |
C2 | 22.10±1.87 b | 2.63±0.13 b | 0.45±0.05 b | 16.62±0.98 b | 2.16±0.27 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 6.32±0.12 b | |
C3 | 19.95±1.24 bc | 3.08±0.19 a | 0.57±0.07 ab | 15.43±0.96 b | 2.00±0.20 a | 0.77±0.06 a | 5.06±0.10 c | |
下部叶Lower leaves | CK | 21.02±1.16 a | 1.67±0.06 b | 1.10±0.06 a | 16.18±0.86 a | 2.79±0.25 b | 0.77±0.04 a | 9.69±0.36 a |
C1 | 16.52±1.40 b | 1.47±0.12 c | 0.68±0.05 c | 11.90±0.50 b | 3.47±0.54 b | 0.72±0.03 b | 8.10±0.23 b | |
C2 | 20.39±1.27 a | 1.69±0.09 b | 0.92±0.07 b | 15.36±0.90 a | 4.12±0.24 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 9.09±0.31 ab | |
C3 | 21.81±1.05 a | 2.65±0.18 a | 1.06±0.07 ab | 17.02±0.54 a | 3.10±0.12 b | 0.73±0.04 ab | 6.05±0.14 c |
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 48.09±2.40 b | 63.29±2.53 ab | 72.92±3.65 a | 50.24±3.01 b |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.87±0.79 a | 13.58±0.81 b | 15.18±0.76 a | 11.57±0.46 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 15.04±0.60 c | 21.12±1.27 a | 18.04±0.81 b | 18.51±0.87 ab | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 22.12±1.15 b | 9.87±0.23 d | 38.57±2.12 a | 16.04±0.58 c | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 566.41±20.23 d | 742.10±25.32 b | 786.81±26.41 a | 728.04±23.15 c | |
总量Total | 667.53±31.37 c | 849.96±38.25 ab | 931.52±45.64 a | 824.40±38.76 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 49.95±2.55 c | 53.28±3.12 b | 43.96±2.67 d | 58.19±2.56 a |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 11.91±0.75 a | 12.73±1.27 a | 7.42±0.65 b | 7.95±0.26 b | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.22±0.89 a | 21.04±0.44 a | 13.36±0.27 d | 15.21±0.56 c |
表5 不同处理下烤烟不同部位叶片中性致香物质的含量 (μg·g-1)
Table 5 Content of neutral aromatic substances in leaves of different positions under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 48.09±2.40 b | 63.29±2.53 ab | 72.92±3.65 a | 50.24±3.01 b |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.87±0.79 a | 13.58±0.81 b | 15.18±0.76 a | 11.57±0.46 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 15.04±0.60 c | 21.12±1.27 a | 18.04±0.81 b | 18.51±0.87 ab | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 22.12±1.15 b | 9.87±0.23 d | 38.57±2.12 a | 16.04±0.58 c | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 566.41±20.23 d | 742.10±25.32 b | 786.81±26.41 a | 728.04±23.15 c | |
总量Total | 667.53±31.37 c | 849.96±38.25 ab | 931.52±45.64 a | 824.40±38.76 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 49.95±2.55 c | 53.28±3.12 b | 43.96±2.67 d | 58.19±2.56 a |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 11.91±0.75 a | 12.73±1.27 a | 7.42±0.65 b | 7.95±0.26 b | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.22±0.89 a | 21.04±0.44 a | 13.36±0.27 d | 15.21±0.56 c |
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部叶Middle leaves | 类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 23.85±1.95 a | 20.83±1.56b | 7.58±0.25 c | 5.23±0.18 c |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 559.74±22.36 d | 593.78±24.61 c | 784.65±28.37 b | 823.42±30.22 a | |
总量Total | 665.67±26.43 d | 701.66±29.32 c | 856.97±32.76 b | 910.00±37.64 a | |
下部叶Lower leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 42.14±2.57 b | 32.43±2.31 c | 63.23±3.45 a | 32.20±2.51 c |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.36±1.07 b | 7.71±0.85 c | 19.02±1.32 a | 6.79±0.26 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.90±1.99 b | 16.67±1.31 c | 25.56±1.04 a | 10.88±0.61 d | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 31.45±2.64 b | 11.15±1.87 c | 43.00±3.12 a | 30.21±2.45 b | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 435.62±17.34 c | 653.08±28.64 a | 644.40±24.38 a | 512.94±20.43 b | |
总量Total | 545.47±21.54 b | 721.04±33.31 a | 795.21±33.56 a | 593.02±24.87 b |
表5 不同处理下烤烟不同部位叶片中性致香物质的含量续表Continued (μg·g-1)
Table 5 Content of neutral aromatic substances in leaves of different positions under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部叶Middle leaves | 类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 23.85±1.95 a | 20.83±1.56b | 7.58±0.25 c | 5.23±0.18 c |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 559.74±22.36 d | 593.78±24.61 c | 784.65±28.37 b | 823.42±30.22 a | |
总量Total | 665.67±26.43 d | 701.66±29.32 c | 856.97±32.76 b | 910.00±37.64 a | |
下部叶Lower leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 42.14±2.57 b | 32.43±2.31 c | 63.23±3.45 a | 32.20±2.51 c |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.36±1.07 b | 7.71±0.85 c | 19.02±1.32 a | 6.79±0.26 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.90±1.99 b | 16.67±1.31 c | 25.56±1.04 a | 10.88±0.61 d | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 31.45±2.64 b | 11.15±1.87 c | 43.00±3.12 a | 30.21±2.45 b | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 435.62±17.34 c | 653.08±28.64 a | 644.40±24.38 a | 512.94±20.43 b | |
总量Total | 545.47±21.54 b | 721.04±33.31 a | 795.21±33.56 a | 593.02±24.87 b |
处理 Treatment | 上等烟比例 Fine tobacco ratio/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 均价 Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值 Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 成本 Cost/ (yuan·hm-2) | 综合效益 Comprehensive benefit/(yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 55.85±2.12 b | 1 744.05±174.75 a | 25.81±1.02 d | 45 013.95±1 798.05 a | 45 013.95±2 376.45 b | |
C1 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 56.62±2.61 b | 1 289.10±81.30 d | 25.98±1.35 c | 33 490.80±1 985.40 d | 47 740.80±2 974.80 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 675.00±49.80 a | 70.00 | 47 250.00±3 449.40 a | 33 000 | |||
C2 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 61.11±3.26 a | 1 392.30±68.85 c | 27.34±2.01 a | 38 065.50±1 654.05 c | 47 365.50±2 436.45 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 465.00±34.05 b | 70.00 | 32 550.00±2 135.70 b | 23 250 | |||
C3 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 60.33±2.65 a | 1512.45±95.55 b | 26.21±1.67 b | 39 641.25±2 504.40 b | 43 091.25±2 303.40 c | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 225.00±24.45 c | 70.00 | 15 750.00±1 712.25 c | 12 300 |
表6 烤烟间作半夏的经济性状
Table 6 Economic characters of intercropping pinellia in flue?cured tobacco
处理 Treatment | 上等烟比例 Fine tobacco ratio/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 均价 Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值 Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 成本 Cost/ (yuan·hm-2) | 综合效益 Comprehensive benefit/(yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 55.85±2.12 b | 1 744.05±174.75 a | 25.81±1.02 d | 45 013.95±1 798.05 a | 45 013.95±2 376.45 b | |
C1 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 56.62±2.61 b | 1 289.10±81.30 d | 25.98±1.35 c | 33 490.80±1 985.40 d | 47 740.80±2 974.80 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 675.00±49.80 a | 70.00 | 47 250.00±3 449.40 a | 33 000 | |||
C2 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 61.11±3.26 a | 1 392.30±68.85 c | 27.34±2.01 a | 38 065.50±1 654.05 c | 47 365.50±2 436.45 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 465.00±34.05 b | 70.00 | 32 550.00±2 135.70 b | 23 250 | |||
C3 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 60.33±2.65 a | 1512.45±95.55 b | 26.21±1.67 b | 39 641.25±2 504.40 b | 43 091.25±2 303.40 c | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 225.00±24.45 c | 70.00 | 15 750.00±1 712.25 c | 12 300 |
1 | 李远远.连作烟田土壤微生物多样性及微生物制剂应用研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2017. |
LI Y Y. Microbal diversity in continuous cropped tobacco field and application of microbial agents [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2017 | |
2 | LIU J J, YAO Q, LI Y S, et al.. Continuous cropping of soybean alters the bulk and rhizospheric soil fungal communities in a mollisol of Northeast PR China [J]. Land Degrad. Dev., 2019, 30(14):1725-1738. |
3 | 白羽祥,蔺忠龙,邓小鹏,等.基于逐步回归模型的连作植烟土壤化学性状和酶活性关系分析[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(12):2387-2393. |
BAI Y X, LIN Z L, DENG X P, et al.. Analysis of relationships between chemical properties and enzyme activity in continuous cropping tobacco-planted soil based on stepwise regression model [J]. J. South Agric., 2018, 49(12):2387-2393. | |
4 | 阮维斌,王敬国,张福锁,等.根际微生态系统理论在连作障碍中的应用[J].中国农业科技导报,1999(4):53-58. |
RUAN W B, WANG J G, ZHANG F S, et al.. The application of rhizosphere micro-ecosystem theory to continuous cropping problem [J]. China Agric. Sci. Technol., 1999(4):53-58. | |
5 | 孙会.连作烟田土壤肥力变化及微生物制剂应用研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2016. |
SUN H. The changes of soil fertility in continuous cropped tobacco field and application of microbial agents [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2016. | |
6 | 白艳茹,马建华,樊明寿.马铃薯连作对土壤酶活性的影响[J].作物杂志,2010(3):34-36. |
BAI Y R, MA J H, FAN M S. Effect of potato continuous cropping on activities of soil enzymes [J]. Crops, 2010(3):34-36. | |
7 | 周广苗. 烤烟和丹参轮间作对土壤生物学性状及烟叶品质的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2020. |
ZHOU G M. Effects of rotation (intercropping) between flue-cured tobacco and salvia miltiorrhiza on soil biological properties and tobacco leaf quality [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
8 | 高林,王新伟,申国明,等.不同连作年限植烟土壤细菌和真菌群落结构差异[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(8):147-152. |
GAO L, WANG X W, SHEN G M, et al.. Differences of bacteria and fungi community structure in tobacco-planting soilof different continuous cropping years [J]. China Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019, 21(8):147-152. | |
9 | 张开虹,桑维钧,何世芳,等.不同作物间作对烤烟根际土壤细菌群落组成及功能的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(4):80-86. |
ZHANG K H, SANG W J, HE S F, et al.. Effects of inter cropping with different crops on bacterial community composition and function in rhizosphere soil of tobacco [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2020, 48(4):80-86. | |
10 | 郝艳茹,劳秀荣,孙伟红,等.小麦/玉米间作作物根系与根际微环境的交互作用[J].生态与农村环境学报,2003,19(4): 18-22. |
HAO Y R, LAO X R, SUN W H, et al.. Interaction of roots and rhizosphere in the wheat-maize intercropping system [J]. J. Ecol. Rural Environ., 2003,19(4):18-22. | |
11 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010. |
12 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草病虫害分级及调查方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2008. |
13 | 韦凤杰,宋六明,苏新宏,等.不同地表覆盖对烤烟香气成分和含量的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2017,51(5):609-614. |
WEI F J, SONG L M, SU X H, et al.. Effects of different mulching method on content of aroma components and flavor quality in flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2017, 51(5):609-614. | |
14 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].第二版.北京:农业出版社,1991:19-107. |
15 | 张宗锦,闫芳芳,孔垂旭,等.烤烟菽麻间作对烟草根结线虫防效及烟叶产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(2):52-56. |
ZHANG Z J, YAN F F, KONG C X, et al.. Effects of intercropping flue-cured tobacco with Crotalaria junce L. on the control of root-knot nematodes, yield and output of tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2019, 40(2):52-56. | |
16 | 赵紫华,时培建,门兴元,等. 基于微景观试验模型系统下作物丰富度对害虫-天敌关系的影响[J].中国科学:生命科学,2013,43(7): 548-556. |
ZHAO Z H, SHI P J, MEN X Y, et al.. Effect of crop richness on pest natural enemy relationship based on micro landscape experimental model system [J]. Sci. Sin. (Vitae), 2013, 43(7):548-556. | |
17 | 薛超群,牟文君,奚家勤,等.烤烟不同间作对烟草黑胫病防控效果的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(3):77-79. |
XUE C Q, MU W J, XI J Q, et al.. Effect of different crops intercropping with flue-cured tobacco on tobacco black shank d disease [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2015, 36(3):77-79. | |
18 | 彭晟,陈兴,杨莹,等.间作芳香植物对烤烟农艺和经济性状的影响初探[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2014,29(1):144-148. |
PENG S, CHEN X, YANG Y, et al.. The preliminary study on effect of intercropping tobacco with aromatic plants on a gronomic and economic characters [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2014, 29(1):144-148. | |
19 | 唐世凯,刘丽芳,李永梅,郑毅.烤烟间套草木樨、甘薯对烟叶产量和品质的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2005(4):518-521, 533. |
TANG S K, LIU L F, LI Y M, et al.. Effects of intercropped with Platycodon on main agronomic traits and economic benefit of flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Yunnan Agric.Univ., 2005(4):518-521, 533. | |
20 | 曲运琴, 姚勇, 任东植,等.晋南半夏与小麦玉米间套作模式研究[J].山西农业科学,2012,40(4):357-360, 374. |
QU Y Q, YAO Y, REN D Z, et al.. Intercropping patterns of wheat/Pinellia ternate/corn in Southern Shanxi [J]. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2012, 40(4):357-360, 374. |
[1] | 张振飞, 颜安, 郭靖, 赵宇航, 袁以琳, 刘鹏, 曲佐昊, 袁川. 基于无人机遥感的苹果产量估测模型研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 110-119. |
[2] | 张剑峰, 侯文峰, 伍永清, 李凯旭, 李小坤. 氮肥与密度互作对水稻病虫害发生和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 145-154. |
[3] | 吕彩霞, 李永福, 信会男, 李娜, 赖宁, 耿庆龙, 陈署晃. 缓释氮肥对滴灌冬小麦产量及土壤硝/铵态氮的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
[4] | 刘雪晴, 王静, 阳宜, 吴慧琴, 王延宏, 王麓尧, 路佳伟, 张凯璇, 翟源, 成妍. 外源乙烯利对色素辣椒脱叶及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 36-46. |
[5] | 陈小伟, 沙玉柱, 刘秀, 邵鹏阳, 王翻兄, 谢转回, 杨文鑫, 陈倩玲, 高敏, 黄薇. 不同物候期藏绵羊肉品质、营养成分及肉质相关基因表达特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 161-171. |
[6] | 周琦, 刘强, 张靖, 邓超超, 王振龙, 柳洋, 吴芳, 常浩, 周彦芳, 宿翠翠, 施志国, 高正睿, 马凤捷. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤生物学特性及南瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[7] | 宋光永, 郭雅文, 薛婧, 杨克箐, 苏学德, 周龙. 不同肥水处理对7个设施鲜食葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 229-240. |
[8] | 朱燕芳, 常强, 郝燕, 陈海龙. 反光膜对‘阳光玫瑰’果实品质及挥发性物质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 72-82. |
[9] | 白世践, 户金鸽. 赤霉素处理对波尔莱特葡萄及葡萄干品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 158-169. |
[10] | 黄娟娟, 张志强, 毛娟, 马宗桓, 陈佰鸿. 不同叶面肥对‘黑比诺’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 205-217. |
[11] | 陈士超, 王举, 郭富强, 郝瑞, 石建平. 不同水氮耦合对蛋白桑生理指标及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
[12] | 邹声浩, 喻奇伟, 贺帅, 张学伟, 马黔, 马关凯, 席飞虎, 罗东升, 王茂贤, 罗贞宝, 景延秋. 外源小球藻对干旱胁迫下烤烟幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 64-71. |
[13] | 袁嘉良, 连润楠, 张吴平. 黄花菜花蕾的精准识别与分级方法[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 103-112. |
[14] | 张文婷, 李阳, 裘实, 路光明, 郭冬姝, 张保龙, 王金彦. 基于CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术研究Badh2基因对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 39-48. |
[15] | 吴艳, 邹乐萍, 宋惠洁, 胡丹丹, 柳开楼, 梁万里. 控释氮肥和尿素配施对田面水铵态氮和早稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(4): 192-200. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||