Evaluation and Screening on Nitrogen Deficiency Tolerant Germplasm of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.1034

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to analyze the nitrogen deficiency tolerance of cotton germplasm resources， in pots with low nitrogen （15 g·m^-2） and normal nitrogen （45 g·m^-2） conditions under a rainproof shelter at the seedling stage， root dry weight， shoot dry weight， total dry weight， ratio of root to shoot and chlorophyll value of 419 upland cotton germplasm resources were measured， and their nitrogen deficiency tolerance indexes were calculated. Through correlation analysis， principal component analysis and membership function analysis， the comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen deficiency tolerance of 419 cotton germplasm resources was conducted. The results showed that， under low nitrogen stress， there was extremely significantly negative correlation between the nitrogen resistance index in shoot dry weight and in ratio of root to shoot of cotton seedlings. However， other traits showed significantly positive correlations or extremely significantly positive correlations. Principal component analysis classified 5 indexes into 3 principal components， whose cumulative variance contribution rate was 98.590%. D-values were calculated based on the weights of these 3 principal components. Then the 419 germplasms were divided into 4 grades and 10 nitrogen deficiency tolerant germplasms were screened. Furthermore， through stepwise regression analysis，a regression equation was established as D=-0.123+0.167X_RDWNRI+0.252X_TDWNRI+0.132X_SPADNRI （X_RDWNRI， X_TDWNRI and X_SPADNRI were nitrogen resistance indexes of root dry weight， total dry weight and chlorophyll value）. Above results laid foundation for further mining of nitrogen deficiency tolerant genes and improving nitrogen deficiency tolerance of cotton.

Key words: upland cotton, core collection, seedling stage, nitrogen deficiency tolerance, screening

摘要：

为分析棉花苗期的耐低氮性，在模拟大田低氮（15 g·m^-2）和正常氮（45 g·m^-2）施肥条件下，采用旱棚盆栽种植法，对419份陆地棉核心种质苗期的根干重、地上部干重、总干重、根冠比和叶绿素值进行测定，计算其耐低氮指数，并通过相关性分析、主成分分析以及隶属函数分析，综合评价419份陆地棉种质资源的耐低氮性。结果表明，低氮胁迫下，陆地棉幼苗地上部干重的耐低氮指数与根冠比的耐低氮指数呈极显著负相关，其他性状间均呈显著或极显著正相关。主成分分析将5项指标综合为3个主成分，累积贡献率达98.590%。依据3个主成分的权重计算各种质资源的综合评价值（D值），将419份种质划分为4个等级，筛选出10份耐低氮种质。利用逐步回归分析建立了陆地棉耐低氮性鉴定的回归方程：D=-0.123+0.167X_RDWNRI+0.252X_TDWNRI+0.132X_SPADNRI （X_RDWNRI、X_TDWNRI、X_SPADNRI分别为根干重、总干重、叶绿素值的耐低氮指数）。以上研究结果为进一步开展棉花耐低氮基因挖掘和耐低氮品种改良奠定了基础。

关键词: 陆地棉, 核心种质, 苗期, 耐低氮, 筛选

CLC Number:

S562

Xing LYU, Xingyi WANG, Zhengwen SUN, Huifeng KE, Guoning WANG, Yan ZHANG, Xingfen WANG, Zhiying MA, Qishen GU. Evaluation and Screening on Nitrogen Deficiency Tolerant Germplasm of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(11): 102-110.

吕星, 王星懿, 孙正文, 柯会锋, 王国宁, 张艳, 王省芬, 马峙英, 谷淇深. 陆地棉苗期耐低氮种质鉴评与筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(11): 102-110.

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

[1]	LIU H, LIU Q, GAO X H, et al.. Role of nitrogen sensing and its integrative signaling pathways in shaping root system architecture [J]. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng., 2022, 9(3): 316-332.
[2]	O’BRIEN J A, VEGA A, BOUGUYON E, et al.. Nitrate transport, sensing, and responses in plants [J]. Mol. Plant, 2016, 9(6): 837-856.
[3]	MA Z Y, ZHANG Y, WU L Q, et al.. High-quality genome assembly and resequencing of modern cotton cultivars provide resources for crop improvement [J]. Nat. Genet., 2021, 53(9): 1385-1391.
[4]	STEVENS C J. Nitrogen in the environment [J]. Science, 2019, 363(6427): 578-580.
[5]	XU G, FAN X, MILLER A J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency [J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2012, 63: 153-182.
[6]	刘学英,李姗,吴昆,等.提高农作物氮肥利用效率的关键基因发掘与应用[J].科学通报, 2019, 64(25): 2633-2640.
	LIU X Y, LI S, WU K, et al.. Sustainable crop yields from the coordinated modulation of plant growth and nitrogen metabolism [J]. Chin. Sci. Bull., 2019, 64(25): 2633-2640.
[7]	LIU X J, HU B, CHU C C. Nitrogen assimilation in plants: current status and future prospects [J]. J. Genet. Genomics, 2022, 49(5): 394-404.
[8]	翟荣荣, 余鹏, 叶胜海, 等. 浙江省晚粳稻耐低氮品种的筛选和评价[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5): 565-572.
	ZHAI R R, YU P, YE S H, et al.. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of low nitrogen tolerance of Zhejiang photosensitive Japonica rice cultivars [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2016, 42(5): 565-572.
[9]	徐晴,许甫超,董静,等.小麦氮素利用效率的基因型差异及相关特性分析[J].中国农业科学, 2017, 28(14): 2647-2657.
	XU Q, XU F C, DONG J, et al.. Genotypic difference of nitrogen use efficiency of wheat and correlation analysis of the related characters [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2017, 28(14): 2647-2657.
[10]	常晓,郭志军,王小博,等.玉米自交系氮高效指标的筛选及综合评价[J].玉米科学, 2019, 27(1): 17-24.
	CHANG X, GUO Z J, WANG X B, et al.. Indexes screening and evaluation for nitrogen use efficiency in maize inbred lines [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2019, 27(1): 17-24.
[11]	郝青南,王程, 陈水莲,等.大豆苗期氮高效和氮敏感资源的筛选研究[J].大豆科学,2011,30(6):910-915, 920.
	HAO Q N, WANG C, CHEN S L, et al.. Screening of soybean varieties with different nitrogen efficiency at seedling stage [J]. Soybean Sci., 2011, 30(6): 910-915, 920.
[12]	蒋春姬, 郭佩, 王晓光, 等. 花生氮高效品种资源的苗期筛选研究[J]. 花生学报, 2020, 49(3): 40-45.
	JIANG C J, GUO P, WANG X G, et al.. Screening of peanut varieties with different nitrogen efficiency at seedling stage [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2020, 49(3): 40-45.
[13]	KANT S, BI Y M, ROTHSTEIN S J. Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2011, 62(4): 1499-1509.
[14]	韩璐,张薇.棉花苗期氮营养高效品种筛选[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(1): 84-88.
	HAN L, ZHANG W. Screening of cotton varieties with high nitrogen efficiency at seedling stage [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2011, 27(1): 84-88.
[15]	郑顺利,赵一超,陈金湘,等.棉花苗期氮效率对其产量性状和品质性状的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15):220-226.
	ZHENG S L, ZHAO Y C, CHEN J X, et al.. Effect of nitrogen efficiency on yield traits and fiber qualities in seedling of cotton [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(15): 220-226.
[16]	贵会平,董强,张恒恒,等.棉花苗期耐低氮基因型初步筛选[J].棉花学报, 2018, 30(4): 326-337.
	GUI H P, DONG Q, ZHANG H H, et al.. Preliminary screening of low nitrogen-tolerant cotton genotypes at seedling stage [J]. Cotton Sci., 2018, 30(4): 326-337.
[17]	王准, 张恒恒, 董强, 等. 棉花耐低氮和氮敏感种质筛选及验证[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(6): 538-551.
	WANG Z, ZHANG H H, DONG Q, et al.. Screening and verification of low nitrogen tolerant and nitrogen sensitive cotton germplasm [J]. Cotton Sci., 2020, 32(6): 538-551.
[18]	ZHANG H H, FU X Q, WANG X R, et al.. Identification and screening of nitrogen-efficient cotton genotypes under low and normal nitrogen environments at the seedling stage [J/OL]. J. Cotton Res., 2018, 1:6 [2024-11-15]. .
[19]	祝令晓,宋世佳,李浩然,等.基于耐低氮综合指数的棉花苗期耐低氮品种筛选[J].作物学报,2022,48(7):1800-1812.
	ZHU L X, SONG S J, LI H R, et al.. Screening of low nitrogen tolerant cultivars based on low nitrogen tolerance comprehensive index at seeding stage in cotton [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2022, 48(7): 1800-1812.
[20]	MA Z Y, HE S P, WANG X F, et al.. Resequencing a core collection of upland cotton identifies genomic variation and loci influencing fiber quality and yield [J]. Nat. Genet., 2018, 50(6): 803-813.
[21]	HOAGLAND D R, ARNON D I. The water culture method for growing plants without soil [J/OL]. California Agric. Experiment Station Circular, 1950, 14:9 [2024-11-15]. .
[22]	黎毛毛,万建林,黄永兰,等.水稻微核心种质氮素利用率相关性状的鉴定评价及其相关分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(3):352-361.
	LI M M, WAN J L, HUANG Y L, et al.. Evaluation and correlation analysis of the related characters of nitrogen use efficiency for mini core collection of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in China [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2011, 12(3): 352-361.
[23]	李强,罗延宏,谭杰,等.玉米杂交种苗期耐低氮指标的筛选与综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(10):1190-1199.
	LI Q, LUO Y H, TAN J, et al.. Indexes screening and comprehensive evaluation of low nitrogen tolerance of hybrid maize cultivars at seedling stage [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2014, 22(10): 1190-1199.
[24]	远月丽,易媛媛,战勇,等.大豆氮高效种质苗期筛选与鉴定[J].中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(3): 539-547.
	YUAN Y L, YI Y Y, ZHAN Y, et al.. Distinguishing and evaluating high nitrogen-use-efficiency soybean germplasm at seedling stage [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2022, 44(3): 539-547.
[25]	杜保见,郜红建,常江,等.小麦苗期氮素吸收利用效率差异及聚类分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(6):1349-1357.
	DU B J, GAO H J, CHANG J, et al.. Screening and cluster analysis of nitrogen use efficiency of different wheat cultivars at the seedling stage [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2014, 20(6): 1349-1357.
[26]	裴雪霞,王姣爱,党建友,等.耐低氮小麦基因型筛选指标的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(1): 93-98.
	PEI X X, WANG J A, DANG J Y, et al.. An approach to the screening index for low nitrogen tolerant wheat genotype [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2007, 13(1): 93-98.
[27]	陈二影,杨延兵,秦岭,等.谷子苗期氮高效品种筛选及相关特性分析[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(17): 3287-3297.
	CHEN E Y, YANG Y B, QIN L, et al.. Evaluation of nitrogen efficient cultivars of foxtail millet and analysis of the related characters at seedling stage [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2016, 49(17): 3287-3297.
[28]	陈凌, 王君杰, 王海岗, 等. 耐低氮糜子品种的筛选及农艺性状的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(16): 3214-3224.
	CHEN L, WANG J J, WANG H G, et al.. Screening of broomcorn millet varieties tolerant to low nitrogen stress and the comprehensive evaluation of their agronomic traits [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2020, 53(16): 3214-3224.
[29]	刘芯欣,侯云龙,杜楠琳,等.大豆耐低氮资源的苗期鉴定与筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报,2023,24(2):408-418.
	LIU X X, HOU Y L, DU N L, et al.. Identification and screening of soybean resources tolerant to low nitrogen by seedling assay [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2023, 24(2): 408-418.
[30]	沈倩,张思平,刘瑞华,等.棉花出苗期耐冷综合评价体系的构建及耐冷指标筛选[J].中国农业科学,2022,55(22):4342-4355.
	SHEN Q, ZHANG S P, LIU R H, et al.. Construction of a comprehensive evaluation system and screening of cold tolerance indicators for cold tolerance of cotton at seedling emergence stage [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[31]	邢国芳,侯颖,王浩,等.谷子苗期硒高效品种筛选及评价[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(1):158-171.
	XING G F, HOU Y, WANG H, et al.. Screening and evaluation of efficient utilization of selenium in foxtail millet at the seedling stage [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2023, 24(1): 158-171.

性状 Trait	低氮 Low nitrogen			正常氮 Normal nitrogen			耐低氮指数 NRI
性状 Trait	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%
根干重RDW/g	0.42	0.22	51.22	0.43	0.25	58.53	1.10	0.64	57.91
地上部干重SDW/g	1.10	0.42	37.93	1.20	0.58	48.43	0.99	0.53	53.54
总干重TDW/g	1.52	0.60	39.62	1.64	0.81	49.44	1.02	0.53	51.89
根冠比RSR	0.38	0.13	33.10	0.35	0.12	33.26	1.08	0.48	44.88
叶绿素值SPAD	37.96	6.82	17.97	39.43	5.77	14.64	0.97	0.20	21.14

性状 Trait	低氮 Low nitrogen			正常氮 Normal nitrogen			耐低氮指数 NRI
性状 Trait	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%
根干重RDW/g	0.42	0.22	51.22	0.43	0.25	58.53	1.10	0.64	57.91
地上部干重SDW/g	1.10	0.42	37.93	1.20	0.58	48.43	0.99	0.53	53.54
总干重TDW/g	1.52	0.60	39.62	1.64	0.81	49.44	1.02	0.53	51.89
根冠比RSR	0.38	0.13	33.10	0.35	0.12	33.26	1.08	0.48	44.88
叶绿素值SPAD	37.96	6.82	17.97	39.43	5.77	14.64	0.97	0.20	21.14

性状 Trait	环境 Environment	最小值 Min.	最大值 Max.	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	偏度 Skew	峰度 Kurt	广义遗传力 H²_b/%
根干重耐低氮指数 RDWNRI	E1	0.04	4.05	1.30	0.75	57.92	0.94	0.95	35.81
	E2	0.06	4.37	1.29	0.77	59.58	0.91	0.67
	E3	0.02	2.52	0.98	0.44	44.81	0.86	0.77
	E4	0.21	2.18	0.84	0.36	42.84	0.75	0.32
	E	0.16	2.27	1.00	0.35	34.68	0.70	0.71
地上部干重耐低氮指数 SDWNRI	E1	0.10	3.50	1.21	0.58	48.28	0.75	0.68	21.95
	E2	0.09	3.27	1.13	0.62	54.45	0.89	0.64
	E3	0.01	2.44	0.85	0.40	46.94	0.91	0.95
	E4	0.17	1.90	0.75	0.30	40.46	0.86	0.82
	E	0.36	2.01	0.93	0.30	32.07	0.85	0.88
总干重耐低氮指数 TDWNRI	E1	0.16	3.77	1.27	0.60	47.31	0.85	0.95	25.23
	E2	0.10	3.48	1.16	0.61	52.41	0.93	0.87
	E3	0.07	2.33	0.88	0.38	42.90	0.78	0.78
	E4	0.18	1.80	0.76	0.28	36.87	0.77	0.79
	E	0.31	2.05	0.94	0.28	29.53	0.71	0.75
根冠比耐低氮指数 RSRNRI	E1	0.04	2.81	1.04	0.46	44.43	0.75	0.89	45.34
	E2	0.04	2.74	1.06	0.50	47.17	0.87	0.94
	E3	0.18	3.12	1.14	0.44	38.48	0.71	0.78
	E4	0.01	2.98	1.07	0.52	49.26	0.75	0.66
	E	0.18	2.56	1.10	0.36	32.99	0.63	0.88
叶绿素值耐低氮指数 SPADNRI	E1	0.46	1.70	1.04	0.20	19.60	0.18	0.49	56.89
	E2	0.25	1.66	1.00	0.21	21.46	-0.28	0.70
	E3	0.54	1.58	0.91	0.16	17.44	0.27	0.45
	E4	0.49	1.59	0.92	0.21	22.43	0.58	-0.04
	E	1.14	1.66	1.02	0.20	19.74	0.34	-0.09

性状 Trait	环境 Environment	最小值 Min.	最大值 Max.	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV%	偏度 Skew	峰度 Kurt	广义遗传力 H²_b/%
根干重耐低氮指数 RDWNRI	E1	0.04	4.05	1.30	0.75	57.92	0.94	0.95	35.81
	E2	0.06	4.37	1.29	0.77	59.58	0.91	0.67
	E3	0.02	2.52	0.98	0.44	44.81	0.86	0.77
	E4	0.21	2.18	0.84	0.36	42.84	0.75	0.32
	E	0.16	2.27	1.00	0.35	34.68	0.70	0.71
地上部干重耐低氮指数 SDWNRI	E1	0.10	3.50	1.21	0.58	48.28	0.75	0.68	21.95
	E2	0.09	3.27	1.13	0.62	54.45	0.89	0.64
	E3	0.01	2.44	0.85	0.40	46.94	0.91	0.95
	E4	0.17	1.90	0.75	0.30	40.46	0.86	0.82
	E	0.36	2.01	0.93	0.30	32.07	0.85	0.88
总干重耐低氮指数 TDWNRI	E1	0.16	3.77	1.27	0.60	47.31	0.85	0.95	25.23
	E2	0.10	3.48	1.16	0.61	52.41	0.93	0.87
	E3	0.07	2.33	0.88	0.38	42.90	0.78	0.78
	E4	0.18	1.80	0.76	0.28	36.87	0.77	0.79
	E	0.31	2.05	0.94	0.28	29.53	0.71	0.75
根冠比耐低氮指数 RSRNRI	E1	0.04	2.81	1.04	0.46	44.43	0.75	0.89	45.34
	E2	0.04	2.74	1.06	0.50	47.17	0.87	0.94
	E3	0.18	3.12	1.14	0.44	38.48	0.71	0.78
	E4	0.01	2.98	1.07	0.52	49.26	0.75	0.66
	E	0.18	2.56	1.10	0.36	32.99	0.63	0.88
叶绿素值耐低氮指数 SPADNRI	E1	0.46	1.70	1.04	0.20	19.60	0.18	0.49	56.89
	E2	0.25	1.66	1.00	0.21	21.46	-0.28	0.70
	E3	0.54	1.58	0.91	0.16	17.44	0.27	0.45
	E4	0.49	1.59	0.92	0.21	22.43	0.58	-0.04
	E	1.14	1.66	1.02	0.20	19.74	0.34	-0.09

性状 Trait	主成分 Principal component			总载荷 Total load	排名 Ranking
性状 Trait	1	2	3	总载荷 Total load	排名 Ranking
根干重耐低氮指数RDWNRI	0.333	0.334	-0.188	0.231	2
地上部干重耐低氮指数SDWNRI	0.363	-0.267	0.077	0.114	5
总干重耐低氮指数TDWNRI	0.396	0.097	-0.004	0.227	3
根冠比耐低氮指数RSRNRI	0.020	0.633	-0.279	0.148	4
叶绿素值耐低氮指数SPADNRI	0.043	0.266	0.977	0.285	1
特征值Eigenvalue	2.492	1.506	0.932
贡献率Contribution rate/%	49.840	30.115	18.635
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/%	49.840	79.956	98.590