








中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 181-189.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0990
收稿日期:2021-11-20
接受日期:2022-04-12
出版日期:2023-06-15
发布日期:2023-07-28
通讯作者:
乔江方
作者简介:张盼盼 E-mail:zhangpan1602@163.com;
基金资助:
Panpan ZHANG(
), Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO(
)
Received:2021-11-20
Accepted:2022-04-12
Online:2023-06-15
Published:2023-07-28
Contact:
Jiangfang QIAO
摘要:
为明确硝化抑制剂对夏玉米氮素高效利用的影响,通过连续2年田间试验研究不同氮肥减施水平下添加硝化抑制剂(2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶)对夏玉米产量和氮素累积转运及利用的影响。结果表明,氮肥减施20%并添加硝化抑制剂不影响玉米植株各器官及总干物质的累积量,各器官的氮素累积量及植株的总氮吸收量未出现下降趋势,其产量与正常施氮处理无显著差异。随着施氮量的增加,玉米植株的氮素转运量呈先增后降趋势,其中减氮20%配施硝化抑制剂处理的氮素转运量和转运率均最高,分别为62.41 kg·hm-2和44.54%,对籽粒氮素贡献率达33.96%。氮肥偏生产力随施氮量的增加而下降,平均为58.94 kg·kg-1;每生产100 kg籽粒平均需吸收纯氮1.96 kg,以减氮10%处理最高。综合玉米产量、氮素转运累积和利用等因素,在常规施氮的基础上氮肥减施20%,并配施硝化抑制剂2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶,既能够保证玉米高产、稳产,又能够促进农田生态系统中氮素的高效利用,达到节本增效的目的。
中图分类号:
张盼盼, 李川, 张美微, 赵霞, 牛军, 乔江方. 氮肥减施下添加硝化抑制剂对夏玉米氮素累积转运和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
Panpan ZHANG, Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO. Effect of Nitrification Inhibitor Application on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Grain Yield of Summer Maize Under Reduced Nitrogen[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
| 年份Year | 处理Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴Cobs | 苞叶Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 5.66±0.06 bc | 3.73±0.00 a | 1.58±0.05 ab | 1.91±0.02 a | 1.10±0.01 a | 10.61±0.32 ab | 24.59±0.16 ab |
| T2 | 7.82±0.23 a | 3.42±0.00 ab | 1.64±0.07 a | 1.46±0.04 bc | 1.14±0.01 a | 11.12±0.44 ab | 26.59±0.21 a | |
| T3 | 4.81±0.19 cd | 2.84±0.03 bcd | 1.31±0.01 bc | 1.64±0.07 abc | 0.87±0.03 abc | 10.41±0.10 bc | 21.89±0.04 bc | |
| T4 | 5.99±0.06 b | 3.26±0.10 bc | 1.62±0.05 a | 1.88±0.02 a | 0.93±0.03 ab | 11.59±0.35 a | 25.26±0.76 a | |
| T5 | 3.74±0.11 cd | 3.61±0.14 ab | 1.39±0.01 bc | 1.62±0.05 abc | 0.80±0.03 bc | 9.55±0.38 c | 20.71±0.06 bc | |
| T6 | 5.27±0.21 bc | 3.31±0.03 ab | 1.52±0.02 ab | 1.78±0.07 ab | 0.98±0.01 ab | 9.33±0.28 cd | 22.18±0.23 bc | |
| T7 | 3.62±0.04 cd | 2.80±0.08 cd | 1.25±0.04 c | 1.26±0.01 c | 0.71±0.02 bc | 9.33±0.37 cd | 18.96±0.19 c | |
| 平均Mean | 5.27 | 3.28 | 1.47 | 1.65 | 0.93 | 10.28 | 22.88 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 5.10±0.15 ab | 3.35±0.00 a | 1.42±0.04 a | 1.72±0.02 a | 0.99±0.03 a | 11.95±0.48 a | 24.53±0.21 a |
| T2 | 4.53±0.18 b | 2.88±0.00 abc | 1.18±0.05 bc | 1.31±0.04 ab | 0.73±0.01 abc | 11.43±0.11 ab | 22.05±0.04 ab | |
| T3 | 4.33±0.04 bc | 2.76±0.08 abc | 1.38±0.01 ab | 1.48±0.06 ab | 0.98±0.01 a | 11.17±0.34 ab | 22.10±0.21 ab | |
| T4 | 5.39±0.16 a | 2.94±0.12 abc | 1.46±0.00 a | 1.69±0.02 a | 0.84±0.03 ab | 12.49±0.37 a | 24.80±0.04 a | |
| T5 | 4.47±0.18 bc | 3.25±0.03 ab | 1.25±0.00 abc | 1.46±0.00 ab | 0.72±0.03 abc | 10.97±0.11 ab | 22.11±0.15 ab | |
| T6 | 3.96±0.04 bcd | 3.12±0.09 ab | 1.26±0.04 abc | 1.44±0.00 ab | 0.76±0.01 abc | 11.16±0.33 b | 21.69±0.18 bc | |
| T7 | 3.26±0.10 cd | 2.52±0.10 bc | 1.12±0.04 bc | 1.13±0.03 b | 0.63±0.02 bc | 11.02±0.44 b | 19.69±0.04 c | |
| 平均 Mean | 4.43 | 2.97 | 1.30 | 1.46 | 0.81 | 11.46 | 22.43 |
表1 不同处理下玉米成熟期植株各器官的干物质累积量 (t·hm-2)
Table 1 Dry matter accumulation of maize organs in the maturity stage under different treatments
| 年份Year | 处理Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴Cobs | 苞叶Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 5.66±0.06 bc | 3.73±0.00 a | 1.58±0.05 ab | 1.91±0.02 a | 1.10±0.01 a | 10.61±0.32 ab | 24.59±0.16 ab |
| T2 | 7.82±0.23 a | 3.42±0.00 ab | 1.64±0.07 a | 1.46±0.04 bc | 1.14±0.01 a | 11.12±0.44 ab | 26.59±0.21 a | |
| T3 | 4.81±0.19 cd | 2.84±0.03 bcd | 1.31±0.01 bc | 1.64±0.07 abc | 0.87±0.03 abc | 10.41±0.10 bc | 21.89±0.04 bc | |
| T4 | 5.99±0.06 b | 3.26±0.10 bc | 1.62±0.05 a | 1.88±0.02 a | 0.93±0.03 ab | 11.59±0.35 a | 25.26±0.76 a | |
| T5 | 3.74±0.11 cd | 3.61±0.14 ab | 1.39±0.01 bc | 1.62±0.05 abc | 0.80±0.03 bc | 9.55±0.38 c | 20.71±0.06 bc | |
| T6 | 5.27±0.21 bc | 3.31±0.03 ab | 1.52±0.02 ab | 1.78±0.07 ab | 0.98±0.01 ab | 9.33±0.28 cd | 22.18±0.23 bc | |
| T7 | 3.62±0.04 cd | 2.80±0.08 cd | 1.25±0.04 c | 1.26±0.01 c | 0.71±0.02 bc | 9.33±0.37 cd | 18.96±0.19 c | |
| 平均Mean | 5.27 | 3.28 | 1.47 | 1.65 | 0.93 | 10.28 | 22.88 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 5.10±0.15 ab | 3.35±0.00 a | 1.42±0.04 a | 1.72±0.02 a | 0.99±0.03 a | 11.95±0.48 a | 24.53±0.21 a |
| T2 | 4.53±0.18 b | 2.88±0.00 abc | 1.18±0.05 bc | 1.31±0.04 ab | 0.73±0.01 abc | 11.43±0.11 ab | 22.05±0.04 ab | |
| T3 | 4.33±0.04 bc | 2.76±0.08 abc | 1.38±0.01 ab | 1.48±0.06 ab | 0.98±0.01 a | 11.17±0.34 ab | 22.10±0.21 ab | |
| T4 | 5.39±0.16 a | 2.94±0.12 abc | 1.46±0.00 a | 1.69±0.02 a | 0.84±0.03 ab | 12.49±0.37 a | 24.80±0.04 a | |
| T5 | 4.47±0.18 bc | 3.25±0.03 ab | 1.25±0.00 abc | 1.46±0.00 ab | 0.72±0.03 abc | 10.97±0.11 ab | 22.11±0.15 ab | |
| T6 | 3.96±0.04 bcd | 3.12±0.09 ab | 1.26±0.04 abc | 1.44±0.00 ab | 0.76±0.01 abc | 11.16±0.33 b | 21.69±0.18 bc | |
| T7 | 3.26±0.10 cd | 2.52±0.10 bc | 1.12±0.04 bc | 1.13±0.03 b | 0.63±0.02 bc | 11.02±0.44 b | 19.69±0.04 c | |
| 平均 Mean | 4.43 | 2.97 | 1.30 | 1.46 | 0.81 | 11.46 | 22.43 |
| 年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴 Cobs | 苞叶 Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 29.49±0.29 bcd | 37.40±1.12 bc | 4.59±0.18 cd | 3.65±0.04 bc | 4.86±0.05 b | 124.22±1.24 ab | 204.21±2.04 ab |
| T2 | 32.12±0.96 bc | 42.66±1.28 a | 5.89±0.06 b | 4.41±0.76 a | 6.03±0.18 a | 124.87±3.75 a | 215.98±2.16 a | |
| T3 | 33.39±1.34 bc | 42.58±1.70 a | 5.42±0.16 bc | 3.94±0.04 ab | 3.45±0.14 bc | 125.12±5.00 a | 213.89±6.42 a | |
| T4 | 44.24±0.44 a | 36.44±0.36 bc | 6.55±0.26 a | 4.08±0.12 a | 4.37±0.13 b | 123.22±1.23 ab | 218.90±8.76 a | |
| T5 | 34.04±1.02 bc | 27.44±0.82 d | 4.89±0.15 cd | 3.10±0.12 c | 4.58±0.14 b | 125.28±1.25 a | 199.33±5.98 ab | |
| T6 | 37.53±1.50 b | 32.55±1.30 cd | 6.93±0.28 a | 4.00±0.16 ab | 6.51±0.26 a | 109.50±3.29 c | 197.01±5.91 abc | |
| T7 | 25.88±0.26 cd | 33.32±1.00 bcd | 3.88±0.04 d | 3.20±0.03 c | 3.77±0.15 bc | 120.82±4.83 bc | 190.88±7.64 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 35.24 | 36.06 | 5.45 | 3.77 | 4.80 | 122.25 | 205.74 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 41.55±0.42 b | 45.13±0.45 a | 9.07±0.36 ab | 5.73±0.17 a | 4.52±0.14 ab | 125.57±1.22 ab | 231.57±9.26 ab |
| T2 | 53.92±1.62 a | 48.16±1.44 a | 10.33±0.10 a | 3.22±0.13 cd | 5.11±0.20 a | 120.18±3.61 bc | 240.92±2.41 a | |
| T3 | 33.64±1.35 bc | 42.68±1.71 ab | 7.69±0.23 cd | 3.96±0.04 bc | 3.06±0.03 bcd | 129.92±5.20 a | 220.95±2.21 abc | |
| T4 | 34.88±0.35 bc | 41.56±0.42 ab | 7.87±0.24 cd | 4.75±0.76 ab | 4.53±0.05 ab | 135.47±1.35 a | 229.06±2.29 ab | |
| T5 | 30.10±0.30 cd | 42.15±1.26 ab | 7.77±0.08 cd | 3.00±0.03 cd | 2.42±0.07 cd | 125.10±1.25 ab | 210.55±6.32 bc | |
| T6 | 25.91±0.26 d | 35.38±1.42 bc | 8.67±0.26 bc | 3.89±0.12 bc | 4.14±0.17 bc | 130.79±3.92 a | 208.78±8.35 bcd | |
| T7 | 28.09±0.84 d | 32.19±0.32 c | 7.74±0.31 cd | 4.22±0.17 ab | 2.82±0.03 cd | 114.50±1.15 c | 189.56±1.90 cd | |
| 平均Mean | 35.44 | 41.04 | 8.45 | 4.11 | 3.80 | 125.93 | 218.77 |
表2 不同处理下成熟期玉米植株各器官的氮素累积量 (kg·hm-2)
Table 2 Nitrogen accumulation of maize organs in the maturity stage under different treatments
| 年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴 Cobs | 苞叶 Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 29.49±0.29 bcd | 37.40±1.12 bc | 4.59±0.18 cd | 3.65±0.04 bc | 4.86±0.05 b | 124.22±1.24 ab | 204.21±2.04 ab |
| T2 | 32.12±0.96 bc | 42.66±1.28 a | 5.89±0.06 b | 4.41±0.76 a | 6.03±0.18 a | 124.87±3.75 a | 215.98±2.16 a | |
| T3 | 33.39±1.34 bc | 42.58±1.70 a | 5.42±0.16 bc | 3.94±0.04 ab | 3.45±0.14 bc | 125.12±5.00 a | 213.89±6.42 a | |
| T4 | 44.24±0.44 a | 36.44±0.36 bc | 6.55±0.26 a | 4.08±0.12 a | 4.37±0.13 b | 123.22±1.23 ab | 218.90±8.76 a | |
| T5 | 34.04±1.02 bc | 27.44±0.82 d | 4.89±0.15 cd | 3.10±0.12 c | 4.58±0.14 b | 125.28±1.25 a | 199.33±5.98 ab | |
| T6 | 37.53±1.50 b | 32.55±1.30 cd | 6.93±0.28 a | 4.00±0.16 ab | 6.51±0.26 a | 109.50±3.29 c | 197.01±5.91 abc | |
| T7 | 25.88±0.26 cd | 33.32±1.00 bcd | 3.88±0.04 d | 3.20±0.03 c | 3.77±0.15 bc | 120.82±4.83 bc | 190.88±7.64 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 35.24 | 36.06 | 5.45 | 3.77 | 4.80 | 122.25 | 205.74 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 41.55±0.42 b | 45.13±0.45 a | 9.07±0.36 ab | 5.73±0.17 a | 4.52±0.14 ab | 125.57±1.22 ab | 231.57±9.26 ab |
| T2 | 53.92±1.62 a | 48.16±1.44 a | 10.33±0.10 a | 3.22±0.13 cd | 5.11±0.20 a | 120.18±3.61 bc | 240.92±2.41 a | |
| T3 | 33.64±1.35 bc | 42.68±1.71 ab | 7.69±0.23 cd | 3.96±0.04 bc | 3.06±0.03 bcd | 129.92±5.20 a | 220.95±2.21 abc | |
| T4 | 34.88±0.35 bc | 41.56±0.42 ab | 7.87±0.24 cd | 4.75±0.76 ab | 4.53±0.05 ab | 135.47±1.35 a | 229.06±2.29 ab | |
| T5 | 30.10±0.30 cd | 42.15±1.26 ab | 7.77±0.08 cd | 3.00±0.03 cd | 2.42±0.07 cd | 125.10±1.25 ab | 210.55±6.32 bc | |
| T6 | 25.91±0.26 d | 35.38±1.42 bc | 8.67±0.26 bc | 3.89±0.12 bc | 4.14±0.17 bc | 130.79±3.92 a | 208.78±8.35 bcd | |
| T7 | 28.09±0.84 d | 32.19±0.32 c | 7.74±0.31 cd | 4.22±0.17 ab | 2.82±0.03 cd | 114.50±1.15 c | 189.56±1.90 cd | |
| 平均Mean | 35.44 | 41.04 | 8.45 | 4.11 | 3.80 | 125.93 | 218.77 |
| 处理 Treatment | 吐丝期营养器官氮素累积量 N accumulation in vegetative organ in silking stage/(kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运量 N transportation amount after silking/ (kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运率 N transportation rate after silking/% | 花后氮素转运对籽粒氮素贡献率 Concentration rate to grain of N transportation after silking/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 123.84±1.24 bc | 43.85±1.75 a | 35.41±1.13 a | 35.30±0.35 a |
| T2 | 130.54±3.92 ab | 39.43±0.39 bc | 30.20±0.91 bc | 31.58±0.95 abc | |
| T3 | 126.43±3.79 abc | 37.66±1.13 bcd | 29.79±1.19 bc | 30.10±0.30 bc | |
| T4 | 136.49±1.36 a | 40.81±1.63 ab | 29.90±0.30 bc | 33.12±0.99 ab | |
| T5 | 115.44±3.46 cd | 41.39±0.41 a | 35.86±1.43 a | 33.04±1.32 ab | |
| T6 | 112.29±4.49 cd | 24.78±0.25 d | 22.07±0.22 cd | 22.63±0.23 cd | |
| T7 | 105.22±1.05 cd | 35.16±0.35 cd | 33.42±1.00 ab | 29.10±0.87 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 121.46 | 37.58 | 30.95 | 30.70 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 146.03±1.46 ab | 40.03±1.60 bc | 27.41±0.27 bc | 31.88±1.28 abc |
| T2 | 153.85±1.54 a | 33.12±1.32 cd | 21.53±0.86 bc | 27.56±0.28 bcd | |
| T3 | 134.86±4.05 bc | 43.83±0.44 ab | 32.50±0.33 ab | 33.73±0.34 ab | |
| T4 | 140.73±5.63 abc | 47.14±1.41 a | 33.50±1.34 a | 34.80±0.35 a | |
| T5 | 121.90±3.66 bcd | 36.45±1.46 cd | 29.90±0.90 abc | 29.14±1.17 bc | |
| T6 | 117.57±1.18 cd | 39.57±0.40 bc | 33.66±1.35 a | 30.25±0.91 bc | |
| T7 | 108.80±3.26 cd | 33.74±0.34 cd | 31.01±0.31 ab | 29.47±0.29 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 131.96 | 39.12 | 29.93 | 30.97 | |
表3 不同处理下玉米植株营养器官的氮素转运特征
Table 3 Characteristics of nitrogen transportation in organ vegetation of maize plant under different treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 吐丝期营养器官氮素累积量 N accumulation in vegetative organ in silking stage/(kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运量 N transportation amount after silking/ (kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运率 N transportation rate after silking/% | 花后氮素转运对籽粒氮素贡献率 Concentration rate to grain of N transportation after silking/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | T1 | 123.84±1.24 bc | 43.85±1.75 a | 35.41±1.13 a | 35.30±0.35 a |
| T2 | 130.54±3.92 ab | 39.43±0.39 bc | 30.20±0.91 bc | 31.58±0.95 abc | |
| T3 | 126.43±3.79 abc | 37.66±1.13 bcd | 29.79±1.19 bc | 30.10±0.30 bc | |
| T4 | 136.49±1.36 a | 40.81±1.63 ab | 29.90±0.30 bc | 33.12±0.99 ab | |
| T5 | 115.44±3.46 cd | 41.39±0.41 a | 35.86±1.43 a | 33.04±1.32 ab | |
| T6 | 112.29±4.49 cd | 24.78±0.25 d | 22.07±0.22 cd | 22.63±0.23 cd | |
| T7 | 105.22±1.05 cd | 35.16±0.35 cd | 33.42±1.00 ab | 29.10±0.87 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 121.46 | 37.58 | 30.95 | 30.70 | |
| 2020 | T1 | 146.03±1.46 ab | 40.03±1.60 bc | 27.41±0.27 bc | 31.88±1.28 abc |
| T2 | 153.85±1.54 a | 33.12±1.32 cd | 21.53±0.86 bc | 27.56±0.28 bcd | |
| T3 | 134.86±4.05 bc | 43.83±0.44 ab | 32.50±0.33 ab | 33.73±0.34 ab | |
| T4 | 140.73±5.63 abc | 47.14±1.41 a | 33.50±1.34 a | 34.80±0.35 a | |
| T5 | 121.90±3.66 bcd | 36.45±1.46 cd | 29.90±0.90 abc | 29.14±1.17 bc | |
| T6 | 117.57±1.18 cd | 39.57±0.40 bc | 33.66±1.35 a | 30.25±0.91 bc | |
| T7 | 108.80±3.26 cd | 33.74±0.34 cd | 31.01±0.31 ab | 29.47±0.29 bc | |
| 平均Mean | 131.96 | 39.12 | 29.93 | 30.97 | |
图1 不同处理下玉米的籽粒产量注:不同小写字母表示同年不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 Grain yield of maize under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
图2 不同处理下氮肥的偏生产力注:不同小写字母表示同年不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 Partial factor productivity of N fertilizer under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同处理下每生产100 kg籽粒吸收的纯氮量注:不同小写字母表示同年不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 Amount of pure N absorbed per 100 kg grain under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
| 1 | 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2020 [EB/OL]. [2021-10-15].. |
| 2 | 陈传永,赵久然,王元东,等.氮肥减施对京科968与郑单958氮效率及产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(3):121-127. |
| CHEN C Y, ZHAO J R, WANG Y D, et al.. Effects of nitrogen reduction on nitrogen efficiency and yield of Jingke968 and Zhendan 958 [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(3): 121-127. | |
| 3 | 彭钰洁,程楠,李佳佳,等. 氮肥减施对玉米幼苗根系分泌物影响的根际代谢组学分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(6): 807-814. |
| PENG Y J, CHENG N, LI J J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on root exudates of maize seedling analyzed by rhizosphere metabonomics [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2018, 26(6): 807-814. | |
| 4 | 尹彩侠,李前,孔丽丽,等. 控释氮肥减施对春玉米产量、氮素吸收及转运的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3941-3950. |
| YIN C X, LI Q, KONG L L, et al.. Effect of reduced controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application on yield, nitrogen absorption and transportation of spring maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(20): 3941-3950. | |
| 5 | 陈治嘉,隋标,赵兴敏,等. 吉林省黑土区玉米氮肥减施效果研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(6): 139-145. |
| CHEN Z J, SUI B, ZHAO X M, et al.. Effect of nitrogen reduction on maize in black soil area of Jilin province [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(6): 139-145. | |
| 6 | 孙晓,景建元,吕慎强,等. 不同缓/控释尿素在黄土台塬区春玉米的减量施用效果[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(6): 848-855. |
| SUN X, JING J Y, LYU S Q, et al.. Effect of different rates of slow/controlled release urea on nitrogen content in spring maize in loess highlands [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2017, 25(6): 848-855. | |
| 7 | 张盼盼,朱玉平,黄璐,等. 氮肥减施对夏玉米花后生理特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4): 137-145, 164. |
| ZHANG P P, ZHU Y P, HUANG L, et al.. Effects of reducing nitrogen applications on the physiological characteristics after anthesis of summer maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2020, 28(4): 137-145, 164. | |
| 8 | CÉLINE M, ISABELLE Q, ANDRÉ G, et al.. The challenge of remobilisation in plant nitrogen economy. A survey of physio‐agronomic and molecular approaches [J]. Ann. Appl.Biol., 2010, 138(1):69-81. |
| 9 | LIU S L, WANG X H, YIN X H, et al.. Ammonia volatilization loss and corn nitrogen nutrition and productivity with efficiency enhanced uan and urea under no-tillage [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2019, 9(1):6610 [2021-10-15]. . |
| 10 | 王进军,黄瑞冬. 玉米氮效率及其研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(1): 89-92. |
| WANG J J, HUANG R D. Nitrogen use efficiency and its research advances in maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2005, 13(1): 89-92. | |
| 11 | OSLAN J, YUSMINAH H, R.NENI I, et al.. Combined effects of nitrification inhibitor and zeolite on greenhouse gas fluxes and corn growth [J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2020, 27(2): 2087-2095. |
| 12 | ZHANG L, WU Z, JIANG Y, et al.. Fate of applied urea 15N in a soil-maize system as affected by urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor [J]. Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(1):8-15. |
| 13 | 崔磊,李东坡,武志杰,等. 用于黑土的稳定性氯化铵的适宜硝化抑制剂和氮肥增效剂组合[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188. |
| CUI L, LI D P, WU Z J, et al.. Suitable combination of nitrogen-inhibitors and nitrogen synergist for production of stable ammonium chloride applied to black soil [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188. | |
| 14 | 张英鹏,李洪杰,刘兆辉,等. 农田减氮调控施肥对华北潮土区小麦-玉米轮作体系氮素损失的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187. |
| ZHANG Y P, LI H J, LIU Z H, et al.. Effect of reducing N and regulated fertilization on N loss from wheat-maize rotation system of farmland in Chao soil region of North China Plain [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187. | |
| 15 | 李婷玉. 增效氮肥综合效应及影响因素研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2018. |
| LI T Y. Evaluation of integrated effectiveness of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and influencing factors [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. | |
| 16 | 朱永昶,李玉娥,秦晓波,等. 控释肥和硝化抑制剂对华北春玉米N2O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(7): 1421-1428. |
| ZHU Y C, LI Y E, QIN X B, et al.. Effects of controlled release fertilizer and nitrification inhibitor additions on nitrous oxide emissions from spring maize field in Northern China [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2016, 35(7): 1421-1428. | |
| 17 | 蒲玮,吴雅薇,张頔,等. 减氮配施氮肥增效剂对土壤速效氮和玉米产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3): 276-283. |
| PU W, WU Y W, ZHANG D, et al.. Effects of nitrogen reduction combined with nitrogen fertilizer synergist on soil availability nitrogen and corn yield [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 35(3): 276-283. | |
| 18 | 郭静. 不同脲酶抑制剂/硝化抑制剂组合增效机理研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
| GUO J. Study on synergistic mechanism of different urease inhibiter and nitrification inhibiter combinations [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
| 19 | 崔磊,李东坡,武志杰,等.高效稳定性硫酸铵氮肥在黑土中的施用效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2390-2398. |
| CUI L, LI D P, WU Z J, et al.. Effects of high efficiency and stability ammonium sulfate fertilizer applied in black soil [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(7): 2390-2398. | |
| 20 | 王丹阳,边文范,董晓霞,等. 氮肥增效剂用量对玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(12): 53-57. |
| WANG D Y, BIAN W F, DONG X X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer synergist amounts on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2019, 51(12): 53-57. | |
| 21 | 李广浩,刘娟,董树亭,等. 密植与氮肥用量对不同耐密型夏玉米品种产量及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2247-2258. |
| LI G H, LIU J, DONG S T, et al.. Effects of close planting and nitrogen application rates on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of different density-tolerance maize hybrids [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(12): 2247-2258. | |
| 22 | 任佰朝,范霞,董树亭,等. 种植密度和施氮量对不同株高夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 269-277. |
| REN B C, FAN X, DONG S T, et al.. Effect of plant density and nitrogen rate on yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of summer maize hybrids with different plant height [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(2): 269-277. | |
| 23 | 程乙,王洪章,刘鹏,等. 品种和氮素供应对玉米根系特征及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2259-2269. |
| CHENG Y, WANG H Z, LIU P, et al.. Effect of different maize varieties and nitrogen supply on root characteristics and nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(12): 2259-2269. | |
| 24 | 陈晓辉,徐开未,唐义琴,等. 麦/玉/豆周年套作体系氮素积累分配及转运[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(5): 1127-1138. |
| CHEN X H, XU K W, TANG Y Q, et al.. Nitrogen accumulation,allocation and translocation in wheat/maize/soybean relay intercropping system [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2014, 20(5): 1127-1138. | |
| 25 | 隋鹏祥,有德宝,安俊朋,等. 秸秆还田方式与施氮量对春玉米产量及干物质和氮素积累、转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 316-324. |
| SUI P X, YOU D B, AN J P, et al.. Effects of straw management and nitrogen application on spring maize yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and transfer [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2018, 24(2): 316-324. | |
| 26 | 张经廷,刘云鹏,李旭辉,等. 夏玉米各器官氮素积累与分配动态及其对氮肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(3): 506-514. |
| ZHANG J T, LIU Y P, LI X H, et al.. Dynamic responses of nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in summer maize organs to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2013, 39(3): 506-514. | |
| 27 | 孙旭东,孙浒,董树亭,等. 包膜尿素施用时期对夏玉米产量和氮素积累特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2179-2188. |
| SUN X D, SUN H, DONG S T, et al.. Effect of coated-urea application times on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(11): 2179-2188. | |
| 28 | 周培禄,任红,齐华,等. 氮肥用量对两种不同类型玉米杂交种物质生产及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(2): 263-276. |
| ZHOU P L, REN H, QI H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rates on dry matter productivity and nitrogen utilization of different type maize hybrids [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2017, 43(2): 263-276. | |
| 29 | 葛均筑,展茗,赵明,等. 一次性施肥对长江中游春玉米产量及养分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(5): 1073-1082. |
| GE J Z, ZHAN M, ZHAO M, et al.. Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze river [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(5): 1073-1082. | |
| 30 | 董强,吴得峰,党廷辉,等. 黄土高原南部不同减氮模式对春玉米产量及土壤硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 856-863. |
| DONG Q, WU D F, DANG T H, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen reduction modes on yield of spring maize and nitrate-N residue in soils of the southern Loess Plateau [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(4): 856-863. | |
| 31 | 郝小雨,马星竹,高中超,等. 氮肥管理措施对黑土春玉米产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(4): 151-159. |
| HAO X Y, MA X Z, GAO Z C, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on spring maize yield and nitrogen utilization in black soil [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2016, 24(4): 151-159. | |
| 32 | 吴雪娜,彭智平,涂玉婷,等. 2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶对甜玉米产量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(11): 86-91. |
| WU X N, PENG Z P, TU Y T, et al.. Effects of 2-chloro-6-trichloromethyl pyridine on yield and agronomic characters of sweet corn [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2016, 43(11): 86-91. | |
| 33 | 林海涛,李慧,余晔,等. 氮肥与新型增效剂配施对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(11): 68-71. |
| LIN H T, LI H, YU Y, et al.. Effects of N fertilizer combined with new synergist on summer corn growth and yield [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2015, 47(11): 68-71. | |
| 34 | 吴得峰. 黄土旱塬区减氮条件下氮素利用及温室气体排放特征[D]. 咸阳:西北农林科技大学, 2016. |
| WU D F. Nitrogen utilization and greenhouse gas emissions under reduced nitrogen fertilization in the semiarid Loess Plateau [D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2016. |
| [1] | 张振飞, 颜安, 郭靖, 赵宇航, 袁以琳, 刘鹏, 曲佐昊, 袁川. 基于无人机遥感的苹果产量估测模型研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 110-119. |
| [2] | 张剑峰, 侯文峰, 伍永清, 李凯旭, 李小坤. 氮肥与密度互作对水稻病虫害发生和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 145-154. |
| [3] | 吕彩霞, 李永福, 信会男, 李娜, 赖宁, 耿庆龙, 陈署晃. 缓释氮肥对滴灌冬小麦产量及土壤硝/铵态氮的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
| [4] | 刘雪晴, 王静, 阳宜, 吴慧琴, 王延宏, 王麓尧, 路佳伟, 张凯璇, 翟源, 成妍. 外源乙烯利对色素辣椒脱叶及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 36-46. |
| [5] | 周琦, 刘强, 张靖, 邓超超, 王振龙, 柳洋, 吴芳, 常浩, 周彦芳, 宿翠翠, 施志国, 高正睿, 马凤捷. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤生物学特性及南瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
| [6] | 陈士超, 王举, 郭富强, 郝瑞, 石建平. 不同水氮耦合对蛋白桑生理指标及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
| [7] | 吴艳, 邹乐萍, 宋惠洁, 胡丹丹, 柳开楼, 梁万里. 控释氮肥和尿素配施对田面水铵态氮和早稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(4): 192-200. |
| [8] | 李大荣, 李小玲, 周武先, 张美德, 蒋小刚, 由金文, 王华. 有机肥替代部分化肥对湖北贝母生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
| [9] | 吴强, 吴聪连, 吴小云, 吴剑, 徐选美, 赖俊声, 胡伟云, 龚榜初, 江锡兵. 不同施肥处理对锥栗产量及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 228-237. |
| [10] | 刘婷婷, 郝曦煜, 王辉, 冷静文, 宫世航, 刘伟. 吉林西部半干旱地区不同谷子品种产量与农艺性状的分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 50-60. |
| [11] | 石纹碹, 谭金芳, 张倩, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 一次性施肥对不同生态区夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(9): 193-202. |
| [12] | 吴梅, 张金珠, 王振华, 刘健, 温越, 李宣志. 水气互作对膜下滴灌玉米生理生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 189-200. |
| [13] | 庞博, 李生梅, 李彦霖, 杨涛, 梁维维, 张茹, 黄雅婕, 任丹, 崔进鑫, 李静, 马晶晶, 高文伟. 192份陆地棉杂交种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 34-50. |
| [14] | 孙亮, 徐益, 蔡沁, 郭靖豪, 赵灿, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 胡雅杰. 中微量元素对水稻产量和品质的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 9-19. |
| [15] | 孙宪印, 牟秋焕, 米勇, 吕广德, 亓晓蕾, 孙盈盈, 尹逊栋, 王瑞霞, 吴科, 钱兆国, 赵岩, 高明刚. 基于GT双标图对小麦新品系的分类评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||