Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 50-60.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0184
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Tingting LIU1(), Xiyu HAO1,2(
), Hui WANG1, Jingwen LENG1, Shihang GONG1, Wei LIU1(
)
Received:
2023-03-14
Accepted:
2023-05-05
Online:
2025-01-15
Published:
2025-01-21
Contact:
Wei LIU
刘婷婷1(), 郝曦煜1,2(
), 王辉1, 冷静文1, 宫世航1, 刘伟1(
)
通讯作者:
刘伟
作者简介:
刘婷婷 E-mail: liutingting928103@163.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Tingting LIU, Xiyu HAO, Hui WANG, Jingwen LENG, Shihang GONG, Wei LIU. Correlation Analysis Between Yield and Agronomical Traits of Different Foxtail Millet Varieties in Semi-arid Area of Western Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 50-60.
刘婷婷, 郝曦煜, 王辉, 冷静文, 宫世航, 刘伟. 吉林西部半干旱地区不同谷子品种产量与农艺性状的分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 50-60.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0184
品种 Variety | 来源 Source |
---|---|
公谷88号 Gonggu 88 | 吉林省农业科学院作物资源研究所 Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
黄金苗 Huangjinmiao | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
山西红谷 Shanxihonggu | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
金苗K2 Jinmiao K2 | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
赤优金苗1号 Chiyoujinmiao 1 | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
陇谷13号 Longgu 13 | 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所 Institute of Crops Research, Gansu Province Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
冀谷168 Jigu 168 | 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所 Millet Research Institue, Heber Academy of Agriculture and Forestry |
冀谷39号 Jigu 39 | 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所 Millet Research Institue, Heber Academy of Agriculture and Forestry |
张杂谷16号 Zhangzagu 16 | 河北省张家口市农业科学院 Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | 河南省安阳市农业科学院 Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Province |
豫谷35号 Yugu 35 | 河南省安阳市农业科学院 Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Province |
嫩选18号 Nenxuan 18 | 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院 Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
嫩选15号 Nenxuan 15 | 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院 Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
龙谷38号 Longgu 38 | 黑龙江省农业科学院作物资源研究所 Crop Resource Research Institue of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
九谷23号 Jiugu 23 | 吉林省吉林市农业科学院 Jilin City Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Jilin Province |
朝谷58号 Chaogu 58 | 辽宁省旱地农林研究所 Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute in Dryland of Liaoning Province |
济谷22号 Jigu 22 | 山东省农业科学院作物研究所 Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
大同29号 Datong 29 | 山西省农业科学院高寒作物所 High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
中谷9号 Zhonggu 9 | 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
中谷2号 Zhonggu 2 | 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
Table 1 Name and source of cultivars
品种 Variety | 来源 Source |
---|---|
公谷88号 Gonggu 88 | 吉林省农业科学院作物资源研究所 Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
黄金苗 Huangjinmiao | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
山西红谷 Shanxihonggu | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
金苗K2 Jinmiao K2 | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
赤优金苗1号 Chiyoujinmiao 1 | 赤峰市农牧科学研究院 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences |
陇谷13号 Longgu 13 | 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所 Institute of Crops Research, Gansu Province Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
冀谷168 Jigu 168 | 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所 Millet Research Institue, Heber Academy of Agriculture and Forestry |
冀谷39号 Jigu 39 | 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所 Millet Research Institue, Heber Academy of Agriculture and Forestry |
张杂谷16号 Zhangzagu 16 | 河北省张家口市农业科学院 Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | 河南省安阳市农业科学院 Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Province |
豫谷35号 Yugu 35 | 河南省安阳市农业科学院 Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Province |
嫩选18号 Nenxuan 18 | 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院 Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
嫩选15号 Nenxuan 15 | 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院 Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
龙谷38号 Longgu 38 | 黑龙江省农业科学院作物资源研究所 Crop Resource Research Institue of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
九谷23号 Jiugu 23 | 吉林省吉林市农业科学院 Jilin City Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Jilin Province |
朝谷58号 Chaogu 58 | 辽宁省旱地农林研究所 Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute in Dryland of Liaoning Province |
济谷22号 Jigu 22 | 山东省农业科学院作物研究所 Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
大同29号 Datong 29 | 山西省农业科学院高寒作物所 High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
中谷9号 Zhonggu 9 | 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
中谷2号 Zhonggu 2 | 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
性状 Trait | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异幅度 Variation range | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
生育日数 GP/d | 114.3 | 6.8 | 96.5~124.0 | 5.9 |
拔节期茎节数 NST | 4.3 | 0.4 | 4.0~5.0 | 10.5 |
抽穗期茎节数 NSH | 11.5 | 1.5 | 7.0~14.0 | 13.4 |
成熟期茎节数 NSM | 12.5 | 1.4 | 9.0~14.0 | 10.9 |
拔节期茎粗 STT/cm | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.8~1.2 | 10.1 |
抽穗期茎粗 STH/cm | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.9~1.3 | 11.1 |
成熟期茎粗 STM/cm | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.9~1.6 | 14.1 |
拔节期叶片数 NLT | 9.3 | 0.6 | 8.0~10.0 | 6.1 |
抽穗期叶片数 NLH | 11.8 | 1.4 | 10.0~15.0 | 11.7 |
成熟期叶片数 NLM | 13.5 | 1.3 | 11.0~16.0 | 9.8 |
拔节期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLT/cm | 51.1 | 6.2 | 37.0~61.5 | 12.2 |
抽穗期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLH/cm | 56.5 | 4.1 | 47.8~61.6 | 7.3 |
成熟期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLM/cm | 58.7 | 4.1 | 50.0~64.2 | 7.1 |
拔节期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLT/cm | 2.7 | 0.2 | 2.2~3.1 | 7.0 |
抽穗期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLH/cm | 2.9 | 0.2 | 2.5~3.4 | 7.2 |
成熟期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLM/cm | 3.2 | 0.3 | 2.6~4.0 | 10.2 |
株高 PH/cm | 151.7 | 22.3 | 88.2~197.0 | 14.7 |
穗长 SL/cm | 23.1 | 2.9 | 18.1~28.5 | 12.6 |
穗粗 ST/cm | 3.0 | 0.3 | 2.5~3.5 | 10.3 |
单穗重 SPW/g | 22.1 | 3.1 | 17.0~28.1 | 13.9 |
单穗粒重 SGW/g | 18.2 | 2.8 | 13.6~24.0 | 15.3 |
千粒重 TGW/g | 2.9 | 0.2 | 2.6~3.2 | 6.6 |
产量 Y/(kg·hm-2) | 5 510.8 | 530.3 | 4 734.0~6 430.5 | 9.6 |
Table 2 Variation analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
性状 Trait | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异幅度 Variation range | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
生育日数 GP/d | 114.3 | 6.8 | 96.5~124.0 | 5.9 |
拔节期茎节数 NST | 4.3 | 0.4 | 4.0~5.0 | 10.5 |
抽穗期茎节数 NSH | 11.5 | 1.5 | 7.0~14.0 | 13.4 |
成熟期茎节数 NSM | 12.5 | 1.4 | 9.0~14.0 | 10.9 |
拔节期茎粗 STT/cm | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.8~1.2 | 10.1 |
抽穗期茎粗 STH/cm | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.9~1.3 | 11.1 |
成熟期茎粗 STM/cm | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.9~1.6 | 14.1 |
拔节期叶片数 NLT | 9.3 | 0.6 | 8.0~10.0 | 6.1 |
抽穗期叶片数 NLH | 11.8 | 1.4 | 10.0~15.0 | 11.7 |
成熟期叶片数 NLM | 13.5 | 1.3 | 11.0~16.0 | 9.8 |
拔节期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLT/cm | 51.1 | 6.2 | 37.0~61.5 | 12.2 |
抽穗期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLH/cm | 56.5 | 4.1 | 47.8~61.6 | 7.3 |
成熟期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLM/cm | 58.7 | 4.1 | 50.0~64.2 | 7.1 |
拔节期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLT/cm | 2.7 | 0.2 | 2.2~3.1 | 7.0 |
抽穗期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLH/cm | 2.9 | 0.2 | 2.5~3.4 | 7.2 |
成熟期倒第2叶叶宽 WSLLM/cm | 3.2 | 0.3 | 2.6~4.0 | 10.2 |
株高 PH/cm | 151.7 | 22.3 | 88.2~197.0 | 14.7 |
穗长 SL/cm | 23.1 | 2.9 | 18.1~28.5 | 12.6 |
穗粗 ST/cm | 3.0 | 0.3 | 2.5~3.5 | 10.3 |
单穗重 SPW/g | 22.1 | 3.1 | 17.0~28.1 | 13.9 |
单穗粒重 SGW/g | 18.2 | 2.8 | 13.6~24.0 | 15.3 |
千粒重 TGW/g | 2.9 | 0.2 | 2.6~3.2 | 6.6 |
产量 Y/(kg·hm-2) | 5 510.8 | 530.3 | 4 734.0~6 430.5 | 9.6 |
品种 Variety | 生育日数 GP/d | 株高 PH/cm | 穗长 SL/cm | 穗粗 ST/cm | 单穗重 SPW/g | 单穗粒重 SGW/g | 千粒重 TGW/g | 产量 Y/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公谷88号 Gonggu 88 | 122.5 | 88.2 | 18.8 | 3.0 | 23.4 | 19.9 | 3.1 | 5 904.0 |
黄金苗 Huangjinmiao | 111.0 | 172.2 | 21.1 | 2.5 | 17.0 | 13.6 | 3.1 | 4 734.0 |
山西红谷 Shanxihonggu | 107.0 | 183.5 | 21.4 | 2.6 | 18.2 | 14.5 | 2.8 | 4 812.0 |
金苗K2 Jinmiao K2 | 114.5 | 149.0 | 24.6 | 3.1 | 22.6 | 18.8 | 2.6 | 5 692.5 |
赤优金苗1号 Chiyoujinmiao 1 | 114.5 | 166.0 | 24.9 | 3.1 | 22.5 | 18.5 | 2.8 | 5 539.5 |
陇谷13号 Longgu 13 | 111.0 | 197.0 | 24.8 | 3.0 | 24.1 | 19.7 | 2.8 | 5 763.0 |
冀谷168 Jigu 168 | 114.5 | 146.2 | 24.7 | 3.4 | 24.3 | 20.1 | 2.8 | 6 013.5 |
冀谷39号 Jigu 39 | 117.5 | 148.0 | 21.7 | 2.9 | 18.2 | 15.1 | 3.1 | 5 152.5 |
张杂谷16号 Zhangzagu 16 | 119.0 | 134.1 | 22.4 | 2.7 | 22.5 | 18.5 | 3.2 | 5 530.5 |
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | 117.5 | 141.6 | 24.8 | 3.2 | 21.9 | 18.0 | 2.6 | 5 236.5 |
豫谷35号 Yugu 35 | 120.0 | 148.0 | 25.6 | 3.4 | 25.8 | 21.3 | 2.9 | 6 180.0 |
嫩选18号 Nenxuan 18 | 111.5 | 156.0 | 27.4 | 3.5 | 28.1 | 24.0 | 3.1 | 6 430.5 |
嫩选15号 Nenxuan 15 | 100.0 | 146.8 | 28.5 | 3.3 | 22.2 | 18.2 | 3.2 | 5 460.0 |
龙谷38号 Longgu 38 | 96.5 | 165.0 | 20.7 | 3.0 | 22.2 | 18.0 | 2.8 | 5 368.5 |
九谷23号 Jiugu 23 | 116.5 | 143.0 | 18.1 | 3.3 | 18.0 | 14.2 | 2.9 | 4 881.0 |
朝谷58号 Chaogu 58 | 116.5 | 155.9 | 19.3 | 2.5 | 21.3 | 17.5 | 3.1 | 5 103.0 |
济谷22号 Jigu 22 | 124.0 | 135.9 | 25.5 | 3.4 | 25.0 | 20.8 | 2.7 | 6 126.0 |
大同29号 Datong 29 | 117.0 | 174.0 | 23.5 | 2.8 | 18.1 | 14.6 | 3.2 | 4 929.0 |
中谷9号 Zhonggu 9 | 117.0 | 144.9 | 25.1 | 2.7 | 26.3 | 21.8 | 3.1 | 6 346.5 |
中谷2号 Zhonggu 2 | 118.0 | 138.0 | 19.6 | 2.9 | 20.5 | 17.0 | 3.0 | 5 013.0 |
Table 3 Yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
品种 Variety | 生育日数 GP/d | 株高 PH/cm | 穗长 SL/cm | 穗粗 ST/cm | 单穗重 SPW/g | 单穗粒重 SGW/g | 千粒重 TGW/g | 产量 Y/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公谷88号 Gonggu 88 | 122.5 | 88.2 | 18.8 | 3.0 | 23.4 | 19.9 | 3.1 | 5 904.0 |
黄金苗 Huangjinmiao | 111.0 | 172.2 | 21.1 | 2.5 | 17.0 | 13.6 | 3.1 | 4 734.0 |
山西红谷 Shanxihonggu | 107.0 | 183.5 | 21.4 | 2.6 | 18.2 | 14.5 | 2.8 | 4 812.0 |
金苗K2 Jinmiao K2 | 114.5 | 149.0 | 24.6 | 3.1 | 22.6 | 18.8 | 2.6 | 5 692.5 |
赤优金苗1号 Chiyoujinmiao 1 | 114.5 | 166.0 | 24.9 | 3.1 | 22.5 | 18.5 | 2.8 | 5 539.5 |
陇谷13号 Longgu 13 | 111.0 | 197.0 | 24.8 | 3.0 | 24.1 | 19.7 | 2.8 | 5 763.0 |
冀谷168 Jigu 168 | 114.5 | 146.2 | 24.7 | 3.4 | 24.3 | 20.1 | 2.8 | 6 013.5 |
冀谷39号 Jigu 39 | 117.5 | 148.0 | 21.7 | 2.9 | 18.2 | 15.1 | 3.1 | 5 152.5 |
张杂谷16号 Zhangzagu 16 | 119.0 | 134.1 | 22.4 | 2.7 | 22.5 | 18.5 | 3.2 | 5 530.5 |
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | 117.5 | 141.6 | 24.8 | 3.2 | 21.9 | 18.0 | 2.6 | 5 236.5 |
豫谷35号 Yugu 35 | 120.0 | 148.0 | 25.6 | 3.4 | 25.8 | 21.3 | 2.9 | 6 180.0 |
嫩选18号 Nenxuan 18 | 111.5 | 156.0 | 27.4 | 3.5 | 28.1 | 24.0 | 3.1 | 6 430.5 |
嫩选15号 Nenxuan 15 | 100.0 | 146.8 | 28.5 | 3.3 | 22.2 | 18.2 | 3.2 | 5 460.0 |
龙谷38号 Longgu 38 | 96.5 | 165.0 | 20.7 | 3.0 | 22.2 | 18.0 | 2.8 | 5 368.5 |
九谷23号 Jiugu 23 | 116.5 | 143.0 | 18.1 | 3.3 | 18.0 | 14.2 | 2.9 | 4 881.0 |
朝谷58号 Chaogu 58 | 116.5 | 155.9 | 19.3 | 2.5 | 21.3 | 17.5 | 3.1 | 5 103.0 |
济谷22号 Jigu 22 | 124.0 | 135.9 | 25.5 | 3.4 | 25.0 | 20.8 | 2.7 | 6 126.0 |
大同29号 Datong 29 | 117.0 | 174.0 | 23.5 | 2.8 | 18.1 | 14.6 | 3.2 | 4 929.0 |
中谷9号 Zhonggu 9 | 117.0 | 144.9 | 25.1 | 2.7 | 26.3 | 21.8 | 3.1 | 6 346.5 |
中谷2号 Zhonggu 2 | 118.0 | 138.0 | 19.6 | 2.9 | 20.5 | 17.0 | 3.0 | 5 013.0 |
指标 Index | 偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t值 t value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y, X3) | -0.687* | 2.991 | 0.012 |
r(Y, X4) | 0.507 | 1.860 | 0.090 |
r(Y, X8) | -0.494 | 1.798 | 0.100 |
r(Y, X9) | 0.642* | 2.651 | 0.023 |
r(Y, X13) | 0.550 | 2.083 | 0.061 |
r(Y, X19) | 0.647* | 2.686 | 0.021 |
r(Y, X20) | -0.299 | 0.992 | 0.343 |
r(Y, X21) | 0.573* | 2.212 | 0.049 |
r(Y, X22) | 0.489 | 1.773 | 0.104 |
Table 4 Partial correlation analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
指标 Index | 偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t值 t value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y, X3) | -0.687* | 2.991 | 0.012 |
r(Y, X4) | 0.507 | 1.860 | 0.090 |
r(Y, X8) | -0.494 | 1.798 | 0.100 |
r(Y, X9) | 0.642* | 2.651 | 0.023 |
r(Y, X13) | 0.550 | 2.083 | 0.061 |
r(Y, X19) | 0.647* | 2.686 | 0.021 |
r(Y, X20) | -0.299 | 0.992 | 0.343 |
r(Y, X21) | 0.573* | 2.212 | 0.049 |
r(Y, X22) | 0.489 | 1.773 | 0.104 |
性状 Trait | 生育日数GP | 拔节期茎节数NST | 抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期茎粗 STT | 抽穗期茎粗 STH | 成熟期茎粗 STM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期叶片数NLM | 拔节期倒第2叶叶长LSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLM | 拔节期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | 株高 PH | 穗长SL | 穗粗ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期茎节数NST | 0.070 | |||||||||||||||||||||
抽穗期茎节数NSH | -0.026 | -0.019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
成熟期茎节数NSM | 0.108 | 0.218 | 0.794** | |||||||||||||||||||
拔节期茎粗STT | 0.479* | -0.078 | 0.335 | 0.255 | ||||||||||||||||||
抽穗期茎粗STH | 0.539* | -0.157 | 0.293 | 0.230 | 0.915** | |||||||||||||||||
成熟期茎粗STM | 0.479* | -0.128 | 0.182 | 0.062 | 0.731** | 0.877** | ||||||||||||||||
拔节期叶片数NLT | -0.390 | 0.311 | 0.018 | 0.000 | -0.170 | -0.284 | -0.081 | |||||||||||||||
抽穗期叶片数NLH | -0.090 | 0.108 | 0.480* | 0.495* | 0.499* | 0.497* | 0.339 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||
成熟期叶片数NLM | 0.332 | 0.225 | 0.636** | 0.677** | 0.327 | 0.345 | 0.251 | -0.070 | 0.539* | |||||||||||||
拔节期倒第2片叶长LSLLT | -0.209 | -0.013 | 0.141 | -0.007 | 0.278 | 0.227 | 0.320 | 0.176 | 0.113 | -0.046 | ||||||||||||
抽穗期倒第2片叶长LSLLH | 0.289 | 0.069 | 0.367 | 0.398 | 0.645** | 0.712** | 0.594** | -0.197 | 0.344 | 0.358 | 0.435 | |||||||||||
成熟期倒第2片叶长LSLLM | -0.040 | 0.275 | 0.328 | 0.254 | 0.312 | 0.244 | 0.235 | 0.371 | 0.343 | 0.302 | 0.594** | 0.567** |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
性状 Trait | 生育日数GP | 拔节期茎节数NST | 抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期茎粗 STT | 抽穗期茎粗 STH | 成熟期茎粗 STM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期叶片数NLM | 拔节期倒第2叶叶长LSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLM | 拔节期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | 株高 PH | 穗长SL | 穗粗ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期茎节数NST | 0.070 | |||||||||||||||||||||
抽穗期茎节数NSH | -0.026 | -0.019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
成熟期茎节数NSM | 0.108 | 0.218 | 0.794** | |||||||||||||||||||
拔节期茎粗STT | 0.479* | -0.078 | 0.335 | 0.255 | ||||||||||||||||||
抽穗期茎粗STH | 0.539* | -0.157 | 0.293 | 0.230 | 0.915** | |||||||||||||||||
成熟期茎粗STM | 0.479* | -0.128 | 0.182 | 0.062 | 0.731** | 0.877** | ||||||||||||||||
拔节期叶片数NLT | -0.390 | 0.311 | 0.018 | 0.000 | -0.170 | -0.284 | -0.081 | |||||||||||||||
抽穗期叶片数NLH | -0.090 | 0.108 | 0.480* | 0.495* | 0.499* | 0.497* | 0.339 | 0.168 | ||||||||||||||
成熟期叶片数NLM | 0.332 | 0.225 | 0.636** | 0.677** | 0.327 | 0.345 | 0.251 | -0.070 | 0.539* | |||||||||||||
拔节期倒第2片叶长LSLLT | -0.209 | -0.013 | 0.141 | -0.007 | 0.278 | 0.227 | 0.320 | 0.176 | 0.113 | -0.046 | ||||||||||||
抽穗期倒第2片叶长LSLLH | 0.289 | 0.069 | 0.367 | 0.398 | 0.645** | 0.712** | 0.594** | -0.197 | 0.344 | 0.358 | 0.435 | |||||||||||
成熟期倒第2片叶长LSLLM | -0.040 | 0.275 | 0.328 | 0.254 | 0.312 | 0.244 | 0.235 | 0.371 | 0.343 | 0.302 | 0.594** | 0.567** |
性状 Trait | 直接效应 Direct effect | 间接效应 Indirect effect | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶长LSLLM | 穗粗 ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW | ||
抽穗期茎节数 NSH | -0.306 | 0.166 | -0.002 | 0.082 | 0.049 | 0.012 | 0.053 | -0.148 | -0.035 | |
成熟期茎节数 NSM | 0.208 | -0.243 | 0.000 | 0.085 | 0.038 | -0.013 | 0.144 | -0.372 | -0.062 | |
拔节期叶片数 NLT | -0.108 | -0.006 | 0.000 | 0.029 | 0.055 | 0.004 | 0.118 | -0.297 | -0.003 | |
抽穗期叶片数 NLH | 0.172 | -0.147 | 0.103 | -0.018 | 0.051 | -0.029 | 0.124 | -0.317 | -0.037 | |
成熟期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLM | 0.149 | -0.100 | 0.053 | -0.040 | 0.059 | -0.055 | 0.109 | -0.310 | -0.011 | |
穗粗 ST | 0.200 | -0.019 | -0.013 | -0.002 | -0.025 | -0.041 | -0.397 | 0.890 | -0.034 | |
单穗重 SPW | -0.735 | 0.022 | -0.041 | 0.017 | -0.029 | -0.022 | 0.108 | 1.647 | -0.008 | |
单穗粒重 SGW | 1.653 | 0.027 | -0.047 | 0.019 | -0.033 | -0.028 | 0.108 | -0.732 | -0.005 | |
千粒重 TGW | 0.124 | 0.086 | -0.104 | 0.003 | -0.051 | -0.013 | -0.055 | 0.049 | -0.067 |
Table 6 Path analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
性状 Trait | 直接效应 Direct effect | 间接效应 Indirect effect | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶长LSLLM | 穗粗 ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW | ||
抽穗期茎节数 NSH | -0.306 | 0.166 | -0.002 | 0.082 | 0.049 | 0.012 | 0.053 | -0.148 | -0.035 | |
成熟期茎节数 NSM | 0.208 | -0.243 | 0.000 | 0.085 | 0.038 | -0.013 | 0.144 | -0.372 | -0.062 | |
拔节期叶片数 NLT | -0.108 | -0.006 | 0.000 | 0.029 | 0.055 | 0.004 | 0.118 | -0.297 | -0.003 | |
抽穗期叶片数 NLH | 0.172 | -0.147 | 0.103 | -0.018 | 0.051 | -0.029 | 0.124 | -0.317 | -0.037 | |
成熟期倒第2叶叶长 LSLLM | 0.149 | -0.100 | 0.053 | -0.040 | 0.059 | -0.055 | 0.109 | -0.310 | -0.011 | |
穗粗 ST | 0.200 | -0.019 | -0.013 | -0.002 | -0.025 | -0.041 | -0.397 | 0.890 | -0.034 | |
单穗重 SPW | -0.735 | 0.022 | -0.041 | 0.017 | -0.029 | -0.022 | 0.108 | 1.647 | -0.008 | |
单穗粒重 SGW | 1.653 | 0.027 | -0.047 | 0.019 | -0.033 | -0.028 | 0.108 | -0.732 | -0.005 | |
千粒重 TGW | 0.124 | 0.086 | -0.104 | 0.003 | -0.051 | -0.013 | -0.055 | 0.049 | -0.067 |
性状 Trait | 生育日数GP | 拔节期茎节数NST | 抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期茎粗 STT | 抽穗期茎粗 STH | 成熟期茎粗 STM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期叶片数NLM | 拔节期倒第2叶叶长LSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLM | 拔节期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | 株高 PH | 穗长SL | 穗粗ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLT | -0.014 | -0.443 | -0.132 | -0.351 | 0.343 | 0.368 | 0.277 | -0.373 | 0.023 | -0.196 | 0.114 | 0.039 | -0.068 | |||||||||
抽穗期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLH | 0.192 | -0.302 | 0.023 | -0.105 | 0.489* | 0.522* | 0.396 | -0.407 | 0.143 | 0.008 | -0.147 | 0.083 | -0.228 | 0.869** | ||||||||
成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | -0.068 | -0.457* | -0.274 | -0.346 | -0.041 | 0.042 | 0.078 | -0.471* | -0.241 | -0.251 | -0.120 | -0.204 | -0.482* | 0.724** | 0.681** | |||||||
株高 PH | -0.508* | 0.398 | 0.430 | 0.423 | 0.001 | -0.090 | -0.098 | 0.580** | 0.489* | 0.278 | 0.460* | 0.241 | 0.490* | -0.415 | -0.446* | -0.562** | ||||||
穗长 SL | -0.155 | -0.094 | -0.020 | -0.144 | -0.112 | -0.039 | 0.150 | 0.019 | 0.005 | 0.086 | 0.390 | 0.130 | 0.000 | -0.137 | -0.332 | 0.090 | 0.204 | |||||
穗粗 ST | 0.065 | 0.038 | 0.061 | -0.064 | -0.314 | -0.145 | 0.182 | 0.020 | -0.146 | 0.147 | -0.154 | -0.201 | -0.273 | -0.230 | -0.171 | 0.180 | -0.220 | 0.524* | ||||
单穗重SPW | 0.129 | -0.278 | -0.071 | -0.196 | -0.134 | -0.018 | 0.145 | -0.160 | -0.168 | 0.153 | 0.114 | -0.137 | -0.149 | -0.114 | -0.218 | 0.074 | -0.240 | 0.601** | 0.539* | |||
单穗粒重SGW | 0.168 | -0.304 | -0.090 | -0.225 | -0.116 | -0.006 | 0.145 | -0.179 | -0.192 | 0.142 | 0.078 | -0.162 | -0.188 | -0.081 | -0.181 | 0.104 | -0.289 | 0.588** | 0.538* | 0.996** | ||
千粒重TGW | -0.036 | -0.239 | -0.283 | -0.501* | 0.214 | 0.170 | 0.201 | -0.027 | -0.297 | -0.506* | 0.252 | -0.065 | -0.086 | 0.504* | 0.472* | 0.423 | -0.184 | -0.074 | -0.274 | -0.066 | -0.041 | |
产量 Y | 0.223 | -0.233 | -0.129 | -0.214 | -0.079 | 0.080 | 0.217 | -0.207 | -0.098 | 0.172 | 0.055 | -0.094 | -0.145 | -0.054 | -0.130 | 0.112 | -0.305 | 0.601** | 0.559* | 0.958** | 0.962** | -0.028 |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of foxtail millet
性状 Trait | 生育日数GP | 拔节期茎节数NST | 抽穗期茎节数NSH | 成熟期茎节数NSM | 拔节期茎粗 STT | 抽穗期茎粗 STH | 成熟期茎粗 STM | 拔节期叶片数NLT | 抽穗期叶片数NLH | 成熟期叶片数NLM | 拔节期倒第2叶叶长LSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶 叶长 LSLLM | 拔节期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLT | 抽穗期倒第2叶 叶宽 WSLLH | 成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | 株高 PH | 穗长SL | 穗粗ST | 单穗重SPW | 单穗粒重SGW | 千粒重TGW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLT | -0.014 | -0.443 | -0.132 | -0.351 | 0.343 | 0.368 | 0.277 | -0.373 | 0.023 | -0.196 | 0.114 | 0.039 | -0.068 | |||||||||
抽穗期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLH | 0.192 | -0.302 | 0.023 | -0.105 | 0.489* | 0.522* | 0.396 | -0.407 | 0.143 | 0.008 | -0.147 | 0.083 | -0.228 | 0.869** | ||||||||
成熟期倒第2叶叶宽WSLLM | -0.068 | -0.457* | -0.274 | -0.346 | -0.041 | 0.042 | 0.078 | -0.471* | -0.241 | -0.251 | -0.120 | -0.204 | -0.482* | 0.724** | 0.681** | |||||||
株高 PH | -0.508* | 0.398 | 0.430 | 0.423 | 0.001 | -0.090 | -0.098 | 0.580** | 0.489* | 0.278 | 0.460* | 0.241 | 0.490* | -0.415 | -0.446* | -0.562** | ||||||
穗长 SL | -0.155 | -0.094 | -0.020 | -0.144 | -0.112 | -0.039 | 0.150 | 0.019 | 0.005 | 0.086 | 0.390 | 0.130 | 0.000 | -0.137 | -0.332 | 0.090 | 0.204 | |||||
穗粗 ST | 0.065 | 0.038 | 0.061 | -0.064 | -0.314 | -0.145 | 0.182 | 0.020 | -0.146 | 0.147 | -0.154 | -0.201 | -0.273 | -0.230 | -0.171 | 0.180 | -0.220 | 0.524* | ||||
单穗重SPW | 0.129 | -0.278 | -0.071 | -0.196 | -0.134 | -0.018 | 0.145 | -0.160 | -0.168 | 0.153 | 0.114 | -0.137 | -0.149 | -0.114 | -0.218 | 0.074 | -0.240 | 0.601** | 0.539* | |||
单穗粒重SGW | 0.168 | -0.304 | -0.090 | -0.225 | -0.116 | -0.006 | 0.145 | -0.179 | -0.192 | 0.142 | 0.078 | -0.162 | -0.188 | -0.081 | -0.181 | 0.104 | -0.289 | 0.588** | 0.538* | 0.996** | ||
千粒重TGW | -0.036 | -0.239 | -0.283 | -0.501* | 0.214 | 0.170 | 0.201 | -0.027 | -0.297 | -0.506* | 0.252 | -0.065 | -0.086 | 0.504* | 0.472* | 0.423 | -0.184 | -0.074 | -0.274 | -0.066 | -0.041 | |
产量 Y | 0.223 | -0.233 | -0.129 | -0.214 | -0.079 | 0.080 | 0.217 | -0.207 | -0.098 | 0.172 | 0.055 | -0.094 | -0.145 | -0.054 | -0.130 | 0.112 | -0.305 | 0.601** | 0.559* | 0.958** | 0.962** | -0.028 |
1 | 刁现民. 中国谷子产业与产业技术体系[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011:1-500. |
2 | 智慧, 牛振刚, 贾冠清, 等. 谷子干草饲用品质性状变异及相关性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(5): 800-807. |
ZHI H, NIU Z G, JIA G Q, et al.. Variation and correlation analysis of hay forage quality traits of foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.] [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2012, 38(5): 800-807. | |
3 | 刘建垒, 常柳, 段晓亮, 等. 小米营养成分及其贮藏加工稳定性研究进展[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2022, 28(3): 55-62. |
LIU J L, CHANG L, DUAN X L, et al.. Research advancement on nutritional compontent of foxtail millet and their stability during storage and processing [J]. Food Nutr. China, 2022, 28(3): 55-62. | |
4 | 杨延兵, 张会笛, 秦岭, 等. 种植地点和加工精度对小米营养与安全品质的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2021, 36(9): 54-59. |
YANG Y B, ZHANG H D, QIN L, et al.. Effect of planting location and processing fineness on nutrition and safety quality of millet [J]. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Association, 2021, 36(9): 54-59. | |
5 | KAUR K D, JHA A, SABIKHI L, et al.. Significance of coarse cereals in health and nutrition: a review [J]. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2014, 51(8): 1429-1441. |
6 | VERMA S, SRIVASTAVA S, TIWARI N. Comparative study on nutritional and sensory quality of barnyard and foxtail millet food products with traditional rice products [J]. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2015, 52(18): 5147-5155. |
7 | 赵利蓉, 马珂, 张丽光, 等. 不同生态区谷子品种农艺性状和品质分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(2): 44-53. |
ZHAO L R, MA K, ZHANG L G, et al.. Analysis of agronomic traits and quality of foxtail millet varieties in different ecological regions [J]. Crops, 2022(2): 44-53. | |
8 | 路志国, 解慧芳, 邢璐, 等. 22个谷子品种农艺性状及适应性综合分析[J]. 中国种业, 2022(11): 49-53. |
9 | 李涌泉, 金赟, 李佳月, 等. 晋北谷子农艺和营养品质性状的相关性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 22-30. |
LI Y Q, JIN Y, LI J Y, et al.. Correlation analysis of agronomic and nutrient quality characters of millet in northern Shanxi [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2022, 38(29): 22-30. | |
10 | 赵小琴, 贾瑞玲, 刘军秀, 等. 120份谷子种质资源的农艺性状表现和遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(6): 61-69. |
ZHAO X Q, JIA R L, LIU J X, et al.. Agronomic traits and genetic diversity analysis of 120 foxtail millet germplasms [J]. Crops, 2022(6): 61-69. | |
11 | 韩燕丽, 樊永强, 王彦辉, 等. 15个谷子品种农艺性状与产量的综合评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(11): 10-14. |
HAN Y L, FAN Y Q, WANG Y H, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic trait and yield of 15 millet cultivars [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2022,61(11): 10-14. | |
12 | 赵芳, 魏玮, 张晓磊, 等. 224个谷子品种农艺性状聚类和相关性分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(1): 74-83. |
ZHAO F, WEI W, ZHANG X L, et al.. Clustering and correlation analysis of agronomic traits of 224 millet varieties [J]. Seed, 2022, 41(1): 74-83. | |
13 | 李涛, 高志军, 杨文耀. 37份谷子农艺性状多样性与相关性分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(11): 96-100. |
LI T, GAO Z J, YANG W Y. Diversity and correlation analysis of 37 millet agronomic traits [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci. Bull., 2021, 27(11): 96-100. | |
14 | 刘思辰, 曹晓宁, 温琪汾, 等. 山西谷子地方品种农艺性状和品质性状的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(11): 2137-2148. |
LIU S C, CAO X N, WEN Q F, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits and quality traits of foxtail millet landrace in Shanxi [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2020, 53(11): 2137-2148. | |
15 | 解云, 李强, 郭世华. 30份谷子品种农艺性状的遗传多样性及相关性[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(9): 3079-3085. |
XIE Y, LI Q, GUO S H. Genetic diversity and correlation of agronomic traits in 30 foxtail millet cultivars [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(9): 3079-3085. | |
16 | 解云, 郭世华. 谷子品种农艺性状的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6): 2064-2072. |
XIE Y, GUO S H. Grey correlation degree analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characters in foxtail millet cultivars [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(6): 2064-2072. | |
17 | 任芹勇, 樊巧利, 李涛, 等. 65份谷子品种农艺性状聚类和相关性[J]. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(12): 5178-5188. |
REN Q Y, FAN Q L, LI T, et al.. Clustering and correlation of agronomic traits in 65 foxtail millets [J].Mol. Plant Breeding, 2017, 15(12): 5178-5188. | |
18 | 陈树人, 肖伟中, 朱云开, 等. 土壤养分和小麦产量空间变异性与相关性分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2008,39(10): 140-143. |
CHEN S R, XIAO W Z, ZHU Y K, et al.. Spatial variability and correlation of soil nutrient and wheat yield [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2008, 39(10): 140-143. | |
19 | 左慧文, 王卫斌, 陈升位, 等. ‘云枝麦1号’8种成熟籽粒成分的含量差异和偏相关分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(16): 5406-5412. |
ZUO H W, WANG W B, CHEN S W, et al.. The content difference and partial correlation of 8 components from the mature grains of ‘Yunzhimai No.1’ [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2019, 17(16): 5406-5412. | |
20 | 刘卫星, 郭志军, 苗友顺, 等. 黄河流域中早熟棉产量构成因素与高产结构指标分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(9): 81-82. |
21 | 王义伟, 张方学. 不同产地香料烟烟叶化学成分与外观形态特征偏相关分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(14): 3328-3332. |
WANG Y W, ZHANG F X. Partial correlation analysis on appearance morphological characteristics and chemical composition of oriental tobacco from different producing areas [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2013, 52(14): 3328-3332. | |
22 | 徐翠莲, 杨衍菊, 王瑞清. 冬小麦籽粒品质性状与农艺性状间的相关分析[J]. 种子, 2013, 32(2): 85-88. |
XU C L, YANG Y J, WANG R Q. The correlation analysis of grain quality traits and agronomic traits of winter wheat [J]. Seed, 2013, 32(2): 85-88. | |
23 | 刘志龙, 方建民, 虞木奎, 等. 三种林-茶复合林分中环境因子和茶的光合特征参数的日变化规律[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2009,18 (2): 62-67. |
LIU Z L, FANG J M, YU M K, et al.. Diurnal variations of environmental factors and photosynthetic parameters of camellia sinensis in three forest-tea mixed stands [J]. J. Plant Resour. Environ., 2009,18 (2): 62-67. | |
24 | 罗永忠, 成自勇. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(2): 215-221. |
LUO Y Z, CHENG Z Y. Impact of water stress on leaf water potential,transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs) of alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2011, 19(2): 215-221. | |
25 | 宫璇, 张如莲, 曹红星, 等. 4个椰子品种光合、蒸腾作用日变化特征及影响因素[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(2): 221-224. |
GONG X, ZHANG R L, CAO H X, et al.. Daily changes of photosynthesis and transpiration rate of four cultivars of coconut and the influencing factors [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2011, 32(2): 221-224. | |
26 | 邹学校, 马艳青, 张竹青, 等. 环境因子对辣椒光合与蒸腾特性的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2005,14 (4): 17-22. |
ZOU X X, MA Y Q, ZHANG Z Q, et al.. Effects of environment factors on photosynthesis and transpiration characters of Capsicum annuum [J]. J. Plant Resour. Environ., 2005,14 (4): 17-22. | |
27 | 陆平. 谷子种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2006: 22-36. |
28 | 齐光荣, 苏连顺, 关立, 等. 2020年全国谷子区域试验(东北春谷区组)四元联系数多因素态势排序分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(21): 41-44. |
QI G R, SU L S, GUAN L, et al.. Analysis on multivariate situation ranking for quaternion connection coefficient in national millet regional experiment in 2020 (northeast spring valley group) [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021(21): 41-44. | |
29 | 杨慧卿, 王根全, 郝晓芬, 等. 山西谷子品种主要农艺性状的相关和主成分分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(10): 19-23. |
YANG H Q, WANG G Q, HAO X F, et al.. Main agronomic traits of millet varieites in Shanxi: correlation and principal component analysis [J]. J. Agric., 2020, 10(10): 19-23. | |
30 | 贾小平, 袁玺垒, 陆平, 等. 中国71个谷子种质资源的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(9): 63-66. |
JIA X P, YUAN X L, LU P, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic trait and yield of 15 millet cultivars [J]. Seed, 2017, 36(9): 63-66. | |
31 | 贾小平, 李剑峰, 赵渊, 等. 谷子抽穗期与农艺性状的相关与回归分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3): 634-645. |
JIA X P, LI J F, ZHAO Y, et al.. Correlation and regression analysis between heading date and agronomic traits in foxtail millet [J]. J. Plant Genetic Resour.,2019, 20(3): 634-645. | |
32 | 李会霞, 王玉文, 田岗, 等. 谷子一些数量性状的遗传相关分析及其在育种上的应用[J].甘肃农业科技, 2005(4): 12-14. |
LI H X, WANG Y W, TIAN G, et al.. Genetic correlation analysis and application in breeding on some quantitative character of millet [J]. Gansu Agric. Sci. Technol., 2005(4): 12-14. |
[1] | Wen DONG, Zehui JU, Zhenzhong WANG, Kangtai SUN. Project Establishment Analysis and Prospects of China’s “Forestry Germplasm Resources Cultivation and Quality Improvement” in the “14th Five-Year” National Key R&D Program [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 1-10. |
[2] | Zhenfei ZHANG, An YAN, Jing GUO, Yuhang ZHAO, Yilin YUAN, Peng LIU, Zuohao QU, Chuan YUAN. Research on Apple Yield Estimation Model Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 110-119. |
[3] | Jianfeng ZHANG, Wenfeng HOU, Yongqing WU, Kaixu LI, Xiaokun LI. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Interactions on Occurrence of Diseases and Insect Pests and Grain Yield of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 145-154. |
[4] | Huaqiang TAN, Liping LI, Manman TIE, Jiaqin YANG, Xiaoyun ZHENG, Shaokun PAN, Youwan TANG. Mining and Analysis of Genes Related to Anthocyanin Degradation in Purple Pepper [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 79-91. |
[5] | Caixia LYU, Yongfu LI, Huinan XIN, Na LI, Ning LAI, Qinglong GENG, Shuhuang CHEN. Effects of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate/Ammonium Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
[6] | Zhining YANG, Xuke LU, Yapeng FAN, Yuping SUN, Xin YU, Liang WANG, Yongjian GAO, Gulijiayinashen Habuli, Gulishaxi Nasiyi, Wumuer Abudu, Hui HUANG, Menghao ZHANG, Lidong WANG, Xiao CHEN, Lei XIAO, Xinrui ZHANG, Shuai WANG, Xiugui CHEN, Junjuan WANG, Lixue GUO, Wenwei GAO, Wuwei YE. Response Mechanism of Cotton GhDMT7 Gene to 5-azacytidine [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 28-35. |
[7] | Xueqing LIU, Jing WANG, Yi YANG, Huiqin WU, Yanhong WANG, Luyao WANG, Jiawei LU, Kaixuan ZHANG, Yuan ZHAI, Yan CHENG. Effect of Exogenous Ethephon on Defoliation and Yield of Pigmented Pepper [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 36-46. |
[8] | Yongxu GUAN, Zhicheng SUN, Yan WANG, Yuan LI, Xiaoli SUN, Bowei JIA, Mingzhe SUN. Functional Analysis of Arabidopsis thalianaAtCHX19 Gene in Response to Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 60-72. |
[9] | Yiyang ZHANG, Tuoyu LIU, Yuan WANG, Jian TIAN, Feifei GUAN. Expression and Thermostability Modification of Alkaline Xylanase [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 73-79. |
[10] | Qi ZHOU, Qiang LIU, Jing ZHANG, Chaochao DENG, Zhenlong WANG, Yang LIU, Fang WU, Hao CHANG, Yanfang ZHOU, Cuicui SU, Zhiguo SHI, Zhengrui GAO, Fengjie MA. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Soil Biological Characteristics of Pumpkin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[11] | Yi HU, Jie GONG, Wei ZHAO, Rong CHENG, Zhongyu LIU, Shiqing GAO, Yazhen YANG. Identification of PHY Gene Family in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)and Their Expression Analysis Under Heat Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 30-43. |
[12] | Shichao CHEN, Ju WANG, Fuqiang GUO, Rui HAO, Jianping SHI. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Physiological Indexes and Yield of Protein Mulberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
[13] | Xinwei XUE, Dan LIU, Shi ZHANG, Wenyu HAN, Ankang MU, Zhikun YU, Fan YANG, Yahui WEN, Jialin ZHANG, Yongping ZHANG, Xianrui WANG. Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening of Drought Resistance of 86 Millet Germplasm Resources During Germination Period [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 39-51. |
[14] | Shuo SHI, Yu FENG, Liang LI, Rui MENG, Yanze ZHANG, Xiurong YANG. Transcriptome Analysis of Resistance to Sharp Eyespot of Wheat Mediated by Piriformospora indica and Key Genes Screening [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 133-145. |
[15] | Lijun DUAN, Xianhua DING, Weiqin LI, Shuangdui YAN. Investigation of Co-pyrolysis Behavior and Pyrolysis Product Analysis of Oak Bark and Corn Stalks [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 164-172. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||