中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 145-154.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0594
张剑峰1(), 侯文峰1, 伍永清2, 李凯旭2, 李小坤1,3(
)
收稿日期:
2024-07-26
接受日期:
2024-09-18
出版日期:
2025-09-15
发布日期:
2025-09-24
通讯作者:
李小坤
作者简介:
张剑峰 E-mail:zjianfeng@webmail.hzau.edu.cn;
基金资助:
Jianfeng ZHANG1(), Wenfeng HOU1, Yongqing WU2, Kaixu LI2, Xiaokun LI1,3(
)
Received:
2024-07-26
Accepted:
2024-09-18
Online:
2025-09-15
Published:
2025-09-24
Contact:
Xiaokun LI
摘要:
为探究氮肥与密度互作对水稻病虫害发生和产量的影响,以杂交稻两优3905为材料,采用裂区试验设计,主区为氮肥用量,设置0.0(N0)、82.5(N82.5)、165.0(N165)、247.5 kg·hm-2(N247.5 )共4个氮水平,副区为种植密度,设置15×104(D1)、21×104(D2)、27×104(D3)和33×104蔸·hm-2(D4)共4个密度水平,对各处理稻瘟病、螟虫和颖花败育的发病情况及产量和产量构成因素进行分析。结果表明,氮肥用量和种植密度对水稻稻瘟病、螟虫和颖花败育的发生有显著影响,且存在交互作用。与N0处理相比,增施氮肥使稻瘟病发病率和病情指数分别增加1.8~47.1和0.9~37.6百分点;螟虫发病率表现为先升高后降低,变幅在-0.4~1.3百分点;颖花败育减少0.6~2.9百分点。稻瘟病的发生和发病程度与种植密度呈显著正相关,各处理较D1分别增加1.2~3.0和0.7~3.1百分点;螟虫和颖花败育均随密度增加呈下降趋势,各处理较D1分别减少0.7~1.2和0.9~1.8个百分点。产量在一定范围内随氮肥用量和种植密度的增加而增加,施氮使有效穗数和每穗粒数显著增加9.6%~25.1%和18.4%~30.4%,种植密度对有效穗数影响更大,增幅在25.1%~30.6%。产量在N165D3处理下达到最大,为7 328 kg·hm-2,在此基础上继续增氮或增密均会导致减产,合理的氮密组合可显著提高单位面积有效穗数,平衡各产量构成因素而实现高产。在本试验条件下,通过二项回归分析和模型计算得出,适宜的氮肥用量为182.18 kg·hm-2,适宜种植密度为26.90×104蔸·hm-2,在此基础上加强稻瘟病防治有望进一步提高产量。研究结果为水稻绿色高产高效发展提供理论依据和技术支撑。
中图分类号:
张剑峰, 侯文峰, 伍永清, 李凯旭, 李小坤. 氮肥与密度互作对水稻病虫害发生和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 145-154.
Jianfeng ZHANG, Wenfeng HOU, Yongqing WU, Kaixu LI, Xiaokun LI. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Interactions on Occurrence of Diseases and Insect Pests and Grain Yield of Rice[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 145-154.
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | 病情指数 Sickness index/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g |
D2 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
D3 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
D4 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
N82.5 | D1 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g |
D2 | 4 200 | 2.0 e | 0.8 f | |
D3 | 6 700 | 2.5 e | 1.0 f | |
D4 | 9 100 | 2.8 e | 1.7 e | |
N165 | D1 | 23 800 | 15.9 d | 9.5 d |
D2 | 36 000 | 17.1 d | 10.3 d | |
D3 | 56 200 | 20.8 c | 16.7 c | |
D4 | 70 700 | 21.4 c | 17.1 c | |
N247.5 | D1 | 67 800 | 45.2 b | 36.1 b |
D2 | 98 200 | 46.8 ab | 37.4 ab | |
D3 | 127 300 | 47.2 ab | 37.7 ab | |
D4 | 162 000 | 49.1 a | 39.3 a | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 0 | 0.0 d | 0 d |
N82.5 | 5 000 | 1.8 c | 0.9 c | |
N165 | 46 700 | 18.8 b | 13.4 b | |
N247.5 | 113 800 | 47.1 a | 37.6 a | |
D1 | 22 900 | 15.3 c | 11.4 d | |
D2 | 34 600 | 16.5 b | 12.1 c | |
D3 | 47 600 | 17.6 a | 13.8 b | |
D4 | 60 400 | 18.3 a | 14.5 a | |
方差分析 ANOVA | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** | ** |
种植密度D | ns | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** | ** |
表1 氮肥与密度互作条件下稻瘟病发生情况
Table 1 Occurrence of rice blast disease under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | 病情指数 Sickness index/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g |
D2 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
D3 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
D4 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g | |
N82.5 | D1 | 0 | 0 f | 0 g |
D2 | 4 200 | 2.0 e | 0.8 f | |
D3 | 6 700 | 2.5 e | 1.0 f | |
D4 | 9 100 | 2.8 e | 1.7 e | |
N165 | D1 | 23 800 | 15.9 d | 9.5 d |
D2 | 36 000 | 17.1 d | 10.3 d | |
D3 | 56 200 | 20.8 c | 16.7 c | |
D4 | 70 700 | 21.4 c | 17.1 c | |
N247.5 | D1 | 67 800 | 45.2 b | 36.1 b |
D2 | 98 200 | 46.8 ab | 37.4 ab | |
D3 | 127 300 | 47.2 ab | 37.7 ab | |
D4 | 162 000 | 49.1 a | 39.3 a | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 0 | 0.0 d | 0 d |
N82.5 | 5 000 | 1.8 c | 0.9 c | |
N165 | 46 700 | 18.8 b | 13.4 b | |
N247.5 | 113 800 | 47.1 a | 37.6 a | |
D1 | 22 900 | 15.3 c | 11.4 d | |
D2 | 34 600 | 16.5 b | 12.1 c | |
D3 | 47 600 | 17.6 a | 13.8 b | |
D4 | 60 400 | 18.3 a | 14.5 a | |
方差分析 ANOVA | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** | ** |
种植密度D | ns | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** | ** |
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | 病情指数 Sickness index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | D2 | D3 | D4 | ||
N82.5 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.38 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.83 | |
N165 | 0.65 | 2.49 | 2.78 | 0.39 | 3.57 | 3.81 | |
N247.5 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 1.95 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 1.56 |
表2 氮肥与密度互作条件下稻瘟病发生情况的互作效应
Table 2 Interaction effect of rice blast incidence under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | 病情指数 Sickness index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | D2 | D3 | D4 | ||
N82.5 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.38 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.83 | |
N165 | 0.65 | 2.49 | 2.78 | 0.39 | 3.57 | 3.81 | |
N247.5 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 1.95 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 1.56 |
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | |
---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 900 | 0.6 b |
D2 | 1 300 | 0.6 b | |
D3 | 2 200 | 0.8 b | |
D4 | 1 800 | 0.5 b | |
N82.5 | D1 | 4 000 | 2.7 a |
D2 | 2 200 | 1.1 b | |
D3 | 2 700 | 1.0 b | |
D4 | 4 000 | 1.2 b | |
N165 | D1 | 4 700 | 3.1 a |
D2 | 5 600 | 2.6 a | |
D3 | 3 600 | 1.3 b | |
D4 | 2 000 | 0.6 b | |
N247.5 | D1 | 1 300 | 0.9 b |
D2 | 0 | 0.c | |
D3 | 0 | 0 c | |
D4 | 0 | 0 c | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 1 600 | 0.6 c |
N82.5 | 3 200 | 1.5 b | |
N165 | 3 900 | 1.9 a | |
N247.5 | 3 300 | 0.2 d | |
D1 | 2 700 | 1.8 a | |
D2 | 2 300 | 1.1 b | |
D3 | 2 100 | 0.8 b | |
D4 | 1 900 | 0.6 b | |
方差分析 ANOVA | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** |
种植密度D | ns | ** | |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** |
表3 氮肥与密度互作条件下水稻螟虫发生情况
Table 3 Occurrence of rice stem borer under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | |
---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 900 | 0.6 b |
D2 | 1 300 | 0.6 b | |
D3 | 2 200 | 0.8 b | |
D4 | 1 800 | 0.5 b | |
N82.5 | D1 | 4 000 | 2.7 a |
D2 | 2 200 | 1.1 b | |
D3 | 2 700 | 1.0 b | |
D4 | 4 000 | 1.2 b | |
N165 | D1 | 4 700 | 3.1 a |
D2 | 5 600 | 2.6 a | |
D3 | 3 600 | 1.3 b | |
D4 | 2 000 | 0.6 b | |
N247.5 | D1 | 1 300 | 0.9 b |
D2 | 0 | 0.c | |
D3 | 0 | 0 c | |
D4 | 0 | 0 c | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 1 600 | 0.6 c |
N82.5 | 3 200 | 1.5 b | |
N165 | 3 900 | 1.9 a | |
N247.5 | 3 300 | 0.2 d | |
D1 | 2 700 | 1.8 a | |
D2 | 2 300 | 1.1 b | |
D3 | 2 100 | 0.8 b | |
D4 | 1 900 | 0.6 b | |
方差分析 ANOVA | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** |
种植密度D | ns | ** | |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** |
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | ||
---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | |
N82.5 | -0.83 | -0.95 | -0.70 |
N165 | -0.25 | -1.01 | -1.23 |
N247.5 | -0.47 | -0.56 | -0.42 |
表4 氮肥与密度互作条件下水稻螟虫发生情况的互作效应
Table 4 Interaction effect of rice stem borer occurrence under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | ||
---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | |
N82.5 | -0.83 | -0.95 | -0.70 |
N165 | -0.25 | -1.01 | -1.23 |
N247.5 | -0.47 | -0.56 | -0.42 |
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | |
---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 6 700 | 4.4 a |
D2 | 6 700 | 3.2 ab | |
D3 | 7 800 | 2.9 b | |
D4 | 7 800 | 2.4 bc | |
N82.5 | D1 | 5 100 | 3.4 ab |
D2 | 5 100 | 2.4 bc | |
D3 | 8 900 | 3.3 ab | |
D4 | 3 600 | 1.1 de | |
N165 | D1 | 3 600 | 2.4 bc |
D2 | 2 200 | 1.1 de | |
D3 | 4 000 | 1.5 cd | |
D4 | 2 200 | 0.7 e | |
N247.5 | D1 | 1 600 | 1.0 de |
D2 | 0 | 0 f | |
D3 | 0 | 0 f | |
D4 | 0 | 0 f | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 7 200 | 3.2 a |
N82.5 | 5 700 | 2.6 b | |
N165 | 3 000 | 1.4 c | |
N247.5 | 400 | 0.3 d | |
D1 | 4 200 | 2.8 a | |
D2 | 3 500 | 1.7 bc | |
D3 | 5 200 | 1.9 ab | |
D4 | 3 400 | 1.0 c | |
方差分析 | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** |
ANOVA | 种植密度D | ns | ** |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** |
表5 氮肥与密度互作条件下水稻颖花败育发生情况
Table 5 Occurrence of floret sterility in rice under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病数/(株·hm-2) Number of incidence/(plants·hm-2) | 发病率 Incidence/% | |
---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 6 700 | 4.4 a |
D2 | 6 700 | 3.2 ab | |
D3 | 7 800 | 2.9 b | |
D4 | 7 800 | 2.4 bc | |
N82.5 | D1 | 5 100 | 3.4 ab |
D2 | 5 100 | 2.4 bc | |
D3 | 8 900 | 3.3 ab | |
D4 | 3 600 | 1.1 de | |
N165 | D1 | 3 600 | 2.4 bc |
D2 | 2 200 | 1.1 de | |
D3 | 4 000 | 1.5 cd | |
D4 | 2 200 | 0.7 e | |
N247.5 | D1 | 1 600 | 1.0 de |
D2 | 0 | 0 f | |
D3 | 0 | 0 f | |
D4 | 0 | 0 f | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 7 200 | 3.2 a |
N82.5 | 5 700 | 2.6 b | |
N165 | 3 000 | 1.4 c | |
N247.5 | 400 | 0.3 d | |
D1 | 4 200 | 2.8 a | |
D2 | 3 500 | 1.7 bc | |
D3 | 5 200 | 1.9 ab | |
D4 | 3 400 | 1.0 c | |
方差分析 | 氮肥用量N | ns | ** |
ANOVA | 种植密度D | ns | ** |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | ** |
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | ||
---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | |
N82.5 | -0.83 | -0.95 | -0.70 |
N165 | -0.25 | -1.01 | -1.23 |
N247.5 | -0.47 | -0.56 | -0.42 |
表6 氮肥与密度互作条件下水稻颖花败育发生情况的互作效应
Table 6 Interaction effect of the occurrence of floret sterility in rice under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence | ||
---|---|---|---|
D2 | D3 | D4 | |
N82.5 | -0.83 | -0.95 | -0.70 |
N165 | -0.25 | -1.01 | -1.23 |
N247.5 | -0.47 | -0.56 | -0.42 |
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles/ (104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 154.2 i | 186.3 ij | 86.6 a | 30.9 a | 4 825 h |
D2 | 207.7 h | 184.3 j | 86.2 ab | 30.6 ab | 5 505 g | |
D3 | 228.0 efg | 184.0 j | 85.6 ab | 30.8 ab | 5 912 efg | |
D4 | 209.0 gh | 172.7 j | 85.2 abc | 30.5 ab | 6 213 def | |
N82.5 | D1 | 165.0 i | 231.7 bcde | 85.2 abc | 30.0 ab | 5 860 fg |
D2 | 215.8 fgh | 222.7 def | 84.8 abcd | 29.6 abc | 6 248 def | |
D3 | 250.5 bcd | 206.7 gh | 84.6 abcd | 29.6 bc | 6 489 cde | |
D4 | 243.8 cde | 200.0 hi | 83.6 bcd | 29.7 abc | 6 636 bcd | |
N165 | D1 | 198.3 h | 238.0 bcd | 85.0 abc | 28.3 de | 6 299 def |
D2 | 233.3 def | 229.0 cde | 84.7 abcd | 28.5 cd | 6 959 abc | |
D3 | 276.0 a | 226.3 cde | 83.6 bcd | 28.2 de | 7 328 a | |
D4 | 254.8 bc | 220.3 efg | 81.9 de | 28.3 de | 6 811 abcd | |
N247.5 | D1 | 203.3 h | 254.7 a | 83.6 bcd | 27.5 def | 6 206 def |
D2 | 245.0 cde | 245.3 ab | 82.5 cde | 27.2 ef | 6 654 bcd | |
D3 | 283.5 a | 239.0 bc | 80.5 ef | 26.5 f | 7 231 ab | |
D4 | 267.7 ab | 209.3 fgh | 78.8 f | 26.6 f | 6 440 cdef | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 199.7 c | 181.8 d | 85.9 a | 30.7 a | 5 614 c |
N82.5 | 218.8 b | 215.3 c | 84.6 b | 29.7 b | 6 308 b | |
N165 | 240.6 a | 228.4 b | 83.8 c | 28.3 c | 6 849 a | |
N247.5 | 249.9 a | 237.1 a | 81.4 d | 26.9 d | 6 633 a | |
D1 | 180.2 d | 227.7 a | 85.1 a | 29.2 a | 5 797 b | |
D2 | 225.5 c | 220.3 ab | 84.5 a | 29.0 a | 6 342 ab | |
D3 | 259.5 a | 214.0 b | 83.6 ab | 28.8 a | 6 740 a | |
D4 | 243.8 b | 200.6 c | 82.4 b | 28.7 a | 6 525 a | |
方差分析 | 氮肥用量N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
ANOVA | 种植密度D | ** | ** | ** | ns | ** |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | * | ns | ns | ns |
表7 氮肥与密度互作条件下水稻产量及其构成因素
Table 7 Rice yield and its components under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction conditions
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicles/ (104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | D1 | 154.2 i | 186.3 ij | 86.6 a | 30.9 a | 4 825 h |
D2 | 207.7 h | 184.3 j | 86.2 ab | 30.6 ab | 5 505 g | |
D3 | 228.0 efg | 184.0 j | 85.6 ab | 30.8 ab | 5 912 efg | |
D4 | 209.0 gh | 172.7 j | 85.2 abc | 30.5 ab | 6 213 def | |
N82.5 | D1 | 165.0 i | 231.7 bcde | 85.2 abc | 30.0 ab | 5 860 fg |
D2 | 215.8 fgh | 222.7 def | 84.8 abcd | 29.6 abc | 6 248 def | |
D3 | 250.5 bcd | 206.7 gh | 84.6 abcd | 29.6 bc | 6 489 cde | |
D4 | 243.8 cde | 200.0 hi | 83.6 bcd | 29.7 abc | 6 636 bcd | |
N165 | D1 | 198.3 h | 238.0 bcd | 85.0 abc | 28.3 de | 6 299 def |
D2 | 233.3 def | 229.0 cde | 84.7 abcd | 28.5 cd | 6 959 abc | |
D3 | 276.0 a | 226.3 cde | 83.6 bcd | 28.2 de | 7 328 a | |
D4 | 254.8 bc | 220.3 efg | 81.9 de | 28.3 de | 6 811 abcd | |
N247.5 | D1 | 203.3 h | 254.7 a | 83.6 bcd | 27.5 def | 6 206 def |
D2 | 245.0 cde | 245.3 ab | 82.5 cde | 27.2 ef | 6 654 bcd | |
D3 | 283.5 a | 239.0 bc | 80.5 ef | 26.5 f | 7 231 ab | |
D4 | 267.7 ab | 209.3 fgh | 78.8 f | 26.6 f | 6 440 cdef | |
平均值Mean | N0 | 199.7 c | 181.8 d | 85.9 a | 30.7 a | 5 614 c |
N82.5 | 218.8 b | 215.3 c | 84.6 b | 29.7 b | 6 308 b | |
N165 | 240.6 a | 228.4 b | 83.8 c | 28.3 c | 6 849 a | |
N247.5 | 249.9 a | 237.1 a | 81.4 d | 26.9 d | 6 633 a | |
D1 | 180.2 d | 227.7 a | 85.1 a | 29.2 a | 5 797 b | |
D2 | 225.5 c | 220.3 ab | 84.5 a | 29.0 a | 6 342 ab | |
D3 | 259.5 a | 214.0 b | 83.6 ab | 28.8 a | 6 740 a | |
D4 | 243.8 b | 200.6 c | 82.4 b | 28.7 a | 6 525 a | |
方差分析 | 氮肥用量N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
ANOVA | 种植密度D | ** | ** | ** | ns | ** |
氮肥用量×种植密度N×D | ns | * | ns | ns | ns |
产量指标 Yield indicator | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
穗粒数Grains per panicle | 0.19 | |||
结实率Seed-setting rate | -0.74** | -0.40 | ||
千粒重1000-grain weight | -0.62* | -0.75** | 0.86** | |
产量Yield | 0.84** | 0.51* | -0.62* | -0.68** |
表8 氮肥与密度互作下产量及其构成因素的相关性
Table 8 Correlation of yield and its components under nitrogen fertilizer and density interaction
产量指标 Yield indicator | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
穗粒数Grains per panicle | 0.19 | |||
结实率Seed-setting rate | -0.74** | -0.40 | ||
千粒重1000-grain weight | -0.62* | -0.75** | 0.86** | |
产量Yield | 0.84** | 0.51* | -0.62* | -0.68** |
[1] | 亓璐,张涛,曾娟,等.近年我国水稻五大产区主要病害发生情况分析[J].中国植保导刊,2021,41(4):37-42, 65. |
QI L, ZHANG T, ZENG J, et al.. Analysis of the occurrence and control of diseases in five major rice-producing areas in China in recent years [J]. China Plant Prot., 2021,41(4):37-42, 65. | |
[2] | 王玲,黄世文,林贤青,等.两种氮肥用量对超级稻产量性状和病虫害发生的影响[J].植物保护,2007,33(3):76-79. |
WANG L, HUANG S W, LIN X Q, et al.. Effects of two nitrogen applications on yield components and occurrence of major diseases and insect pests of super hybrid rices [J]. Plant Prot., 2007, 33(3):76-79. | |
[3] | 王伟妮,鲁剑巍,何予卿,等.氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2011,25(6):645-653. |
WANG W N, LU J W, HE Y Q, et al.. Effects of N,P,K fertilizer application on grain yield,quality,nutrient uptake and utilization of rice [J]. Chin. J. Rice Sci., 2011, 25(6): 645-653. | |
[4] | 张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924. |
ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, et al.. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2008, 45(5):915-924. | |
[5] | 朱兆良,金继运.保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):259-273. |
ZHU Z L, JIN J Y. Fertilizer use and food security in China [J].Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(2):259-273. | |
[6] | 吴碧球,黄所生,覃丽莎,等.氮高效利用水稻品种桂育11号病虫害发生效应研究[J].西南农业学报,2020, 33(10):2250-2255. |
WU B Q, HUANG S S, QIN L S, et al.. Effect of high-efficiency nitrogen utilization rice cultivar Guiyu No.11 to rice pests and diseases [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2020,33(10):2250-2255. | |
[7] | HOU W F, KHAN M R, ZHANG J L, et al.. Nitrogen rate and plant density interaction enhances radiation interception,yield and nitrogen use efficiency of mechanically transplanted rice [J]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2019, 269:183-192. |
[8] | LIU Z C, SHANG L Y, DAI S J, et al.. Optimizing nitrogen application and planting density improves yield and resource use efficiency via regulating canopy light and nitrogen distribution in rice [J/OL]. J. Integr. Agric., 2024, 4: 006 [2024-06-26]. . |
[9] | 林洪鑫,肖运萍,袁展汽,等.水稻合理密植及其优质高产机理研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(9):1-4. |
LIN H X, XIAO Y P, YUAN Z Q, et al.. Advance in rational colse planting and its mechanism of superior quality and high yield in rice [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2011, 27(9):1-4. | |
[10] | 张桂芬,鲁传涛,申效诚,等.栽插密度、施氮量对水稻主要病虫害的综合生态效应[J].植物保护学报,1995,22(1):38-44. |
ZHANG G F, LU C T, SHEN X C, et al.. The synthesized ecological effect of rice density and nitrogen fertilizer on the occurrence of main rice pests [J]. J. Plant Prot., 1995,22(1):38-44. | |
[11] | 徐新朋,周卫,梁国庆,等.氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(3):763-772. |
XU X P, ZHOU W, LIANG G Q, et al.. Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2015,21(3):763-772. | |
[12] | 邓中华,明日,李小坤,等.不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(1):20-25. |
DENG Z H, MING R, LI X K, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice [J]. Soils, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. | |
[13] | 严凯,蒋玉兰,唐纪元,等.盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2018(2):67-74. |
YAN K, JIANG Y L, TANG J Y, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate and transplanting density on yield and grain quality of rice on saline-alkaline land [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China,2018(2):67-74. | |
[14] | 王建强,夏冰,刘宇. 稻瘟病测报调查规范: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009. |
[15] | 孙云飞.氮肥用量与基施硅锌肥对水稻产量、品质及抗病性的影响[D].扬州:扬州大学,2020. |
SUN Y F. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer dosages and basal application of silicon and zinc fertilizer on yield, quality and disease resistance of rice [D]. Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2020. | |
[16] | 吴天琦,李保同,刘浪,等.氮肥运筹对江西省双季稻主要病虫害发生及产量的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2020,42(6):1087-1098. |
WU T Q, LI B T, LIU L, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer operation on occurrence of major diseases and insects in double cropping rice and its yield in Jiangxi province [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2020, 42(6):1087-1098. | |
[17] | 李熙英,黄世臣,权成武,等.延边地区水稻二化螟发生危害及化学防治[J].植物保护,2001,27(6):17-19. |
[18] | 张文地,董明辉,李扬,等.施氮量对水稻非结构性碳水化合物积累分配与颖花形成的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2023,44(1):29-39, 48. |
ZHANG W D, DONG M H, LI Y, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate on accumulation and distribution of non-structural carbohydrates and spikelets formation in rice [J].J. Yangzhou Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2023, 44(1):29-39, 48. | |
[19] | 马亮,高虹,吕桂兰.栽培密度对辽粳212病害发生程度及产量的影响[J].中国稻米,2018,24(4):124-127, 129. |
MA L, GAO H, LYU G L. Effects of planting density on disease occurrence and yield of Liaogeng 212 [J]. China Rice,2018, 24(4):124-127, 129. | |
[20] | 罗礼智.水稻种植密度和生育期对三化螟卵天敌种群及其效益的影响[J].昆虫学报,1994,37(3):298-304. |
[21] | 陈毅敏,张建红,李世东,等.浅析部分杂交水稻品种颖花退化的原因与对策[J].种子科技,2021,39(2):137-138. |
[22] | 种浩天,尚程,张运波,等.增密减氮对不同类型水稻品种颖花形成的影响[J].作物杂志,2022(6):226-233. |
CHONG H T, SHANG C, ZHANG Y B, et al.. Effects of dense planting with reduced nitrogen application on spikelet formation of different types of rice varieties [J]. Crops, 2022(6):226-233. | |
[23] | 吕宙,易秉怀,陈平平,等.施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2024,38(4):422-436. |
LYU Z, YI B H, CHEN P P, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and transplanting density on yield formation of small seed hybrid rice [J]. Chin. J. Rice Sci., 2024, 38(4): 422-436. | |
[24] | 郑志刚,向丽,刘功义,等.施氮量和密度对有序机抛早稻生长发育和产量的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(7):132-143. |
ZHENG Z G, XIANG L, LIU G Y, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and density on growth and yield of orderly machine-thrown early rice [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(7):132-143. |
[1] | 张振飞, 颜安, 郭靖, 赵宇航, 袁以琳, 刘鹏, 曲佐昊, 袁川. 基于无人机遥感的苹果产量估测模型研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 110-119. |
[2] | 吕彩霞, 李永福, 信会男, 李娜, 赖宁, 耿庆龙, 陈署晃. 缓释氮肥对滴灌冬小麦产量及土壤硝/铵态氮的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
[3] | 刘之恩, 何勇, 王志成, 詹逍康, 王廷宝, 刘耀威, 田志宏. 水稻生长调节因子GRF基因家族的鉴定及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 18-27. |
[4] | 刘雪晴, 王静, 阳宜, 吴慧琴, 王延宏, 王麓尧, 路佳伟, 张凯璇, 翟源, 成妍. 外源乙烯利对色素辣椒脱叶及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 36-46. |
[5] | 吴正, 杨红云, 孙爱珍, 孔杰, 黄淑梅. 基于CA_MobileViT模型的水稻钾素营养诊断研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 80-88. |
[6] | 朱强, 车宗贤, 崔恒, 张久东, 包兴国. 绿肥替代氮肥对麦田温室气体的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 182-189. |
[7] | 周琦, 刘强, 张靖, 邓超超, 王振龙, 柳洋, 吴芳, 常浩, 周彦芳, 宿翠翠, 施志国, 高正睿, 马凤捷. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤生物学特性及南瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[8] | 张曦瑜, 沈幸, 李伟, 谢文歌, 李杰, 杨昌浩, 柴仲平. 氮肥减量配施有机肥对库尔勒香梨园土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 217-228. |
[9] | 邵丽华, 李鹏. 水稻对恶苗病菌侵染响应的蛋白质组分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 126-135. |
[10] | 庆福, 梁洪月, 孙静, 鲁新蕊, 梁运江. 生物炭-氮肥配施对东北黑土团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 195-204. |
[11] | 陈士超, 王举, 郭富强, 郝瑞, 石建平. 不同水氮耦合对蛋白桑生理指标及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
[12] | 吴艳, 邹乐萍, 宋惠洁, 胡丹丹, 柳开楼, 梁万里. 控释氮肥和尿素配施对田面水铵态氮和早稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(4): 192-200. |
[13] | 沈乐丞, 温志刚, 廖涵, 刘贤标, 蒋耀聪, 张远聪, 刘婷, 王玫. 叶面喷施不同硒肥对水稻硒含量及硒形态和稻米组分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 206-215. |
[14] | 李大荣, 李小玲, 周武先, 张美德, 蒋小刚, 由金文, 王华. 有机肥替代部分化肥对湖北贝母生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[15] | 段俊雅, 赵园园, 王婷婷, 韦建玉, 王政, 王德勋, 李娟, 史宏志. 减氮配施聚天冬氨酸对烤烟氮素利用及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 227-238. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||