Leaf Color Characteristic Value and Nitrogen Diagnosis Model of Tobacco During Growth Period

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.1074

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to clarify the color characteristic parameters significantly related to the total nitrogen content of tobacco leaves， the relationship between the leaf color characteristic value and the total nitrogen content and chlorophyll （expressed by SPAD value） of tobacco leaves under different nitrogen application rates was analyzed， and the color characteristic value diagnosis model of total nitrogen content of tobacco leaves was established by multiple stepwise regression analysis. The results showed that， under different nitrogen application rates， the most sensitive period to the change of nitrogen content was fast growing period. There was a significant negative correlation （P<0.05） between color characteristic values （red， R； green， G； blue， B； lightness， L） and leaf SPAD values， which the correlation coefficient showed as r_R（0.728）>r_L （0.706）>r_G（0.649）>r_B（0.477）. There was significant correlation （P<0.05） between total nitrogen content and color characteristic values L， R， G， L/（R+G）， B/R， B/G， L/B， R+B， B+G， R+B+G+L， R/（G+B） and R+B/（R+B+G）. The nitrogen diagnosis model was established by multiple stepwise regression analysis using the characteristic values of leaf total nitrogen content and color characteristic values， which was significant at P<0.05 level. The model was verified， and the correlation between the measured value and the simulated value reached significant at P<0.01 level. The model of leaf color characteristic and leaf total nitrogen content of flue-cured tobacco could be used to guide the nitrogen nutrition diagnosis of flue-cured tobacco during the growth period， which provided a theoretical basis for smart agriculture in the future.

Key words: tobacco leaf, color characteristic value, nitrogen, chlorophyll

摘要：

为明确与烟叶全氮含量显著相关的颜色特征参数，利用多元逐步回归分析，建立烟叶全氮含量的颜色特征值诊断模型，分析不同氮肥用量下叶片颜色特征值与烟叶全氮含量及叶绿素（以SPAD值表示）的关系。结果表明，不同氮肥用量下，烤烟对氮素含量变化最敏感的时期为旺长期。颜色特征值［红色（red， R），绿色（green， G），蓝色（blue， B），亮度（lightness， L）］与叶片SPAD值之间呈显著负相关（P<0.05），其相关系数表现为r_R（0.728）>r_L（0.706）>r_G（0.649）>r_B（0.477）。烟叶全氮含量与颜色特征值L、R、G、L/（R+G）、B/R、B/G、L/B、R+B、B+G、R+B+G+L、R/（G+B）、R+B/（R+B+G）呈显著相关（P<0.05）。利用叶片全氮含量和颜色特征值进行多元逐步回归分析，构建氮素诊断模型，模型达到显著水平（P<0.05），对该模型进行验证，实测值与模拟值的相关性达到极显著水平（P<0.01）。因此，模型可用于指导烤烟生长期的氮素营养诊断，可方便、快捷地诊断烤烟叶片全氮含量，为智慧农业的发展提供理论依据。

关键词: 烟叶, 颜色特征值, 氮素, 叶绿素

CLC Number:

S572

Yingxue ZHU, Qi WANG, Xianfa MA, Yusheng JIAO, Jinxu GAO, Weijia MAO, Jia FU, Xuedong SUN, Ye YUAN. Leaf Color Characteristic Value and Nitrogen Diagnosis Model of Tobacco During Growth Period[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 54-62.

朱莹雪, 王琪, 马献发, 焦玉生, 高金旭, 毛卫佳, 付佳, 孙雪岽, 元野. 烤烟生长期叶片颜色特征值及其氮素诊断模型[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 54-62.

Figures/Tables 8

References 31

1	柴玉华, 侯升飞, 彭长禄. 基于高光谱图像技术的大豆分级识别方法研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2014, 45(4): 107-112.
	CHAI Y H, HOU S F, PENG C L. Identification of different soybean grades based on hyperspectral imagery [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 2014, 45(4): 107-112.
2	杨红云, 罗建军, 孙爱珍, 等. 基于图像特征的水稻叶片全氮含量估测模型研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2232-2243.
	YANG Y H, LUO J J, SUN A Z, et al.. Study on estimation model of total nitrogen content in rice leaves based on image characteristics [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12):2232-2243.
3	刘国宏, 于竞翔, 任丽君. RGB检测方法研究进展[J].分析科学学报, 2020, 36(4): 591-596.
	LIU G H, YU J X, REN L J. Research progress of RGB detection methods [J]. J. Anal. Sci., 2020, 36(4): 591-596.
4	徐功文, 廖明海, 王晓燕, 等. 基于区域相似度的图像自动标注方法[J]. 智能计算机与应用, 2015, 5(3): 4-7.
	XU G W, LIAO M H, WANG X Y, et al.. Automatic image annotation based on region similarity [J]. Intell. Comput. Appl., 2015, 5(3): 4-7.
5	徐光辉, 虎晓红, 熊淑萍, 等. 烤烟叶片叶绿素含量与颜色特征的关系[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2007, 41(6): 600-604.
	XU G H, HU X H, XIONG S P, et al.. Relationship between chlorophyll concentration and color feature of tobacco leaf [J]. J. Henan Agric. Univ., 2007, 41(6): 600-604.
6	靳双珍, 李雁斌, 杨玉坤, 等. 烤烟颜色特征值对质体色素的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(12): 20-24.
	JIN S Z, LI Y B, YANG Y K, et al.. Effect of color characteristic value on plastid pigment of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2017, 49(12): 20-24.
7	靳双珍, 李雁斌, 杨玉坤, 等. 烤烟颜色特征值对多酚物质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(9): 56-59, 76.
	JIN S Z, LI Y B, YANG Y K, et al.. Effect of color characteristic value of flue cured tobacco on polyphenols [J]. Tianjin Agric. Sci., 2018, 24(9):56-59, 76.
8	ZHANG J, SOKHANSANJ S, WU S, et al.. A transformation technique from RGB signals to the Munsell system for color analysis of tobacco leaves [J]. Comput. Electron. Agric., 1998, 19(2): 155-166.
9	ZHI R C, GAO M X, LIU Z L, et al.. Color chart development by computer vision for flue-cured tobacco leaf [J]. Sens. Mater., 2018, 30(12): 2843-2864.
10	费丽君, 蔡月芹. 大豆叶片叶绿素含量与颜色特征的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(4): 967-969.
	FEI L J, CAI Y Q. Relationship between chlorophyll content and color features of soybean leaf [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2015, 54(4): 967-969.
11	李艳, 王娟, 马腾飞, 等. 基于颜色特征的加工番茄叶片氮素评价初步研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2007, 16(3): 175-179.
	LI Y, WANG J, MA T F, et al.. A primary study on N evaluating of processing tomato leaves based on color features [J]. Acta Agric. Bo-Occident. Sin., 2007, 16(3): 175-179.
12	高士, 邱伟, 彭佳红. 基于苎麻叶片RGB特征值的缺素诊断研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2019, 15(24): 199-200, 211.
	GAO S, QIU W, PENG J H. Study on the diagnosis of deficiency based on RGB eigenvalues of ramie leaves [J]. Comput. Knowl. Technol., 2019, 15(24): 199-200, 211.
13	韩文霆, 孙瑜, 徐腾飞, 等. 基于RGB图像处理的玉米叶片含水率监测方法研究[J]. 农业工程技术, 2016, 36(12): 75.
	HAN W T, SUN Y, XU T F, et al.. Detecting maize leaf water status by using digital RGB images [J]. Agric. Eng. Technol., 2016, 36(12): 75.
14	SARRAFZADEH M H, LA H J, LEE J Y, et al.. Microalgae biomass quantification by digital image processing and RGB color analysis [J]. J. Appl. Phycol., 2015, 27(1): 205-209.
15	WAN L, CEN H Y, ZHU J P, et al.. Grain yield prediction of rice using multitemporal UAV-based RGB and multispectral images and model transfer-a case study of small farmlands in the South of China [J/OL]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2020, 291:108096 [2021-11-05]. .
16	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2008: 264-268.
17	马献发, 焦玉生, 张继舟, 等. 基于图像分析技术的烤烟叶片含氮量诊断模型[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2011(11): 23-25.
	MA X F, JIAO Y S, ZHANG J Z, et al.. Diagnostic model of nitrogen content in tobacco leaf by image analysis [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2011(11): 23-25.
18	秦艳青, 李春俭, 赵正雄, 等. 不同供氮方式和施氮量对烤烟生长和氮素吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(3): 436-442.
	QING Y Q, LI C J, ZHAO Z X, et al.. Effects of rates and methods of N application on growth and N uptake of flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2007, 13(3): 436-442.
19	LIU L J, LI L, WANG Y, et al.. Analysis of growth laws of leaves of flue-cured tobacco in various periods [J]. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2017, 18(9): 1653-1657.
20	刘良教, 李立, 王翠,等. 烤烟不同时期叶片生长规律研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(22): 25-28.
	LIU L J, LI L, WANG C, et al.. Study on leaf growth rhythm of flue-curd tobacco [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2017, 45(22): 25-28.
21	钟思荣, 龚丝雨, 陈仁霄, 等. 基于数字图像技术的烟草氮素营养诊断研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(6): 1104-1111.
	ZHING S R, GONG S Y, CHEN R X, et al.. Diagnosis of nitrogen nutrition status of tobacco based on digital image processing technique [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(6): 1104-1111.
22	LI H M, ZHANG J C, XU K, et al.. Spectral monitoring of wheat leaf nitrogen content based on canopy structure information compensation [J/OL]. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2021, 190:106434 [2021-11-05]. .
23	EVANS J R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationship in leaves of C3 plants [J]. Oecologia, 1989, 78: 9-19.
24	SUN Y N, LI W X. Effects the mechanism of micro-vacuum storage on broccoli chlorophyll degradation and builds prediction model of chlorophyll content based on the color parameter changes [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2017, 224(6): 206-214.
25	龚刚猛, 杨珺, 何火娇, 等. 水稻叶色RGB组分与SPAD的关系研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(24): 19-24.
	GONG G M, YANG J, HE H J, et al.. The relationship between leaf color components RGB and SPAD [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2015, 31(24): 19-24.
26	QIAO L, ZHANG Z Y, CHEN L S, et al.. Detection of chlorophyll content in maize canopy from UAV imagery [J]. IFAC Pap., 2019, 52(30): 330-335.
27	孙爱珍, 杨红云, 何火娇. 基于SPAD值的水稻叶色变化过程可视化模拟[J].计算机工程与应用, 2017, 53(11): 233-236.
	SUN A Z, YANG H Y, HE H J. Visual simulation of rice leaf color change process based on SPAD value [J]. Comput. Eng. Appl., 2017, 53(11): 233-236.
28	杨爱萍, 张坤, 段里成, 等. 基于RGB与HSV颜色空间的水稻齐穗后叶片SPAD值估测方法研究[J]. 江西农业学报,2019, 31(8): 106-112.
	YANG A P, ZHANG K, DUAN L C, et al.. Estimation method for SPAD value of rice leaves after full heading based on RGB and HSV color space [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2019, 31(8):106-112.
29	宋一帆, 张武, 姚雨晴, 等. 基于RGB模型的大豆叶片叶绿素含量预测[J]. 江汉大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1):65-72.
	SONG Y F, ZHANG W, YAO Y Q, et al.. Estimation of chlorophyll content in soybean leaves based on RGB model [J]. J. Jianghan Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2020, 48(1): 65-72.
30	叶春, 刘莹, 李艳大, 等. 基于RGB颜色空间的早稻氮素营养监测研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(8): 25-34.
	YE C, LIU Y, LI Y D, et al.. Monitoring the nitrogen nutrition of early rice based on RGB color space [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Univ., 2020, 25(8): 25-34.
31	PAGOLA M, ORTIZ R, LRIGOYEN I, et al.. New method to assess barley nitrogen nutrition status based on image colour analysis: comparison with SPAD-502 [J]. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2009, 65(2): 213-218.

处理 Treatment	纯氮施用量 Nitrogen application rate/（kg·hm^-2）
处理 Treatment	总氮 Total nitrogen	移栽前1 d 1 d before transplanting	移栽后58 d 58 d after transplanting
N0	0.0	0.0	0.0
N1	15.0	7.5	7.5
N2	30.0	15.0	15.0
N3	45.0	22.5	22.5
N4	60.0	30.0	30.0
N5	75.0	37.5	37.5
N6	90.0	45.0	45.0

处理 Treatment	纯氮施用量 Nitrogen application rate/（kg·hm^-2）
处理 Treatment	总氮 Total nitrogen	移栽前1 d 1 d before transplanting	移栽后58 d 58 d after transplanting
N0	0.0	0.0	0.0
N1	15.0	7.5	7.5
N2	30.0	15.0	15.0
N3	45.0	22.5	22.5
N4	60.0	30.0	30.0
N5	75.0	37.5	37.5
N6	90.0	45.0	45.0

指标 Index	TN	L	R	G	B	R/ （G+B）	L/ （R+G）	G/R	B/R	B/G	L/B	（R+B）/（R+B+G）	R+B	B+G
L	-0.575^**
R	-0.553^**	0.987^**
G	-0.597^**	0.991^**	0.960^**
B	-0.253	0.773^**	0.767^**	0.743^**
R/ （G+B）	-0.338^*	0.440^**	0.547^**	0.364^*	0.021
L/ （R+G）	0.473^**	-0.531^**	-0.585^**	-0.535^**	-0.209	-0.594^**
G/R	0.011	-0.268	-0.415^**	-0.145	-0.297	-0.755^**	0.344^*
B/R	0.508^**	-0.430^**	-0.460^**	-0.429^**	0.215	-0.813^**	0.618^**	0.234
B/G	0.503^**	-0.307^*	-0.267	-0.364^*	0.351^*	-0.455^**	0.460^**	-0.239	0.888^**
L/B	-0.460^**	0.346^*	0.337^*	0.373^*	-0.324^*	0.633^**	-0.464^**	0.024	-0.954^**	-0.964^**
R+B/ （R+B+G）	0.355^*	-0.082	0.025	-0.190	0.412^**	0.073	0.153	-0.708^**	0.521^**	0.855^**	-0.716^**
R+B	-0.473^**	0.964^**	0.971^**	0.934^**	0.899^**	0.382^*	-0.478^**	-0.395^**	-0.234	-0.051	0.108	0.172
B+G	-0.512^**	0.976^**	0.952^**	0.971^**	0.881^**	0.265	-0.452^**	-0.208	-0.226	-0.132	0.148	0.013	0.980^**
R+G+ B+L	-0.547^**	0.996^**	0.985^**	0.983^**	0.827^**	0.398^**	-0.517^**	-0.287	-0.353^*	-0.222	0.259	-0.010	0.983^**	0.989^**

指标 Index	TN	L	R	G	B	R/ （G+B）	L/ （R+G）	G/R	B/R	B/G	L/B	（R+B）/（R+B+G）	R+B	B+G
L	-0.575^**
R	-0.553^**	0.987^**
G	-0.597^**	0.991^**	0.960^**
B	-0.253	0.773^**	0.767^**	0.743^**
R/ （G+B）	-0.338^*	0.440^**	0.547^**	0.364^*	0.021
L/ （R+G）	0.473^**	-0.531^**	-0.585^**	-0.535^**	-0.209	-0.594^**
G/R	0.011	-0.268	-0.415^**	-0.145	-0.297	-0.755^**	0.344^*
B/R	0.508^**	-0.430^**	-0.460^**	-0.429^**	0.215	-0.813^**	0.618^**	0.234
B/G	0.503^**	-0.307^*	-0.267	-0.364^*	0.351^*	-0.455^**	0.460^**	-0.239	0.888^**
L/B	-0.460^**	0.346^*	0.337^*	0.373^*	-0.324^*	0.633^**	-0.464^**	0.024	-0.954^**	-0.964^**
R+B/ （R+B+G）	0.355^*	-0.082	0.025	-0.190	0.412^**	0.073	0.153	-0.708^**	0.521^**	0.855^**	-0.716^**
R+B	-0.473^**	0.964^**	0.971^**	0.934^**	0.899^**	0.382^*	-0.478^**	-0.395^**	-0.234	-0.051	0.108	0.172
B+G	-0.512^**	0.976^**	0.952^**	0.971^**	0.881^**	0.265	-0.452^**	-0.208	-0.226	-0.132	0.148	0.013	0.980^**
R+G+ B+L	-0.547^**	0.996^**	0.985^**	0.983^**	0.827^**	0.398^**	-0.517^**	-0.287	-0.353^*	-0.222	0.259	-0.010	0.983^**	0.989^**

[1]	Jianfeng ZHANG, Wenfeng HOU, Yongqing WU, Kaixu LI, Xiaokun LI. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Interactions on Occurrence of Diseases and Insect Pests and Grain Yield of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 145-154.
[2]	Caixia LYU, Yongfu LI, Huinan XIN, Na LI, Ning LAI, Qinglong GENG, Shuhuang CHEN. Effects of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate/Ammonium Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 179-186.
[3]	Xiyu ZHANG, Xing SHEN, Wei LI, Wenge XIE, Jie LI, Changhao YANG, Zhongping CHAI. Influence of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Korla Pear Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 217-228.
[4]	Fu QING, Hongyue LIANG, Jing SUN, Xinrui LU, Yunjiang LIANG. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Aggregate and Organic Carbon Content of Black Soil in Northeast China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 195-204.
[5]	Shichao CHEN, Ju WANG, Fuqiang GUO, Rui HAO, Jianping SHI. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Physiological Indexes and Yield of Protein Mulberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 240-249.
[6]	Shenghao ZOU, Qiwei YU, Shuai HE, Xuewei ZHANG, Qian MA, Guankai MA, Feihu XI, Dongsheng LUO, Maoxian WANG, Zhenbao LUO, Yanqiu JING. Effect of Exogenous Chlorellavulgaris on Physiological Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco Seedlings Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 64-71.
[7]	Sile HU, Yulong BAO, Tubuxinbayaer, Jifeng TAO, Enliang GUO. Chlorophyll Content Inversion of Spring Wheat Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral and Integrated Learning [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 93-103.
[8]	Yan WU, Leping ZOU, Huijie SONG, Dandan HU, Kailou LIU, Wanli LIANG. Effect of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined Urea on Ammonium Nitrogen of Surface Water and Early Rice Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 192-200.
[9]	Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization， Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238.
[10]	Tingting NIE, Yiqiang DONG, Qinghe SU, Yongjuan ZHANG, Helong YANG, Shazhou AN. Effects of Nitrogen Application and Cattle Manure Addition on Vegetation Restoration in Coal Mine Replanting Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 218-227.
[11]	Songjiang DUAN, Haoran HU, Chengjie ZHANG, Wei SUN, Yifan WU, Rensong GUO, Jusong ZHANG. Differences in Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Genotypes of Island Cotton and Their Effects on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 61-71.
[12]	Ziqin LI, Jiaqiang WANG, Zhen LI, Deqiu ZOU, Xiaogong ZHANG, Xiaoyu LUO, Weiyang LIU. Estimation of Chlorophyll Density of Cotton Leaves Based on Spectral Index [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 103-111.
[13]	Lingwei KONG, Kongtan WANG, Liwen MAI, Yupeng WU, Xiongfei WANG, Zhaobi WANG, Jiacong LIN, Qinfen LI. Effects of Carbon Source with Different Bioavailability on Vermicomposting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 199-209.
[14]	Yukun QIN, Junying CHEN, Lijuan ZHANG. Response of Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristics and Yield of Cotton in North Jiangxi Cotton Region to Nitrogen Reduction Measures [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 191-199.
[15]	Peihan JIANG, Xiaonan YANG, Chenxu YANG, Aijun ZHANG. Estimation of Nitrogen Content in Millet Canopy Based on Multi Parameter Partial Least Squares Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 91-101.