








Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 240-249.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0490
• INNOVATIVE METHODS AND TECHNOLOGIES • Previous Articles
Guanqun CHAI1(
), Maoyuan TIAN2, Jinghang CAI3, Daoming WU3, Kaifu CHEN3, Miaomiao ZHAO4, Chengwu FAN1(
)
Received:2024-06-18
Accepted:2024-09-24
Online:2025-11-15
Published:2025-11-17
Contact:
Chengwu FAN
柴冠群1(
), 田茂苑2, 蔡景行3, 吴道明3, 陈开富3, 赵苗苗4, 范成五1(
)
通讯作者:
范成五
作者简介:柴冠群 E-mail:chaiguanqun@163.com;
基金资助:CLC Number:
Guanqun CHAI, Maoyuan TIAN, Jinghang CAI, Daoming WU, Kaifu CHEN, Miaomiao ZHAO, Chengwu FAN. Accuracy Evaluation and Analysis of Detection Conditions for Rapid Determination of Cd Content in Paddy Soil by HDXRF Method[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(11): 240-249.
柴冠群, 田茂苑, 蔡景行, 吴道明, 陈开富, 赵苗苗, 范成五. HDXRF法快速测定水稻土Cd含量的精准度评价与检测条件分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(11): 240-249.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0490
Fig. 1 Detection limit and determination limit of Cd in soil by HDXRFNote:Φ—Detection data within the range of reference values; Ψ—Detection data outside the reference range; λ—Minimum quantitative detection limit by HDXRF method; AVE—The average of detection data; α—The upper limit of reference value of soil reference material (GSS-8a); β—The lower limit of reference value of soil reference material (GSS-8a); MDL—Method detection limit by HDXRF method.
| 项目 Item | 检测方法Detection method | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HDXRF | ICP-MS | ||
| 最小值Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.22 | 0.23 | |
| 最大值Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 2.29 | 2.33 | |
| 变异系数Coefficient of variation | 0.62 | 0.63 | |
| 算术平均值Arithmetic average/(mg·kg-1) | 0.77 | 0.78 | |
| 算术标准差Arithmetic standard deviation | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
| 几何平均值Geometric average/(mg·kg-1) | 0.65 | 0.66 | |
| 几何标准差Geometric standard deviation | 1.79 | 1.79 | |
镉含量 Cd content/(mg·kg-1) | 5% | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| 25% | 0.41 | 0.41 | |
| 50% | 0.58 | 0.58 | |
| 75% | 0.94 | 0.96 | |
| 95% | 1.75 | 1.81 | |
| 分布类型Dispersion pattern | 对数正态Lognormal distribution | 对数正态Lognormal distribution | |
Table 1 Cd content in paddy soil determined by HDXRF and ICP-MS
| 项目 Item | 检测方法Detection method | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HDXRF | ICP-MS | ||
| 最小值Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.22 | 0.23 | |
| 最大值Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 2.29 | 2.33 | |
| 变异系数Coefficient of variation | 0.62 | 0.63 | |
| 算术平均值Arithmetic average/(mg·kg-1) | 0.77 | 0.78 | |
| 算术标准差Arithmetic standard deviation | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
| 几何平均值Geometric average/(mg·kg-1) | 0.65 | 0.66 | |
| 几何标准差Geometric standard deviation | 1.79 | 1.79 | |
镉含量 Cd content/(mg·kg-1) | 5% | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| 25% | 0.41 | 0.41 | |
| 50% | 0.58 | 0.58 | |
| 75% | 0.94 | 0.96 | |
| 95% | 1.75 | 1.81 | |
| 分布类型Dispersion pattern | 对数正态Lognormal distribution | 对数正态Lognormal distribution | |
水分含量 Moisture content/% | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.755 | 0.772 | 0.017 | 0.767 a | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.782 |
| 2.5 | 0.745 | 0.762 | 0.017 | 0.753 a | 0.012 | 1.825 | 1.594 |
| 5.0 | 0.674 | 0.723 | 0.049 | 0.698 b | 0.013 | 8.996 | 1.862 |
| 10.0 | 0.490 | 0.539 | 0.049 | 0.509 c | 0.018 | 33.638 | 3.536 |
| 15.0 | 0.400 | 0.452 | 0.052 | 0.430 d | 0.015 | 43.937 | 3.488 |
| 20.0 | 0.325 | 0.370 | 0.045 | 0.354 e | 0.021 | 53.846 | 5.932 |
| 25.0 | 0.294 | 0.390 | 0.096 | 0.324 e | 0.029 | 57.757 | 8.951 |
Table 2 Cd content in paddy soil with different water contents by HDXRF
水分含量 Moisture content/% | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.755 | 0.772 | 0.017 | 0.767 a | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.782 |
| 2.5 | 0.745 | 0.762 | 0.017 | 0.753 a | 0.012 | 1.825 | 1.594 |
| 5.0 | 0.674 | 0.723 | 0.049 | 0.698 b | 0.013 | 8.996 | 1.862 |
| 10.0 | 0.490 | 0.539 | 0.049 | 0.509 c | 0.018 | 33.638 | 3.536 |
| 15.0 | 0.400 | 0.452 | 0.052 | 0.430 d | 0.015 | 43.937 | 3.488 |
| 20.0 | 0.325 | 0.370 | 0.045 | 0.354 e | 0.021 | 53.846 | 5.932 |
| 25.0 | 0.294 | 0.390 | 0.096 | 0.324 e | 0.029 | 57.757 | 8.951 |
编号 Number | 过筛粒径 Sieve diameter/mm | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLX160 | 2.00 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 17.39 |
| 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 13.04 | |
| 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 8.69 | |
| CLX125 | 2.00 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 4.88 | 10.26 |
| 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.03 | 4.88 | 7.69 | |
| 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 4.88 | |
| CLX071 | 2.00 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 6.90 | 7.41 |
| 0.25 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 5.26 | |
| 0.15 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 3.45 | |
| CLX170 | 2.00 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.92 | 0.03 | 4.17 | 3.26 |
| 0.25 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.11 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3.12 | 3.23 | |
| 0.15 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 2.08 | 3.19 | |
| CLX063 | 2.00 | 2.07 | 2.29 | 0.22 | 2.20 | 0.08 | 5.58 | 3.64 |
| 0.25 | 2.17 | 2.30 | 0.13 | 2.19 | 0.04 | 6.01 | 1.83 | |
| 0.15 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 0.11 | 2.29 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
Table 3 Cd content in paddy soil with different diameters by HDXRF
编号 Number | 过筛粒径 Sieve diameter/mm | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLX160 | 2.00 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 17.39 |
| 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 13.04 | |
| 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 8.69 | |
| CLX125 | 2.00 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 4.88 | 10.26 |
| 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.03 | 4.88 | 7.69 | |
| 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 4.88 | |
| CLX071 | 2.00 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 6.90 | 7.41 |
| 0.25 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 5.26 | |
| 0.15 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 3.45 | |
| CLX170 | 2.00 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.92 | 0.03 | 4.17 | 3.26 |
| 0.25 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.11 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3.12 | 3.23 | |
| 0.15 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 2.08 | 3.19 | |
| CLX063 | 2.00 | 2.07 | 2.29 | 0.22 | 2.20 | 0.08 | 5.58 | 3.64 |
| 0.25 | 2.17 | 2.30 | 0.13 | 2.19 | 0.04 | 6.01 | 1.83 | |
| 0.15 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 0.11 | 2.29 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
项目 Item | GSS-4 | GSS-5 | GSS-38 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | |||
参考值 Reference value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.35±0.06 | 0.45±0.06 | 2.80±0.20 | ||||||||
最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 2.43 | 2.57 | 2.61 | ||
最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 2.91 | 2.79 | 2.75 | ||
平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 2.65 | 2.66 | 2.69 | ||
标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.04 | ||
| 相对误差RE/% | 11.43 | 11.43 | 8.57 | 8.89 | 6.67 | 4.44 | 5.36 | 5.00 | 3.93 | ||
| 相对偏差RSD/% | 17.95 | 10.26 | 5.26 | 17.07 | 9.52 | 4.65 | 5.66 | 3.01 | 1.49 | ||
Table 4 Cd content in soil standard substance by HDXRF with different detection time
项目 Item | GSS-4 | GSS-5 | GSS-38 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | |||
参考值 Reference value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.35±0.06 | 0.45±0.06 | 2.80±0.20 | ||||||||
最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 2.43 | 2.57 | 2.61 | ||
最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 2.91 | 2.79 | 2.75 | ||
平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 2.65 | 2.66 | 2.69 | ||
标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.04 | ||
| 相对误差RE/% | 11.43 | 11.43 | 8.57 | 8.89 | 6.67 | 4.44 | 5.36 | 5.00 | 3.93 | ||
| 相对偏差RSD/% | 17.95 | 10.26 | 5.26 | 17.07 | 9.52 | 4.65 | 5.66 | 3.01 | 1.49 | ||
编号 Number | 检测时长 Detection time/min | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLX160 | 3 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 8.70 | 23.81 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 17.39 | |
| 10 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 8.69 | |
| CLX125 | 3 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 14.63 | 22.86 |
| 5 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 2.44 | 10.00 | |
| 10 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 4.88 | |
| CLX071 | 3 | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.05 | 1.72 | 8.47 |
| 5 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 5.17 | |
| 10 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 3.45 | |
| CLX170 | 3 | 0.85 | 1.08 | 0.23 | 0.98 | 0.06 | 2.08 | 6.12 |
| 5 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 4.17 | |
| 10 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 2.08 | 3.19 | |
| CLX063 | 3 | 1.95 | 2.34 | 0.39 | 2.20 | 0.10 | 5.58 | 4.55 |
| 5 | 2.14 | 2.37 | 0.23 | 2.24 | 0.06 | 3.86 | 2.68 | |
| 10 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 0.11 | 2.29 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
Table 5 Cd content in paddy soil determined by HDXRF with different detection time
编号 Number | 检测时长 Detection time/min | 最小值 Minimum value/(mg·kg-1) | 最大值 Maximum value/(mg·kg-1) | 变幅 Range/(mg·kg-1) | 平均值 Average value/(mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation/(mg·kg-1) | 相对误差RE/% | 相对偏差RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLX160 | 3 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 8.70 | 23.81 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 17.39 | |
| 10 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 8.69 | |
| CLX125 | 3 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 14.63 | 22.86 |
| 5 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 2.44 | 10.00 | |
| 10 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 4.88 | |
| CLX071 | 3 | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.05 | 1.72 | 8.47 |
| 5 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 5.17 | |
| 10 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 3.45 | |
| CLX170 | 3 | 0.85 | 1.08 | 0.23 | 0.98 | 0.06 | 2.08 | 6.12 |
| 5 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 4.17 | |
| 10 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 2.08 | 3.19 | |
| CLX063 | 3 | 1.95 | 2.34 | 0.39 | 2.20 | 0.10 | 5.58 | 4.55 |
| 5 | 2.14 | 2.37 | 0.23 | 2.24 | 0.06 | 3.86 | 2.68 | |
| 10 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 0.11 | 2.29 | 0.03 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
| [1] | 柴冠群,杨娇娇,刘桂华,等.高镉地质背景区设施菜地土壤镉生物有效性主控因子分析[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(7): 917-923. |
| CHAI G Q, YANG J J, LIU G H, et al.. Analysis of dominant control factors of cadmium phytoavailability in greenhouse soils with a high cadmium geological background [J]. J. Ecol. Rural Environ., 2021, 37(7):917-923. | |
| [2] | 涂峰,胡鹏杰,李振炫,等.苏南地区Cd低积累水稻品种筛选及土壤Cd安全阈值推导[J].土壤学报,2023,60(2):435-445. |
| TU F, HU P J, LI Z X, et al.. Screening of low-Cd-accumulating rice varieties and derivation of soil Cd safety threshold in Southern Jiangsu [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2023, 60(2):435-445. | |
| [3] | SHI J D, ZHAO D, REN F T, et al.. Spatiotemporal variation of soil heavy metals in China: the pollution status and risk assessment [J/OL]. Sci. Total Environ., 2023, 871:161768 [2024-05-20]. . |
| [4] | 柴冠群,周礼兴,王丽,等.不同品种马铃薯块茎Cd吸收特征及食用安全性评价[J].河南农业科学,2023,52(3):73-81. |
| CHAI G Q, ZHOU L X, WANG L, et al.. The Cd absorption characteristics and edible safety evaluation of different varieties of potato tubers [J]. J. Henan Agric. Sci., 2023, 52(3):73-81. | |
| [5] | 蔡大为,李龙波,蒋国才,等.贵州耕地主要元素地球化学背景值统计与分析[J].贵州地质,2020,37(3):233-239. |
| CAI D W, LI L B, JIANG G C, et al.. Statistics and analysis of geochemical backgrounds of main elements of cultivated land in Guizhou province [J]. Guizhou Geol., 2020, 37(3):233-239. | |
| [6] | 徐梦琪,杨文弢,杨利玉,等.黔西北山区耕地重金属健康风险评价及环境基准[J].环境科学, 2022, 43(7): 3799-3810. |
| XU M Q, YANG W T, YANG L Y, et al.. Health risk assessment and environmental benchmark of heavy metals in cultivated land in mountainous area of Northwest Guizhou province [J]. Environ. Sci., 2022, 43(7):3799-3810. | |
| [7] | 杨寒雯,刘秀明,刘方,等.喀斯特高镉地质背景区水稻镉的富集、转运特征与机理[J].地球与环境,2021,49(1):18-24. |
| YANG H W, LIU X M, LIU F, et al.. Translocation and accumulation of cadmium in rice in a Karst Area with high geochemical background and its mechanism [J]. Earth Environ., 2021, 49(1):18-24. | |
| [8] | 江晓宇,李福生,王清亚,等.便携式XRF分析仪检测土壤重金属应用研究[J].核电子学与探测技术,2021,41(6):1005-1012. |
| JIANG X Y, LI F S, WANG Q Y, et al.. Application progress of portable XRF instrument in soil heavy metal detection [J]. Nucl. Electron. Detection Technol., 2021, 41(6):1005-1012. | |
| [9] | SIRKOVICH E C, WALSER S L, PERDRIAL N, et al.. Evaluating trace elements in urban forest soils across three contrasting New England USA towns and cities by pXRF and mass spectrometry [J/OL]. Environ. Pollut., 2023, 336:122441 [2024-05-20]. . |
| [10] | TANJA R, DERMOT D. Comparison of soil pollution concentrations determined using AAS and portable XRF techniques [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 171:1168-1171. |
| [11] | 傅赵聪,王翀,吴春发,等.HDXRF法农田土壤镉测定结果准确度评价与精准校正模型构建[J].土壤,2023,55(4):829-837. |
| FU Z C, WANG C, WU C F, et al.. Accuracy evaluation and precision correction model construction of cadmium determination in farmland soil by HDXRF method [J]. Soil, 2023, 55(4):829-837. | |
| [12] | 梅雪,刘鸿雁,吴龙华,等.基于HDXRF和ICP-MS的黔西北土壤重金属空间分布及影响因素研究[J].土壤,2023,55(2):399-408. |
| MEI X, LIU H Y, WU L H, et al.. Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal contents and Influencing factors in northwest of Guizhou based on HDXRF and ICP-MS [J]. Soil, 2023, 55(2):399-408. | |
| [13] | 彭洪柳,杨周生,赵婕,等.高精度便携式X射线荧光光谱仪在污染农田土壤重金属速测中的应用研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(7):1386-1395. |
| PENG H L, YANG Z S, ZHAO J, et al.. Use of high-precision portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer on the heavy metal rapid determination for contaminated agricultural soils [J].J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2018, 37(7):1386-1395. | |
| [14] | 云南省环境检测中心站. 土壤和沉积物 12种金属元素的测定 王水提取—电感耦合等离子体质谱法: [S].北京:中国环境出版社,2016. |
| [15] | 中国环境监测总站,南京市环境监测中心站. 土壤环境监测技术规范: [S].北京:中国环境出版社,2004. |
| [16] | 中国环境科学研究院. 环境监测分析方法标准制订技术导则: [S].北京:中国环境出版社,2020. |
| [17] | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所,中国科学院南京土壤研究所,中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,等. 土壤环境质量 农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行): [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018. |
| [18] | PADILLA J T, HORMES J, MAGDI SELIM H. Use of portable XRF: effect of thickness and antecedent moisture of soils on measured concentration of trace elements [J]. Geoderma, 2019, 337:143-149. |
| [19] | MCLAREN T I, GUPPY C N, TIGHE M K, et al.. Rapid, nondestructive total elemental analysis of vertisol soils using portable X-ray fluorescence [J].Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2012, 76(4):1436-1445. |
| [20] | 陈云,应蓉蓉,孔令雅,等.手持式X射线荧光光谱快速测定仪的实践应用评价及建议[J].土壤,2022,54(3):586-593. |
| CHEN Y, YING R R, KONG L Y, et al.. Assessment and suggestions of application of field portable XRF in investigating contaminated sites [J]. Soil, 2022, 54(3):586-593. | |
| [21] | HU W Y, HUANG B, WEINDORF D C, et al.. Metals analysis of agricultural soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry [J]. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2014, 92:420-426. |
| [22] | ARNAUD ROBIN SCHNEIDER, BENJAMIN CANCES, CLEMENT BRETON, et al.. Comparison of field portable XRF and aqua regia/ICP-AES soil analysis and evaluation of soil moisture influence on FPXRF results [J]. J. Soils Sediment, 2015, 16:438-448. |
| [23] | ROSIN N A, DEMATTÊ J A M, LEITE M C A, et al.. The fundamental of the effects of water, organic matter, and iron forms on the pXRF information in soil analyses [J/OL]. Catena, 2022, 210:105868 [2024-05-20]. . |
| [24] | RAVANSARI R, WILSON S C, TIGHE M. Portable X-ray fluorescence for environmental assessment of soils: Not just a point and shoot method [J/OL]. Environ. Int., 2020, 134: 105250 [2024-05-20]. . |
| [25] | 朱梦杰.便携式XRF测定仪在土壤检测中的应用及其影响因素[J].中国环境监测,2019,35(6):129-137. |
| ZHU M J. Application of portable XRF analyzer in soil detection and its influencing factors [J]. Chin. Environ. Monit., 2019, 35(6):129-137. | |
| [26] | CHRIS P, EVA G M, ERIC P, et al.. Quantification of trace arsenic in soils by field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: considerations for sample preparation and measurement conditions [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 262:1213-1222. |
| [27] | 杨桂兰,商照聪,李良君,等.便携式X射线荧光光谱法在土壤重金属快速检测中的应用[J].应用化工,2016,45(8):1586-1591. |
| YANG G L, SHANG Z C, LI L J, et al.. Application of portable-XRF spectrometry for rapid determinationof common heavy metals in soil [J]. Appl. Chem. Ind., 2016, 45(8):1586-1591. |
| [1] | Junlei ZHANG, Xiaotong GE, Zhengting ZHAO, Di LIU, Jinfeng WANG, Ning JIANG, Yating LIU. Establishment and Optimization of RT-LAMP Assay System for Tobacco Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 140-150. |
| [2] | Xiaoxiao ZHANG, Xiaoqian LI, Cheng ZHU, Chenze LYU. Research Status and Development Trend of Rapid Detection of Agglutinin in Concanavalin A [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 214-225. |
| [3] | Haixia YUE, Bo TAN, Song WEI, Hong XIE. Structural Design and Analysis of Air Suction Precision Metering Device for White Radish [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 120-128. |
| [4] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
| [5] | Kui FANG, Cheng LI, Xiao HE, Yineng CHEN. Research on Multi-angle Identification of Grape Leaf Disease Based on 3D Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 86-96. |
| [6] | Nanrui TANG, Yong ZHOU, Guozhong ZHANG, Fang LIANG, Huibin KE. Performance Simulation and Experiment of Stirred and Bunch Rice Seeding Device [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 107-115. |
| [7] | Liangyan YANG, Yanan LI, Hongjian FAN, Yating WANG. Temporal and Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Evapotranspiration in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(10): 169-178. |
| [8] | CHEN Haoyu, YANG Guang, HAN Xueying, LIU Xin, LIU Feng, WANG Ning. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Continuous Wavelet Transform [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 132-142. |
| [9] | LI Tai, LU Shijun, HUANG Jiazhang, CHEN Lei, FAN Xieyu. Research Progress of Apple Quality Evaluation Standards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 121-130. |
| [10] | LIU Huixia, SUN Zongjiu, SHI Yukun, WU Wenchao, ZHENG Li, AI Tijian. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 147-155. |
| [11] | LIU Xinghong, ZHANG Qingqing, ZHANG Guangpeng, LI Hong . Analysis of Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Plant Communities in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 131-144. |
| [12] |
GUO Han1, ZHANG Xu1*, LU Zhou2, TIAN Ting3, XU Feifei2,LUO Ming2, WU Zhenggui3, SUN Zhenjun5.
Estimation of Organic Matter Content in Southern Paddy Soil Based on Airborne Hyperspectral Images
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 60-71.
|
| [13] | QI Haixia1,2, LIAO Hai1,2, LAN Yubin1,2*. Research Status and Prospect of Automatic Pesticide Mixing Device [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 10-18. |
| [14] | WU Xiaoqing1, ZHAO Xiaoyan1, XU Yuanzhang2, WANG Jianing1, ZHOU Fangyuan1, ZHOU Hongzi1, ZHANG Guangzhi1, XIE Xueying1, YAN Kun3, ZHANG Xinjian1*. Research Progress on Precision Application Technology of Biological Control [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 13-21. |
| [15] | LI Xueqiang1,2, WANG Faming2,3, SUN Chuanzhu2,3*, SU Guoliang1,2, WEI Zhongcai2,4, WANG Xiangyou2,5, WANG Shijun2,3. Research on the Intelligent Control of Potato Precision Planter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 70-79. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010802021197号