Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 225-233.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0430
• INNOVATIVE METHODS AND TECHNOLOGIES • Previous Articles
Qi LI(), Shulin ZHANG, Dajuan ZHANG(
), Yingxuan JIA, Zebin WANG
Received:
2022-05-23
Accepted:
2022-07-23
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-09-07
Contact:
Dajuan ZHANG
通讯作者:
张达娟
作者简介:
李琦 E-mail:lqdengdeng@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Qi LI, Shulin ZHANG, Dajuan ZHANG, Yingxuan JIA, Zebin WANG. Optimization of Culture Medium of Chaetoceros muelleri by Response Surface Methodology[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 225-233.
李琦, 张树林, 张达娟, 贾滢暄, 王泽斌. 响应面法改良牟氏角毛藻培养基[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 225-233.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://nkdb.magtechjournal.com/EN/10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0430
营养盐 Nutrient | 质量浓度 Mass concentration | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
硝酸钠 NaNO3 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
磷酸二氢钠 NaH2PO4·H2O | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
硅酸钠 Na2SiO3 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 500 |
柠檬酸铁铵 C6H8FeNO7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
Table 1 Single factor level of nutrients
营养盐 Nutrient | 质量浓度 Mass concentration | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
硝酸钠 NaNO3 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
磷酸二氢钠 NaH2PO4·H2O | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
硅酸钠 Na2SiO3 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 500 |
柠檬酸铁铵 C6H8FeNO7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
水平 Level | 因素 Factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A:硝酸钠 NaNO3 | B:磷酸二氢钠 NaH2PO4 ·H2O | C:硅酸钠 Na2SiO3 | D:柠檬酸铁铵 C6H8FeNO7 | |
-1 | 10 | 1 | 20 | 0.1 |
0 | 20 | 2 | 50 | 0.3 |
1 | 30 | 3 | 80 | 0.5 |
Table 2 Box Behnken experimental factor level
水平 Level | 因素 Factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A:硝酸钠 NaNO3 | B:磷酸二氢钠 NaH2PO4 ·H2O | C:硅酸钠 Na2SiO3 | D:柠檬酸铁铵 C6H8FeNO7 | |
-1 | 10 | 1 | 20 | 0.1 |
0 | 20 | 2 | 50 | 0.3 |
1 | 30 | 3 | 80 | 0.5 |
Fig. 1 Growth of Chaetoceros muelleri with different nutrient speciesNote:Different lowercase letter of same index indicate the significant difference between treatments at P<0.05 level.
编号 Number | 因素 Factor | 密度 Density/(104 cell·mL-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 551.62 |
2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 418.96 |
3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 526.07 |
4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 494.49 |
5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 495.8 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 557.98 |
7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 514.89 |
8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 510.47 |
9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 513.83 |
10 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 453.45 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 573.33 |
12 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 492.02 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 571.92 |
14 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 447.57 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 559.34 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 532.82 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 500.08 |
18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 515.38 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 468.55 |
20 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 479.73 |
21 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 439.22 |
22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 521.65 |
23 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 518.83 |
24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 508.63 |
25 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 458.31 |
26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 518.83 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 560.75 |
28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 549.04 |
29 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 520.43 |
Table 3 Experimental results of response surface method
编号 Number | 因素 Factor | 密度 Density/(104 cell·mL-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 551.62 |
2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 418.96 |
3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 526.07 |
4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 494.49 |
5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 495.8 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 557.98 |
7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 514.89 |
8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 510.47 |
9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 513.83 |
10 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 453.45 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 573.33 |
12 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 492.02 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 571.92 |
14 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 447.57 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 559.34 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 532.82 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 500.08 |
18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 515.38 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 468.55 |
20 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 479.73 |
21 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 439.22 |
22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 521.65 |
23 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 518.83 |
24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 508.63 |
25 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 458.31 |
26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 518.83 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 560.75 |
28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 549.04 |
29 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 520.43 |
方差来源 Variance sources | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean squares | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 44 720.85 | 14 | 3 194.35 | 29.89 | <0.000 1 | ** |
A-A | 11 797.01 | 1 | 11 797.01 | 110.39 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B-B | 575.47 | 1 | 575.47 | 5.38 | 0.035 9 | * |
C-C | 878.77 | 1 | 878.77 | 8.22 | 0.012 4 | * |
D-D | 322.61 | 1 | 322.61 | 3.02 | 0.104 2 | |
AB | 258.41 | 1 | 258.41 | 2.42 | 0.142 3 | |
AC | 704.90 | 1 | 704.90 | 6.60 | 0.022 3 | * |
AD | 12.74 | 1 | 12.74 | 0.119 3 | 0.735 0 | |
BC | 730.62 | 1 | 730.62 | 6.84 | 0.020 4 | * |
BD | 1 021.76 | 1 | 1 021.76 | 9.56 | 0.008 0 | ** |
CD | 1 962.93 | 1 | 1 962.93 | 18.37 | 0.000 8 | ** |
A2 | 22 529.99 | 1 | 22 529.99 | 210.81 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 1 679.08 | 1 | 1 679.08 | 15.71 | 0.001 4 | ** |
C2 | 6 714.11 | 1 | 6 714.11 | 62.82 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D2 | 4 466.73 | 1 | 4 466.73 | 41.80 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差Residual | 1 496.19 | 14 | 106.87 | |||
失拟项Lack of fit | 1 280.10 | 10 | 128.01 | 2.37 | 0.210 5 | |
纯误差Pure error | 216.09 | 4 | 54.02 | |||
总和 Cor total | 46 217.04 | 28 |
Table 4 Analysis of variance of regression model
方差来源 Variance sources | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean squares | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 44 720.85 | 14 | 3 194.35 | 29.89 | <0.000 1 | ** |
A-A | 11 797.01 | 1 | 11 797.01 | 110.39 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B-B | 575.47 | 1 | 575.47 | 5.38 | 0.035 9 | * |
C-C | 878.77 | 1 | 878.77 | 8.22 | 0.012 4 | * |
D-D | 322.61 | 1 | 322.61 | 3.02 | 0.104 2 | |
AB | 258.41 | 1 | 258.41 | 2.42 | 0.142 3 | |
AC | 704.90 | 1 | 704.90 | 6.60 | 0.022 3 | * |
AD | 12.74 | 1 | 12.74 | 0.119 3 | 0.735 0 | |
BC | 730.62 | 1 | 730.62 | 6.84 | 0.020 4 | * |
BD | 1 021.76 | 1 | 1 021.76 | 9.56 | 0.008 0 | ** |
CD | 1 962.93 | 1 | 1 962.93 | 18.37 | 0.000 8 | ** |
A2 | 22 529.99 | 1 | 22 529.99 | 210.81 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 1 679.08 | 1 | 1 679.08 | 15.71 | 0.001 4 | ** |
C2 | 6 714.11 | 1 | 6 714.11 | 62.82 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D2 | 4 466.73 | 1 | 4 466.73 | 41.80 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差Residual | 1 496.19 | 14 | 106.87 | |||
失拟项Lack of fit | 1 280.10 | 10 | 128.01 | 2.37 | 0.210 5 | |
纯误差Pure error | 216.09 | 4 | 54.02 | |||
总和 Cor total | 46 217.04 | 28 |
Fig. 7 Maximum light energy conversion efficiency of experimental group and control groupNote:* and ** indicate significant difference compared with the control at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels,respectively.
1 | 李志军,薛长湖,林洪.微藻中的活性物质及其保健食品的研究与开发[J].山东商业职业技术学院学报,2003,3(2):75-76. |
2 | 梁英,黄徐林,田传远,等.海洋药源微藻研究进展[J].中国海洋大学学报,2016,46(11):32-43. |
LIANG Y, HUANG X L, TIAN C Y, et al.. Advances in studies on marine medicinal microalgae [J]. J. Ocean Univ. China,2016,46(11):32-43. | |
3 | 赵子续,曲木,张宝龙,等.饲料中添加多种微藻对锦鲤生长、体色及抗氧化指标的影响[J].养殖与饲料,2021,20(5):9-16. |
4 | MOHSENI A, FAN L H, RODDICK F A. Impact of microalgae species and solution salinity on algal treatment of wastewater reverse osmosis concentrate [J/OL]. Chemosphere,2021,285:131487[2022-04-22]. . |
5 | 胡一丞,吴悦,陆丰逸,等.牟氏角毛藻与微拟球藻、青岛大扁藻混合培养技术的初步研究[J].当代水产,2016,41(6):77-78. |
6 | 朱昔恩,黎大勇,熊建华,等.接种密度、氮、磷、碳、硅、维生素对牟氏角毛藻生长的影响[J].普洱学院学报,2018,34(6):9-14. |
ZHU X E, LI D Y, XIONG J H, et al.. Effects of salinity, temperature and light on the growth of Chaetoceros muelleri from the coast of Guangxi [J]. J. Puer Univ., 2018,34(6):9-14. | |
7 | 林权卓,吴悦,陆丰逸,等.牟氏角毛藻规模化培育过程中营养因子的筛选[J].科学养鱼,2016(10):50-51. |
8 | 张贵杰,孟二力.不同氮源对牟氏角毛藻增殖的影响[J].河北渔业,2006(2):25-26. |
9 | 于瑾,蒋霞敏,梁洪,等.氮、磷、铁对牟氏角毛藻生长速率的影响[J].水产科学,2006(3):121-124. |
YU J, JIANG X M, LIANG H, et al.. Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and iron nutrition on the growth rate of Chaetoceros muelleri [J]. Fisheries Sci., 2006(3):121-124. | |
10 | 褚以文.微生物培养基优化方法及其OPTI优化软件[J].国外医药(抗生素分册),1999,20(2):58-60, 66. |
11 | 郝学财,余晓斌,刘志钰,等.响应面方法在优化微生物培养基中的应用[J].食品研究与开发,2006,27(1):38-41. |
HAO X C, YU X B, LIU Z Y, et al.. The application of response surface methodology in optimization of microbial media [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2006,27(1):38-41. | |
12 | 王立原.响应面法在结构优化应用上的研究[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学,2018. |
WANG L Y. The response surface method in structural optimization study on the application [D]. Shanghai : Shanghai Ocean University,2018. | |
13 | 孙晓富,董超,李文静,等.响应面法优化纳豆芽孢杆菌发酵制备多肽螯合钙工艺[J].中国酿造,2021,40(6):119-123. |
SUN X F, DONG C, LI W J, et al.. Optimization of preparation process of peptides chelated calcium from Bacillus natto fermentation by response surface methodology [J]. China Brewing,2021,40(6):119-123. | |
14 | 宋立立,李志国.响应面法优化枯草芽孢杆菌产蛋白酶的发酵条件[J].饲料研究,2020,43(7):81-85. |
SONG L L, LI Z G. Optimization of fermentation conditions for protease production by Bacillus subtilis using response surface methodology [J]. Feed Res., 2020,43(7):81-85. | |
15 | 马若欣,王学魁,曹春晖.氮浓度和光照强度对小新月菱形藻生长和总脂含量的影响[J].天津科技大学学报,2009,24(3):31-34. |
MA R X, WANG X K, CAO C H. Effects of nitrate concentrations and light intensity on the growth and total lipid contents of Nitzschia Closterium f.minutissima [J]. J. Tianjin Univ. Sci. Technol., 2009,24(3):31-34. | |
16 | 张力.底栖硅藻的规模化培养及其在刺参育苗中的应用[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学,2013. |
ZHANG L. Large-scale culture of benthic diatoms and its application to the breeding of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus [D]. Yangzhou :Yangzhou University,2013. | |
17 | 张国庆,邓湘云,李建保,等.氮、磷、铁、硅营养盐对牟氏角毛藻生长的影响[J].河北渔业,2013(3):8-11. |
ZHANG G Q, DENG X Y, LI J B, et al.. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, iron and silicon on the growth of Chaetoceros muelleri [J]. Hebei Fisheries,2013(3):8-11. | |
18 | SHIFRIN N S, CHISHOLM S W. Phytoplankton lipids: inter specific differences and effects of nitrate, silicate and light-dark cycles [J]. J. Phycol.,1981,17(4):374-384. |
19 | 如扎·哈布都拉,王萍,王阳,等.Box-Behnken响应面法优化阿里红总多糖水提醇沉工艺[J].化学与生物工程,2020,37(3):29-36. |
Ruzha·Habudula WANG P, WANG Y, et al.. Optimization of water extraction and alcohol precipitation process of fomes of ficinalis ames total polysaccharide with Box-Behnken response surface methodology [J]. Chem. Bioeng.,2020,37(3):29-36. | |
20 | 许天阳,董坤园,宋凤媛,等.Box-Behnken响应面法优化炒赤芍炮制工艺[J].中国药房,2019,30(20):2845-2850. |
XU T Y, DONG K Y, SONG F Y, et al.. Optimization of processing technology of fried radix paeoniae by Box-Behnken response surface method [J]. China Pharmacy, 2019,30(20):2845-2850. | |
21 | 李莉,张赛,何强,等.响应面法在试验设计与优化中的应用[J].试验室研究与探索,2015,34(8):41-45. |
LI L, ZHANG S, HE Q, et al.. Application of response surface methodology in experiment design and optimization [J]. Res. Exploration Laboratory,2015,34(8):41-45. |
[1] | Haidong ZHANG, Zhixian TANG, Liyun ZHANG, Qi YU, Chaojun SONG. Optimization of Discrete Elemental Simulation Parameters for Forest Panax pseudoginseng Plantation Red Soil Based on GA-BP-GA [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 120-130. |
[2] | Shanshan TONG, Feng JIN, Qingzhu YANG, Ruifang ZHANG, Xinxin WANG, Hong WANG. Effects of Fertilization by Mulched Drip Irrigation on Soil Nutrient Accumulation and Distribution in Pear Orchards on Gneiss Mountain Slopes [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 181-192. |
[3] | Danrong YU, Ziqi SHANG, Shizuo QIU, Fengjing SONG, Zhihui YU, Xiaoyu ZHANG, Xiaoyan ZHANG. Comparative Analysis of Nutritional Composition and Functional Properties of Different Types of Bean Powder [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 144-154. |
[4] | Xiaowei CHEN, Yuzhu SHA, Xiu LIU, Pengyang SHAO, Fanxiong WANG, Zhuanhui XIE, Wenxin YANG, Qianling CHEN, Min GAO, Wei HUANG. Analysis of Gene Expression Characteristics Associated with Quality, Nutrient Composition, and Meat Quality of Tibetan Sheep Meat During Different Phenological Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 161-171. |
[5] | Xiyu ZHANG, Xing SHEN, Wei LI, Wenge XIE, Jie LI, Changhao YANG, Zhongping CHAI. Influence of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Korla Pear Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 217-228. |
[6] | Shuoshuo FU, Weiyong GONG, Yixuan LIN, Yuanshun LI, Chengcan LIU, Lin NI. Optimization of Extraction Technology and Antifungal Activity of Total Diterpene from Fokienia Hodginsii [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 146-155. |
[7] | Chunlin MIAO, Huanhuan XU, Ziyi JIA, Aimin HE, Yangyang JI, Dehua MOU, Shan GAO. Oxidation Resistance Analysis and Component Identification of Distracted Wood Water Extracts [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 182-192. |
[8] | Saisai HOU, Shanshan TONG, Pengqi WANG, Bingxue XIE, Ruifang ZHANG, Xinxin WANG. Effects of Biochar and Straw on Growth Characteristics and Nutrient Uptake of Different Crops [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 179-191. |
[9] | Changlong FENG, Chenyang NING, Yixin ZHU, Shuping LI, Chunguang HUANG. Research on Design and Optimization of Ring Winding Mechanism for Trunk Bandages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 122-132. |
[10] | Ruyan ZHANG, Shenhao LI, Qipeng ZHU, Taigang FENG, Hongbo LI, Zebing XING, Yu XIAN. Effect of Biochar Content on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Garden Greening Waste/polylactic Acid Composites [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 192-200. |
[11] | Changlong FENG, Chunguang HUANG, Chenyang NING, Shuping LI, Kejin CHEN. Optimization of Performance and Characteristics of Spiral Drill Bit Excavation Mechanism for Planting Machine [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 89-98. |
[12] | Xue WANG, Xing ZHENG, Jiamiao REN, Yazhou ZHAO, Wenjun PENG. Optimization of Extraction Conditions for Volatile Components in Jujube Honey Based on Plackett-Burman Design and Response Surface Method [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 181-192. |
[13] | Chunjiao MI, Hongren SUN, Jiping ZHANG, Yucai LYU, Yandi ZHANG. Abundance-deficiency Index of Soil Available Phosphorus and Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rates for Tomato in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 222-232. |
[14] | Jingyi XI, Shuangqing WANG, Yitong BAI, Xiuli YAO, Bixuan HUANG, Qingyi LI, Liqing FAN, Shichen HUANG, Mingguo SUN. Study on Optimization of Processing Parameters Using Hermetia illucens Larva to Treat Food Waste by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 241-249. |
[15] | Chongtao LIU, Tong LI, Yangyang LI, Zhuangzhuang LIU, Yangyang CAI, Jianchao SONG, Wantong ZHANG, Bin SHANG, Xiuping TAO. Study on Antifungal Effect and Composition of Ultraviolet on Nutritional Wastewater [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 166-173. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||