








中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 32-42.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2025.0123
闫芸芸1,2(
), 汪福保3, 董浚键2, 张赫桐2, 高风英2, 张媛2, 叶星2, 孙成飞2(
), 吴成宾1(
)
收稿日期:2025-02-26
接受日期:2025-05-07
出版日期:2025-11-15
发布日期:2025-11-17
通讯作者:
孙成飞,吴成宾
作者简介:闫芸芸 E-mail: 20222170546@pgs.hebau.edu.cn
基金资助:
Yunyun YAN1,2(
), Fubao WANG3, Junjian DONG2, Hetong ZHANG2, Fengying GAO2, Yuan ZHANG2, Xing YE2, Chengfei SUN2(
), Chengbin WU1(
)
Received:2025-02-26
Accepted:2025-05-07
Online:2025-11-15
Published:2025-11-17
Contact:
Chengfei SUN,Chengbin WU
摘要:
鳜鱼(Siniperca chuatsi)是我国重要的淡水养殖优质鱼类,天生吃活饵,是凶猛的肉食性鱼类。采用人工驯化的方法改变肉食性鱼类的食性可以降低养殖成本并减少对自然资源的依赖。为探究配合饲料替代活饵对翘嘴鳜生长性能、消化功能及抗氧化能力的影响,将驯化的翘嘴鳜幼鱼(23.17±0.75 g)分别饲喂配合饲料(F组)、活饵(B组)、1餐饲料和1餐活饵(M组),养殖3个月后测量其生长指标及消化酶和抗氧化酶活性,并观察胃肠道组织显微结构。结果显示,F组的体质量和体长显著高于M组,F组的饲料系数显著低于B组,全长、体高、肥满度、肝体比和脏体比在3组之间均无显著差异;F组和M组的超氧化物歧化酶活性显著高于B组,B组和M组的过氧化氢酶活性显著高于F组,F组的还原型谷胱甘肽含量、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶活性显著高于M组,B组的总抗氧化能力显著高于M组,3组之间的丙二醛含量差异不显著。在胃组织中,M组胰蛋白酶活性显著低于B组,F组淀粉酶活性显著高于B组,胃脂肪酶活性和肠道消化酶活性在3组间差异不显著;F组肠道绒毛高度显著高于B组和M组,相比B组,F组和M组肠道绒毛较稀疏,肠腔中绒毛间空隙增大。综上,翘嘴鳜经过驯化后摄食配合饲料不会影响其生长性能,但M组的饲喂效果不及另外2组。鱼体通过提高淀粉酶活性和部分抗氧化酶活性,以及增加肠道绒毛高度和绒毛间空隙,对饲料养殖具有一定的适应性。研究结果为鳜鱼的大规模饲料养殖以及饲料成分的进一步优化提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
闫芸芸, 汪福保, 董浚键, 张赫桐, 高风英, 张媛, 叶星, 孙成飞, 吴成宾. 配合饲料替代活饵对翘嘴鳜生长性能、消化功能及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(11): 32-42.
Yunyun YAN, Fubao WANG, Junjian DONG, Hetong ZHANG, Fengying GAO, Yuan ZHANG, Xing YE, Chengfei SUN, Chengbin WU. Effect of Replacing Live Bait with Compound Feed on Growth Performance, Digestive Function and Antioxidant Capacity of Siniperca chuatsi[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(11): 32-42.
图1 不同饲喂方式下翘嘴鳜的生长指标注:不同小写字母表示不同组间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 Growth indexes of S. chuatsi under different feeding practicesNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different groups at P<0.05 level.
图2 不同饲喂方式下翘嘴鳜肝脏组织的抗氧化酶活性注:不同小写字母表示不同组别间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 Antioxidant enzyme activities in the liver tissue of S. chuatsi under different feeding practicesNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different groups at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同饲喂方式下翘嘴鳜胃肠道组织的消化酶活性注:不同小写字母表示不同组别间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 Digestive enzyme activities in the stomach and intestine tissues of S. chuatsi under different feeding practicesNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different groups at P<0.05 level.
图4 不同饲喂方式下翘嘴鳜胃组织结构A:活饵组胃组织切片,SL—浆膜层,ML—肌层,SM—黏膜下层,Muc—黏膜层,GP—胃小凹,MT—肌层厚度;B:混合组胃组织切片;C:饲料组胃组织切片
Fig. 4 Stomach tissue structure of S. chuatsi under different feeding practicesA:Stomach tissue section of the live bait group, SL—Serosa layer, ML—Muscularis layer, SM—Submucosa layer, Muc—Mucous layer, GP—Gastric pits, MT—muscle thickness; B:Stomach tissue section of the mixed diet group; C: Stomach tissue section of the compound feed group
图5 不同饲喂方式下翘嘴鳜肠道组织结构A: 活饵组肠道组织切片,SL—浆膜层,ML—肌层,SM—黏膜下层,Muc—黏膜层,GC—杯状细胞,VH—绒毛高度,VW—绒毛宽度,MT—肌层厚度;B: 混合组肠道组织切片;C: 饲料组肠道组织切片
Fig. 5 Intestinal tissue structure of S. chuatsi under different feeding practicesA:Intestinal tissue section of the live bait group, SL—Serosa layer, ML—Muscularis layer, SM—Submucosa layer, Muc—Mucous layer, GC—Goblet cell, VH—Villus height, VW—Villus width, MT—Muscle thickness; B:Intestinal tissue section of the mixed diet group; C:Intestinal tissue section of the compound feed group
图6 不同饲喂方式对翘嘴鳜胃肠道组织结构的影响注:不同小写字母表示不同组别间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 6 Effect of different feeding practices on stomach and intestinal tissues structure of S. chuatsiNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different groups at P<0.05 level.
| [1] | 李松林, 韩志豪, 王小源, 等. 鳜养殖概况及摄食调控机制研究进展[J]. 水产学报, 2021, 45(10): 1787-1795. |
| LI S L, HAN Z H, WANG X Y, et al.. Research progress on aquaculture and feeding regulation mechanism of mandarin fish [J]. J. Fish. China, 2021, 45(10): 1787-1795. | |
| [2] | 农业农村部渔业渔政管理局,全国水产技术推广总站,中国水产学会.2024中国渔业统计年鉴[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2024:1-159. |
| [3] | 张梅,王洋.鳜鱼养殖现状及2024年养殖趋势[J].科学养鱼,2024(7):3-5. |
| [4] | 刘立维.700亿的鳜鱼产业风口已现,不能再被这些问题“卡脖子”了[J].当代水产,2023,48(6):74-75. |
| [5] | LIANG X F, KIU J K, HUANG B Y. The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch [J]. J. Fish Biol., 1998,52(5):1058-1067. |
| [6] | HE S, LI L, LYU L Y,et al.. Mandarin fish (Sinipercidae) genomes provide insights into innate predatory feeding [J/OL].Commun.Biol.,2020,3(1):361 [2025-01-16].. |
| [7] | LIANG X F, LIN X T, LI S Q, et al.. Impact of environmental and innate factors on the food habit of Chinese perch Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) (Percichthyidae) [J].Aquac.Res.,2008,39(2):150-157. |
| [8] | LIANG X F, OKU H, OGATA H Y, et al.. Weaning Chinese perch Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) onto artificial diets based upon its specific sensory modality in feeding [J]. Aquac. Res., 2001,32(S1):76-82. |
| [9] | SHEN Y W, LI H Y, ZHAO J L, et al.. The digestive system of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) can adapt to domestication by feeding with artificial diet [J/OL].Aquaculture,2021,538:736546 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [10] | SHEN Y W, SONG L Y, CHEN T T, et al.. Identification of hub genes in digestive system of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) fed with artificial diet by weighted gene co-expression network analysis [J/OL].Comp.Biochem.Physiol.Part D Genomics Proteomics,2023,47:101112 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [11] | JIAO F, ZHANG L, LIMBU S M, et al.. A comparison of digestive strategies for fishes with different feeding habits:digestive enzyme activities,intestinal morphology,and gut microbiota [J/OL]. Ecol. Evol., 2023,13(9):e10499 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [12] | ZHANG Y P, FENG H X, LIANG X F, et al.. Dietary bile acids reduce liver lipid deposition via activating farnesoid X receptor,and improve gut health by regulating gut microbiota in Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi) [J]. Fish Shellfish. Immunol., 2022,121:265-275. |
| [13] | MAI Q Y, JIN Y Q, CHEN Y F, et al.. Assessing the effects of dietary live prey versus an artificial compound feed on growth performance,immune response,and intestinal microflora of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides [J]. Aquac. Int., 2023,31(3):1213-1230. |
| [14] | MARTÍNEZ-ÁLVAREZ R M, MORALES A E, SANZ A. Antioxidant defenses in fish:biotic and abiotic factors [J]. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 2005,15(1):75-88. |
| [15] | 樊玉文, 张木子, 黎明, 等. 饲料中添加雨生红球藻对黄颡鱼生长、抗氧化酶活性、免疫应答及氨氮耐受的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2022, 46(11): 2168-2176. |
| FAN Y W, ZHANG M Z, LI M, et al.. Effects of dietary Haematococcus pluvialis on growth, antioxidant enzyme activity, immune response and ammonia tolerance in yellow catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco [J]. J. Fish. China, 2022, 46(11): 2168-2176. | |
| [16] | 汪福保,孙成飞,董浚键,等.投喂配合饲料和活饵对翘嘴鳜形体和肌肉品质的影响[J].淡水渔业,2022,52(6):102-111. |
| WANG F B, SUN C F, DONG J J, et al.. Effects of compound feed and live bait on the nutrient composition and meat quality of Siniperca chuatisi [J]. Freshwater Fish., 2022,52(6):102-111. | |
| [17] | 陈晓虹,洪越群,谭永基,等.鳜鱼配合饲料对翘嘴鳜生长的影响和驯化养殖技术[J].当代水产,2022,47(7):76-78, 81. |
| [18] | 窦亚琪,梁旭方,易提林,等.翘嘴鳜不同月龄性状的主成分与判别分析[J].中国水产科学,2014,21(6):1116-1124. |
| DOU Y Q, LIANG X F, YI T L, et al.. Principal component and discriminant analyses of traits of Siniperca chuatsi at different ages [J]. J. Fish. Sci. China, 2014,21(6):1116-1124. | |
| [19] | 刘慧军,杨海明,胥蕾,等.畜禽肠道组织H.E.染色石蜡切片制作要点及关键技术[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2018(15):206-210. |
| LIU H J, YANG H M, XU L, et al.. Key points and techniques of H.E.staining and paraffin sectionin livestock and poultry intestines [J].Heilongjiang Anim.Sci.Vet.Med., 2018(15):206-210. | |
| [20] | WANG C, XIE S, ZHENG K, et al.. Effects of live food and formulated diets on survival, growth and protein content of first-feeding larvae of Plelteobagrus fulvidraco [J]. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 2005,21(3):210-214. |
| [21] | 陈剑斌,于俊琦,徐杭忠,等.配合饲料和饵料鱼对鳜生长、胃肠结构功能及肉质的影响[J].水产学报,2023,47(10):84-98. |
| CHEN J B, YU J Q, XU H Z, et al.. Effects of compound feed and bait fish on growth,gastrointestinal structure and function and meat quality of Siniperca chuatsi [J]. J. Fish. China, 2023,47(10):84-98. | |
| [22] | 班赛男, 朱传忠, 杨新冬, 等. 摄食不同饵料对翘嘴鳜生长、体成分和消化酶活性的影响[J]. 淡水渔业, 2020, 50(1): 93-100. |
| BAN S N, ZHU C Z, YANG X D, et al.. Effect of different diet on the growth performance, body composition and digestive enzymes active of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatisi) [J]. Freshwater Fish., 2020, 50(1): 93-100. | |
| [23] | 马林,李明泽,毕相东,等.摄食不同饵料对翘嘴鳜生长性能、肌肉营养成分及消化酶活性的影响[J].饲料研究,2023,46(6):44-49. |
| MA L, LI M Z, BI X D, et al.. Effect of different diets on growth performance,muscle nutrient composition and digestive enzyme activity of Siniperca chuatsi [J]. Feed. Res., 2023,46(6):44-49. | |
| [24] | 曾萌冬,徐俊,宋银都,等.配合饲料替代活饵对鳜生长性能、消化功能及小肽转运载体基因表达的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(1):228-237. |
| ZENG M D, XU J, SONG Y D, et al.. Effects of replacing live bait with compound feed on growth,digestion and expression of small peptide transporter (PepT1) gene of Siniperca chuatsi [J].J. South. Agric., 2021,52(1):228-237. | |
| [25] | LI X M, ZHU Y J, RINGØ E, et al.. Intestinal microbiome and its potential functions in bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) under different feeding strategies [J/OL]. Peer J, 2018, 6:e6000 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [26] | PANG X, TAN G, SUN H, et al.. Effect of feeding different diets on postprandial metabolic response,digestive capacity and growth performance in juvenile southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis) [J/OL].Aquac. Rep., 2022,27:101413 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [27] | XUE S Y, DING J K, LI J Q, et al.. Effects of live,artificial and mixed feeds on the growth and energy budget of Penaeus vannamei [J/OL]. Aquac. Rep., 2021,19:100634 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [28] | LIU S C, LIU S J, SUN Z Q, et al.. Effects of dietary lipid and protein levels on growth,body composition,antioxidant capacity,and flesh quality of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) [J/OL].Aquac. Int., 2024,33(1):78 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [29] | ZELKO I N, MARIANI T J, FOLZ R J. Superoxide dismutase multigene family:a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1),Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures,evolution,and expression [J]. Free. Radic. Biol. Med., 2002,33(3):337-349. |
| [30] | TAN P, DONG X J, XU H L, et al.. Dietary vegetable oil suppressed non-specific immunity and liver antioxidant capacity but induced inflammatory response in Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) [J]. Fish Shellfish. Immunol., 2017,63:139-146. |
| [31] | ALUTA U P, ADEROLU A Z, LAWAL M O, et al.. Inclusion effect of onion peel powder in the diet of African catfish,Clarias gariepinus:growth,blood chemistry,hepatic antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD mRNA responses [J/OL]. Sci. Afr., 2021,12:e00780 [2025-01-16].. |
| [32] | MONIRUZZAMAN M, GHOSAL I, DAS D, et al.. Melatonin ameliorates H2O2-induced oxidative stress through modulation of Erk/Akt/NFkB pathway [J/OL]. Biol. Res., 2018,51(1):17 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [33] | ZHOU C P, HUANG Z, LIN H Z, et al.. Rhizoma curcumae Longae ameliorates high dietary carbohydrate-induced hepatic oxidative stress,inflammation in golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus [J]. Fish Shellfish. Immunol., 2022,130:31-42. |
| [34] | 马兴宇, 唐忠林, 陈树桥, 等. 转食饲料对大口黑鲈幼鱼的存活率、抗氧化酶和消化酶活性及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 中国水产科学, 2024, 31(4): 403-415. |
| MA X Y, TANG Z L, CHEN S Q, et al.. Impacts of early weaning on survival rate, antioxidant and digestive enzyme activities, and intestinal microbiota of juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) [J]. J. Fish. Sci. China, 2024, 31(4): 403-415. | |
| [35] | MUÑOZ-PEÑUELA M, NOSTRO F LLO, DAL’OLIO GOMES A, et al.. Diclofenac and caffeine inhibit hepatic antioxidant enzymes in the freshwater fish Astyanax altiparanae (Teleostei:Characiformes) [J/OL]. Comp.Biochem.Physiol.Part C Toxicol.Pharmacol., 2021,240:108910 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [36] | CAO L, HUANG W, SHAN X J, et al.. Tissue-specific accumulation of cadmium and its effects on antioxidative responses in Japanese flounder juveniles [J]. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2012,33(1):16-25. |
| [37] | 李良. 饥饿复投喂对翘嘴鳜酶活性、血液生化及基因表达的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2021. |
| LI L. Effects of starvation and refeeding on enzyme activity, blood biochemistry and gene expression of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2021. | |
| [38] | ALI S S, AHSAN H, ZIA M K, et al.. Understanding oxidants and antioxidants:classical team with new players [J/OL].J.Food Biochem.,2020,44(3):e13145 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [39] | PIZZIMENTI S, CIAMPORCERO E, DAGA M, et al.. Interaction of aldehydes derived from lipid peroxidation and membrane proteins [J/OL]. Front. Physiol., 2013,4:242 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [40] | AYALA A, MUÑOZ M F, ARGÜELLES S. Lipid peroxidation:production,metabolism,and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal [J/OL]. Oxid. Med.Cell. Longev., 2014,2014(1):360438 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [41] | ZHAO J, LIU Y, JIANG J, et al.. Effects of dietary isoleucine on growth,the digestion and absorption capacity and gene expression in hepatopancreas and intestine of juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. jian) [J].Aquaculture, 2012, 368: 117-128. |
| [42] | TANG L, WANG G X, JIANG J, et al.. Effect of methionine on intestinal enzymes activities,microflora and humoral immune of juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. jian) [J]. Aquac. Nutr., 2009,15(5):477-483. |
| [43] | BUDDINGTON R K, KROGDAHL A, BAKKE-MCKELLEP A M. The intestines of carnivorous fish: structure and functions and the relations with diet [J]. Acta Physiol.Scand. , 1997, 638:67-80. |
| [44] | ZHAO L L, LUO J, LIU Q, et al.. Different diets can affect the digestion and immunity of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) according to enzyme activity assay and transcriptome sequencing [J/OL]. Aquaculture,2020,523:735176 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [45] | YAN Y Y, WANG F B, CHEN X, et al.. Comparative analysis of the intestinal flora of Siniperca chuatsi at different growth stages under three feeding practices [J/OL]. Aquac. Rep., 2025,40:102582 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [46] | DING L Y, ZHANG Y P, CHEN J C, et al.. Growth,muscle nutrition composition,and digestive enzyme activities of the juvenile and adult siniperca chuatsi fed on live baits and a formulated diet [J/OL]. Fishes, 2022,7(6):379 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [47] | 赵月月,赵健蓉,胡佐灿,等.不同饵料对稀有鮈鲫仔稚鱼生长、消化道及消化酶的影响[J].水生生物学报,2018,42(1):114-122. |
| ZHAO Y Y, ZHAO J R, HU Z C, et al.. The effects of different baits on the growth and activities of the digestive tract and enzyme of the larvae and juvenile Gobiocypris rarus [J]. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin., 2018,42(1):114-122. | |
| [48] | 申亚伟. 鳜消化系统枢纽基因鉴定及Lect2的表达和功能分析[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学, 2022. |
| SHEN Y W. Identification of hub genes in the digestive system of Siniperca chuatsi and expression and functional analysis of Lect2 [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2022. | |
| [49] | 欧红霞,王广军,李志斐,等.不同饲料对大口黑鲈肠道组织结构的影响[J].水产科学,2020,39(6):902-907. |
| OU H X, WANG G J, LI Z F, et al.. Influence of different diets on intestinal histological morphologic structure of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides [J]. Fish. Sci., 2020,39(6):902-907. | |
| [50] | 赖铭勇.投喂不同饵料对斑鳜生长及消化性能的影响[J].南方农业学报,2024,55(8):2523-2534. |
| LAI M Y. Effects of feeding different diets on growth and digestive performance of spotted mandarin fish (Siniperca scherzeri) [J]. J. South. Agric., 2024,55(8):2523-2534. | |
| [51] | CAO K L, WANG Y Y, LI M L, et al.. Supplementation of a multienzyme complex,an organic acid-essential oil complex,and prebiotic alone or in combination affects growth,nutrient utilization,and immune function of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [J/OL]. Aquac. Nutr., 2022,2022(1):1068537 [2025-01-16]. . |
| [1] | 周文豪, 张玉涵, 孟德龙, 梁慧, 张元培, 杨雅麟, 张震, 药园园, 冉超, 周志刚. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌在养殖业中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(11): 1-7. |
| [2] | 欧密, 赵建, 罗青, 刘海洋, 黄容, 汪亚平, 陈昆慈. 鳢性别控制育种及应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 11-25. |
| [3] | 黄俊,丁宏标,赵国琦. 海藻糖对AA肉鸡生长及屠宰性能的影响[J]. , 2009, 11(4): 58-63. |
| [4] | 战余铭,赵明晓,朱良智,刘华阳,李斌. 高效液相色谱法测定配合饲料中氯米芬的含量[J]. , 2008, 10(S2): 48-52. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||